Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
661
EXHIBITS re #660 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Exhibits to Mueller Declaration ISO Apple's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [660-9] filed byApple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 2, #2 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 3, #3 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 4, #4 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 5, #5 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 6, #6 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 7, #7 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 8, #8 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 9, #9 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 10, #10 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 11, #11 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 12, #12 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 13, #13 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 14, #14 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 15, #15 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 16, #16 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 17, #17 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 18, #18 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 19, #19 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 20, #20 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 21, #21 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 22, #22 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 23, #23 Exhibit Mueller Decl Exhibit 24)(Related document(s) #660 ) (Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 1/25/2012)
Mueller Exhibit 15
TSG-RAN Working Group 1 meeting #8
New York, U.S.A.
October 24 - October 15, 1999
TSGRl #8(99)g43
Agenda Item:
Source:
Secretary
Title:
Revised minutes (rev. of R1-99f13)
Document for:
Revised Minutes for 3GPP RAN-TSG 7th WG1 Meeting
Meeting start: August 30th
Day l, start 9.00
1. Opening of the meeting
The chairman, Mr.Antti Toskala(Nokia), opened the meeting.
2. Approval of agenda (Tdoc b07)
Agend item3(Assignment of secretary) was deleted because the new secretary was
assigned by 3GPP secretariat. The schedule of Day2 Ad Hoc session was slightly
modified. Ad Hocl and Ad Hoc8 were exchanged. Approved as amended.
4.Approval of the minutes of the last meeting. (Tdoc a65)
The minutes were approved without modifications.
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010064
5. Approval of the changes done by the editors to 25.2 documents based on the
results of WG1 No.6
TS
Discussed
Ver. Tdoc
25.201
2.1.1 a67
25.211
2.2.1 a71
25.212
2.0.1 a86
25.213
2.1.2 a66
25.214
1.1.2 b52
25.221
1.2.1
a25
25.222
2.0.2
2.1.2
a75
25.224
1.0.1
25.231
TR1.03
Chip Rate
4.096 to 3.84
Slot Structure
16 to 15
102 to TRR102
Status
Reorganization of Sec. 5
Editorial Changes
Text proposal approved in the 6m meeting.
Small editorial changes
Sec. 6.1.1.2 Note 1 will be removed.
Text proposals approved in the 6m meeting.
Annex B should be informative.
2nd paragraph of 4.2.6.2 should be recovered.
Text proposals 783, 880, 806, 921, 923, 932, a94
One editorial comment on Sec. 4.3.1 (Table)
5 text proposals concerning
- Random Access Procedure
- SSDT
- Slow Transmit Power Control
- Feedback Mode Transmit Diversity
- Power Control
Modification of Annex
a89
25.223
Approved
Ver. Tdoc
Changes / Comments
(*)
Updated in WG2 meeting / No comments received.
2.2.0 c68
2.3.0 c69
2.1.0 c70
2.2.0 c71
1.2.0 c72
1.3.0
c73
2.1.0
c74
No comments received.
2.2.0
c75
a68
No comments received.
1.1.0
d27
0.3.1
a70
Discuss again later (some part might be missing)
0.3.2
c77
0.0.1
b06-7
(*) 0.0.1
d64
4.2 The first box should be removed.
Tdoc b06 "TR R1.03 V0.0.1"
Mr. Kowalewski(Bosch) explained the document.
The scope of this document was discussed.
The chairman comment;
In general it should contain the items which are not included in release99 specifications but we
might as well (if we agree) include the certain topics that are expected in next year, for example
Hybrid ARQ. It might help us to proceed.
On the Hybrid ARQ it was agreed that it should be mentioned but no further details
should be covered as there is no earlier approved text on Hybrid ARQ
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010065
6. Identification of the incoming/liaison statements
From Tdoc
T1
SWG
EMC
Title
Forwarded
Notes
to
b78
DPCCH gating issues
Ad Hocl4
c12
Timing Advanced for TDD
USCH requirement for TDD
Ad Hocl
c13
c39
c40
Power control
Length of SFN
Ad Hocl
Ad Hoc 9
Ad Hoc 4
Plenary
Ad Hoc 3
WG2 c41
25.302
Ad Hoc 4
Ad Hoc 5
c42
Slow transmit power control
Ad Hoc 9
c43
Power control issues
Ad Hoc 9
c44
Ad Hoc 3
Status of the work on RACH model
c45
Paging occasions
Plenary
TDD Synchronization method
WG3
c63
Ad Hocl
a90
DPCCH gating
Ad Hocl4
agl Link level simulation (Information)
Plenary
WG4
a92
Measurement
Ad Hoc 16
a93
Power control
Ad Hoc 9
pointl (AdHoc3)
point2 & 3
(AdHoc4)
point3 (AdHocS)
(* 1)
(*2)
There are some other LSs
(*1) The chairman asked Mr. Fredrik Ovesjo (Ericsson) to make the explanatory
materials on paging occasions and to propose the answer and the clarification
of the topic.
(*2) The role of WG1 in the link level simulation was discussed.
Chairman concluded as follows.
To perform link level simulation, some certain assumptions must be needed. It is
definitely up to WG4 to pick up the cases and assumptions in the simulation. Our
role is to define the means which are available, how things can be done.
As to the speech codec, we are supposed to provide the slot structure that can be
used to carry that information or any higher layer information. It is not relevant for
any of our specifications to define the practical speech codec. It’s probably our
way to have a look at whether WG4 assumptions are sensible or not. If they pick
up some improper assumptions, then we should make a comment.
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010066
7. Ad Hoc Reports from WG1 No.6 not yet presented
Tdoc a13 "Report on Ad Hoc 5 Meeting of 15-16 July 1999" Approved.
(Tdoc 805 and a31 are still valid text proposals and both are needed to be considered.)
It was pointed out that the inclusion of possible examples as annex should be handled
why Nortel is looking into details about this to be added.
(The annex mapping issue should be dealt in Ad Hoc4)
As to the text proposal in a61, a55, there was no agreement in the AdHoc itself.
Tdoc a06 "Report from Ad Hoc 12", Mr.Nakamura, NTT DoCoMo explained the
document. Further discussion will take place in the the week meeting.
Tdoc a43 "AdHoc#14 Meeting Summary"
Text proposal concerning gating DPCCH is Tdoc c81 (old version is b51)
The chairman suggested the 2 liaison statements on gating issue should be the first issue
from Ad Hocl4.
8. Text proposals agreed in the Ad Hoc Reports agreed in the Ad Hoc meetings in
the last meeting
Tdoc 805 approved.
Tdoc a31 further discussion will be made in the week meeting.
9. Reoport from the harmonization Ad Hoc(Ad Hocl5) e-mail discussion on the
remaining topics.
The chairman made the presentation about the summary of Ad Hoc 15 e-mail discussion.
- discussions on common pilot ( mainly on the common pilot modulation for Tx )
10. OHG Harmonization agreement related inputs & text proposals
Tdoc c29 "Optimized 2nd Interleaver for High Speed Fading" (Nortel)
Nortel proposed the new channel interleaver.
The chairman asked how many errors occurred in the case ofBER = 10-5.
Mr.Okamura(NTT DoCoMo) asked the meaning of the FER greater than 1 when
EbiNo < 3 dB.
The chairman proposed that the proponent_s should be-di-sc-ussedprovide clarifications
during the week. otherwise the current solution will remain. No new material was
provided during, the week on the issue thus the existing, interleaver remains.:--(umit
-Thursday)
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010067
Tdoc c22 "Text proposal for Modification of TS25.231 for TDD According to OHG
Harmonization Agreement" (Siemens)
Editorial change was made in 7.1.5.4.2.2 concerning 15 time slot.
Comment:
1 time slot should be expressed in chips instead of in microseconds. (It can not be an
integer in microseconds.)
Changes were agreed as amended.
Tdoc d62 "Text proposal on handover preparation from TDD to GSM"
Approved. (discussed in the Day 5)
Appended on Oct. 12, ’99
Tdoc b48 "Proposal for new slot structure of 30 ksps DL DPCH" (NTT DoCoMo)
Accepted without objections.
Tdoc b50 "Proposal to delete lower chip rate" (NTT DoCoMo)
"l.024Mcps" instead of"lower chip rate" should be removed from release 99 FDD.
Ericsson requested the removal of 8Mcpc and 16Mcpc options from release 99
specifications. The chairman proposed that lower and higher chip rates options would be
uploaded on the list which are not for release 99 and presented in RAN.
The document was approved.
Tdoc b34 "Update of FAUSCH scheme and text proposal MODIFIED FOR 15 SLOTS)"
Mr. Moulsley (Philips) explained the document.
Tdoc c32 "Proposal for a DL slot structure to support EVRC vocoder"
Chairman’s comment ;
"$4 mentioned that for release 99 they had not discussed about any other voice codec than AMR.
In general for release 99 UTRAN, the AMR would be the one which will be used by the speech terminals
as mandatory speech codec. I don’t think that EVRC would be anyway addressed by the higher layer
protocols in UTRAN for release 99."
Chairman’ s comment;
We should consider what is the efficient way of supporting 8kbps service, not EVRC but just a service.
The reason why EVRC has been the interest in the harmonisation process is just because it happened to
be fitting the 8kbps(roughly) service. From WG1 perspective if we approve the slot structures, we do not
make any new decisions in terms of how the signalling is transmitted, etc. We introduce the alternative
ways to realise this 8kbps service. The different network conditions will definitely require the different
kind of optimisations. We should not go into too much details for what sort of the EVRC or AMR at
this moment. This year we just add the ~book what enables us to fulfil the efficient support of 8kbps
service.
The slot structures in the document was approved.
Chairman made a small explanation about the "Hooks and Extensions Workshop"
There was very little WG1 directly relevant issues.
Main topic was that of the handover. Most topics are concerning to WG2 matters.
( Ad Hocs sessions were held in the evening. )
( Ad Hoc 6 & Ad Hoc 9
)
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010068
11. First Ad Hocs session 8:30- 12:30
Ad Hoc 1 & Ad Hoc 3
(Day 2)
12. Second Ad Hocs session 13:30 - 17:00
Ad Hoc 5 & Ad Hoc 8
(Day 2)
13. Third Ad Hocs session 19:30- 22:30
Ad Hoc 10 & Ad Hoc 16
(Day 2)
14. Fourth Ad Hocs session 8:30 - 12:30
Ad Hoc 1 & Ad Hoc 17
(Day 3)
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010069
Day 3 & Day 4 (Sep. 1 & Sep.2)
15. Reports from the Ad Hocs from Dayl & 2 ( including agenda item 20)
Ad Hoc
6
9
Tdoc
Title
Presented by
Ad Hoc #6 report to
Mr. Pehkonen
RAN WG1 #7
Ad-hoc 9 report
d34 (FDD Power control) Ms. Le Strat
b 12
Conclusion
Approved
Notes
No comments
Approved (*1) (*)
3
d19
Report of the Ad
Hoc 3 meeting
Mr. Nakamura
Approved
R1-99xxx in Sec. 2.6
should be R1-99d07.
8
c80
Ad hoc 8 report
Mr. Rudolf
Approved
(*2)
d24
Report from Ad Hoc
# 1: TDD, part 1
Report from Ad Hoc
# 1: TDD, part 2
Report from Ad
Hoc 5
Ms. Klein
Approved
(*3)
Ms. Klein
Approved
(*4)
Mr. Hughes
Approved
(*5)
1
d25
5
d46
16
c96
Adhoc #16 report
Mr. Ovesjo
Approved
10
d29
Ad hoc # 10 report
Mr.Kato
Approved
(*6)
17
b 18
Adhoc 17 report to
RAN WGI#7
Mr. Wilde
Approved
(*7)
4
d59
Ad hoc #4 report
Mr. Ovesjo
Approved
No comments
14
d74
Mr. Parsa
Approved
No comments
Mr. Nakamura
Approved
No comments
12
Ad-Hoc 14 meeting
report
Report of the Ad
d61 Hoc 12 meeting
(* 1) A question was made by Mr. Dick. Though in the silde 5, the BER &FER are considered to be
used as the reference of power control, in TDD mode BER&FER was denied to be used as
reference. The chairman suggested that this issue should be referred to Ad Hoc 16 (Measurement).
( Uplink power control in soft handover was not discussed yet.)
(*2) Open items
- Compressed mode during soft handover
- Tx-diversity and compressed mod
- Frame stmcture of uplink compressed mode
- Application of compressed mode for interleaving depths other than 10 ms
( These will be discussed in Sep.2 answering RAN chairman’s request. )
(*3) 2.2 Conclusion of "Tdoc B70/99 "Definition of TPC Bits in TDD", Siemens AG"
"Ad hoc 1 recommends to agree on the text proposal given in Tdoc A70/99." should be
replaced by
"Ad hoc 1 recommends to agree on the text proposal given in Tdoc B70/99.
(*4) For future reference, if needed, TI can provide the figure presented in the meeting in Tdoc e27.
(*5) The liaison statement is B04 instead of B02.
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010070
(*6) - As to the section 2.4, more discussion is needed and the contribution should be made by
Ad Hoc 10. This issue should be left for further discussion.
- Section 2.3 should be discussed more.
- Text proposal is needed for the issue of the section 2.6.
- As to the approval of the specification in RAN when something is in the state of working
assumption;
(TSG-RAN chairman’s comment )
Generally it depends on whether it is essential or not to the system operation. If there is a
essential thing for the system operation it should not be working assumption. It should be
complete agreement. In case of non-essential subject, generally speaking, it is rather
difficult to approve the working assumption in TSG-RAN level. It is better for WG to decide
whether it is agreed result in WG1 or not to be included in release 99.
(*7) TSG-RAN chairman requested WG1 to make a workplan for the location service during this
meeting.
(In the last SA, it was agreed to have the location service as the work item for release 99.)
16. Text proposals agreed in Ad Hocs (including agent item 21)
16. 1 Ad Hoe 6
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
Notes
b 12
Text proposal for PICH
Approved
No comments
c85
Text proposal for Tx Diversity for DCH
Approved
No comments
c17
SSDT specification update (TS25.214)
Approved
No comments
d06
Text proposal for closed loop modes 1 and 2
Approved
(*1)
d52 Text proposal: STTD encoding for DTX(Revised)
Approved Revision of d49
(* 1) The readability of the figures should be improved. (Clarification might be needed.)
(*2) This is for TS25.211
(*2)
16.2 AdHoe9
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
b80
Power limits for downlink power control
Approved
No comments
c98
T.P. for modification of downlink power
control in soft handover in 25.214 and 25.211
Proposal for change of change of 25.214 on
power control
Approved
rev. ofbl6 (* 1)
Approved
(*2)
Approved
revision of d21(b42) (*3)
d37
d55 Text proposal for power control
Note
(* 1) 5.2.3.2 The last sentence in the paragraph which begins with "if DPC_MODE = 1" that is,
"As a response, the UTRAN may adjust its transmit power only after receiving the three TPC
commands." should be removed.
Appendix should be moved to 25.214 because it is directly related to power control.
(*2) Approved including the changes regarding the evaluation of power offset as agreement
(*3) b42 was covered by d21 and d21 was updated to d55. d55 was approved on Sep. 2.
The note < The use or otherwise of AlgoHthm 2 in soft handover is FFS. > was added in 5.1.2.2.3.
d55 was approved with no comments.
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010071
16.3 AdHoc3
Tdoc
b 19
a94
Title
Text proposal for RACH channelization code
allocation
Conclusion
Approved
No comments
Text proposla for AICH Codewords
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
Approved
(* 1)
Text proposal for RACH sub-channel
definition
Text propsal for Dynamic Persistence Part of
d07
the RACH Procedure
Text proposal regarding power offset between
d20 preamble and message part of PRACH
d41
dl0 Text proposal on RACH message scrambling
Note
Approved
(* 1) One comment on power offset
16.4 Ad Hoc 8
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
Notes
d18
Text proposal for changes to TS 25.231
Approved
No comments
b 14
Text proposal for Compressed Mode
Parameters for GSM Search
Approved
No comments
c83
Text propsal for TS 25.212
Approved
No comments
Approved
(* 1)
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
Use of multiple scrambling codes in
compressed mode: text proposal
Compressed Mode for FDD-FDD Handover
b98
preparation
Compressed mode function in multiplexing
b99
chain
Simulation results for TG position and
c57 proposal
c95
Text proposal on handover preparation from TDD
Approved No comments
to GSM
"right spreading factor" should be replaced by "spreading factor SF/2"
(* 1) - Section 5.2.1
- The purpose of using multiple scrambling codes should be mentioned in the meeting minutes.
d62
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010072
16.5 Ad Hoc 1
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
Notes
a96
Text proposal for 25.224
Approved
No comments
b70
Definition of TPC bits in TDD mode
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
Approved
(* 1)
Approved
(*2)
c64
a79
d02
Text proposal for TS25.224 Regarding Closed
Loop PC in TDD mode
Physical Layer Measurements in UTRA TDD
mode
TDD - Physical Channel Definitions and mapping
of Transport Channels onto CCTrCH in TS25.221
-revised
b65
Common Channel Terminology in TDD Mode
Approved
No comments
c65
TFCI for Shared Channels in TDD Mode
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
No comments
d44
2~clTextInterleavingpr°p°sal: Physicalfor TDDChannel Segmentation and Approved
TDD Cell Search and Text Proposals for 25.221,
Approved
25.223 and 25.224
Text proposal for TS25.224: "Transmit diversity for
Approved
SCH" -Revised Version -
c59
Operator requirements for UMTS TDD mode
Approved
(*3)
dS0
Importance of TDD mode
Approved
(*3)
b64
c93
c09
a99
Additional Midambles for PRACH in TDD
Mode
Updated Downlink Shared Channel (DSCH)
physical layer signalling with TDD
No comments
No comments
(* 1) Editing details will be seen later.
(*2) 6.1 2) DPCH should be replaced by "physical channel"
(*3) These are not text proposals and will be presented to the RAN plenary.
16.6 Ad Hoc 5
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
Notes
Transport block concatenation and code block Approved
segmentation
Text proposal for Turbo codes and rate matching in
Approved (d56 was postponed.) (*1)
d84 TS 25.212, TS 25.222 (rev. of R1-99d56)
(*1) Discussed in Day 5
It was pointed out that some editorial modifications should be made in 4.2.6.
b32
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010073
16.7 Ad Hoc 16
Tdoc
Title
Required UTRAN measurements in
b22
UTRA/FDD
Required UE measurements in UTRA/FDD,
b23
revised
Additional required measurements in
b24
UTRA/FDD
b25
Path delay measurement
b26 Proposal for new measurement specification
c97
Proposal for Restructuring the TDD Parts of
the Measurement
Conclusion
Notes
Approved
No comments
Approved
(* 1)
Approved
(*2)
Approved
(*3)
Approved
Appended on Oct. 12, ’99
Approved
Appended on Oct. 12, ’99
(*1) Only tables in section 8 will be included to the new stmcture. The earlier part of the document will
not be included. In 8.1.3, the row of CPICH should be removed including the note.
(*2) - 8.1.8 Note should be removed.
- UTRAN transport channel BLER and physical channel BER should be measured after radio
link combining in Node B. "in Node B" should be added.
- The definition of "Physical CH BER" should be slightly modified. See Ad Hoc 16 report. (c96)
(*3) Some changes (modification of tables) are made. See Ad Hoc 16 report. (c96)
In that sense c96 should be approved as the text proposal and it was approved.
16.8 Ad Hoc 10
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
Notes
b20
Uplink channelization code allocation in
UTRA/FDD, revised
Approved
big discussion
a76
Text proposal for TS 25.211
Approved
(* 1)
Text proposal regarding Multiple Scrambling
Approved No comments
Codes (rev. of R1-99d51)
Text Proposal for 25.213 on the maximal number
Not
d78 of physical channels for one CCTrCH related with
Further discussion needed.
Approved
spreading factor on DL (Revision of d77)
Text Proposal for 25.213 for the conclusion of
Partly
d79
(*2)
AH10
approved
(* 1) 5.2.1 "In general, the spreading factor may thus range from 256 down to 4. " should be replaced
by "DPDCH spreading factor may thus range from 256 down to 4."
(*2) Ad Hoc 4 agreements should be reflected.
d83
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010074
16.9 Ad Hoc 15
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
Notes
dll
Text Proposal for new DL slot structures at
spreading factor 256
Approved
No comments
d17
Common pilot pattern
Approved
(* 1)
Common pilot terminology clarification - a
Approved (*2)
text proposal
Text proposal to fix the CPICH and P-CCPCH
Approved
d91 channelisation codes
(*1) The change to proposal 2 was agreed.
(*2) 5.3.3.1 Primary Common Pilot Channel
"Assigned channelization code c256,0" should be replaced by "The same channelization code is
always reserved for this channel"
dS1
16.10 Ad Hoc 17
Tdoc
Title
901 Text proposal for LCS
Conclusion
Approved
Notes
(Only Section 3)
16.11 Ad Hoc 4
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
Notes
d23
Text proposal for new notation in 25.222
Approved
No comments
b47
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
d38
Proposal to add 24 bit CRC polynomial
Clarifying text proposal for TFCI repetition
encoding
Text proposal for blind rate detection with flexible
positions
Approved
No comments
b33
TFCI mapping
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
Approved
No comments
b 11
d58
Revised Text proposal for DL rate matching
signalling in FDD
Revised text proposal for radio frame equalization,
1st interleaving and radio frame segmentation
d76
Text proposal for 25.212 (revision of b29)
d67
Updated text proposal for restrictions on common
Approved (* 1)
channels
Text proposal regarding TFCI coding for FDD
Approved (*2)
d69
(rev. of R1-99b61)
Text proposal regarding TFCI coding for TDD
Approved No comments
d70 (rev. of R1-99b62)
Revised text proposal for radio frame equalization,
1st interleaving and radio frame segmentation for
Approved No comments
d87
TDD (25.222)
(* 1) Section 6.1 in TS 25.211 should be removed.
(*2) The numbering of the channelization code should start from 0 to 15 instead of 1 to 16.
d75
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010075
16.12 Ad Hoe 14
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
Notes
d71
Proposed CPCH-related changes to 25.214
Approved
revision of a73
d94
Proposed CPCH-related insertions into 25.211
Approved
b93-)d72-)d94
No comments
d95
Proposed CPCH-related changes to 25.213
Approved
c66-)d73-)d95
a29
Proposed CPCH channel assignment related
changes to 25.211
Approved
(* 1)
c81 Text proposal for section 7 in 25.214 (rev. 3)
Approved
(*2)
(* 1) This should be applied to TS 25.213 instead of TS 25.211.
(*2) 7.1 is Working assumption
16.13 Ad Hoc 12
Tdoc
Title
Conclusion
Notes
Text proposal for new downlink scrambling code
Approved No comments
grouping scheme for UTRA!FDD
Proposed P-SCH!S-SCH related text insertions into
Not
(*1) (including d86)
d85 25.213
Approved
(* 1) No Ad Hoc recommendations. This should be discussed in the next meeting.
b21
16.14 etc
Tdoc
Title
c92 Use of Spreading factor 512 with UTRA FDD
c38 DPCH Synchronisation, revised
Conclusion
Notes
This will be discussed in
Postponed the next meeting.
Approved (Discussed in Day5) (* 1)
(* 1) Approved as working assumption.
This is in working assumption but the inclusion for the specification documents would be
confirmed in the Korean meeting.
17. New contributions and not handled in the respective Ad Hocs earlier.
(Time permitting)
B 17(corrections to 25.211). Approved with no comments.
18. Fifth Ad Hocs session 19:30 - 22:30
Ad Hoc 4 & Ad Hoc 14
19. Sixth Ad Hoc session 08:00 - 09:00
Ad Hoc 12
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010076
Day 5 (Sep. 3)
23. Approval of the 25.2 documents and technical reports for RAN submission.
Tdoc
Ver.
Proposed
for RAN to
raise as V.
(Note * 1 )
el6
2.3.0
3.0.0
2.3.1
( Note *2 )
el7
2.4.0
3.0.0
d99
2.1.1
(Note *3 )
el8
2.2.0
3.0.0
25.213
e00
2.2.1
( Note *4 )
el9
2.3.0
3.0.0
25.214
el5
1.2.2
(Note *5 )
e20
1.3.0
(*)
25.215
d90
0.0.1
( Note *6 )
e21
0.1.0
(*)
25.221
d88
1.3.1
Approved without comments.
e22
2.0.0
3.0.0
25.222
d96
2.1.1
( Note *7 )
e23
2.2.0
3.0.0
25.223
d89
2.2.1
Approved without comments.
e24
2.3.0
3.0.0
25.224
d92
1.1.1
(Note *8 )
e25
2.0.0
3.0.0
25.225
d63
0.0.1
( Note *9 )
e26
0.1.0
(*)
TR
d64
0.0.1
(Note *10 )
e40
0.1.0
TS
Discussed
Tdoc
Ver.
25.201
d97
2.2.1
25.211
d60
25.212
Approved
Discussions
(*) To be discussed in extra meeting in Korea
(Note * 1) Reference : Reference to 25.231 should be replaced by 25.215 and 25.225
4.2 1) "fast inner loop" --) "inner loop" (delete "fast")
4.2.5 2) Editor’s Note Physical layer procedures should be removed
4.2.1 Editor’s Note should be removed
In Technical Report R1.03, the future release of FAUSCH and the report of multiplexing
examples should be added.
(Note *2) 5.3.3.7 Editor’s note should be removed.
5.2.2.2.1 "Preamble (CD-P) of length 4096 chips, a [10] ms DPCCH Power Control
5.3.3.3
7
5.3.3.1
2
3.3
Preamble (PC-P) and a message of length Nxl0 ms, where N < =
N Max frames. The value of N Max Frames is TBD. "
should be replaced by
"Preamble (CD-P) of length 4096 chips, a [10] ms DPCCH Power Control
Preamble (PC-P) and a message of variable length. "
and Editor’s note should be removed.
Editor’s note should be removed.
Editor’s note should be removed.
Figure 14. Editor should make sure that total slot number is 15.
Reference [2] T S S 1.02: "UE physical layer capabilities" should be removed.
(It does not exist.)
/*** paragraph exchanged ***/
It was pointed out that abbreviation of PSCCCH could be removed (for the time
being).
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010077
(Note "3)
Editor’s comment should be made for the missing text proposal (Tdoc d84
"Text proposal for Turbo codes and rate matching in TS 25.212, TS 25.222
(rev. of R1-99d56)" from Samsung is missing. It should be approved the
correction in Korea before the RAN.
(Note *4) 5.2.1
Paragraph which begins with "The following restriction is set for the
combination of SF---" and ends with Table 6 should be removed.
The last paragraph "The channelization code for uplink is used to realize---"
should be removed.
should be removed.
The second sentence which begins with "The modulated DPCCH is mapped to
the Q ..... " should be removed.
Editor should clarify the notation "16" 8*j + 16" k, where j = 0.. 63 and k= 0.. 7"
whether k is multiplied by 16 or 8. (Second line of the p.25)
Figure 1 and Figure 2 were deleted. Editor should arrange the Figure numbers.
Reference is empty. Current examples or how-to should be removed and
references should be made.
Definition and Symbols should be defined.
4.3.1
5.2.2
4.2.2
5.2.2
4.2.1
2
3.1, 3.2
Text proposal (Tdoc d71 "Proposed CPCH-related changes to 25.214
(revision of a73)) is missing. Editor should be requested to insert this issue.
Chairman’s comment ¯ "Editor inserts that but leaves revision marks for our
meeting in Korea for us to see what has been done and check for corrections.
and editor puts the note that the "Relations to RACH subchannels" needs to be
clarified."
4.5.3
"IA chip during any 10 ms period" in the last paragraph should not be mentioned
in WG1 spec. (WG4 matter)
5.1.2.2.1 "If there is a single active connection and there is an idle period during the
reception time of the TPC, the UE should not adjust its transmitter power."
should be removed.
(*) 4.5.3 b) "To -+ 128 chips" should be replaced by "To -+ [148 chips]"
(*) 5.2.3.2 The sentence "The transmitted DPCCH!DPDCH power may not exceed
Maximum DL Power dl3m, nor may it be below Minimum DL Power
dl3m." should be removed.
5.2.3.2 The sentence in "if DPC_MODE = 1 ", "As a response, the UTRAN may
adjust its transmit power only after receiving the three TPC commands."
should be removed.
5.2.3.5.3.2 Table 4 should be removed.
5.2.3.1 should be removed.
5.1.1 "Constant value: This value shall be designated via Layer 3 message (operator
matter)." should be removed by "Constant value: This value shall be
designated via higher layers."
(Note *5)
Chairman concluded as follows.
" We will not remove any of those working assumptions, etc statements in this specification.
We will address the selective topics on this document in the meeting in Korea including power
control and uplink synchronous transmission. Our aim in the Korean meeting is to have this
document as well as measurement documents in shape for RAN submission. For other
documents, topics should not be raised in the Korean meeting unless there are some kind of
errors and something we need corrections. Regarding the scope for the meeting in Korea, it
will be WG1 meeting but focusing only in specific topics around this document and then
some clearly needed on some of the packet access items, some of the documents not treated.
I will prepare the detailed plan what we are intent to cover in there and then in the actual
meeting we will not treat topics that are outside that plan unless there are clearly some clear
errors or corrections that is needed in the specifications. They need to be also informed beforehand.
They will be treated in the following week meeting in New York. "
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010078
(Note *6) 7. h 1.2.2.1.3 The same table is included in TS25.223, therefore this table should be
replaced by the reference to TS25.223.
Samsung made one correction in the reference of Tdoc96 (ver 2. h 1) and
discussed version became ver. 2.1.2. Samsung made the explanation on the
screen. There were some comments made but according to Samsung, they had
been already updated in the version in the latest CD-ROM.
(Note *7)
(Note *8) 4.2
4.3.2
4.3.3.1
4.3.3.2
4.5.1
The whole section should be removed and should be noted as study Items.
Section 4.3.2 should be removed and should be noted as study Items.
"Constant value: This value shall be set via Layer 3 message (operator matter).
should be replaced by
"Constant value: This value shall be set via higher layers."
"Constant value: This value shall be set via Layer 3 message (operator matter)."
should be replaced by
"Constant value: This value shall be set via higher layers."
There are several references which refers to the other specifications directly. The
direct reference should be placed in Reference sections.
(Note *9)
It was pointed out that Section 7.1.4 should be created for "the idle mode
measurement" in order for the future use. (it might be useful.) It was agreed.
It was also agreed that the same additional section will be created in TS
25.215.
(Note * 10)
Higher chips rate values should be removed.
(Tdoc d64 Items not for inclusion in release -99) V0.1.0
(For information for RAN)
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010079
24. Liaison statements approval for the responses (or new liaisons) generated during
the meeting.
Tdoc
Title
To:
Source
el4
Proposed Liaison statement on Physical
Layer Service Implementation Capabilities
WG2
Samsung
d40
Draft answer to LCS liaison
WG2
Ad Hoc 17 Approved.
c94
Draft liaison statement on simultaneous
WG2 Ad Hoc3
AICH and S-CCPCH
LS to TSG-R WG4 a~d TSG-T WG1
R-WG4
concerning the changes made to Tx
T-WG1 Ad Hoc6
diversity concept in the TSG-R WG1 #7
LS to TSG-R WG2 concerning the changes
made to Tx diversity concept in tZ~e TSG-R WG2
Ad Hoc6
WG1 meeting #7
d 13
d5 0
Conclusion
(*1)
Approved
Approved
Approved
d35
Draft LS to RAN WG2 and WG4 on
Measurements
Draft LS on power control limits
WG2
WG4
WG3
Nokia,
Qualcomm Approved
Ad Hoc9 Approved
d36
Draft LS on outer loop power control
WG2
Ad Hoc9
e08
e09 Draft LS on Support of Speech
S-WG4
Service in RAN
el0
Nortel
Approved (*3)
Draft LS to $4
Liaison on the removal of
superframe concept in layerl
S-WG4 Ad Hoc4
WG2
d26
LS on SFN and BCH coding
Draft answer to the LS about TDD
synchronisation methods
d04
Draft LS on layer 1 segmentation
e 13
Liaison statement on L1 timing
issues
e07
Text proposal for Liaison on transport
channel multiplexing
e28
d68
WG3
Approved (*2)
Approved
Not Approved
(oct.1:, ’99)
Approved
Ad Hoc 1
Approved
Ericsson
Approved
WG3
WG4
WG 1
Approved
WG2
Nokia,
Approved
Siemens
Draft Liaison statement on TFCI
WG2 Ericsson Approved
mapping
(*1) c87 -) d54 -) el4
(*2) 1) D1 should be replaced by DL.
(*3) S-WG4 should be informed that we have approved 12 bits CRC.
Chairman suggested to add "The details of AMR in TDD has not been covered in full detail
in WG1 though many of the points mentioned here are valid for TDD as well."
d93
(*4)
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010080
Agenda Item 6. Identification of the incoming/liaison statements during
the week,
Tdoc
Title
Source
Notes
c88
LS on the support of different RL
DL TX power levels in case of
Soft Handover
WG3
Ad Hoc 9 chair pointed out that it should
be identified as an open Ad Hoc 9 might
be able to answer.
c89
LS on L1 Timing issues
WG3
Tdoc C89 related papers A87 & C38,
(answer as Tdoc el3) (*1)
Chairman requested Mr. Moulsley
(Philips) to make an answer draft.
( answer as Tdoc el2 )
Liaison Statement on the usage of
c90 the Physical channel BER as UL
WG3
Quality estimate in the UL DCH
Frame Protocol on Iub/Iur
Liaison on UTRAN Frame
c91
WG3 ?
Synchronisation model
(* 1) Chairman requested Mr. Agin (Alcatel) to make an answer draft.
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010081
Annex The Participants List
Ammer
Asanuma
Baker
Bang
B~ir
Barandalla
Barberis
Barroso
Batz
Belaiche
Benthin
Berens
Bernocco
Bishop
Blanz
Boumendil
Brown
Burbidge
Cardiff
Chaehag
Chambers
Cheng
Name
Gerhard
Yutaka
Matthew
Seung-Chan
Siegfried
Ignacio
Marc
Christopher
Gerhard
Vincent
Marcus
Friedbert
Carlo
Craig
Josef
Sarah
Tyler
Richard
Barry
Yi
Peter
Ray-Guang
Sungho
Cho
Jinsung
Choi
Choi
Hokyu
Clop
Oscar
Corden
lan
Cosimini
Peter
Czapla
Liliana
Da Rocha
Alexandre
Dae Lee
Joung
Dahlmann
Erik
De Beneditis Rossella
Dick
Steve
Eiders-Boll
Harald
Fiorentino
Vincenzo
Furuya
Yukitsuma
Futakata
Toshiyuki
Gautier
Cath6rine
Gerstenberger Dirk
Ghosh
Amitava
Golitschek
Alexander
Gollon
Sven
Gouliaev
Alexandre
Guiliang
Yang
Hanaoka
Seishi
Harada
Koichi
Company
Lucent Technol.
Toshiba
Philips
ETRI
Bosch
Telefonica I + D
Synopsis
Lucent Technol.
Motorola
Mitsubishi
Bosch
ST Microelectronics
Italtel
Samsung
Qualcomm
Nortel Networks
Motorola
Motorola
Nokia
Samsung
Roke Manor
Industrial
Technology
Research Institute
Hyundai
LGIC
Samsung
Motorola
Lucent Technol.
Vodafone
Interdig. Comm
Alcatel
LG
Ericsson
Italtel
Interdig. Comm
Sony
Telital S.P.A.
Nec Corporation
NTT DoCoMo
Nortel Networks
Ericsson
Motorola
Panasonic
Rohde & Schwarz
NIIR
CVVTS/CATT
Hitachi Ltd.
DoCoMo Europe
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010082
Harrold
Henriksson
Heynhold
Higashi
Hiramatsu
Hoffmann
HShn
Hong
Hoshida
Hosur
Hoynck
Ikeda
In Lyu
Ito
Itoh
Jang
Jechoux
JingHao
JiJrgensen
Kahtava
Kang
Kanterakis
Kasapidis
Kato
Keisala
Kella
Kim
Kim
Kim
Kim
Kim
Kinjo
Kirimura
Kistowski
Kjum
Klein
Korpela
Kowalewski
Krause
Krauss
Kwon
Laumen
Le Bars
Le Strat
Lee
Lee
Lee
Lee
Lee
Lee
Levetaille
Name
Colin
Anders
Karsten
Akihiro
Katsuhiko
Nicole
Voker
Een Kee
Satoshi
Srinath
Andreas
Shinobu
Dug
Kenji
Katsutoshi
Jaesung
Xu
Jens-Uwe
Jussi
Heewon
Emmanuel
Makis
Osamu
Jyrki
Tideya
Jung-lm
Joe-Heung
Beongjo
Min-Goo
Jaeyoel
Shigenori
Mat
Dirk
Ki-Jan
Anja
Sari
Frank
JSrn
Herbert
Sung Lark
Josef
Philippe
Evelyne
Jae Yong
Chongwon
Yu Ro
Young Jo
Hyeonwoo
Dong Do
Catharine
Company
B.T.
Telia
Bosch
NTT
Panasonic
Bosch
Mannesmann
DSPC Technologies
VLSI Technology
Texas Instruments
Siemens
ETSI
LG
Siemens
Sony
Samsung
Mitsubishi
CWI-S/RITT
Sony
Nokia
Samsung
Gold. Brigde Techn.
Panasonic
Panasonic
Nokia
Infineon Technol.
ETRI
ETRI
Samsung
Samsung
Samsung
Texas Instruments
Japan Radio
T-Mobil
LG
Siemens
Nokia
Bosch
Siemens
Philips
LG
Bosch
Canon
Nortel Networks
Hyundai
Hyundai
Hyundai
LGIC
Samsung
SK Telecom
Nortel Networks
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010083
Lez
Lim
Lopez
Loue
Ludden
Luedtke
Mangold
Mardani
Masahiro
Matsui
Michel
Misra
Mochizuki
Moon
Motebbi
Moulsley
Murai
Nakamura
Nakamura
Narvinger
Nasshan
Okumura
Okuyama
Olofsson
Ovesj6
Ozluturk
Palenius
Park
Parsa
Pehkonen
Perrin
Plechinger
Purat
Robertson
Romano
Rudolf
Schnare
Secord
Seidel
Seifert
Senninger
Shyy
Sommer
Song
St~hlfj~ll
Steudle
Sungkwon
Suzuki
Tanaka
Company
Samsung
Samsung
BT plc.
Motorola
Motorola
E-Plus
Bosch
Lucent Technol.
Sony Corporation
Nippon Ericsson
Siemens
Interdig. Comm
NEC
Samsung
Enjitsu Europe
Philips
Tim
Hideshi
Mitsubishi Electr.
Takaharu
Fujitsu
Takehiro
NTT DoCoMo
Per
Ericsson
Markus
Siemens
NTT Mobile
Yukihiko
Communications
Network Inc.
LSI Logic
Nobutaka
Henrik
Ericsson
Fred rik
Ericsson
Interdig. Comm
Fatih
Torgny
Ericsson
Changsoo
Samsung
Kovrosh
Gold. Brigde Techn.
Kari
Nokia
Jean-Hugues Alcatel
J6rg
Infineon Technol.
Marcus
Siemens
Brett
Motorola
Giovanni
Telecom Italia
Mitsubishi
Dirk
E-Plus
Norman
Nortel Networks
Eiko
Panasonic
Timo
Bosch
Christian
Siemens
Dong Jye
CCL/ITRI
Volker
Siemens
YoungJoon LGIC
Peter
Ericsson
Ville
Nokia
Hong
LG
Hidetoshi
Panasonic
Yoshinori
Fujitsu
Name
Kyungtla
Chai Man
Javier
Robert
Brendan
Gerhard
Peter
Reza
Uno
Wataru
J(Jrgen
Raj
Takashi
Hichan
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010084
Name
Torrance
Jeffery
Toskala
Antti
Stephen
Truelove
Tsunehara
Katsuhiko
0bel
Udo
Ukonmaanaho Mauri
Ulrich
Thomas
Virtanen
Anu
Vishwakarma Ritesh
Whinett
Nick
Wilde
Andreas
Willenegger
Serge
Wonho
Lee
Yamamoto
Kazushi
Yellin
Daniel
Young woo
Yun
Zack
Rafael
Zeira
Eldad
Zelmer
Donald
Company
Ubinetics Ltd.
Nokia
Telecom Modus
Hitachi
Philips
Nokia
Siemens
Nokia
Cadence Design
Motorola
Nippon Ericsson
Qualcom Europe
Samsung
Mitsubishi Electr.
DSPC
LG
DSPC Technologies
Interdig. Comm
Bell South Cellular
APLNDC-WH-A 0000010085
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?