In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Filing 428

EXHIBITS re #418 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Certify Class Public Exhibits to Cisneros Declaration, Exhibit U filed byGoogle Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 175, #2 Exhibit 186, #3 Exhibit 192, #4 Exhibit 557, #5 Exhibit 597, #6 Exhibit 648, #7 Exhibit 650, #8 Exhibit 651, #9 Exhibit 653, #10 Exhibit 661, #11 Exhibit 872, #12 Exhibit 1868, #13 Exhibit 1869, #14 Exhibit 1870, #15 Exhibit 1871, #16 Exhibit 1872, #17 Exhibit 2735)(Related document(s) #418 ) (Evans, Eric) (Filed on 5/17/2013)

EXHIBIT 651

From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Arnnon Geshuri <[e-mail] > on behalf of Arnnon Geshuri
Friday, May OS, 2006 11:47 AM
Eric Schmidt; Shena Brown; Arnnon Geshuri
Re: recruiting

I will investigate and provide a report on this situation.
-----Original Message----From: Eric Schmidt <[e-mail]>
To: Shona Brown <[e-mail]>; Arnnon Geshuri <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thu May 04 15:19:08 2006
Subject: FW: recruiting
can you review? I thought Intel was on our " no hire" list .. Eric

From : Otellini, Paul [mailto:paul.otellini@i ntel.comJ
Sent Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:54 PM
To: Eric Schmidt
Subject: recrui ting

Hi Eric,
Sorry to bother you again on this topic, but my guys are very troubled by Googlc continuing to recruit our key players.
Most recently, two ve ry senior software employees have received an offer for Google that is ''one million dollars" in cash
and restricted shares. They claim that they have turned Google down 2-3 times, and that they were told the offers will
remain in place should they change their minds ... The offers are for Mountain Vi ew. They claim the recruiting was
unsolicited ..
Can you pis reinforce the no recruiting ngreement? f would appreciate it. Thanks, paul

CONFIOENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY

PLAINTIFF'S
EXHIBIT

651

GOOG-H IGH-TECH-00058868