EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC

Filing 4

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment with Memo in Support by FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Dianne Brandi, Esq., # 2 Exhibit A to Brandi Affidavit, # 3 (sealed)Exhibit B to Brandi Affidavit, # 4 Exhibit C to Brandi Affidavit, # 5 Exhibit D to Brandi Affidavit, # 6 Exhibit E to Brandi Affidavit, # 7 Exhibit F to Brandi Affidavit, # 8 (sealed) Exhibit G to Brandi Affidavit, # 9 Exhibit H to Brandi Affidavit, # 10 Exhibit I to Brandi Affidavit, # 11 Exhibit J to Brandi Affidavit, # 12 (sealed) Exhibit K to Brandi Affidavit, # 13 Exhibit L to Brandi Affidavit, # 14 Exhibit M to Brandi Affidavit, # 15 Text of Proposed Order)(Morris, Frank). Added MOTION for Summary Judgment on 11/5/2010 (znmw, ). Modified on 11/9/2010 (zrdj). (The exhibits contained privacy information and was restricted pursuant to the E-Government Act.) Modified on 11/9/2010 (zrdj, ).

Download PDF
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC Doc. 4 Att. 9 EXHIBIT J Dockets.Justia.com From: Henry Reisch [mailto:HReisch@wma.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05,2009 2i4SpM To: Brandi, Dlanne SubjecE Catherine Herridge Dear Dianne, to me of February 13ü, 2009. Catherine does indeed d is hoping that you proceed toward what appears to be d faith negotiations. and amicable resolution, Catherine has agreed that Catherine is the most productive member of e of 3 beats: Homeland Security, Justice has made many contacts in the Government respecr raise in approxi ;,:tjtiJ"*ttn bution to Fox, we believe that Catherine is f enJitl'ed to receive more than aTyo increase. Accordingly, with respect to financial terms, we propose the following First Contract year: $5 15,000 (approximat ely a LZYo increase over what Catherine receives under her current contract) Second Contract yeaˇ: 9565,000 (approximately a l}Toincrease over year 1). Thiˇd contractyear: $620,000 (again, approximately a l0% increase over year 2,) This would be a guaranteed pay or play deal for all three years. f favorable as those contained herein." Accordingly we propose that the non-financial terms of Catherine's new conhact be the same as those c-ontainăd in her current contract, with the following exceptions: 1) That the phrase "occasional anchor/co-anchor" in the ârst paragraph of the current contract not be included, and that any reference.to the letter of .February ViZfiOAbe omitted' 2) Catherine is comfortable with the Arbitration Clause so long as it is understood to b,e limited to the interpretation of the Fox-Herridge contract Since Catheriîe works in Washington, DC, any arbitration should be conducted in Washington. The second full paragraph ofyour draft ofAugust 6, 2008, represents a term not included in Catherine's current contact, and, accordingly must be omitted. In negotiating her emploˇrment contract with Fox, Catherine is, in no way, negotiating or attempting to resolve, waive or release her pending EEOC claim. This contract negotiation is separate and apart from that proceeding. 'We believe that this proposal is advantageous to all parties, and I suggest that you and I meet at a very early date with the intention of resolving this matter, with mutual benefit to Catherine and to Fox. Henry This message contains information which may be con-fidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy, re-fuansmit, or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail @WMA.com, and delete the message. E-mail commwrication is highly susceptible to spoofing, spamming, arid other tampering, some of which may be harmful to your computer. If you are concerned about the authenticity ofthe message or the source, please contact the sender directly. Please be advised that the William Morris Agency does not render legal services. H0#p1"""" consider the environment before printing this email.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?