Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
DECLARATION of Receiver, Burton W. Wiand re 36 Unopposed MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically expansion of the receivership to include Laurel Mountain Preserve, LLC, Laurel Preserve, LLC, Laurel Mountain Preserve Homeowners Association, Inc., and the Marguerite J. Nadel Revocable Trust UAD by Burton W. Wiand. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14)(Morello, Gianluca)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Case No.: 8:09-cv-0087-T-26TBM
NADEL, SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC, SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC.,
SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P., VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P., VALHALLA MANAGEMENT, INC., VICTORY FUND, LTD, VIKING IRA FUND, LLC, VIKING FUND, LLC, AND VIKING MANAGEMENT, LLC.
RECEIVER'S DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF THE SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF RECEIVERSHIP
Buron W. Wi
and declares as follows:
1. I am an attorney with Fowler White Boggs P.A. ("Fowler White") in Tampa,
2. In the Januar 21, 2009, Order Appointing Receiver (Doc. 8), the Cour
appointed me Receiver over (a) defendants Scoop Capital, LLC ("Scoop Capital") and Scoop
Management, Inc. ("Scoop Management") and (b) relief defendants Scoop Real Estate, L.P.;
Valhalla Investment Parners, L.P.; Valhalla Management, Inc.; Victory IRA Fund, Ltd.;
Victory Fund, Ltd.; Viking IRA Fund, LLC; Viking Fund, LLC; and Viking Management
(Scoop Real Estate, Valhalla Investment, Victory IRA, Victory Fund, Viking IRA, and
Viking Fund are collectively referred to as the "Hedge Funds;" Scoop Capital, Scoop
Management, Valhalla Management, and Viking Management are collectively referred to as
the "Investment Managers").
3. In a Januar 27,2009, Order (Doc. 17), the Cour also appointed me Receiver
over Venice Jet Center, LLC, and Tradewind, LLC (all of the entities in receivership are
referred to collectively as the "Receivership Entities").
4. On Januar 26, 2009, I submitted the Receiver's Declaration in Support of
Receivership (the "Receiver's Januar
Receiver's Unopposed Motion to Expand the Scope of
Declaration") (Doc. 16) to include Venice Jet Center, LLC, and Tradewind, LLC.
5. Since my appointment as Receiver, I and professionals that I have retained
(including lawyers and accountants) have continued our investigation, which has included
having communcations with a number of people associated with Nadel and/or the
Receivership Entities such as his wife, officers of some Receivership Entities, and persons
responsible for maintaining the financial books of Receivership Entities and of other
businesses controlled by Nadel, for operating other businesses controlled by Nadel, for
performing accounting services, and for administering the Hedge Funds.
6. We have also reviewed documents located in the offices of the Hedge Funds
and Investment Managers (the "Office") (located at 1618 Main Street, Sarasota, FL 34236),
documents obtained from the accountant for the Receivership Entities, information stored on
the Receivership Entities' computer network, documents obtained from other businesses
controlled by Nadel, documents obtained from financial institutions and other third paries,
and information available in the public record.
7. As shown in the Receiver's Januar Declaration and in Plaintiffs Emergency
Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Temporar Restraining Order and Other
Emergency Relief (the "SEC's Emergency Motion") (Doc. 2) and supporting papers, Nadel
defrauded investors in the six Hedge Funds from at least 2003 through the time he fled last
month by "massively overstating the value of investors' interests in them." SEC Emerg.
Mot. at 2, 6. Specifically, from at least 2003 through 2008, the value of the Hedge Funds as
represented to investors was significantly overstated. The investment retus and
performance as represented to investors were based on the overstated numbers and thus were
8. As shown by the SEC, Nadel defrauded investors through his control of the
Hedge Funds' advisers and managers, Scoop Capital and Scoop Management, which are now
in receivership. !d. at 4-6. Through those entities, Nadel was ultimately responsible for
controllng the Hedge Funds' investment activities.
9. Evidence also showed that the Hedge Funds directly or indirectly paid
substantial fees to Scoop Capital and Scoop Management, and to other Receivership Entities,
in the form of management, advisory, and/or profit incentive fees. ¡d. at 5-6. According to
the Hedge Funds' documents, in 2003 the Hedge Funds paid a total of
$7,045,509.31 in fees;
in 2004, they paid $14,156,501.17 in fees; in 2005, they paid $20,349,897.02 fees; in 2006
they paid $18,257,590.52 in fees; in 2007 they paid $19,873,365.00 in fees; and in 2008 they
paid $15,854,930.76 in fees.
10. Consistent with our earlier findings, our investigation has continued to reveal
information showing that additional businesses and a trust over which Nadel exerted full or
parial control or in which he had a full or parial interest were purchased and/or fuded with
money derived from Nadel's fraudulent investment scheme (the "scheme").
11. This occured through direct payments from Scoop Capital or Scoop
Management financial accounts.
12. This also occured through payments from accounts held in the name of
or Nadel and his wife, which accounts were fuded with money from the scheme, including
with the large sums of "management" and "advisory" fees that Nadel paid himself for
purorting to manage money through Receivership Entities. For example, as demonstrated
by the copies of checks attached as Exhibit A to the Receiver's January Declaration, in 2008
Nadel signed checks transferring at least $1,003,500.00 from Scoop Capital to himself and
his wife. Overall, to date we have uncovered at least $6,426,000.00 that was transferred from
Scoop Capital or Scoop Management accounts into personal accounts controlled by Nadel
and/or his wife between 2003 and 2009.
13. To date we have not uncovered any source of income for Nadel or his wife
that was not in some maner fuded with money from the scheme (whether through
"management fees" or otherwse). Discussions with Nadel's wife, Marguerite "Peg" Nadel,
and others have confirmed that, during the time one or more of the Hedge Funds and
Investment Managers were in operation (i.e., beginning in at least 1999), essentially all of
Nadel and Mrs. Nadel's income was derived directly from those entities.
14. As detailed in the Receiver's January Declaration and the SEC's Emergency
Motion, the Hedge Funds and Investment Managers were operated as par of a fraudulent
scheme from at least 2003 forward. As such, the source of
Nadel and Mrs. Nadel's income
during that period was Nadel's scheme.
15. The information gathered during our investigation shows that money derived
from Nadel's scheme was used to purchase and/or fud other businesses, including Laurel
Mountain Preserve, LLC, and Laurel Preserve, LLC, and to fud his wife's trust.
Laurel Mountain Preserve, LLC; Laurel Preserve, LLC; & Laurel Mountain Preserve Homeowners Association, Inc.
16. To date, our investigation has revealed that Laurel Mountain Preserve, LLC
("Laurel Mountain"), was a North Carolina limited liability company formed in or about
December 2003. See Laurel Mountain filings with N.C. Secretary of
State, attached hereto as
Exhibit 1. Laurel Mountain was "withdrawn" as a limited liability company in January 2006.
¡d. Its principal address was the Office (the Office address in the records -- 1668 Main St. -is the address before the curent one), and its manager and member was NadeL. See id.
17. Laurel Preserve, LLC ("Laurel Preserve"), was formed as a North Carolina
limited liability company in Februar 2006. See Laurel Preserve fiings with N.C. Secretary
of State, attached hereto as Exhibit 2. Its principal address is the Offce, Nadel is its
registered agent, and the "Registered Office" address (131 Garen Creek Road, Fairview,
N.C. 28730) is a home titled in the names of
Nadel and his wife. The manager is Nadel, and
although Laurel Preserve's 2006 Operating Agreement identifies Nadel and his wife as
members of Laurel Preserve with each having made a "capital contribution" of $750, the
Laurel Preserve 2007 federal income tax retu indentifies Scoop Capital as owner of 100%
of Laurel Preserve. See Laurel Preserve 2007 Tax Retu, Schedule K-l, attached hereto as
18. Finally, Laurel Mountain Preserve Homeowners Association, Inc. (the
"HOA"), is a North Carolina non-profit corporation formed in March 2006. See HOA filings
with N.C. Secretary of State, attached hereto as Exhibit 4. Its principal address is the home
in Fairview, N.C., and its registered agent is NadeL. See id.
19. The information we have reviewed, including documents retrieved from the
Office, tax returs, public records, information provided by Mrs. Nadel, and information
provided by an attorney who assisted with transactions relating to these entities, shows that
Laurel Preserve holds title to approximately 430 acres near Ashevile, N.C., intended for
development of home-sites. The information also shows that property was originally
purchased by Laurel Mountain in 2003, and that in February 2006, Laurel Preserve was
created, the land held by Laurel Mountain was "sold" to Laurel Preserve, and Laurel
Mountain provided financing for that purchase in the form of a $2,900,000 loan to Laurel
20. According to a balance sheet retrieved from the Office, Laurel Mountain
received fuding in the form of "loans" from Scoop Capital (at least $200,000.00), Scoop
Management (at least $1,335,753.09), Tradewind (at least $59,000.00), and Nadel and Mrs.
Nadel (at least $214,467.80). See Laurel Mountain Balance Sheet, attached hereto as Exhibit
21. Similarly, according to another balance sheet retrieved from the Office, Laurel
Preserve received fuding in the form of "loans" from Scoop Capital (at least $711,000.00),
Scoop Management (at least $349,862.67), Laurel Mountain (at least $929,434.45),
Tradewind (at least $61,410.85), as well as a loan from BB&T Ban (at least $360,157.37).
See Laurel Preserve Balance Sheet, attached hereto as Exhibit 6.
22. According to documents retrieved from the Office and obtained from financial
institutions, Scoop Capital has made at least the following transfers of money directly to
Laurel Mountain or for its benefit:
Date 2/27/2004 6/23/2004 7/13/2004 8/23/2004 Undated (probably 02/2005)
Payee Rose Law Firm * Laurel Mountain Preserve, LLC Laurel Mountain Preserve, LLC Laurel Mountain Preserve, LLC Laurel Mountain Preserve, LLC
$67,760 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $50,000
Laurel Mountain Preserve, LLC
* According to notes inputed into the account ledger, this transfers was "(fJor mortgage reduction for Laurel Mountain"
23. Similarly, according to documents retrieved from the Offce and obtained
from financial institutions, Scoop Capital has made at least the following transfers of money
directly to Laurel Preserve:
11/3/2006 1/8/2007 3/2/2007 3/28/2008 4/9/2008 4/22/2008 7/7/2008 8/14/2008
Payee Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC
$50,000.00 $100,000 $50,000 $100,000 $10,000 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
8/25/2008 9/2/2008 9/30/2008 10/22/2008 10/25/2008 11/17/2008 12/1/2008 12/9/2008 12/15/2008 12/23/2008 1/6/2009 1/7/2009 1/12/2009
Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC Laurel Preserve, LLC
$35,000 $10,000 $15,000 $5,000 $25,000 $5,000 $25,000 $1,000 $5,000 $10,000 $20,000 $10,000 $15,000 $541,000.00
24. Our investigation indicates the HOA was formed to serve as the homeowners'
association following the development and sale of the land held by Laurel Preserve.
Marguerite J. Nadel Revocable Trust UAD 8/2/2007
25. According to a copy of a trust agreement provided to Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc. ("Goldman Sachs"), in connection with the opening of an account in the name of the
Marguerite J. Nadel Revocable Trust Under Agreement Dated 8/2/2007 (the "Trust"), the
Trust was created on August 2, 2007. See Revocable Trust Agreement at 1, attached hereto
as par of Composite Exhibit 7. The trustee is identified as Mrs. Nadel (the subsequent
trustees are Nadel and Michael Zucker, the Hedge Funds' accountant). See id. at 1, 2.
26. According to information in our possession, the Trust had financial accounts
at two institutions: (i) at Northern Trust, N.A., it had a checking account (ending with
numbers 9316 and referred to herein as the "NT 9316 Account") and an investment account
(ending with numbers 5397 and referred to herein as the "NT 5397 Account") (collectively
referred to as the "NT Accounts"); and (ii) at Goldman Sachs it had a trading account which
was controlled by Nadel (the "GS Account") (see Account Opening Documents at A-I, F-l,
attached hereto as par of Composite Ex. 7 (showing Nadel's authority over GS Account)).
27. Our investigation revealed the Trust was fuded with an initial deposit of
$500,000.00 into the NT 9316 Account from Scoop Management on or about August 2,
2007. See Deposit ticket & copy of deposited check, attached hereto as Exhibit 8; NT 9316 Acct. Statement for 8/2/07 through 8/5/07 at 1, attached hereto as Exhibit 9. On August 15,
2007, $450,000.00 of the initial deposit was transferred to the GS Account. See NT 9316
Acct. & NT 5397 Acct. Statement for 8/6/07 through 9/5/07 at 3, attached hereto as Exhibit
10; GS Acct. Activity Report for 8/1/07 through 2/4/09 at 5, attached hereto as Exhibit 11.
That was the only money deposited into the GS Account. See generally Ex. 11.
28. Funds were transferred out of the GS Account as follows: $51,546.90 on
October 1, 2007; $55,479.87 on November 26, 2007; $69,848.61 on April 1, 2008;
$50,000.00 on July 2,2008; $53,350.00 on September 2,2008; and $179,000.00 on Januar
6,2009. See Ex. 11 at 5,6, 7. Each of those transfers was made to one of
the NT Accounts,
and the statements for the NT Accounts show those accounts did not receive any other
transfers of money except, as noted in the next paragraph, for one transfer from Scoop
Capital the day before Nadel fled. See id.
29. According to records obtained from Wachovia Ban and Northern Trust, on
Januar 13,2009, $150,000.00 was transferred from Scoop Capital's account to the NT 9316
Account. See NT 9316 Acct. Statement for 1/6/09 through 2/5/09 at 3, attached hereto as
Exhibit 12; Activity Report for Wachovia account ending with 2157, attached hereto as
30. Attached as Exhbit 14 is a true and correct copy of the complaint fied in
United States v. Nadel, Case No. 09 MAG 169 (S.D.N.Y.).
I declare under the penalty of perjur that the foregoing is true and correct and is
executed this 10th day ofFebruar, 2009. ~
Buron W. Wiand, as Receiver c/o FOWLER WHITE BOGGS P.A. 501 E. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 1700 Tampa, FL 33602
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?