Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM in Support re 116 MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories 1 and 8 filed by Timebase Pty Ltd. SEALED DOCUMENT RECEIVED IN CLERKS OFFICE ON 2/12/10. (Gasey, Arthur) Modified on 2/12/2010 (akl).
Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The
Doc. 118
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
LeMond Cycling, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Trek Bicycle Corporation, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Greg LeMond, Third-Party Defendant. Case No. 08-CV-01010 (RHK/JSM)
PLACE HOLDER TO EXHIBITS 1, 2, 4, 6, 13, 19, 28, 29, 30, 32 AND 42 TO DECLARATION OF JENNIFER M. ROBBINS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This document is a place holder for the following item(s) which are filed in conventional or physical form with the Clerk's Office: Exhibits 1, 2, 4, 6, 13, 19, 28, 29, 30, 32 and 42 to Declaration of Jennifer M. Robbins in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment If you are a participant in this case, this filing will be served upon you in conventional format. This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s): ___ Voluminous Document* (Document number of order granting leave to file conventionally: ___ ) ___ Unable to Scan Documents (e.g., PDF file size of one page larger than 2MB, illegible when scanned) ___ Physical Object (description): ___ Non Graphical/Textual Computer File (audio, video, etc.) on CD or other media X Item Under Seal pursuant to a court order* (Document number of protective order: 99)
80914281. 1
Dockets.Justia.com
___ Item Under Seal pursuant to the Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 (Document number of redacted version: ___ ) ___ Other (description): * Filing of these items requires Judicial Approval. E-file this place holder in ECF in place of the documents filed conventionally. File a copy of this Placeholder and a copy of the NEF with the Clerk's Office along with the conventionally filed item(s).
80914281. 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?