Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The

Filing 118

MEMORANDUM in Support re 116 MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories 1 and 8 filed by Timebase Pty Ltd. SEALED DOCUMENT RECEIVED IN CLERKS OFFICE ON 2/12/10. (Gasey, Arthur) Modified on 2/12/2010 (akl).

Download PDF
Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, The Doc. 118 Att. 1 Exhibit 3 Dockets.Justia.com TREK BICYCLE CORPORATION 807 W. Madison S . P.O. Box 783, Watertoo. W I 53594 I, To: From: Date: Subject: Greg Lemond John Burke February 20, 1995 Potential For Lemond In The Future I am sorry that I have not gotten back to you sooner, it has been very busy. Based on our phone conversations and a number of factors at Trek and Fisher, I see that Lemond would be set up in the following way: A. Product 1. To begin with, Lemond would be positioned as road bikes. For Model Year '96, we would have three to four models in the line. 2. Price points of the models would be $700-$2,000. 3. For 1996, the bikes would have to be made out of welded steel. We have been working on this project for either Trek or Fisher and we have some great designs. The current plan is to use aluminum forks for the two lower end models and carbon forks for the upper end models. 4. We would also be interested in looking at the potential of Lemond accessories. Sales and Marketing 1. Lemond would be positioned as a separate brand: it's own catalog, advertising, and support. 2 , Lemond would be sold through the Fisher Sales Force in the United States. There are 16 salesmen who work exclusively for Fisher. We currently have 600 dealers in the U.S. By the end of '96 we should be up to 24 reps and 850 dealers. 3. International sales would be through our Fisher distributors. We have our own offices in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland that sell both Trek and Fisher. In addition, we have our own office in the Benelux that would do well with the product. We also have Fisher Distributors in around 15 additional countries. 4. The bad news is that the road bike market has declined significantly in the last five years. I know this well because in the U.S. market, Trek has the largest market share. B. f i Telephone (4 14) 478-2191 Fax 4 f 4-478-2774 TREK000650 5 . My projection of Lemond road bikes would be the following: Model Road 1 Road 2 Road 3 Road 4 Retail $800 $1000 $1400 $2000 DLr Price $520 $650 $910 $1300 Volume 2,000 2,000 1,200 300 5,500 Sales $1,040,000 $1,300,000 $1,092,000 $ 390,000 $3,822,000 Grand Total C. Your Involvement: 1. Help in the design of the products. We have a great engineering staff. You would give your input, and review all of the designs, and help to make component selection for the models. 2. Help promote the product line by working some of the trade shows, appearing at sales meetings, doing a couple of rides, and visiting some key customers and doing some clinics. I would see a minimum of 6 days at various trade shows, 3 days at various sales meetings, 3-4 rides per year, and 3-4 clinics per year. A lot of this depends on how much you want to get involved. 3. Being available for Catalog shoots. D. Why This Would Be Successful: 1. We can offer a great product at a great value. We build great bikes in our own factory so that we can control engineering and design. We have the buying power of Trek (Trek is Shimano's largest customer worldwide) which can lead to great value. 2. Lemond is an incredible brand name. The combination of Trek and Lemond would re-launch the Lemond brand name in the market. Sales people will be excited, dealers will be excited, and the end consumer will be excited. 3. Sales and Service. In the U.S. marketawe have 16 reps who are employees of Fisher and do a great job. Their full attention would be paid to selling Fisher and Lemond. It is not like dealing with independent reps. Fisher also provides the best service in the industry. Fisher dealers love doing business with Fisher and they will view Lemond as a great opportunity. 4. We have the financial resources to put the cart before the horse and promote the brand strongly. 5. It makes great sense. Gary Fisher for mountain bikes and Greg Lemond for road bikes. 6 . Use our leverage in a lot of other ways: 3 warehouses, the ability to give long terms to encourage large commitments, etc, etc. TREK000651 proposal. 1. You would get a royalty of 3% on all bike sales, 5 % on parts sales. At first year's sales projection of $3.822 million, this would earn you $114,660 on bike sales. 2, All of your trave and entertainment expenses relating Lemond events would be paid for. E. How would this deal work financially? This is not a offer, it is a n F. Why this might make sense for you. 1. It is difficult to make money in the bike business. It is extremely difficult to make money if you are a small frame maker. Name one person who has ever made good money with a small bike company. 2. Financially, this package would allow you to make a 3% royalty on bikes and 5% on parts. Even though the road market is weak, the royalty portion could amount to $75,000 to $150,000 per year. We would guarantee the minimum $75,000 in royalties. 3. You would be working with a very well-respected company. We have a lot of good people to work with. As I stated above, this is a proposal. I first need to find out if you are interested before we get into the details. We are also looking at a couple of other opportunities right now and that might have some impact. As we discussed on the phone, there is some sense of urgency based on 1996 timelines, so the sooner I hear from you, the better. I will be in the office Tuesday, February 21, until 2 0 0 p m . , after which I will be leaving for Alabama on a golf trip. If I don't hear from you tomorrow, I would love to talk to you sometime during the week. Please call Cindy, my assistant, at Extension 2491, with a good time to reach you, preferably early morning or evening. Best regards, A John Burke TREK000652

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?