Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd. et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al

Filing 79

CERTIFIED REMAND ORDER. MDL No. 2106. Signed by MDL (FLSD) on 1/14/14. (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal from FLSD, # 2 1 09-md-02106 Designation of Record, # 3 1 09-md-02106 Dkt. Sheet - flsd, # 4 09-MD-2106 DE 1, 2, 4-30, # 5 0 9-MD-2106 DE 32-36, # 6 09-MD-2106 DE 37 part 1 of 3, # 7 09-MD-2106 DE 37 part 2 of 3, # 8 09-MD-2106 DE 37 part 3 of 3, # 9 09-MD-2106 DE 38, 39, 41-47, 49, 50, # 10 09-MD-2106 DE 51, # 11 09-MD-2106 DE 52-59, 61-65, 68, 70, 72-76, # (1 2) 09-MD-2106 DE 78-84, 86-91, # 13 09-MD-2106 DE 93, 95-103, 106-108, # 14 09-MD-2106 DE 110-115, # 15 09-MD-2106 DE 116-125, 127-129, 132-134, # 16 09-MD-2106 DE 136-140, 142-158, # 17 09-MD-2106 DE 160-162, 164-167, 170-175, 177-190, # ( 18) 09-MD-2106 DE 191-199, 201-215, # 19 09-MD-2106 DE 217-229, 232-247, # 20 09-MD-2106 DE 248, # 21 09-MD-2106 DE 249 part 1 of 2, # 22 09-MD-2106 DE 249 part 2 of 2, # 23 09-MD-2106 DE 251-253, 262-266, 284-287, 300, 301, 310, 319, 326-3 31, # 24 09-MD-2106 DE 335, 336, 338-344, 346-349, # 25 09-MD-2106 DE 350, # 26 09-MD-2106 DE 351-358, # 27 09-MD-2106 DE 360-366, 368-374, # 28 09-MD-2106 DE 375 part 1 of 3, # 29 09-MD-2106 DE 375 part 2 of 3, # 30 09-MD-2106 DE 375 p art 3 of 3, # 31 09-MD-2106 DE 376 part 1, # 32 09-MD-2106 DE 376 part 2, # 33 09-MD-2106 DE 376 part 3, # 34 09-MD-2106 DE 376 part 4, # 35 09-MD-2106 DE 376 part 5, # 36 09-MD-2106 DE 376 part 6, # 37 09-MD-2106 DE 376 part 7, # 38 09-MD-2106 DE 376 part 8, # 39 09-MD-2106 DE 376 part 9, # 40 09-MD-2106 DE 377 part 1, # 41 09-MD-2106 DE 377 part 2, # 42 09-MD-2106 DE 378, # 43 09-MD-2106 DE 379, # 44 09-MD-2106 DE 380, # 45 09-MD-2106 DE 381 part 1, # 46 09-MD-2 106 DE 381 part 2, # 47 09-MD-2106 DE 382 part 1, # 48 09-MD-2106 DE 382 part 2, # 49 09-MD-2106 DE 382 part 3, # 50 09-MD-2106 DE 382 part 4, # 51 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 1, # 52 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 2, # 53 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 3, # 54 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 4, # 55 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 5, # 56 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 6, # 57 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 7, # 58 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 8, # 59 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 9, # 60 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 10, # 61 09-MD-2106 DE 383 part 11, # 62 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 1, # 63 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 2, # 64 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 3, # 65 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 4, # 66 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 5, # 67 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 6, # 68 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 7, # ( 69) 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 8, # 70 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 9, # 71 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 10, # 72 09-MD-2106 DE 384 part 11, # 73 09-MD-2106 DE 385 part 1, # 74 09-MD-2106 DE 385 part 2, # 75 09-MD-2106 DE 386 part 1, # 76 09-MD-2106 DE 386 part 2, # 77 09-MD-2106 DE 386 part 3, # 78 09-MD-2106 DE 386 part 4, # 79 09-MD-2106 DE 386 part 5, # 80 09-MD-2106 DE 386 part 6, # 81 09-MD-2106 DE 386 part 7, # 82 09-MD-2106 DE 387 part 1, # 83 09-MD-2106 DE 387 part 2, # 84 09-MD-2106 DE 388, # 85 09-MD-2106 DE 389 part 1, # 86 09-MD-2106 DE 389 part 2, # 87 09-MD-2106 DE 389 part 3, # 88 09-MD-2106 DE 389 part 4, # 89 09-MD-2106 DE 390, 392-394, # 90 1 10-cv-20236 Dkt. Sheet - flsd, # 91 10cv20236 DE #1-27, 29-31, 45, 53, 60-65, 67-70, 73, # 92 1 09-cv-23835 Dkt. Sheet - flsd, # 93 09cv23835 DE 112, 115-126, # 94 09cv23835 DE 130, 134, 135 and 145)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 390 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2013 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO.: 09-2106-MD-GOLD/GOODMAN IN RE: FONTAINEBLEAU LAS VEGAS CONTRACT LITIGATION MDL NO. 2106 This document relates to all actions. ______________________________________/ Motion Requesting Court to Restrict Access to Docket Entry Plaintiffs Avenue CLO Fund, et al. hereby request that the Court restrict access to docket entry number 386-16 (Plaintiffs’ Second Supplemental Appendix Of Exhibits In Support Of Plaintiffs’ Motion For Partial Summary Judgment And In Opposition To Bank Of America, N.A.’s Motion For Summary Judgment excluding attachments), which was inadvertently filed including the confidential attachments that remain under seal. Date: Miami, Florida December 9, 2013 . By: /s/ Lorenz Michel Prüss Lorenz Michel Prüss Lorenz Prüss (Florida Bar No. 581305) DIMOND KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, PH-2B Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 374-1920 Facsimile: (305) 374-1961 E-mail: lpruss@dkrpa.com -andJ. Michael Hennigan Kirk D. Dillman MCKOOL SMITH 865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2900 1 948608 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 390 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2013 Page 2 of 3 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 694-1200 Facsimile: (213) 694-1234 E-mail: hennigan@mckoolsmithhennigan.com kdillman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd., et al 2 948608 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 390 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2013 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Motion Requesting Court to Restrict Access to Docket Entry was filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically the Notice of Electronic Filing. Dated: December 9, 2013. /s/ Lorenz Michel Prüss Lorenz Michel Prüss 3 948608 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 392 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2013 Page 1 of 2 Case MDL No. 2106 Document 116 Filed 12/13/13 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: FONTAINEBLEAU LAS VEGAS CONTRACT LITIGATION Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd., et al. v. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, et al., S.D. Florida, C.A. No. 1:09-23835 (D. Nevada C.A. No. 2:09-01047) ) ) ) MDL No. 2106 REMAND ORDER Before the Panel:* Pursuant to Rule 10.2, defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) moves to vacate the Panel’s order – issued at the suggestion of the transferee judge, the Honorable Alan S. Gold – conditionally remanding this action to the District of Nevada. Responding plaintiffs oppose the motion.1 In its motion, BANA essentially raises the same argument that Judge Gold rejected in denying the bank’s motion seeking reconsideration of his Suggestion of Remand – i.e., that pretrial proceedings in the MDL – including both fact and expert discovery regarding plaintiffs’ alleged damages – have not yet been completed. The judge stated: “[I] do not believe I have obtained any particular expertise from supervising the MDL that would render me more capable than the District of Nevada in presiding over damages discovery. To the contrary, I conclude the central purpose of the JPML referral has been achieved through my orders on motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment, and it will promote the just and efficient conduct of this action to have any remaining damages discovery supervised by the judge trying the * 1 Judge Marjorie O. Rendell and Judge Lewis A. Kaplan took no part in the decision of this matter. Responding plaintiffs are: Avenue CLO IV, Ltd., Avenue CLO V, Ltd., Avenue CLO VI, Ltd., Battalion CLO 2007-I Ltd., Brigade Leveraged Capital Structures Fund, Ltd., Canpartners Investments IV, LLC, Caspian Alpha Long Credit Fund, L.P., Caspian Capital Partners, L.P., Caspian Select Credit Master Fund, Ltd., Genesis CLO 2007-1 Ltd., ING International Senior Bank Loans USD, ING International (II) - Senior Bank Loans Euro, ING International (II) - Senior Bank Loans USD, ING International -Senior Bank Loans Euro, ING Investment Management CLO I, Ltd., ING Investment Management CLO II, Ltd., ING Investment Management CLO III, Ltd., ING Investment Management CLO IV, Ltd., ING Investment Management CLO V, Ltd., ING Prime Rate Trust, ING Senior Income Fund, Mariner LDC, Monarch Master Funding Ltd., Scoggin Capital Management II LLC, Scoggin International Fund Ltd, Scoggin Worldwide Fund Ltd, Sola Ltd, Solus Core Opportunities Master Fund Ltd, Veer Cash Flow CLO, Ltd., Venture II CDO 2002, Limited, Venture III CDO Limited, Venture IV CDO Limited, Venture IX CDO Limited, Venture V CDO Limited, Venture VI CDO Limited, Venture VII CDO Limited, Venture VIII CDO Limited, Vista Leveraged Income Fund, Consol Plaintiffs Cantor Fitzgerald Securities, Olympic CLO I Ltd., SPCP Group, LLC, San Gabriel CLO I Ltd., Shasta CLO I Ltd., Sierra CLO II Ltd., Venor Capital Master Fund, Ltd., and Whitney CLO I Ltd. Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 392 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2013 Page 2 of 2 Case MDL No. 2106 Document 116 Filed 12/13/13 Page 2 of 2 -2case, in conjunction with trial-related issues and pleadings.”2 See Order Den. Mot. Recons., at 2 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 9, 2013) (No. 1:09-md-02106) (ECF No. 366). After considering all argument of counsel, we will deny BANA’s motion. In assessing the question of Section 1407 remand, we assign great weight to the transferee judge’s determination that remand of a particular action (or actions) is appropriate, given that he or she supervises the day-to-day pretrial proceedings.3 We find no reason not to accord such weight to Judge Gold’s considered Suggestion here. We adopt the reasoning quoted above. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, this action is remanded to the District of Nevada. PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION John G. Heyburn II Chairman Paul J. Barbadoro Sarah S. Vance Charles R. Breyer Ellen Segal Huvelle 2 As the judge correctly noted, Section 1407 does not require that all pretrial proceedings be completed prior to remand. See 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a) (“Each action so transferred shall be remanded by the panel at or before the conclusion of such pretrial proceedings to the district from which it was transferred unless it shall have been previously terminated . . . .”) (emphasis added). 3 See, e.g., In re: Columbia/HCA Healthcare Qui Tam Litig. (No. II), 560 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 1350 (J.P.M.L. 2008) (“‘In considering the question of remand, the Panel has consistently given great weight to the transferee judge’s determination that remand of a particular action at a particular time is appropriate because the transferee judge, after all, supervises the day-to-day pretrial proceedings.’”) (quoting In re Holiday Magic Sec. & Antitrust Litig., 433 F. Supp. 1125, 1126 (J.P.M.L. 1977)); see also In re: Light Cigarettes Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig., 856 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (J.P.M.L. 2012) (denying motion to vacate conditional remand order filed upon issuance of transferee judge’s suggestion of remand). Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 393 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2014 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 09-MD-02106-CIV-GOLD/GOODMAN IN RE: FONTAINEBLEAU LAS VEGAS CONTRACT LITIGATION MDL No. 2106 This document relates to all actions. / JOINT NOTICE OF FILING STIPULATION RE INCLUSION OF RECENT TRANSACTIONS IN CASE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that attached is a stipulation agreed to by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) regarding the inclusion in the Avenue Action of all of Plaintiffs’ claims against BANA arising out of the facts stated in the Second Amended Complaint and associated with all of the Term Loan notes Plaintiffs own, including the Additional Interests. Dated: January 2, 2014 Respectfully submitted, DIMOND KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A. By: /s/ Lorenz Michel Pruss David A. Rothstein Lorenz Michel Pruss 2665 South Bayshore Drive Penthouse 2-B Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 600-1393 Facsimile: (305) 374-1961 Email: drothstein@dkrpa.com lpruss@dkrpa.com - and 1 McKool 953743v1 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 393 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2014 Page 2 of 4 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. J. Michael Hennigan Kirk D. Dillman Robert W. Mockler 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2900 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 694-1200 Facsimile: (213) 694-1234 hennigan@mckoolsmithhennigan.com kdillman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com rmockler@mckoolsmithhennigan.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd., et al. HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP By: /s/ Jamie Zysk Isani Jamie Zysk Isani Florida Bar No. 728861 1111 Brickett Avenue, Suite 2500 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone:(305) 536-2724 Facsimile: (305) 810-1675 Email: jisani@hunton.com - and O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Bradley J. Butwin (pro hac vice) Jonathan Rosenberg (pro hac vice) Daniel L. Cantor (pro hac vice) William J. Sushon (pro hac vice) 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036 Telephone:(212) 326-2000 Facsimile: (212) 326-2061 Email: bbutwin@omm.com jrosenberg@omm.com dcantor@omm.com wsushon@omm.com Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. 2 McKool 953743v1 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 393 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2014 Page 3 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing JOINT NOTICE OF FILING STIPULATION RE INCLUSION OF RECENT TRANSACTIONS IN CASE was filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically the Notice of Electronic Filing. Dated: January 2, 2014. /s/ Lorenz M. Prüss ________ Lorenz M. Prüss, Esq. 3 McKool 953743v1 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 393 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2014 Page 4 of 4 SERVICE LIST Jamie Zysk Isani HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 1111 Brickett Avenue, Suite 2500 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 536-2724 Facsimile: (305) 810-1675 Email: jisani@hunton.com Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. Bradley J. Butwin Jonathan Rosenberg Daniel L. Cantor William J. Sushon O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 326-2000 Facsimile: (212) 326-2061 bbutwin@omm.com jrosenberg@omm.com dcantor@omm.com wsushon@omm.com Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. 4 McKool 953743v1 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 393-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2014 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 09-MD-02106-CIV-GOLD/GOODMAN IN RE: FONTAINEBLEAU LAS VEGAS CONTRACT LITIGATION MDL No. 2106 This document relates to all actions. / STIPULATION RE INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN CASE Whereas this action was originally styled as Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd., et al. v. Bank of America, et al. case, and filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (District of Nevada Case No. 09-CV-01047) on June 9, 2009 (“Avenue Action”); Whereas on December 2, 2009, the United States Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) transferred this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Whereas on January 4, 2010, the JPML transferred a related action styled as ACP Master, Ltd., et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., et al., filed in the United States Court for the Southern District of New York on September 21, 2009 (S.D.N.Y. Case No. 09-CV-8064) (“Aurelius Action”) to the United States Court for the Southern District of Florida to be consolidated with the Avenue Action; Whereas on April 19, 2011, the Aurelius Action was dismissed without prejudice pursuant to a stipulation providing that the Aurelius plaintiffs, whose interests had been acquired 1 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 393-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2014 Page 2 of 4 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 393-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2014 Page 3 of 4 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 393-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2014 Page 4 of 4 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 394 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2014 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 09-MD-02106-CIV-GOLD/GOODMAN IN RE: FONTAINEBLEAU LAS VEGAS CONTRACT LITIGATION MDL No. 2106 This document relates to all actions. / STIPULATION RE DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON REMAND Whereas this action was originally styled as Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd., et al. v. Bank of America, et al., and filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (District of Nevada Case No. 09-CV-01047) on June 9, 2009 (“Avenue Action”); Whereas on December 2, 2009, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) transferred this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (becoming S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-cv-23835) and coordinated it with an action styled as Fontainebleau Las Vegas, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., et al (S.D. Fla. Case No. 09-cv-21879) (“Trustee Action”); Whereas on January 4, 2010, the JPML transferred a related action styled as ACP Master, Ltd., et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., et al., filed in the United States Court for the Southern District of New York on September 21, 2009 (S.D.N.Y. Case No. 09-CV-8064) (“Aurelius Action”) to the United States Court for the Southern District of Florida (becoming S.D. Fla. Case No. 10-cv-20236) to be consolidated with the Avenue Action and the Trustee Action; 1 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 394 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2014 Page 2 of 6 Whereas on September 20, 2010, final judgment was entered dismissing the Trustee Action [D.E. 141];1 Whereas on April 19, 2011, the Aurelius Action was dismissed without prejudice pursuant to a stipulation providing that the Aurelius plaintiffs, whose interests had been acquired by the Avenue plaintiffs, could pursue their claims against Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) in the Avenue Action [D.E. 238]; Whereas on December 13, 2013, the JPML issued a Remand Order, remanding the Avenue Action to the District of Nevada [D.E. 392]; Whereas Plaintiffs and BANA are required to designate the record to be remanded to the District of Nevada; Whereas Plaintiffs and BANA desire to designate the entire record of the coordinated proceedings with the exception of documents that relate solely to the Trustee Action; Whereas Plaintiffs and BANA desire to include any documents that were filed in the underlying dockets for the Avenue Action and the Aurelius Action that were not filed on the master MDL docket; Whereas Plaintiffs and BANA desire that any and all documents that were filed under seal in connection with the MDL be sent to the District of Nevada; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs and BANA that the record to be remanded shall contain: 1 All docket entry numbers refer to entries on the master docket of Case No. 09-md-2106. 2 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 394 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2014 Page 3 of 6 1. All documents filed on the master docket, Case No. 09-md-2106, except the following docket entries, which relate solely to the Trustee Action: 3, 77, 92, 104, 135, 139, 141, 168, 169. 2. The following docket entries on the underlying docket for the Avenue Action, Case No. 09-cv-23835, that are not on the master docket: 77, 112, 115 - 126, 130, 134, 135, 145. 3. The following docket entries on the underlying docket for the Aurelius Action, Case No. 10-cv-20236, that are not on the master docket: 1 - 27, 29 - 31, 45, 53, 60 - 65, 67 - 70, 73. 4. All documents filed under seal in the MDL, Case No. 09-md-2106, including those identified by the following docket entry numbers on the master docket: 254 - 261, 267 283, 288 - 299, 302 - 309, 311 - 317, 320 - 324, 332 - 334, 367. Date: January 13, 2014 By: /s/ Jamie Zysk Isani Jamie Zysk Isani Jamie Zysk Isani (Florida Bar No. 728861) HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 1111 Brickell Avenue, Suite 2500 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 810-2500 Facsimile: (305) 810-2460 E-mail: jisani@hunton.com -andBradley J. Butwin (pro hac vice) Jonathan Rosenberg (pro hac vice) Daniel L. Cantor (pro hac vice) William J. Sushon (pro hac vice) O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 326-2000 3 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 394 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2014 Page 4 of 6 Facsimile: (212) 326-2061 E-mail: bbutwin@omm.com jrosenberg@omm.com dcantor@omm.com wsushon@omm.com Attorneys for Defendant Bank of America, N.A. January 13, 2014 By: /s/ Lorenz Michel Prüss Lorenz Michel Prüss Lorenz Prüss (Florida Bar No. 581305) DIMOND KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, PH-2B Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 374-1920 Facsimile: (305) 374-1961 E-mail: lpruss@dkrpa.com -andJ. Michael Hennigan Kirk D. Dillman Robert W. Mockler Rebecca T. Pilch Caroline M. Walters MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN 865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2900 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 694-1200 Facsimile: (213) 694-1234 E-mail: hennigan@mckoolsmithhennigan.com kdillman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com rmockler@mckoolsmithhennigan.com rpilch@mckoolsmithhennigan.com cwalters@mckoolsmithhennigan.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd., et al 4 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 394 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2014 Page 5 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing STIPULATION RE DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON REMAND was filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically the Notice of Electronic Filing. Dated: January 13, 2014. /s/ Lorenz M. Prüss ________ Lorenz M. Prüss, Esq. 5 Case 1:09-md-02106-ASG Document 394 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2014 Page 6 of 6 SERVICE LIST Jamie Zysk Isani HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 1111 Brickett Avenue, Suite 2500 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 536-2724 Facsimile: (305) 810-1675 Email: jisani@hunton.com Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. Bradley J. Butwin Jonathan Rosenberg Daniel L. Cantor William J. Sushon O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 326-2000 Facsimile: (212) 326-2061 bbutwin@omm.com jrosenberg@omm.com dcantor@omm.com wsushon@omm.com Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?