Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC et al

Filing 96

DECLARATION of CLIFFORD C. WEBB In Support of Defendant Democratic Underground, LLC's First Motion to Compel the Production of Documents re 95 First MOTION to Compel the Production of Documents By Defendant Democratic Underground, LLC and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof ; filed by Defendants David Allen, Democratic Underground, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit AA, # 28 Exhibit BB, # 29 Exhibit CC, # 30 Exhibit DD, # 31 Exhibit EE, # 32 Exhibit FF)(Webb, Cliff)

EXHIBIT C

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CA State Bar No. 115163) (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
CLIFFORD C. WEBB (CA State Bar No. 260885) (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
KURT OPSAHL (CA State Bar No. 191303) (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
CORYNNE MCSHERRY (CA State Bar No. 221504) (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, California 94110
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
CHAD BOWERS (NV State Bar No. 7283)
[e-mail]
CHAD A. BOWERS, LTD
3202 West Charleston Boulevard
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Telephone:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, and
Defendant DAVID ALLEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of
Columbia limited-liability company; and DAVID ALLEN,
an individual,
Defendants.
DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of
Columbia limited-liability company,
Counterclaimant,
v.

Case No. 10-cv-01356-RLH (RJJ)
DEFENDANT AND
COUNTERCLAIMANT
DEMOCRATIC
UNDERGROUND LLC’S
FIRST SET OF REQUESTS
FOR PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS TO
COUNTERDEFENDANT
STEPHENS MEDIA LLC

RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited liability company,
and STEPHENS MEDIA LLC, a Nevada limited-liability
company,
Counterdefendants.
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1
2
3

PROPOUNDING PARTIES:

Defendant and Counterclaimant DEMOCRATIC
UNDERGROUND, LLC

RESPONDING PARTY:

Plaintiff Stephens Media LLC

SET NUMBER:

One (Nos. 1-69)

4
5

Pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant and

6

Counterclaimant DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC (“Democratic Underground”)

7

requests that Counterdefendant Stephens Media LLC (“Stephens Media”) respond hereto in

8

writing and produce and permit inspection and copying of each of the following documents and

9

tangible things. Democratic Underground requests that the documents and things be produced

10

within thirty (30) days of service hereof to the offices of Fenwick & West LLP.
DEFINITIONS

11
12

The following definitions and instructions apply to each request:

13

1.

“DU” or “Democratic Underground” means Defendant and Counterclaimant

14

Democratic Underground, LLC, and any present or former officers, directors, employees, agents,

15

representatives, attorneys, or all other PERSONS acting, or purporting to act, on its behalf.
2.

16

“Righthaven” means Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Righthaven LLC, its parents,

17

subsidiaries, divisions, and affiliates, including, any present or former officers, directors, trustees,

18

employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, or ALL other PERSONS acting, or purporting to

19

act, on its behalf.

20

3.

“Defendants” means, collectively, Democratic Underground and Defendant David

4.

“Stephens Media” means Counterdefendant Stephens Media LLC, its parents ,

21
22

Allen.

23

subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, and predecessors, including, any present or former officers,

24

directors, trustees, employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, or all other PERSONS acting, or

25

purporting to act, on its behalf, and specifically including the Las Vegas Review-Journal, and the

26

Arkansas investment banker Warren Stephens’ family.

27
28

5.

“YOU” or “YOUR” refers to Stephens Media and any agent, representative,

attorney, or other PERSON, business, advisor, or legal entity acting, or purporting to act, on its
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

1

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1
2
3
4

behalf.
6.

“Steven Gibson” means the Las Vegas attorney Steven A. Gibson and Steven A.

Gibson, Chartered (a Nevada professional corporation).
7.

“PERSON(S)” includes, without limitation, individuals, corporations,

5

partnerships, limited partnerships, unincorporated associations, and ALL other governmental and

6

nongovernmental entities.

7

8.

“COMMUNICATION(S)” means any transmission or exchange of information,

8

data, opinions, or thoughts, whether orally, in writing or otherwise, including but not limited to

9

reports, mailings, conversations, meetings, letters, notes and telegraphic, facsimile, recordings,

10

telex or computer-assisted electronic messages. References to COMMUNICATIONS with

11

business entities shall be deemed to include present and former officers, directors, employees,

12

agents, attorneys, and/or other representatives or persons acting on behalf of such entities.

13

9.

“RELATING TO” or “RELATES TO” means anything that, in whole or in part,

14

constitutes, comprises, contains, describes, evidences, embodies, reflects, refers to, relates to,

15

identifies, states, pertains directly or indirectly to, concerns, discusses, alludes to, responds to,

16

mentions, comments upon, analyzes, explains, summarizes, or is in any other way relevant to the

17

particular subject matter identified.

18

10.

“DOCUMENTS” or “DOCUMENT” shall have the broadest meaning permitted

19

by law, including, but not limited to, ALL electronic, written or printed matter, information,

20

communication, or data of any kind, including without limitation e-mail, correspondence,

21

memoranda, notes, opinions, journals, descriptions, recounts, minutes, agenda, contracts,

22

agreements, reports, summaries, inter-office and intra-office COMMUNICATIONS, notations of

23

any sort of conversations, diaries, appointment books or calendars, teletypes, telefax,

24

confirmations, computer data (including information or programs stored in a computer, whether

25

or not ever printed out or displayed) and all graphic or manual records or representations of any

26

kind, including without limitation, digital images, photographs, microfiche, microfilm, videotape,

27

records and motion pictures, and electronic mechanical, or electric records or representations of

28

any kind including, without limitation, information on servers, hard drives, diskettes, CD-ROMs,
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

2

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1

DVDs, tapes, cassettes, discs, log files, databases, backups, magnetic cards and recordings, and

2

shall also include but not be limited to anything and everything that would fall within the

3

definition of “document” or “writing” as suggested within the Federal Rules of Evidence.

4

11.

“COMPLAINT” means the complaint filed by Righthaven against DU and David

5

Allen on or about August 10, 2010 in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada,

6

Case No. 2:10-cv-01356 (Dkt. 1).

7
8

12.

“COUNTERCLAIM” means the Answer and Counterclaim filed by DU on

September 27, 2010 in this action (Dkt. 13).

9

13.

“LVRJ” means the Las Vegas Review-Journal newspaper, its owners, parents,

10

subsidiaries, divisions, and affiliates, including, any present or former officers, directors, trustees,

11

employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, or ALL other PERSONS acting, or purporting to

12

act, on its behalf.

13

14.

“LVRJ WEBSITE” means all of the content located at www.lvrj.com, including

14

but not limited to news articles, advertisements, links, editorial statements, and statement of

15

policy.

16
17

15.

www.democraticunderground.com.

18
19

16.

17.

24
25
26

“WEB PAGE” means a document connected to the World Wide Web, consisting

of an HTML file and any related files for scripts and graphics.

22
23

“NEWS ARTICLE” means the article underlying this action entitled “Tea Party

power fuels Angle” published on the LVRJ WEBSITE, shown in Exhibit 2 to the COMPLAINT.

20
21

“DU WEBSITE” means all of the content located at

18.

“PAGE VIEW” means a request to load a single HTML file (' page') of an Internet

19.

“EXCERPT” means the portion of the NEWS ARTICLE posted on the DU

site.

WEBSITE, shown in Exhibit 3 to the COMPLAINT.
20.

The “JULY 19, 2010 ASSIGNMENT” means the purported copyright assignment

27

between Stephens Media and Righthaven for the NEWS ARTICLE, attached as Exhibit 1 to the

28

Declaration of J. Colby Williams in Support of Stephens Media’s Motion to Dismiss or Strike
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

3

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1

filed in this action (Dkt. 38).

2
3

21.

“SCHEDULING ORDER” means the Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order

filed with the Court by the parties on December 3, 2010 (Dkt. 42).

4

22.

“WEHCO Media” means WHECO Media, Inc. and WHECO Newspapers, Inc.,

5

their parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, including, any present or former officers, directors,

6

trustees, employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, or ALL other PERSONS acting, or

7

purporting to act, on its behalf.

8

23.

“Media News Group” means Media News Group, Inc., its parents, subsidiaries,

9

divisions, affiliates, including, any present or former officers, directors, trustees, employees,

10

agents, representatives, attorneys, or ALL other PERSONS acting, or purporting to act, on its

11

behalf.

12

24.

“Clickability, Inc.” means Clickability, Inc., its parents, subsidiaries, divisions,

13

affiliates, including, any present or former officers, directors, trustees, employees, agents,

14

representatives, attorneys, or ALL other PERSONS acting, or purporting to act, on its behalf.

15

25.

The term “ALL” means “any and all.”

16

26.

The terms “or” and “and” shall be read in the conjunctive and in the disjunctive

17

wherever they appear such that neither of these words shall be interpreted to limit the scope of

18

these requests.

19
20

27.

Words in the singular shall, where the context permits, include the plural and

words used in the plural shall, where the context permits, include the singular.

21
22

INSTRUCTIONS
1.

In answering the following requests for production, furnish all available

23

documents in the possession, custody, or control of any of Stephens Media’s attorneys, directors,

24

officers, agents, employees, representatives, associates, investigators or division affiliates,

25

partnerships, parents or subsidiaries and persons under Stephens Media’s control.

26

2.

Electronic records and computerized information must be produced in an

27

intelligible format, together with a description of the system from which they were derived

28

sufficient to permit rendering the records and information intelligible. Further, electronic records
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

4

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1

and computerized information must be produced pursuant to any agreement or agreements

2

between the parties as reflected in the correspondence between the parties.

3

3.

Selection of documents from the files and other sources and the numbering of such

4

documents shall be performed in such a manner as to ensure that the source of each document

5

may be determined, if necessary.

6
7

4.

File folders with tabs or labels or directories of files identifying documents must

be produced intact with such documents.

8

5.

Documents attached to each other shall not be separated.

9

6.

If any information requested is claimed to be privileged, immune from discovery

10

or otherwise not discoverable, please provide all information falling within the scope of the

11

request for production which is discoverable, and for each item of information contained in a

12

document to which a claim of privilege is made, identify such document with sufficient

13

particularity for purposes of a motion to compel, such identification to include at least the

14

following:

15

(a)

the basis on which the privilege is claimed;

16

(b)

the names and positions of the author of the document and all other persons

17

participating in the preparation of the document;

18
19

(c)

the name and position of each individual or other person to whom the

document, or a copy thereof, was sent or otherwise disclosed;

20

(d)

the date of the document;

21

(e)

a description of any accompanying material transmitted with or attached to

22

such document;

23

(f)

the number of pages in such document;

24

(g)

the particular document request to which such document is responsive; and

25

(h)

whether any business or non-legal matter is contained or discussed in such

26
27
28

document.
7.

If Stephens Media’s response to a particular request for production is a statement

that it lacks the ability to comply with that request, it must specify whether the inability to comply
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

5

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1

is because the particular item or category of information never existed, has been destroyed, has

2

been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in Stephens Media’s

3

possession, custody, or control, in which case the name and address of any person or entity

4

known or believed by you to have possession, custody, or control of that information or category

5

of information must be identified.

6
7

REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 1:

8
9

ALL DOCUMENTS supporting any allegations made in the COMPLAINT.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 2:

10

ALL DOCUMENTS supporting any allegations that may be made in any answer to the

11

COUNTERCLAIM.

12

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 3:

13

ALL DOCUMENTS concerning any assignment of rights in the NEWS ARTICLE to

14

Righthaven.

15

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 4:

16

ALL DOCUMENTS reflecting any COMMUNICATIONS between Righthaven and any

17

other PERSON or entity, including YOU, RELATING TO assignment or reversion of rights in

18

the NEWS ARTICLE.

19

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 5:

20

ALL DOCUMENTS concerning any COMMUNICATIONS between Righthaven and

21

Stephens Media RELATING TO assignment or reversion of rights in any other work.

22

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 6:

23

ALL DOCUMENTS concerning any COMMUNICATION between Righthaven and

24

Stephens Media regarding conduct of, or claims against, Defendants.

25

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 7:

26

ALL DOCUMENTS concerning any joint defense, common interest, or other agreements

27

for cooperation in litigation or preservation of privileges between Righthaven and Stephens

28

Media.
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

6

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1
2

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 8:
ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any “monetary commitments” referenced

3

in the JULY 19, 2010 ASSIGNMENT.

4

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 9:

5

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any “commitments to provide services

6

and/or already provided” referenced in the JULY 19, 2010 ASSIGNMENT.

7

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 10:

8
9
10
11

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any “right of reversion” referenced in the
JULY 19, 2010 ASSIGNMENT.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 11:
ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any “good and valuable consideration”

12

referenced in the JULY 19, 2010 ASSIGNMENT.

13

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 12:

14

ALL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO Righthaven’s use or potential future uses of the

15

NEWS ARTICLE.

16

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 13:

17

ALL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO Stephens Media’s use or potential future uses of the

18

NEWS ARTICLE.

19

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 14:

20

ALL DOCUMENTS reflecting the names and addresses (whether electronic mail

21

addresses or otherwise) of any PERSON communicating about Defendants’ use of the NEWS

22

ARTICLE, including any individuals at Righthaven, at Stephens Media, or any other PERSON

23

with whom Stephens Media has communicated.

24

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 15:

25

ALL DOCMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any licensing or attempted licensing of the

26

NEWS ARTICLE by Stephens Media or Righthaven.

27

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 16:

28

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any plans to license the NEWS
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

7

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1

ARTICLE.

2

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 17:

3

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any licensing or attempted licensing of

4

copyrighted works originating with the LVRJ by YOU.

5

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 18:

6

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any plans to license any copyrighted

7

works by YOU.

8

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 19:

9

ALL DOCUMENTS that reflect any settlements by Stephens Media or Righthaven of

10

claims for copyright infringement related to any article published in the LVRJ.

11

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 20:

12

ALL COMMUNICATIONS with any PERSON by Stephens Media or Righthaven

13

RELATING TO terms for settlements for claims of copyright infringement in any article

14

published by the LVRJ.

15

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 21:

16
17
18

YOUR articles of organization.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 22:
ALL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO any harm to Stephens Media as a result of any use

19

of the NEWS ARTICLE by Defendants.

20

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 23:

21

ALL DOCUMENTS evidencing or RELATING TO any harm to Stephens Media as a

22

result of any allegedly unauthorized use of any LVRJ article.

23

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 24:

24

ALL DOCUMENTS evidencing or RELATING TO any harm to Righthaven as a result of

25

any use of the NEWS ARTICLE by Defendants.

26

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 25:

27
28

ALL DOCUMENTS evidencing or RELATING TO any harm to Stephens Media that
could result if uses such as those by Democratic Underground of the NEWS ARTICLE became
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

8

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1

widespread.

2

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 26:

3

Any analyses, studies, reports, or COMMUNICATIONS regarding the actual or potential

4

impact on the newspaper industry, of copying of newspaper articles, or portions thereof, on

5

Internet websites.

6

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 27:

7

ALL logs of any kind or other data reflecting or RELATING TO the NEWS ARTICLE’s

8

display on the LVRJ WEBSITE, including without limitation, those reflecting views of the

9

NEWS ARTICLE, dates, IP address sufficient to identify geography of viewer, source of the

10

viewer, actions by the viewer, sharing or printing by the viewer, advertising displayed with the

11

NEWS ARTICLE, revenue from such advertising.

12

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 28:

13

ALL DOCUMENTS evidencing or RELATING TO Stephens Media’s revenue received

14

in whole or in part as a result of display of the NEWS ARTICLE, including without limitation the

15

number of incidents generating revenue (whether paid per click or per display or otherwise), price

16

per incident, date and payor.

17

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 29:

18

ALL DOCUMENTS evidencing or RELATING TO Stephens Media’s revenue from the

19

LVRJ WEBSITE from 2008 to the present, including without limitation documentation of

20

amounts received daily, sources of those amounts, type of revenue (e.g., PPC, CPM, etc.),

21

average pricing, and average number of events generating revenues.

22

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 30:

23
24
25
26
27

ALL business plans for the LVRJ WEBSITE.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 31:
ALL marketing plans for the LVRJ WEBSITE.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 32:
ALL business plans of Stephens Media.

28
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

9

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1
2
3
4

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 33:
ALL marketing plans and marketing materials of Stephens Media.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 34:
ALL DOCUMENTS referring or RELATING TO the registration of any copyright in the

5

NEWS ARTICLE, including, without limitation, internal COMMUNICATIONS and

6

COMMUNICATIONS with the United States Copyright Office.

7

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 35:

8
9
10
11

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any attempt YOU made to mitigate
damages in connection with the NEWS ARTICLE.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 36:
ALL DOCUMENTS referring or RELATING TO the creation of Righthaven, including,

12

without limitation, ALL COMMUNICATION among its founders and funders.

13

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 37:

14
15

ALL statements from YOUR bank or other financial institution since January 1, 2008.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 38:

16

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any revenue or income received by YOU

17

since January 1, 2008, including but not limited to revenue attributable to the licensing or sales of

18

copyrights.

19

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 39:

20
21
22
23
24

ALL financial DOCUMENTS RELATING TO Righthaven’s use of the NEWS ARTICLE
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 40:
ALL financial DOCUMENTS RELATING TO the YOUR use of the NEWS ARTICLE
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 41:
ALL COMMUNICATIONS that refer or RELATE TO the Defendants in this lawsuit

25

(excluding any assertedly privileged COMMUNICATIONS, which shall be logged pursuant to

26

the SCHEDULING ORDER).

27

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 42:

28

ALL COMMUNICATIONS that refer or RELATE TO the NEWS ARTICLE (excluding
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

10

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1

any assertedly privileged COMMUNICATIONS, which shall be logged pursuant to the

2

SCHEDULING ORDER).

3

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 43:

4

ALL COMMUNICATIONS that refer or RELATE TO Righthaven (excluding any

5

assertedly privileged COMMUNICATIONS, which shall be logged pursuant to the

6

SCHEDULING ORDER).

7

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 44:

8

ALL COMMUNICATIONS that refer or RELATE TO Net Sortie Systems LLC

9

(excluding any assertedly privileged COMMUNICATIONS, which shall be logged pursuant to

10

the SCHEDULING ORDER).

11

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 45:

12

ALL COMMUNICATIONS that refer or RELATE TO SI Content Monitor LLC

13

(excluding any assertedly privileged COMMUNICATIONS, which shall be logged pursuant to

14

the SCHEDULING ORDER).

15

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 46:

16

ALL COMMUNICATIONS that refer or RELATE TO WEHCO Media (excluding any

17

assertedly privileged COMMUNICATIONS, which shall be logged pursuant to the

18

SCHEDULING ORDER).

19

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 47:

20

ALL COMMUNICATIONS that refer or RELATE TO Media News Group (excluding

21

any assertedly privileged COMMUNICATIONS, which shall be logged pursuant to the

22

SCHEDULING ORDER).

23

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 48:

24

ALL COMMUNICATIONS that refer or RELATE TO Clickability, Inc. (excluding any

25

assertedly privileged COMMUNICATIONS, which shall be logged pursuant to the

26

SCHEDULING ORDER).

27

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 49:

28

ALL COMMUNICATIONS between YOU and Steven Gibson.
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

11

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 50:
ALL COMMUNICATIONS between YOU and Charles Coons.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 51:
ALL COMMUNICATIONS between YOU and Joseph Chu.
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 52:
ALL COMMUNICATIONS between YOU and Carlyn Dilger
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 53:
ALL COMMUNICATIONS between YOU and Jackson Farrow
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 54:
ALL COMMUNICATIONS between YOU and Kathy Bryant
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 55:
ALL COMMUNICATIONS between YOU and Warren Stephens
DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 56:
ALL contracts, agreements, investment DOCUMENTS, or other terms between YOU and

15

Righthaven.

16

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 57:

17

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO the agreement referenced by Mark

18

Hinueber on KUAR FM 89.1 on or around Sep. 29, 2010 when he said “Righthaven’s made the

19

decision that based on their agreement with us, they're not going to send [cease and desist]

20

notices.”

21

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 58:

22

ALL COMMUNICATIONS referenced by Mark Hinueber when he noted that “many

23

websites ask permission before posting the paper’s articles, and that he routinely grants such

24

permissions” in the article available at

25

http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202466627090

26

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 59:

27

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO the investment referenced by Mark

28

Hinueber when he said “the investment in Righthaven was made by a company affiliated with the
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

12

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1

Stephens family” in the article originally published at

2

http://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2010/aug/26/firm-holds-websites-law-20100826/

3

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 60:

4

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO any rights or agreements referenced by

5

Mark Hinueber when he said “I can tell Righthaven not to sue somebody” in the article originally

6

published at http://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2010/aug/26/firm-holds-websites-law-

7

20100826/

8

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 61:

9

ALL COMMUNICATIONS received by YOU in response to Sherman Frederick’s

10

statement “If you’d like find out more about working with Righthaven to protect your

11

copyrighted material or you would like to inquire about using any of my company’s content, you

12

may do so by contacting our general counsel, Mark Hinueber, at

13

[e-mail]” published at

14

http://www.lvrj.com/blogs/sherm/Copyright_theft_Were_not_taking_it_anymore.html

15

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 62:

16

Any COMMUNICATIONS sent in response to the COMMUNICATIONS to

17

[e-mail] referenced in the preceding Request.

18

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 63:

19

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO Sherman Frederick’s columns published

20

in the LVRJ concerning Righthaven, including but not limited to Copyright theft: We’re not

21

taking it anymore, Las Vegas Review-Journal, (May 28, 2010); Protecting newspaper content --

22

You either do it, or you don't, Las Vegas Review-Journal, (Sept. 1, 2010); Protecting Newspaper

23

Content II: Thieves are thieves, Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sep. 2, 2010).

24

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 64:

25

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO the “Privacy Statement,” currently located

26

at www.stephensmedia.com/privacy-statement/, including all versions of the Privacy Statement.

27

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 65:

28

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO the comment policy set forth at
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

13

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)

1

http://www.lvrj.com/home/6729126.html, including all versions of the comment policy.

2

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 66:

3

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO the “Share & Save” feature for articles on

4

the LVRJ WEBSITE.

5

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 67:

6

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO the robots.txt file located at

7

www.lvrj.com/robots.txt, including the version of the file published on May 13, 2010.

8

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 68:

9

The version of the http://www.lvrj.com/templates/news-sitemap.xml file that was present

10

on May 13, 2010.

11

DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 69:

12

ALL DOCUMENTS that refer or RELATE TO the facts underlying YOUR statement on

13

page 2 of Docket 38 that “Stephens Media’s involvement with Righthaven…is limited to its role

14

as the assignor of the subject copyright.”

15
16

Dated: December 17, 2010

FENWICK & WEST LLP

17
18

By:

19

/s/ Clifford C. Webb
CLIFFORD C. WEBB, ESQ

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, and
Defendant DAVID ALLEN

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DU’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION

14

CASE NO. 10-CV-01356-RLH (RJJ)