Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC et al
Filing
96
DECLARATION of CLIFFORD C. WEBB In Support of Defendant Democratic Underground, LLC's First Motion to Compel the Production of Documents re 95 First MOTION to Compel the Production of Documents By Defendant Democratic Underground, LLC and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof ; filed by Defendants David Allen, Democratic Underground, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit AA, # 28 Exhibit BB, # 29 Exhibit CC, # 30 Exhibit DD, # 31 Exhibit EE, # 32 Exhibit FF)(Webb, Cliff)
EXHIBIT I
Jennifer Johnson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jennifer Johnson
Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:29 PM
'shawn@manganolaw.com'
'Kurt Opsahl'; Laurence Pulgram; Clifford Webb; 'Colby Williams'
RE: Righthaven v. DU
Shawn,
I write to clarify one point from my previous letter of February 10, 2011 memorializing our meet and confer regarding
Righthaven’s discovery responses. Among other topics, we discussed Righthaven’s objection to a number of Requests
for Production on the grounds that they did not state a time period for the requested materials. We had discussed the
possibility of limiting those requests to January 1, 2010 through the present and you indicated that Righthaven would
agree to that limitation. However, a number of the requests that Righthaven objected to on this basis relate to matters
for which pre‐2010 discovery would be crucial, including the formation of Righthaven and its relationship with Stephens
Media and potential market harm under a fair use analysis. Specifically, Request for Production Nos. 29, 56 and 57 are
likely to lead to the discovery of admissible information concerning the market harm analysis and Request for
Production Nos. 31, 33‐35, 38 and 41‐45 are likely to lead admissible information concerning the formation of
Righthaven and its relationship with Stephens Media.
For this limited set of requests, Democratic Underground needs documents created prior to January 1, 2010 and instead
proposes that they be limited to January 1, 2009 through the present. Democratic Underground believes that
documents may have been created that are relevant and responsive to these requests which are in the possession,
custody, or control of Righthaven, even if they were originally created prior to Righthaven’s formation. Please let us
know if Righthaven will agree to drop its objection to these requests on this basis of this modified time limitation.
Regards,
Jennifer
JENNIFER J. JOHNSON
Fenwick & West LLP
Associate, Litigation Group
(415) 875-2391
(415) 281-1350
jjjohnson@fenwick.com
From: Jennifer Johnson
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 7:26 PM
To: 'shawn@manganolaw.com'
Cc: 'Kurt Opsahl'; Laurence Pulgram; Clifford Webb; 'Colby Williams'
Subject: Righthaven v. DU
Shawn,
1
Please see the attached correspondence summarizing our meet and confer.
Best,
Jennifer
JENNIFER J. JOHNSON
Fenwick & West LLP
Associate, Litigation Group
(415) 875-2391
(415) 281-1350
jjjohnson@fenwick.com
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?