In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation

Filing 4583

JUDICIAL CONSENT ORDER AS TO GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC.; LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION individually and as f/k/a, d/b/a and/or successor in liability to Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc., Lukoil North America LLC and/or Lukoil OilCompany; LUKOIL NORTH AMERICA LLC, individually and as f/k/a, d/b/a and/or successor in liability to Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Lukoil Americas Corporation and/or OAO Lukoil; LUKOIL OIL COMPANY, a/k/a OAO Lukoil a/k/a Public Joint Stock Company Oil Company LUKOIL a/k/a/PJSC Oil Company Lukoil, individually and as f/k/a, d/b/a and/or successor in liability to GettyPetroleum Marketing Inc., Lukoil Americas Corporation and/or Lukoil North America LLC; LUKOIL PAN AMERICAS, LLC ONLY:THEREFORE, with the consent of the Parties to this JCO,it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Within fourteen (14) Days after the effective date of this JCO, GPMI and/or the Lukoil Defendants shall pay, or cause to be paid on their behalf, the Plaintiffs Twenty Two Million Dollars ($22,000,000.00) in full and complete satisfaction of Plaintiffs' claims that are released or for which a covenant not to sue is provided in Section VI of the JCO. Nothing contained in this JCO shall be considered an admission by the Settling Defendants, or a finding by the Plaintiffs or this Court, of any wrongdoing or liability on the Settling Defendants' part. Within thirty days of the Plaintiffs' receipt of payment as set forth in Section V above, Plaintiffs shall request that the Court dismiss this Complaint as to GPMI and the Lukoil Defendants with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a) (2). The Parties to this JCO agree that it was negotiated fairly between them at arms' length and that the final terms of this JCO shall be deemed to have been jointly and equally drafted by them, and that the provisions of this JCO therefore should not be construed against a Party to it on the grounds that the Party drafted or was more responsible for drafting the provision(s) and further set forth in this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 3/27/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit, # 18 Exhibit, # 19 Exhibit, # 20 Exhibit, # 21 Exhibit, # 22 Exhibit, # 23 Exhibit, # 24 Exhibit, # 25 Exhibit, # 26 Exhibit, # 27 Exhibit, # 28 Exhibit, # 29 Exhibit, # 30 Exhibit, # 31 Exhibit, # 32 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 1:00-cv-01898-VSB, 1:08-cv-00312-VSB-DCF (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:08-cv-00312-VSB-DCF Document 593 Filed 02/27/20 Page 6 of 30 liability and contained in asserted the various Complaint. defenses GPMI and to the the allegations Lukoil Defendants represent that they do not, as of the effective date of this JCO, utilize or knowingly distribute MTBE as an additive to gasoline in New Jersey. The L. recognize, Parties to this Judicial Consent Order and this Court by entering this JCO finds, (~JCO") that the Parties to this JCO have negotiated this JCO in good faith; that the implementation of this JCO will allow the Parties to this JCO to avoid continued, prolonged, that this JCO is fair, and complicated litigation; and reasonable, and in the public interest. THEREFORE, with the consent of the Parties to this JCO, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED: II. JURISDICTION 1. This case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d) and the Energy Policy Act of 2005, expressly authorized the 42 U.S.C. removal of § 7545, et seq., which legal actions related to allegations involving MTBE contamination, and then assigned to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as part of the Multi-District Litigation. Part of the litigation was remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. 6 Case 1:08-cv-00312-VSB-DCF Document 593 Filed 02/27/20 Page 7 of 30 2. For purposes of approving and implementing this JCO, the Parties to this have to the JCO waive all objections and defenses they may jurisdiction of this Court and the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey over the Parties and this JCO. The Parties shall not challenge the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York or the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to enforce this JCO against the parties to this JCO. III. PARTIES BOUND This JCO applies to, and is binding upon, the Plaintiffs 3. and the named Settling Defendants, as defined below ( each, a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties"). IV. DEFINITIONS Unless otherwise expressly provided, terms used in this 4. JCO that are defined in the Spill promulgated under the Spill Act, regulatory meaning. Act or in the regulations shall have their statutory or Whenever the terms listed below are used in this JCO, the following definitions shall apply: "Damages" shall mean all damages caused by discharges of MTBE prior to the effective date of this JCO, whether or not known or suspected to exist by Plaintiffs, that at any time threaten or affect waters of New Jersey, including but not limited to natural resource damages, sought in the 7 Complaint. "Damages" do not Case 1:08-cv-00312-VSB-DCF Document 593 Filed 02/27/20 Page 8 of 30 include Settling Defendants' obligation to perform Remediation except for those matters expressly released or for which a covenant not to sue is granted in Paragraph 6(b) Damages also do below. not include Past Cleanup and Removal Costs or Future Cleanup and Removal Costs, except for those matters expressly released in Paragraph 6(b) below or for which a covenant not to sue is granted in Paragraph 6(b) below. "Day" shall mean a calendar day unless expressly stated to be a Working Day. "Working Day" shall mean Saturday, Sunday, or State holiday. a day other than a In computing time under this JCO, where the last day would fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or State holiday, time shall run until the close of business of the next Working Day. ~Defendant's Site" means any site in New Jersey for which a Settling Defendant is in any way responsible for MTBE discharged at that site unless such responsibility is based solely upon a Settling Defendant's Upstream Activities. "Future Cleanup and Removal Costs" shall mean all direct and indirect costs of any kind for any purpose the Plaintiffs incur on or after the effective date of this JCO, including oversight costs, with respect to MTBE that threatens or affects the waters of New Jersey for which GPMI responsible under any or any of applicable regulation or order. 8 the Lukoil federal or Defendants state are statute, Case 1:08-cv-00312-VSB-DCF Document 593 Filed 02/27/20 Page 9 of 30 "MTBE" shall mean methyl tertiary butyl ether, neat or as a part of gasoline degradation or as byproducts tertiary butyl alcohol a of contaminant commercial ("TBA"). of other grade fuel, MTBE, and the including In addition, MTBE shall include TBA when TBA is present in MTBE gasoline. "Paragraph" shall mean a portion of this JCO identified by an Arabic numeral or an upper case letter. "Past Cleanup and Removal Costs" shall mean all direct and indirect costs of any kind for any purpose the Plaintiffs incurred before the effective date of this JCO, including oversight costs, with respect to MTBE that threatens or affects the waters of New Jersey for which GPMI responsible under any or any of applicable the Lukoil federal or Defendants state are statute, regulation or order. "Plaintiffs" shall mean plaintiffs DEP, the Commissioner, and the Administrator, including in their capacities as described in paragraphs 14 to 18 of the Complaint, and any successor department, agency or official. Plaintiffs hereby represent and warrant that they have the power and authority to enter into this Agreement. "Remediation" shall mean compliance with the Administrative Requirements for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites, N.J.A.C. 7:26C, or any successor regulation, and all of the then-applicable remediation standards pursuant to N.J.S.A. 58:lOB-12 and N.J.A.C. 7:26D, or any successor regulation. 9 Remediation does not include Case 1:08-cv-00312-VSB-DCF Document 593 Filed 02/27/20 Page 10 of 30 restoration to pre-discharge conditions (primary restoration) beyond what is necessary to comply with the applicable remediation standards pursuant to N.J.S.A. 58:lOB-12 and N.J.A.C. 7:26D. Remediation also does not include any liability to comply with the Administrative Requirements for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites, N.J.A.C. 7:26C, or any successor regulation, and all of the then-applicable remediation standards pursuant to N.J.S.A. 58:lOB/ 12 and N.J.A.C. 7:26D, or any successor regulation based solely upon Upstream Activities, and nothing herein shall be deemed an admission by Settling Defendants that such liability can be based on Upstream Activities. "Section" shall mean a portion of this JCO identified by a roman numeral. "Settling claims was made Defendants" against means insurance GPMI (including policies under insured), LAC, LNA, PJSC LUKOIL, and LPA, Plaintiffs' which GPMI and each of GPMI's and the Lukoil Defendants' related entities, as well as GPMI's and the Lukoil employees, Defendants' parent predecessors, companies, predecessors officers, in directors, interest, parents, successors, successors in interest and subsidiaries. No other party named as a defendant related in the entity Fifth Amended considered a of Defendants. Getty Properties Corp. GPMI or Complaint any of shall the be Lukoil and its related entities are specifically excluded from the definition of Settling Defendants 10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?