O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al

Filing 233

Deposition Designations by Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Bojedla, Swathi) (Filed on 6/20/2014) Modified on 6/23/2014 (kcS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
MICHAEL P. LEHMANN (SBN 77152) 1 mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com BRUCE J. WECKER (SBN 78530) 2 bwecker@hausfeldllp.com ARTHUR N. BAILEY, JR. (SBN 248460) 3 abailey@hausfeldllp.com HAUSFELD LLP 4 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400 San Francisco, California 94104 5 Telephone: (415) 633-1908 Facsimile: (415) 358-4980 6 MICHAEL D. HAUSFELD (pro hac vice) 7 mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com HILARY K. SCHERRER (SBN 209451) 8 hscherrer@hausfeldllp.com SATHYA S. GOSSELIN (SBN 269171) 9 sgosselin@hausfeldllp.com SWATHI BOJEDLA (pro hac vice) 10 sbojedla@hausfeldllp.com HAUSFELD LLP 11 1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650 Washington, D.C. 20006 12 Telephone: (202) 540-7200 Facsimile: (202) 540-7201 13 Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 Case No. 09-cv-3329-CW EDWARD C. O’BANNON, JR. on behalf of 18 himself and all others similarly situated, 19 20 ANTITRUST PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Plaintiffs, Judge: Crtrm: v. Hon. Claudia Wilken 2, 4th Floor 21 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION (NCAA); ELECTRONIC 22 ARTS, INC.; and COLLEGIATE LICENSING COMPANY, 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 09-CV-3329-CW APS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 1 Plaintiffs hereby submit the attached deposition declarations for use in their case-in-chief. 2 The following depositions have been designated by the Plaintiffs: 3 1. Exhibit A – Robert Beebe 4 2. Exhibit B – David Berst 5 3. Exhibit C – Walter Byers (White v. NCAA) 6 4. Exhibit D – Walter Byers (written question) 7 5. Exhibit E – Bo Kerin 8 6. Exhibit F – Wallace Renfro 9 7. Exhibit G – Jeremy Strauser 10 8. Exhibit H – John Swofford 11 9. Exhibit I – John Welty 12 Pursuant to the Court’s request that each witness be presented only once, the parties have 13 agreed to present joint deposition designations for any witness for whom both parties have 14 designated testimony in their case. In order to distinguish the different designations, Plaintiffs 15 have highlighted their affirmative designations in yellow, with the NCAA’s counter-designations 16 in pink and any rebuttal designations in green. For each deposition where the NCAA has also 17 designated the witness in its own case, the NCAA has highlighted its affirmative designations in 18 gray, with Plaintiffs’ counter-designations in red and any rebuttal designations in orange. 19 20 Respectfully submitted, 21 By: /s/ Swathi Bojedla Michael D. Hausfeld (pro hac vice) Hilary K. Scherrer (Cal. Bar No. 209451) Sathya S. Gosselin (Cal. Bar. No. 269171) HAUSFELD LLP 1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 540-7200 Facsimile: (202) 540-7201 E-mail:mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com hscherrer@hausfeldllp.com sgosselin@hausfeldllp.com sbojedla@hausfeldllp.com 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1APS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 09-CV-3329-CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Michael P. Lehmann (Cal. Bar No. 77152) Arthur N. Bailey, Jr. (Cal. Bar No. 248460) HAUSFELD LLP 44 Montgomery St., 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 633-1908 Facsimile: (415) 358-4980 E-mail:mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com abailey@hausfeldllp.com Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel with Principal Responsibility for the Antitrust Claims 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2APS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 09-CV-3329-CW 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 I hereby certify that on June 20, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to the e-mail 4 addresses registered. 5 6 7 8 By: _/s/Swathi Bojedla_____ Swathi Bojedla 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3APS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 09-CV-3329-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?