O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
Filing
233
Deposition Designations by Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Bojedla, Swathi) (Filed on 6/20/2014) Modified on 6/23/2014 (kcS, COURT STAFF).
MICHAEL P. LEHMANN (SBN 77152)
1 mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com
BRUCE J. WECKER (SBN 78530)
2 bwecker@hausfeldllp.com
ARTHUR N. BAILEY, JR. (SBN 248460)
3 abailey@hausfeldllp.com
HAUSFELD LLP
4 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400
San Francisco, California 94104
5 Telephone:
(415) 633-1908
Facsimile:
(415) 358-4980
6
MICHAEL D. HAUSFELD (pro hac vice)
7 mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com
HILARY K. SCHERRER (SBN 209451)
8 hscherrer@hausfeldllp.com
SATHYA S. GOSSELIN (SBN 269171)
9 sgosselin@hausfeldllp.com
SWATHI BOJEDLA (pro hac vice)
10 sbojedla@hausfeldllp.com
HAUSFELD LLP
11 1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650
Washington, D.C. 20006
12 Telephone:
(202) 540-7200
Facsimile:
(202) 540-7201
13
Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
Case No. 09-cv-3329-CW
EDWARD C. O’BANNON, JR. on behalf of
18 himself and all others similarly situated,
19
20
ANTITRUST PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITION
DESIGNATIONS
Plaintiffs,
Judge:
Crtrm:
v.
Hon. Claudia Wilken
2, 4th Floor
21 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC
ASSOCIATION (NCAA); ELECTRONIC
22 ARTS, INC.; and COLLEGIATE
LICENSING COMPANY,
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
09-CV-3329-CW
APS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
1
Plaintiffs hereby submit the attached deposition declarations for use in their case-in-chief.
2 The following depositions have been designated by the Plaintiffs:
3
1. Exhibit A – Robert Beebe
4
2. Exhibit B – David Berst
5
3. Exhibit C – Walter Byers (White v. NCAA)
6
4. Exhibit D – Walter Byers (written question)
7
5. Exhibit E – Bo Kerin
8
6. Exhibit F – Wallace Renfro
9
7. Exhibit G – Jeremy Strauser
10
8. Exhibit H – John Swofford
11
9. Exhibit I – John Welty
12
Pursuant to the Court’s request that each witness be presented only once, the parties have
13 agreed to present joint deposition designations for any witness for whom both parties have
14 designated testimony in their case. In order to distinguish the different designations, Plaintiffs
15 have highlighted their affirmative designations in yellow, with the NCAA’s counter-designations
16 in pink and any rebuttal designations in green. For each deposition where the NCAA has also
17 designated the witness in its own case, the NCAA has highlighted its affirmative designations in
18 gray, with Plaintiffs’ counter-designations in red and any rebuttal designations in orange.
19
20
Respectfully submitted,
21
By: /s/ Swathi Bojedla
Michael D. Hausfeld (pro hac vice)
Hilary K. Scherrer (Cal. Bar No. 209451)
Sathya S. Gosselin (Cal. Bar. No. 269171)
HAUSFELD LLP
1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 540-7200
Facsimile: (202) 540-7201
E-mail:mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com
hscherrer@hausfeldllp.com
sgosselin@hausfeldllp.com
sbojedla@hausfeldllp.com
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1APS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
09-CV-3329-CW
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Michael P. Lehmann (Cal. Bar No. 77152)
Arthur N. Bailey, Jr. (Cal. Bar No. 248460)
HAUSFELD LLP
44 Montgomery St., 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 633-1908
Facsimile: (415) 358-4980
E-mail:mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com
abailey@hausfeldllp.com
Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel with Principal
Responsibility for the Antitrust Claims
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2APS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
09-CV-3329-CW
1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3
I hereby certify that on June 20, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the
Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to the e-mail
4
addresses registered.
5
6
7
8
By: _/s/Swathi Bojedla_____
Swathi Bojedla
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3APS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
09-CV-3329-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?