O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
Filing
233
Deposition Designations by Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Bojedla, Swathi) (Filed on 6/20/2014) Modified on 6/23/2014 (kcS, COURT STAFF).
EXHIBIT E
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
Case No. 4:09-cv-1967 CW
3
----------------------------------x
4
The NCAA objects to plaintiffs' affirmative
designations of Mr. Kerin's testimony on the
grounds that plaintiffs first disclosed these
designations on June 18, 2014, weeks after
the disclosure deadline of April 30, 2014.
IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE
NAME & LIKENESS LICENSING
5
LITIGATION
6
----------------------------------x
December 12, 2012
7
9:03 a.m.
8
9
- HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY -
10
11
Videotaped deposition of BO KERIN, held at the
12
offices of Munsch, Hardt, Kopf & Harr, PC, 401 Congress
13
Avenue, Suite 3050, Austin, Texas, pursuant to Notice
14
before Steven Stogel, Texas Certified Shorthand Reporter
15
No. 6174
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
212-279-9424
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 5
1
plaintiffs.
2
3
MR. WIERENGA:
Bob Wierenga for the NCAA
and the witness.
4
MR. SLAUGHTER:
Jamie Slaughter for EA.
5
MR. HENN:
6
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
Charlie Henn for CLC.
At this time our court
7
reporter, Steven Stogel, representing Veritext, will
8
swear in the witness, and we can proceed.
9
10
13
BO KERIN,
having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
Q.
212-279-9424
Good morning, Mr. Kerin.
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 6
7
8
Q.
Do you recognize what I just handed you as a
copy of your public LinkedIn profile?
9
A.
Yes, I do.
10
Q.
And do you see there's a section entitled "Bo
11
Kerin's Experience"?
12
A.
Yes, I do.
13
Q.
Did you draft that section?
14
A.
I did.
15
Q.
And is this an accurate description of the
16
17
18
19
20
positions you've held and the dates indicated?
A.
Fairly accurate, yes.
Abbreviated, but
accurate.
Q.
Okay.
And is this an accurate description of
the responsibilities and experiences you had in those
21
23
Q.
In looking at the bottom of the page, do you
24
see where it says "Assistant/Associate Director of
25
Membership Services"?
212-279-9424
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 7
1
A.
Yes.
2
Q.
So it sounds like you had two positions during
3
that period of November 2001 to 2007?
4
A.
That's correct.
5
Q.
And what were -- what were your
6
responsibilities as an assistant director for membership
7
services?
8
9
A.
It was a lot of phone work, answering phone
calls from the general public, from the membership,
10
assisting them in understanding and correctly applying
11
NCAA rules.
12
waivers such as initial eligibility, continuing
13
eligibility, worked with athletic certification team for
14
Division 1, conducted compliance reviews.
15
supervisory responsibilities associated with that
16
position, which was different from the associate
17
athletics director position.
18
associate director, I tended to focus more in certain
19
areas, whereas an assistant director, you could be
20
working on ten different project teams with not a lot of
21
focus.
22
23
24
25
Q.
I did a lot of waiver work for academic
There was no
So being promoted to
What were the areas that you then focused on
as associate director?
A.
Primarily in interpretations, recruiting
Division 1 membership.
212-279-9424
I continued to do work with
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 8
1
Division 2 compliance reviews, but those were the main
2
focuses, working as liaison to several committees.
3
then internally working and training new staff members,
4
continuing education of the existing staff.
5
6
7
Q.
And
And what were the committees that you
liaisoned with?
A.
I worked on the former academic eligibility
8
compliance cabinet recruiting -- Division 1 recruiting
9
subcommittee, Division 1 championships, competition
10
cabinet, events -- I can't remember the exact name of
11
the -- of the committee, but I worked with certified
12
events, certified contests, and also with the Division 1
13
membership committee.
14
Q.
Any others that you can remember?
15
A.
No.
I probably had some before that that I
16
don't remember, but those were the main ones that I
17
worked with for a good amount of time.
18
Q.
In looking at that heading, do you see where
19
it says, "Develop legislation designed to advance one or
20
more of the Association's basic principles for the
21
conduct of intercollegiate athletics"?
22
A.
Uh-huh.
23
Q.
What legislation were you referring to there?
24
A.
212-279-9424
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 10
1
2
discussions and things -- things of that nature.
Q.
And so if you recall, which -- what
3
legislation actually made it into a proposal form as
4
you --
5
6
A.
I
mean, I couldn't even begin to --
7
Q.
8
402
Oh, there were numerous -- numerous ones.
A.
9
Q.
Are we talking dozens?
Continuing looking at this paragraph, do you
10
see where you state, "and understand the legal and other
11
implications of NCAA rules"?
12
phrase.
13
the legal and other implications of NCAA rules."
And I'll quote the full
"Apply and interpret legislation and understand
14
Do you see that?
15
A.
Yes.
16
Q.
What did you mean by "understand the legal
17
18
implications of NCAA rules"?
A.
Well, I think anytime as a responsible
19
employee you try to get the big picture of how things
20
bubble up, and although I'm not an attorney, we work
21
with -- you know, we had several attorneys -- or
22
individuals with law degrees on staff, and so you try to
23
get an overall understanding of what the effect of this
24
rule might be, identify when it would be appropriate to
25
seek legal counsel's advice on a particular issue.
212-279-9424
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 101
1
training.ppt."
2
A.
Uh-huh.
3
Q.
Is it your understanding that "ppt" means
6
Q.
Okay.
7
Now, looking at Exhibit 730, is this
the PowerPoint that you had attached to that email?
8
A.
I can't be overly sure that it is.
9
Q.
Okay.
10
MS. STEINER:
I'll note for the record
11
that this email is Bates stamped NCAAPROD00474881
12
through 925, which is the next sequential numbers to
13
Exhibit 729.
15
Q.
16
17
Do you know if you were the author of this
PowerPoint deck?
A.
I don't know.
These -- this appears to be
18
part of a staff training program for new staff members,
19
and these PowerPoints get -- they reside in a folder on
20
the server, and they become updated over time by
21
numerous staff members.
22
23
Q.
Okay.
As part of your job responsibilities,
you did new staff training?
24
A.
Yes.
25
Q.
And is this the type of PowerPoint you would
212-279-9424
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 102
1
use to train staff?
2
A.
Yes.
3
Q.
When you did staff training using PowerPoints,
4
did anyone assist you?
5
A.
In some cases, yes.
6
Q.
What are those instances you're thinking of
7
where you had somebody else assist you in training?
8
A.
I don't recall specifically.
9
Q.
Did Scott Bearby ever co-present with you in
10
terms of staff training?
11
12
13
14
15
MR. WIERENGA:
A.
I don't recall.
It would not be likely.
BY MS. STEINER:
Q.
Do you -- do you recall any in-house NCAA
counsel assisting you in staff training?
16
17
Object to the form.
MR. WIERENGA:
A.
Same objection.
I definitely recall, although I don't recall
18
when, Scott -- it would not be -- that he would have
19
come to a staff meeting to present on various issues.
20
What those issues were, I don't recall, and I don't
21
recall that he was part of any formal training.
22
wasn't a Scott Bearby session.
23
BY MS. STEINER:
24
There
Q.
212-279-9424
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 105
402
2
3
10
Q.
Okay.
Do you agree with the statement that
the student-athlete has the right of publicity?
A.
I don't -- I just -- I don't really have an
11
opinion on it.
12
not my area of expertise.
13
whether I agree with that or not.
15
Q.
I mean, that's a legal issue, and that's
I've never thought about
During your time at the NCAA from 2001 to
16
2007, you had no opinion about whether a student-athlete
17
has the right of publicity?
18
19
A.
I never had an occasion to form one.
They
either do or they don't.
20
Q.
You never thought about it?
21
A.
No.
22
Q.
You never cared what the answer was?
23
A.
I cared --
25
A.
I cared to the effect that if it impacted my
212-279-9424
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 106
402
1
job, I would need to know what that was.
2
rarely did, so I did -- I never -- I never gave it --
3
gave it much thought.
4
BY MS. STEINER:
5
6
Q.
At any time when you were at the NCAA national
office, did you receive any antitrust training?
7
8
9
But it very
MR. WIERENGA:
You can answer this
question "yes" or "no" or "I don't know."
A.
I -- I mean, we -- we had so many training
10
sessions, you know, throughout my time there -- I don't
11
specifically recall antitrust training.
12
there wasn't one.
13
BY MS. STEINER:
14
Q.
It doesn't mean
Do you recall having any training with
15
relationship to how the actual laws of this country
16
apply to the laws that the NCAA had instituted through
17
their rules and interpretations and so on?
18
19
20
MR. WIERENGA:
foundation.
A.
No, I don't -- I don't recall.
21
22
23
Object to the form,
(Exhibit No. 731 marked)
BY MS. STEINER:
Q.
212-279-9424
You've been given a document marked
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 131
1
foundation.
2
3
THE WITNESS:
6
Repeat the
question.
4
5
I'm sorry.
(The requested portion was read by the
reporter)
A.
I think it would have been irresponsible to
7
not be sensitive at all times to the position of our
8
corporate partners.
9
policy, I'm not aware of anything of that nature, but as
10
with any other partner, you would be irresponsible as an
13
14
And so -- I mean, as a matter of
(Exhibit No. 735 marked)
BY MS. STEINER:
15
Q.
I'm showing you what's been marked as
16
Exhibit 735.
It's Bates stamped NCAAPROD00107857
17
through 859.
Do you see that?
18
Can you identify for the record what this
19
document is?
20
A.
Yes.
This was a form that CBA would fill out
21
and submit to membership services to request a response
22
to an interpretive issue.
23
24
25
Q.
response.
A.
212-279-9424
On Page 2, it seems that you wrote the
Is that correct?
Let's see.
Yes.
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 132
1
2
3
4
5
6
Q.
Why is it that this would have been routed to
A.
I was one of the ILT contacts for the CBA
you?
group.
Q.
Okay.
And you write that this particular
request is permissible.
7
A.
Yes.
8
Q.
Okay.
Correct?
9
10
And you also write, "Obviously, 2K
would need permission from all the former
student-athletes, but we'll leave that to them."
11
Do you see that?
12
A.
I do.
13
Q.
Why was it your opinion that 2K needed
14
15
permission from all the former student-athletes?
A.
I mean, NCAA rules outline what applies to
16
student-athletes with remaining eligibility.
17
that, whatever federal, local, and state laws apply to
18
publicity, that's on the student-athlete to do whatever
19
they need to do.
20
example -- an on-campus example.
21
Outside of
I mean, it's -- I'll give you an
If an outside entity uses the picture of
22
a student-athlete to promote that they're televising the
23
game, the institution is required -- and, of course,
24
212-279-9424
VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
www.veritext.com
212-490-3430
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?