Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 925

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460 filed by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Erica Tierney in Support of Apple's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #2 Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Apple's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #3 Proposed Order Granting Apple Inc.'s Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #4 Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460, #5 Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460, #6 Exhibit 1, #7 Exhibit 2, #8 Exhibit 3, #9 Exhibit 4, #10 Exhibit 5, #11 Exhibit 6, #12 Exhibit 7, #13 Exhibit 8, #14 Exhibit 9, #15 Exhibit 10, #16 Exhibit 11, #17 Exhibit 12, #18 Exhibit 13, #19 Exhibit 14, #20 Exhibit 15, #21 Exhibit 16, #22 Exhibit 17, #23 Exhibit 18, #24 Exhibit 19, #25 Exhibit 20, #26 Exhibit 21, #27 Exhibit 22, #28 Exhibit 23, #29 Exhibit 24, #30 Exhibit 25, #31 Exhibit 26, #32 [Proposed] Order Granting Apple Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 5/17/2012) Modified on 5/21/2012 attachment #1 and 2 sealed pursuant to General Order No. 62 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 7 8 9 WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice) william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 22 23 24 APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendants. 20 21 Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, 25 v. 26 27 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Counterclaim-Defendant. 28 APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK) 1 2 3 In accordance with Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) moves for an order to seal the following documents: 1. Confidential portions of Apple’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary 4 Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. 5 Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460, filed herewith. 6 2. Exhibits 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12-17, 22 and 26 to the Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in 7 Support of Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed herewith. 8 Items 1 and 2 of the above documents contain information that Samsung has designated 9 as confidential under the protective order. Apple expects that pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79- 10 5(d), Samsung will file a declaration, and accompanying Proposed Order, attempting to establish 11 good cause to permit the sealing of these materials. 12 Items 1 and 2 of the above documents also contain information that is Apple-confidential 13 as set out in the Declaration of Erica Tierney in Support of Apple’s Administrative Motion to 14 File Documents Under Seal (“Tierney Declaration”), filed herewith. As described in the Tierney 15 Declaration, this motion requests relief that is necessary and narrowly tailored to protect only 16 that confidential information. It is Apple’s policy not to disclose or describe its confidential 17 design and product development information. (Tierney Declaration ¶ 3.) This information is 18 highly confidential to Apple. (Id.) The information described above could be used by Apple’s 19 competitors to Apple’s disadvantage if disclosed publicly. (Id.) The relief requested in this 20 motion is necessary and is narrowly tailored to protect confidential information, focusing only on 21 specific portions of the documents at issue. (Id. ¶ 4.) 22 Items 1 and 2 of the above documents also contain information that is confidential to 23 Intel as set out in the Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Apple’s Administrative 24 Motion to File Documents Under Seal (“Selwyn Declaration”), filed herewith. As described in 25 the Selwyn Declaration, this motion requests relief that is necessary and narrowly tailored to 26 protect only that confidential information. (Selwyn Declaration ¶ 3.) 27 28 -1- APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK) 1 Pursuant to the Court’s standing order regarding motions to file under seal, effective 2 December 1, 2011, attached is the proposed public redacted versions of Item 1 that Apple is 3 seeking to file under seal. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-(c), Apple will lodge with the Clerk the 4 document at issue with the sealable portions highlighted. 5 Because Exhibits 4, 5 and 9 may also contain Samsung confidential information and were 6 marked “Highly Confidential” by Samsung, Apple is not lodging proposed public redacted 7 versions of those documents. Apple will coordinate with Samsung to lodge the public redacted 8 versions concurrently with Samsung’s declaration in support of this motion. 9 10 Pursuant to General Order No. 62, Apple’s entire filing will be lodged with the Court for in camera review and served on all parties. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: May 17, 2012 /s/ Mark. D Selwyn Mark D. Selwyn (SBN 244180) (mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 William F. Lee (admitted pro hac vice) (william.lee@wilmerhale.com) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Harold J. McElhinny (SBN 66781) (HMcElhinny@mofo.com) Michael A. Jacobs (SBN 111664) (MJacobs@mofo.com) Richard S.J. Hung (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: ( 415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK) 1 2 3 4 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on May 17, 2012 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5.4. Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery. 6 7 /s/ Mark. D Selwyn Mark D. Selwyn 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?