Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 925

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460 filed by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Erica Tierney in Support of Apple's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #2 Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Apple's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #3 Proposed Order Granting Apple Inc.'s Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, #4 Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460, #5 Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460, #6 Exhibit 1, #7 Exhibit 2, #8 Exhibit 3, #9 Exhibit 4, #10 Exhibit 5, #11 Exhibit 6, #12 Exhibit 7, #13 Exhibit 8, #14 Exhibit 9, #15 Exhibit 10, #16 Exhibit 11, #17 Exhibit 12, #18 Exhibit 13, #19 Exhibit 14, #20 Exhibit 15, #21 Exhibit 16, #22 Exhibit 17, #23 Exhibit 18, #24 Exhibit 19, #25 Exhibit 20, #26 Exhibit 21, #27 Exhibit 22, #28 Exhibit 23, #29 Exhibit 24, #30 Exhibit 25, #31 Exhibit 26, #32 [Proposed] Order Granting Apple Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 5/17/2012) Modified on 5/21/2012 attachment #1 and 2 sealed pursuant to General Order No. 62 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 10 WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 22 23 24 25 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendants. 26 27 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN ISO APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK 1 I, Mark D. Selwyn, do hereby declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner with the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 3 and counsel for plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”). I am familiar with 4 and knowledgeable about the facts stated in this declaration and if called upon could and would 5 testify competently as to the statements made herein. 6 2. Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment and exhibits 5 and 7 to the Declaration of 7 Mark D. Selwyn (“Selwyn Declaration”) contain information that third parties have designated 8 confidential. Specifically: 9 A. Exhibit 5 to the Selwyn Declaration is an excerpt from the deposition 10 transcript of Richard D. Wesel, an expert retained by Samsung. Pages 113- 11 119 and 165-166 contain information that Dr. Wesel indicates is based on 12 documents and source code produced by Intel in this action and in ITC Inv. 13 No. 337-794. 14 B. Exhibit 7 to the Selwyn Declaration is the Expert Report of Wayne Stark 15 Regarding Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867. 16 Paragraphs 25-30, 38-39, 52-56, 58-60, 64-67, 72-76, and 85-87 contain 17 information about Intel baseband processors based on documents and 18 source code produced by Intel in this action and in ITC Inv. No. 337-794. 19 C. The confidential, unredacted version of Apple’s Motion for Summary 20 Judgment discusses and references the information contained in paragraphs 21 A-B above, and should therefore be sealed for the same reasons. 22 3. The relief requested in this motion is necessary and is narrowly tailored to protect 23 confidential information, focusing only on specific exhibits and specific portions of the briefs at 24 issue. 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN ISO APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK 1 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 2 the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that this Declaration was 3 executed this 17th day of May, 2012, at Palo Alto, California. 4 5 Dated: May 17, 2012 By: __/s/ Mark. D Selwyn ____________ Mark. D Selwyn 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN ISO APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK 1 2 3 4 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on May 17, 2012 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5.4. Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery. 6 7 /s/ Mark. D Selwyn Mark D. Selwyn 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN ISO APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?