Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 224

MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Regarding Set-Top Box Patents (Nos. 19-22) by Apple, Inc.. Responses due by 2/16/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jill Ho, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C-SEALED, # 5 Exhibit D-SEALED, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N, # 16 Exhibit O, # 17 Exhibit P, # 18 Exhibit Q, # 19 Exhibit R, # 20 Exhibit S, # 21 Exhibit T, # 22 Exhibit U-SEALED, # 23 Exhibit V-SEALED, # 24 Exhibit W-SEALED, # 25 Exhibit X-SEALED, # 26 Exhibit Y-SEALED, # 27 Exhibit Z-SEALED, # 28 Exhibit AA-SEALED, # 29 Exhibit BB-SEALED, # 30 Exhibit CC-SEALED, # 31 Exhibit DD-SEALED, # 32 Text of Proposed Order)(Pace, Christopher)

EXHIBIT K

Ho, Jill
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Harrison, Cody <[e-mail]>
Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:01 PM
Ho, Jill
RE: Bright House Networks

Thanks, Jill.  This is all I need.  Just want to make sure we agree no obligation to do anything now.   

Regards, 

CJH 

From: Ho, Jill [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:39 PM
To: Harrison, Cody
Subject: RE: Bright House Networks

Hi Cody, 

I just left you a voicemail. Given our close of discovery in the middle of January, I cannot agree to withdraw Apple's
subpoena because there will not be enough time for us to serve a new one if it turns out Motorola does not produce the
discovery we need. That said, as I confirmed during our conversation the other day, we would prefer to get discovery
from Motorola rather than bother any third-parties, so we do not plan to actively pursue further information from you at
this time. If we can let the subpoena sit as a placeholder, I should be able to confirm whether we need any discovery from
Bright House after we see what Motorola produces. I'm happy to agree to an extension on Bright House's objections, if
needed. 

Please give me a call if you'd like to discuss. 

Best regards, 
Jill 

Jill Ho

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1134
[e-mail]
[phone] Direct
[phone] Fax 

From: Harrison, Cody [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 8:06 AM
To: Ho, Jill
Subject: Bright House Networks 

Jill, 

1

This is to confirm our conversation that Apple, Inc. will not presently pursue the two third‐party subpoenas issued to 
Bright House Networks by the U.S. District Courts in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Middle District of New 
York, and that Bright House has no obligation to respond to those subpoenas.  We ask that Apple withdraw the two 
subpoenas, with the understanding that it may obtain new subpoenas should it seek information from Bright House in 
the future.  I am also sending to your attention the two $40 subpoena processing checks. 

Feel free to give me a call if needed. 

CJH 

Cody J. Harrison 
Four Times Square 
New York, NY 10036  
tel. [phone] 
fax [phone]  
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it. 

The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email, [e-mail],
and destroy the original message. Thank you.

2