Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Regarding Set-Top Box Patents (Nos. 19-22) by Apple, Inc.. Responses due by 2/16/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jill Ho, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C-SEALED, # 5 Exhibit D-SEALED, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N, # 16 Exhibit O, # 17 Exhibit P, # 18 Exhibit Q, # 19 Exhibit R, # 20 Exhibit S, # 21 Exhibit T, # 22 Exhibit U-SEALED, # 23 Exhibit V-SEALED, # 24 Exhibit W-SEALED, # 25 Exhibit X-SEALED, # 26 Exhibit Y-SEALED, # 27 Exhibit Z-SEALED, # 28 Exhibit AA-SEALED, # 29 Exhibit BB-SEALED, # 30 Exhibit CC-SEALED, # 31 Exhibit DD-SEALED, # 32 Text of Proposed Order)(Pace, Christopher)
Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:00 PM
Cathleen Garrigan (email@example.com); Marshall Searcy
(firstname.lastname@example.org); Moto-Apple-SDFL (Moto-AppleSDFL@quinnemanuel.com)
Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; AppleCov@cov.com
Apple/Motorola (FL): Apple's supplemental interrogatory responses
2012.01.17 Apple's Suppl. Responses to Motorola's 1st Set Interrogatories.pdf;
2012.01.17 Apple's 2nd Suppl. Responses to Motorola's 2nd Set Interrogatories.pdf
Hi Cathleen / Marshall,
Per our agreement, attached are Apple's supplemental responses to Motorola's Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, & 11‐
14. Both of these documents contain Apple CBI. As I have mentioned in prior conversations with Ben & Cathleen, we
have nothing to add to our response to Interrogatory No. 15 as Apple has not marked any of the Apple Accused
Instrumentalities with the patent numbers of the Apple Asserted Patents.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1134
+1 650 802 3163 Direct
+1 650 802 3100 Fax
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?