Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 224

MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Regarding Set-Top Box Patents (Nos. 19-22) by Apple, Inc.. Responses due by 2/16/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jill Ho, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C-SEALED, # 5 Exhibit D-SEALED, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N, # 16 Exhibit O, # 17 Exhibit P, # 18 Exhibit Q, # 19 Exhibit R, # 20 Exhibit S, # 21 Exhibit T, # 22 Exhibit U-SEALED, # 23 Exhibit V-SEALED, # 24 Exhibit W-SEALED, # 25 Exhibit X-SEALED, # 26 Exhibit Y-SEALED, # 27 Exhibit Z-SEALED, # 28 Exhibit AA-SEALED, # 29 Exhibit BB-SEALED, # 30 Exhibit CC-SEALED, # 31 Exhibit DD-SEALED, # 32 Text of Proposed Order)(Pace, Christopher)

EXHIBIT H

Ho, Jill
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Benyacar, David <[e-mail]>
Wednesday, November 30, 2011 4:56 PM
Ho, Jill
Reisner, Daniel
RE: Subpoena to Time Warner Cable (1:10cv023580)

Jill:  This will confirm the agreement we reached today regarding the above‐identified subpoena.  You said that because 
Motorola has 
become more cooperative in discovery, Apple agreed that non‐party Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) could defer any action 
relating to the subpoena 
until such time as Apple determines whether party Motorola will produce the information Apple needs.  Thus, while the 
subpoena  
will remain outstanding, all of TWC’s dates relating to the subpoena, including its dates to respond to, object to and 
comply with the subpoena,  
are postponed indefinitely.   

If, after taking discovery from Motorola, Apple believes there is still information it needs from TWC, you will contact me 
and, if necessary, ask that 
new dates for TWC action relating to the subpoena be set.  Both Apple and TWC otherwise reserve all rights. 

Thank you for your cooperation. 

‐ Dave 

From: Ho, Jill [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:14 PM
To: Benyacar, David
Cc: Reisner, Daniel
Subject: Re: Subpoena to Time Warner Cable (1:10cv023580)

That is fine. Thanks, David.  

Best regards, 
Jill
From: Benyacar, David [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:09 PM
To: Ho, Jill
Cc: Reisner, Daniel <[e-mail]>
Subject: Subpoena to Time Warner Cable (1:10cv023580)

Dear Ms. Ho: 

Further to the voicemail message I left you yesterday, we represent Time Warner Cable (“TWC� ) with respect to the 
non‐party 
subpoena served on it by Apple Inc. in Case No. 1:10cv023580.  TWC would like more time to evaluate the subpoena,  
set forth its objections and ascertain what, if anything, TWC can produce responsive to the requests. 
1

We propose to provide you with complete objections to the subpoena by December 16.  Those objections will set forth 
the types of documents, 
if any, that TWC will search for and produce.  We can discuss at that time whether a deposition is appropriate or 
necessary.  For now, and 
to preserve the record, we advise you that we object to the subpoena at least on the grounds that it is overly broad and 
unduly burdensome,  
seeks privileged information, is vague and ambiguous, provides insufficient time for compliance, and seeks information 
that can and should  
be obtained directly from Motorola. 

I would appreciate it if you would reply to this email confirming that this is acceptable.  Because I am out of the office 
today, please  
copy Dan Reisner, who is cc’d on this email, on your reply. 

Thank you. 

David S. Benyacar  
Kaye Scholer LLP 
_____________________________________ 
425 Park Avenue • New York, New York 10022 
Phone: [phone] · Fax: [phone] 
[e-mail] 
www.kayescholer.com 

*

*

*

*

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with Treasury
Department regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this correspondence (including any attachments) is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email, [e-mail],
and destroy the original message. Thank you.

*

*

*

*

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with Treasury
Department regulations, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this correspondence (including any attachments) is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

2