Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 224

MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Regarding Set-Top Box Patents (Nos. 19-22) by Apple, Inc.. Responses due by 2/16/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jill Ho, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C-SEALED, # 5 Exhibit D-SEALED, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N, # 16 Exhibit O, # 17 Exhibit P, # 18 Exhibit Q, # 19 Exhibit R, # 20 Exhibit S, # 21 Exhibit T, # 22 Exhibit U-SEALED, # 23 Exhibit V-SEALED, # 24 Exhibit W-SEALED, # 25 Exhibit X-SEALED, # 26 Exhibit Y-SEALED, # 27 Exhibit Z-SEALED, # 28 Exhibit AA-SEALED, # 29 Exhibit BB-SEALED, # 30 Exhibit CC-SEALED, # 31 Exhibit DD-SEALED, # 32 Text of Proposed Order)(Pace, Christopher)

EXHIBIT P

Ho, Jill
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Ho, Jill
Tuesday, January 03, 2012 2:29 PM
Marshall Searcy
David Elihu; Ben Quarmby; Moto-Apple-SDFL; Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External;
[e-mail]
RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): supplementation of interrogatory responses
Apple/Motorola (FL): interrogatory supplementation

Hi Marshall,
As I discussed with your colleague Cathleen last week, Apple will agree to exchanging supplemental interrogatory
responses on January 16, as you proposed, but we expect Motorola's supplemental responses to be substantive. I attach
my clarifying email for your reference.
Best regards,
Jill
From: Marshall Searcy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 2:16 PM
To: Ho, Jill
Cc: David Elihu; Ben Quarmby; Moto-Apple-SDFL; Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Apple/Motorola (FL): supplementation of interrogatory responses

Hi Jill, following up on this, in light of the upcoming hearing before Judge Posner and the recent deposition
scheduling, we think it makes even more sense now that the parties' exchange supplemental responses during
the week of January 16. I can also confirm that our supplementation will include any supplemental responses
for the third set.
On Dec 29, 2011, at 7:55 AM, "Ho, Jill" <[e-mail]> wrote:
Hi Marshall,

How about January 11th? Also, please confirm that Motorola will be supplementing its responses to
Apple's third set of interrogatories at the same time.

Best regards,
Jill

From: Marshall Searcy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 5:20 PM
To: Ho, Jill; David Elihu; Ben Quarmby; Moto-Apple-SDFL
1

Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; '[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): supplementation of interrogatory responses

Jill, 

We propose an exchange date of January 16.  Please let me know if this date is agreeable.

From: Ho, Jill [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 12:16 PM
To: Marshall Searcy; David Elihu; Ben Quarmby; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; '[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): supplementation of interrogatory responses

Hi Marshall,

Apple proposes January 6 for the exchange of supplemental interrogatory responses. Please confirm that
Motorola will also be supplementing its responses to Apple's third set of interrogatories at that time.

Thanks,
Jill

From: Ho, Jill
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 4:14 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Apple/Motorola (FL): supplementation of interrogatory responses

Hi Marshall, 

Just confirming our conversation that, although Apple is ready to supplement our interrogatory 
responses and Motorola is partially ready to supplement its responses, neither side will be serving 
supplemental responses tonight.  

You have requested that we pick a new date for mutual exchange of our supplemental interrogatory 
responses approximately 2‐3 weeks from now. I requested that Motorola add responses to Apple's third 
2

set of interrogatories to its list of responses to supplement. I will touch base with you early next week, 
after circling back with the team, to confirm a date that would be agreeable to us.  

Please let me know if I have misunderstood our agreement.  

Happy holidays, 
Jill 

From: Marshall Searcy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 06:20 PM
To: Ho, Jill; David Elihu <[e-mail]>; Ben Quarmby
<[e-mail]>; Moto-Apple-SDFL <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): supplementation of interrogatory responses

Hi Jill,
I can be available for a call.  Let me know what time works for you.  

From: Ho, Jill [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 3:00 PM
To: David Elihu; Ben Quarmby; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]; Marshall Searcy
Subject: Re: Apple/Motorola (FL): supplementation of interrogatory responses

Hi David,  

I am in transit at the moment, but are you available for a call in another hour or so? 

Best regards, 
Jill

From: David Elihu [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 05:37 PM
To: Ho, Jill; Ben Quarmby <[e-mail]>; Moto-Apple-SDFL <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; '[e-mail]' <[e-mail]>; Marshall Searcy
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): supplementation of interrogatory responses

Jill,

3

We will be providing supplemental responses today to Apple’s Interrogatory Nos. 3, 8 and 13.  Motorola 
responded to Interrogatory Nos. 20 and 22 on Monday.  For the remaining interrogatories, Apple’s 
Interrogatory Nos. 1, 7, 9, 11, and 12, we are continuing to work on our responses.  We suggest that the 
parties meet and confer to discuss new dates, in view of the new case schedule, by which to exchange 
supplemental responses on these interrogatories.  To the extent that Apple wishes to take additional 
time to supplement its responses to Motorola’s Interrogatories, we are of course agreeable to this. 

Regards,
David

David Elihu
Associate,
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10010
212-849-7285 Direct
212.849.7000 Main Office Number
212.849.7100 FAX
[e-mail]
www.quinnemanuel.com
NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.

From: Ho, Jill [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 7:50 PM
To: Ben Quarmby; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; '[e-mail]'; Marshall Searcy
Subject: Apple/Motorola (FL): supplementation of interrogatory responses

Hi Ben,

Per your request, I write to confirm our understanding that the parties are supplementing their responses
for the interrogatories identified in your letter of November 21, 2011. These are: Motorola's Interrogatory
Nos. 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, & 11-15 and Apple's Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, 7, 9, 11-13, 20, & 22.

Also, Apple agrees to Motorola's proposed extension of the date by which the parties will exchange these
supplemental responses from Friday, December 16 to Wednesday, December 21.

Best regards,
4

Jill

<image001.jpg>

Jill Ho

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1134
[e-mail]
[phone] Direct
[phone] Fax

The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named
above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to
deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify us by email, [e-mail], and destroy the original message. Thank you.

5