Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 224

MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Regarding Set-Top Box Patents (Nos. 19-22) by Apple, Inc.. Responses due by 2/16/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jill Ho, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C-SEALED, # 5 Exhibit D-SEALED, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N, # 16 Exhibit O, # 17 Exhibit P, # 18 Exhibit Q, # 19 Exhibit R, # 20 Exhibit S, # 21 Exhibit T, # 22 Exhibit U-SEALED, # 23 Exhibit V-SEALED, # 24 Exhibit W-SEALED, # 25 Exhibit X-SEALED, # 26 Exhibit Y-SEALED, # 27 Exhibit Z-SEALED, # 28 Exhibit AA-SEALED, # 29 Exhibit BB-SEALED, # 30 Exhibit CC-SEALED, # 31 Exhibit DD-SEALED, # 32 Text of Proposed Order)(Pace, Christopher)

EXHIBIT Q

Ho, Jill
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Ho, Jill
Thursday, December 29, 2011 6:06 PM
Cathleen Garrigan ([e-mail])
Apple/Motorola (FL): interrogatory supplementation

Hi Cathleen,
Just confirming that we meant all of the rogs in Apple's third set (Nos. 16-22), not just Nos. 20 & 22. In particular, for
some of these, Motorola merely identified "the source code produced by Counterclaim Defendants in this case" without
providing a narrative explanation or identifying specific file names, as requested by the interrogatory.
Best regards,
Jill

1