Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 224

MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Regarding Set-Top Box Patents (Nos. 19-22) by Apple, Inc.. Responses due by 2/16/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jill Ho, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C-SEALED, # 5 Exhibit D-SEALED, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N, # 16 Exhibit O, # 17 Exhibit P, # 18 Exhibit Q, # 19 Exhibit R, # 20 Exhibit S, # 21 Exhibit T, # 22 Exhibit U-SEALED, # 23 Exhibit V-SEALED, # 24 Exhibit W-SEALED, # 25 Exhibit X-SEALED, # 26 Exhibit Y-SEALED, # 27 Exhibit Z-SEALED, # 28 Exhibit AA-SEALED, # 29 Exhibit BB-SEALED, # 30 Exhibit CC-SEALED, # 31 Exhibit DD-SEALED, # 32 Text of Proposed Order)(Pace, Christopher)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT T Ho, Jill From: Sent: To: Subject: Ho, Jill Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:30 PM 'Cathleen Garrigan'; AppleCov; Matthew.Powers@tensegritylawgroup.com; Steven.Cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com; Apple Moto Weil; emullins@astidavis.com; Moto-Apple-SDFL RE: Motorola v. Apple (SDFL): Mobility discovery responses Hi Cathleen,    Based on my agreement with Ben, as documented in his November 21, 2011 letter and as modified by subsequent  discussions with you and Marshall, we were expecting Motorola to supplement its responses for Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3,  7, 9, 11‐13, and 16‐22 by today.  (Indeed, our original agreement was to exchange responses over a month ago, on  December 16.)  It appears, however, that Motorola only served supplemental interrogatory responses for Nos. 1, 3, 9,  11, 16 and 17.      Please let me know when you are available to meet and confer about this issue tomorrow.    Best regards,  Jill    From: Cathleen Garrigan [mailto:cathleengarrigan@quinnemanuel.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:02 PM To: AppleCov; Matthew.Powers@tensegritylawgroup.com; Steven.Cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com; Apple Moto Weil; emullins@astidavis.com; Moto-Apple-SDFL Subject: Motorola v. Apple (SDFL): Mobility discovery responses   Jill,    Please see the attached documents.     Best,  Cathleen      Cathleen Garrigan Associate, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415-875-6341 Direct 415.875.6600 Main Office Number 415.875.6700 FAX cathleengarrigan@quinnemanuel.com www.quinnemanuel.com NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.     1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?