The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al

Filing 276

DECLARATION of Elizabeth Anne Figueira, Esq. in Opposition re: 167 MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by The Music Force LLC, Cal IV Entertainment, LLC, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc., The Football Association Premier League Limited, Robert Tur, National Music Publishers' Association, The Rodgers & Hammerstein Organization, Edward B. Marks Music Company, Freddy Bienstock Music Company, Alley Music Corporation, X-Ray Dog Music, Inc., Federation Francaise De Tennis, The Scottish Premier League Limited, The Music Force Media Group LLC, Sin-Drome Records, Ltd., Murbo Music Publishing, Inc., Stage Three Music (US), Inc., Bourne Co.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 189, # 2 Exhibit 190, # 3 Exhibit 191, # 4 Exhibit 192, # 5 Exhibit 193, # 6 Exhibit 194, # 7 Exhibit 195, # 8 Exhibit 196, # 9 Exhibit 197, # 10 Exhibit 198, # 11 Exhibit 199, # 12 Exhibit 200, # 13 Exhibit 201, # 14 Exhibit 202, # 15 Exhibit 203, # 16 Exhibit 204, # 17 Exhibit 205, # 18 Exhibit 206, # 19 Exhibit 207, # 20 Exhibit 208, # 21 Exhibit 209, # 22 Exhibit 210, # 23 Exhibit 211, # 24 Exhibit 212, # 25 Exhibit 213, # 26 Exhibit 214, # 27 Exhibit 215, # 28 Exhibit 216, # 29 Exhibit 217, # 30 Exhibit 218, # 31 Exhibit 219, # 32 Exhibit 220, # 33 Exhibit 221, # 34 Exhibit 222, # 35 Exhibit 223, # 36 Exhibit 224 Part 1, # 37 Exhibit 224 Part 2, # 38 Exhibit 225, # 39 Exhibit 226, # 40 Exhibit 227 Part 1, # 41 Exhibit 227 Part 2, # 42 Exhibit 227 Part 3, # 43 Exhibit 227 Part 4, # 44 Exhibit 228, # 45 Exhibit 229, # 46 Exhibit 230, # 47 Exhibit 231, # 48 Exhibit 232, # 49 Exhibit 233, # 50 Exhibit 234, # 51 Exhibit 235, # 52 Exhibit 236, # 53 Exhibit 237, # 54 Exhibit 238, # 55 Exhibit 239, # 56 Exhibit 240, # 57 Exhibit 241, # 58 Exhibit 242, # 59 Exhibit 243, # 60 Exhibit 244, # 61 Exhibit 245, # 62 Exhibit 246, # 63 Exhibit 247, # 64 Exhibit 248, # 65 Exhibit 249, # 66 Exhibit 250, # 67 Exhibit 251, # 68 Exhibit 252, # 69 Exhibit 253, # 70 Exhibit 254, # 71 Exhibit 255, # 72 Exhibit 256, # 73 Exhibit 257, # 74 Exhibit 258, # 75 Exhibit 259, # 76 Exhibit 260, # 77 Exhibit 261, # 78 Exhibit 262, # 79 Exhibit 263, # 80 Exhibit 264, # 81 Exhibit 265, # 82 Exhibit 266, # 83 Exhibit 267, # 84 Exhibit 268, # 85 Exhibit 269, # 86 Exhibit 270, # 87 Exhibit 271, # 88 Exhibit 272 Part 1, # 89 Exhibit 272-2, # 90 Exhibit 272 Part 3, # 91 Exhibit 272 Part 4, # 92 Exhibit 272 Part 5, # 93 Exhibit 272 Part 6, # 94 Exhibit 272 Part 7, # 95 Exhibit 272 Part 8, # 96 Exhibit 272 Part 9, # 97 Exhibit 272 Part 10, # 98 Exhibit 272 Part 11, # 99 Exhibit 272 Part 12, # 100 Exhibit 272 Part 13, # 101 Exhibit 272 Part 14, # 102 Exhibit 272 Part 15, # 103 Exhibit 272 Part 16, # 104 Exhibit 272 Part 17, # 105 Exhibit 272 Part 18, # 106 Exhibit 272 Part 19, # 107 Exhibit 273, # 108 Exhibit 274, # 109 Exhibit 275, # 110 Exhibit 276, # 111 Exhibit 277, # 112 Exhibit 278, # 113 Exhibit 279, # 114 Exhibit 280, # 115 Exhibit 281, # 116 Exhibit 282, # 117 Exhibit 283, # 118 Exhibit 284, # 119 Exhibit 285, # 120 Exhibit 286, # 121 Exhibit 287, # 122 Exhibit 288, # 123 Exhibit 289, # 124 Exhibit 290, # 125 Exhibit 291, # 126 Exhibit 292, # 127 Exhibit 293, # 128 Exhibit 294, # 129 Exhibit 295, # 130 Exhibit 296, # 131 Exhibit 297, # 132 Exhibit 298, # 133 Exhibit 299, # 134 Exhibit 300, # 135 Exhibit 301, # 136 Exhibit 302, # 137 Exhibit 303, # 138 Exhibit 304, # 139 Exhibit 305, # 140 Exhibit 306, # 141 Exhibit 307, # 142 Exhibit 308, # 143 Exhibit 309, # 144 Exhibit 310, # 145 Exhibit 311, # 146 Exhibit 312, # 147 Exhibit 313, # 148 Exhibit 314, # 149 Exhibit 315, # 150 Exhibit 316, # 151 Exhibit 317, # 152 Exhibit 318, # 153 Exhibit 319, # 154 Exhibit 320, # 155 Exhibit 321, # 156 Exhibit 322, # 157 Exhibit 323, # 158 Exhibit 324, # 159 Exhibit 325, # 160 Exhibit 326, # 161 Exhibit 327, # 162 Exhibit 328, # 163 Exhibit 329, # 164 Exhibit 330, # 165 Exhibit 331, # 166 Exhibit 332, # 167 Exhibit 333 Part 1, # 168 Exhibit 333 Part 2, # 169 Exhibit 334, # 170 Exhibit 335, # 171 Exhibit 336, # 172 Exhibit 337, # 173 Exhibit 338)(Figueira, Elizabeth)

Download PDF
5/26/2009 Lamond DISTRICT Pierre UNITED FOR THE STATES COURT Figueir Deci. Thb SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 282 VIACOM PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL COUNTRY INC. COMEDY MUSIC TELEVISION CORPORATION TELEVISION INC. and PARI1OUNT PICTURES BLACK ENTERTAINMENT LLC 07CV2203 Plaintiffs vs. No. YOUTUBE and INC. YOUTUBE LLC GOOGLE INC. Defendants. 10 ____________________________________/ THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION BOURNE PREMIER et 11 LEAGUE on LIMITED of CO. and al. others behalf themselves all 12 13 14 15 similarly situated Plaintiffs vs. No. 07CV3582 YOUTUBE GOOGLE INC. INC. YOUTUBE LLC and 16 Defendants. ____________________________________________/ 17 CONFIDENTIAL PARTIALLY VIDEOTAPED PALO DEPOSITION OF PIERRE LI1OND 18 ALTO CALIFORNIA MAY TUESDAY 19 26 2009 BY 20 21 22 23 24 25 LORRIE CSR No. L. MARCHANT RPR CRR CCRR CLR 10523 JOB NO. 16796 5/26/2009 Lamond Pierre video it that It could was you the be in uploaded few but dont think. that remember what 111343 111346 was. minutes whether Sequoia Q. Do know time when that limitation was in 111349 111352 111358 in place A. at invested Youlube It might have Do been. dont that it remember. Q. Okay. you understand Youlube in actually early 111401 111404 111410 had ten-minute and that limitation that was was change imposed its to. 2006 A. this in policy thought minutes. it Thats 2005. now. Okay. what referring It 111414 111416 111420 10 was in And But youre right. is ten 11 remember Q. didnt remember were it then 12 And you awa re that YouTube changed 111423 111427 111430 111433 13 its ten policy because had found TV that sh ows videos or exceeding that are 14 minutes were on typically the movies 15 unauthorized MR. site Objection. That to was the We 16 TANGRI WITNESS At two hog and Assumes not best the of facts. that the 111436 111439 111440 111442 of 17 ThE limit it reason 18 came in in. least my recollection people 19 came for reasons. didnt want nd or did at to 20 quote/unquote other users that we bandwidth we long found the detriment 111446 111452 111459 111508 21 also that at least remember many 22 thought videos not attract 23 viewers. BY MR. So 24 GALDSTON you have any 111508 recollection of 25 Q. do Maryrose 111508 76 5/26/2009 Lamond Pierre Dunton Youlube Digital A. ever were expressing necessary the to view be that policy changes at 111510 111515 111518 more compliant with the Millennium remember Copyright the name Act of this lady but dont 111521 111523 remember what Q. youre Other talking than about. Okay. the limitation imposed there any of ten 111527 111532 111535 111540 111545 minutes on to the video durations policies were that other changes in Youlube early user were implemented around 10 A. 2006 remember. about your dont We 11 Q. talked increasing view that traffic at the end 111549 111552 111557 111601 111604 111606 12 of due 2005. to And its of this traffic and increased not 13 variety usergenerated material Objection. content is 14 professionally MR. produced that correct Assumes 15 TANGRI Ambiguous. 16 facts. ThE that the 17 WITNESS My conviction because It was of and still is 111609 111612 111615 18 traffic word of increased of mouth. that usergenerated to 19 videos and started you build Go on 20 community if you people to see said or know YouTube or 111622 111625 111628 21 want my kid something stupid 22 whatever. BY MR. Do 23 GALDSTON recall in late 111628 December being 24 Q. you 05 to early 06 111629 111635 25 Saturday Night Live video posted YouTube 77 5/26/2009 Lamond Pierre ThE WITNESS would be be The section of Like the it document was in that in 125016 125018 125025 125031 125033 says June. Even Comments It updated. again updated February. would updated no -- again if there was investment event. BY MR. Okay. GALDSTON And when you or say Q. updated these would be there 125034 125037 125039 be additional and These new Okay. comments would comments removed A. comments would be removed and replaced 125040 125042 10 with Q. 11 new narrative happened well as 125043 you can read six 12 A. Basically it what 125046 125048 125053 125057 of 13 here months. says So YouTube executed over the past 14 its And sixmonth if you review down it basically. at 15 Q. Okay. in look the third The 16 sentence videos that comment increased over an 100 section from says number in 125059 125102 125106 125113 125117 17 streamed to million per day in day 18 early January Is million per July. 19 that accurate statement 20 A. Yes. Okay. Did the 21 Q. anybody traffic at YouTube do any analysis 125118 125122 22 to determine million day A. why had increased day to over from 100 23 $8 million views in million 125126 125132 24 views July know if there was any 25 dont analysis done of 125134 107 5/26/2009 Lamond Pierre why it happened. Okay. was due So 125137 nobody wanted of to Q. consider whether thE 125138 125144 125150 increase generated to popularity professionally content MR. versus usergenerated content facts and TANGRI Objection. Assumes 125154 125156 ambiguous. MS. REES WITNESS Same objections. told you that 125157 dont know if ThE there 10 125157 125159 125200 was any analysis done. BY MR. Okay. GALDSTON But this this in is 11 Q. good thing for 125201 125207 12 YouTube A. correct Well the of the increase the traffic increase in the terms of 13 thats the way was they 125211 thE 14 thats number Q. way traffic per day. measured 125213 125216 15 visitors Sure. 16 And its positive development day to event that over for the 125218 125219 125221 125224 17 company. Its from positive its million pe 18 increased million per 100 19 day A. 20 Yes. Okay. 125225 And why is 21 Q. that of the for ad the reasons we it 125225 125228 125230 22 discussed would A. earlier because revenues that 23 attract For MR. 24 the ad 125231 Objection. 25 TANGRI Mischaracterizes. 125233 108 5/26/2009 Lamond Pierre ThE WITNESS of It was important just per ad from the 125234 125236 125240 point of view potential revenue BY MR. Do GALDSTON recall of the an Q. you episode of American published on 125245 125250 125255 125301 125306 Idol or episodes American and Idol of being 2006 YouTube authori A. between ation January July without by the content that any owners at Fremantle dont You recall have all. any Q. dont recollection of that 125308 125310 125310 10 occurring A. No. 11 12 Q. So if episodes YouTube here of American site Idol were unaware of 125315 125319 125321 13 publ ished that as on the sit Web youre 14 you MS. today Objection. 15 REES Asked and answered 125324 125325 16 Vague and ambiguous. ThE 17 WITNESS Im totally unaware of that 125326 125328 18 BY MR. GALDSTON So 19 Q. Okay. this is in the comments realize input. section Mr. it and and The 125330 125341 125347 125351 125353 20 again and -- document with your Botha 21 authored of rapid And says 22 strains growth what is are evident. 23 What MR. meant there to the 24 TANGRI his Objection preamble as 125355 125356 25 mischaracterizing prior answer. 109 5/26/2009 Lamond Pierre reviews A. for inappropriate content not 125503 enough people in that Probably there well. Okay. It were 125509 125512 125513 area as Q. A. was fast not easy to get quality people and train 125513 125517 them and -- enough. see Q. Do you below active the next paragraph to begins owners to 125524 125525 125535 125541 Youlube What 10 continues Youlube its outreach of active content outreach was doing by way content A. owners Well apparently had 11 they had deal with NBC which 125546 125548 12 now remember. NBC forgotten decided earlier. it 13 marketing clips of in that on was on useful for to 125556 125601 125610 125614 14 them create to put their shows some cases or Youlube some 15 awareness create audience 16 following. And 17 remember actually this deal as being Not as it says 125615 125621 18 here as being fairly small. remember what the that 19 significant. dont was so dollar value 125626 125628 20 was but it not we that significant. exploring the 21 And were possibility of 125633 125635 22 doing Q. more of that. 23 Okay. was And thats to because there was belief 125636 125639 125641 24 that it critical provide content consumers as with 25 professionally produced well as 111 5/26/2009 Lamond Pierre usergenerated MR. content is that part of the reason 125644 125648 125650 TANGRI the Objection. document. Ambiguous. Mischaracterizes ThE WITNESS the time. Well guess its what we 125655 125656 125656 believed at BY MR. GALDSTON YouTube to Q. Why did believe provide at the time that it was 125657 125659 125702 125706 125707 critically content 10 as important well as professionally produced usergenerated Objection. Same content MS. REES TANGRI WITNESS at Mischaracterization. 11 MR. objection. remember. 12 ThE dont dont 125708 125711 125712 13 remember that all. 14 BY MR. Okay. as GALDSTON But it 15 Q. was critically important to the 125713 125715 16 company of June of 2006 Same objection. 17 MR. TANGRI REES WITNESS Mischaracterizes. 125718 125720 18 MS. Same objection. what it 19 ThE Thats says here but 125724 125726 125727 20 dont remember why. BY MR. 21 GALDSTON This at is 22 Q. Okay. document that was distributed 125727 125729 125731 23 to the A. partners Sequoia Capital right 24 Yes So sir. and Mr. Botha were 25 Q. you preparing this 125732 112

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?