Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1150

MOTION for Extension of Time and to Seal Documents re #1024 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #1022 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #1020 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #1023 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #925 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460, #1013 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). Responses due by 7/2/2012. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Samsung's Motion, #2 Declaration of Anthony P. Alden in Support of Samsung's Motion, #3 Exhibit 1 to the Alden Declaration, #4 Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Samsung's Motion, #5 Exhibit 1 to the Kang Declaration, #6 Exhibit 2 to the Kang Declaration, #7 Exhibit 3 to the Kang Declaration, #8 Exhibit 4 to the Kang Declaration, #9 Exhibit 5 to the Kang Declaration, #10 Exhibit 6 to the Kang Declaration, #11 Exhibit 7 to the Kang Declaration, #12 Exhibit 8 to the Kang Declaration, #13 Exhibit 9 to the Kang Declaration, #14 Exhibit 10 to the Kang Declaration, #15 Exhibit 11 to the Kang Declaration, #16 Exhibit 12 to the Kang Declaration, #17 Exhibit 13 to the Kang Declaration, #18 Exhibit 14 to the Kang Declaration, #19 Exhibit 15 to the Kang Declaration, #20 Exhibit 16 to the Kang Declaration, #21 Exhibit 17 to the Kang Declaration, #22 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 1 of 5, #23 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 2 of 5, #24 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 3 of 5, #25 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 4 of 5, #26 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 5 of 5, #27 Exhibit 19 to the Kang Declaration, #28 Exhibit 20 to the Kang Declaration, #29 Exhibit 21 to the Kang Declaration, #30 Exhibit 22 to the Kang Declaration, #31 Exhibit 23 to the Kang Declaration, #32 Exhibit 24 to the Kang Declaration, #33 Exhibit 25 to the Kang Declaration, #34 Exhibit 26 to the Kang Declaration, #35 Exhibit 27 to the Kang Declaration, #36 Exhibit 28 to the Kang Declaration, #37 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Miscellaneous Administrative Request)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/28/2012)

Download PDF
KANG DECLARATION EXHIBIT 15 Exhibit 44 (Submitted Under Seal) HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 1 ·1· · · · · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT · · · · · · · · · · NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ·2· · · · · · · · · · · · SAN JOSE DIVISION ·3· · · ·4· · · ·5 · · ·6 · · ·7· · · ·8· · · ·9· · · 10 · · 11· ·APPLE, INC., a California ·corporation, · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · CASE NO. · · · · ·Plaintiff,· · · · · · · · · · ·11cv01846-LHK 12· · · 13· · · 14· · · 15· ·SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO., LTD., ·a Korean business entity; ·SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, ·INC., a New York corporation; ·SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS ·AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited ·liability company, ·v. ·SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO., LTD., ·a Korean business entity; ·SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, ·INC., a New York corporation; ·SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS ·AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited ·liability company, · · · · ·Defendants. ·________________________________ 16· · · · · ·Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, 17· ·v. · · ·APPLE, INC., a California 18· ·corporation, 19· · · · · ·Counterclaim-Defendant. 20 21· · · · *** HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY *** 22· · · 23 · · 24· · · 25· · · · · · · · VIDEOTAPED PERSONAL DEPOSITION OF: · · · · · · · · · · · · ·HANGIL SONG · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·February 8, 2012 · · ·Kim & Chang · Seoul, South Korea 9:02 A.M. - 2:20 P.M. American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia www.americanrealtime.com· (561) 279-9132 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 79 ·1· ·BY MR. STERN: ·2· · · · Q.· · Based on your work designing the Prevail, ·3· ·Mr. Song, you don't have any recollection of the nature of ·4· ·the front surface of the Prevail? ·5· · · · · · · MS. CARUSO:· Objection, mischaracterizes the ·6· ·prior testimony, vague. ·7· · · · A.· · When it comes to the design of the front ·8· ·surface, actually the boundaries are quite vague.· This is ·9· ·because the corner portions are curved, so it's hard to 10· ·tell whether it belongs to the front surface or bottom 11· ·surface or side surface.· So because of that ambiguity of 12· ·the borders, it's hard to answer your question. 13· ·BY MR. STERN: 14· · · · Q.· · So you're not able to tell me whether the front 15· ·face of the Prevail is -- consists of a piece of glass 16· ·extending from the edge to edge of the device; is that 17· ·correct? 18· · · · · · · MS. CARUSO:· Objection, mischaracterizes the 19· ·testimony, vague. 20· · · · A.· · No. 21· ·BY MR. STERN: 22· · · · Q.· · Do you recall, Mr. Song, any alternative 23· ·designs that you considered when you were working on the 24· ·design of the Prevail? 25· · · · · · · MS. CARUSO:· Objection, vague. American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia www.americanrealtime.com· (561) 279-9132 ·1· · · · A.· · There are a lot of alternative designs in order ·2· ·to complete a single design.· For example, when you ·3· ·determine your hairstyle, there are a lot of options that ·4· ·you can consider. ·5· ·BY MR. STERN: ·6· · · · Q.· · Do you recall any of those options that you ·7· ·considered with respect to the Prevail? ·8· · · · A.· · If we look at the top view of this drawing, ·9· ·this is the main concept that we used.· 18· · · · Q.· · When you refer to the "line," are you referring 19· ·to the thin shiny and metallic-looking edge that runs 20· ·around the face of the phone? 21· · · · · · · MS. CARUSO:· Objection, vague, mischaracterizes 22· ·the record, lacks foundation.· The witness does not have 23· ·the phone in front of him. 24· · · · A.· · What you are referring to as "metallic-looking" 25· ·is actually plastic, and what I was referring to was that HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 87 ·1· · · · · · · · · · · C E R T I F I C A T E ·2· · SEOUL· · · · · · ) · · · · · · · · · · · ·) ·3· · KOREA· · · · · · ) ·4· · · ·5· · · ·6· · · ·7· · · ·8 · · ·9· · · 10· · · · · · · I, Michael E. Miller, Registered Diplomate ·Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter, do hereby certify ·that the aforementioned witness was first duly sworn by me ·pursuant to stipulation of counsel to testify to the ·truth; that I was authorized to and did report said ·deposition in stenotype; and that the foregoing pages are ·a true and correct transcription of my shorthand notes of ·said deposition. 11· · · 12· · · 13· · · · · · · · · I further certify that I am not attorney or ·counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a relative or ·employee of any attorney or counsel of any party connected ·with the action, nor am I financially interested in the ·action. 14· · · 15· · · 16 · · · · · · · · The foregoing certification of this ·transcript does not apply to any reproduction of the same ·by any means unless under the direct control and/or ·direction of the certifying reporter. · · · · · · · · I further certify that said deposition was ·taken at the time and place hereinabove set forth and that ·the taking of said deposition was commenced and completed ·as hereinabove set out. 17 18· · · · · · · · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my 19· ·hand this February 9, 2012. 20 21 22· · · 23· · · 24· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ____________________________ MICHAEL E. MILLER Certified Realtime Reporter Registered Diplomate Reporter Realtime Systems Administrator 25 American Realtime Court Reporters / Asia www.americanrealtime.com· (561) 279-9132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?