Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1150
MOTION for Extension of Time and to Seal Documents re #1024 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #1022 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #1020 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #1023 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #925 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460, #1013 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). Responses due by 7/2/2012. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Samsung's Motion, #2 Declaration of Anthony P. Alden in Support of Samsung's Motion, #3 Exhibit 1 to the Alden Declaration, #4 Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Samsung's Motion, #5 Exhibit 1 to the Kang Declaration, #6 Exhibit 2 to the Kang Declaration, #7 Exhibit 3 to the Kang Declaration, #8 Exhibit 4 to the Kang Declaration, #9 Exhibit 5 to the Kang Declaration, #10 Exhibit 6 to the Kang Declaration, #11 Exhibit 7 to the Kang Declaration, #12 Exhibit 8 to the Kang Declaration, #13 Exhibit 9 to the Kang Declaration, #14 Exhibit 10 to the Kang Declaration, #15 Exhibit 11 to the Kang Declaration, #16 Exhibit 12 to the Kang Declaration, #17 Exhibit 13 to the Kang Declaration, #18 Exhibit 14 to the Kang Declaration, #19 Exhibit 15 to the Kang Declaration, #20 Exhibit 16 to the Kang Declaration, #21 Exhibit 17 to the Kang Declaration, #22 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 1 of 5, #23 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 2 of 5, #24 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 3 of 5, #25 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 4 of 5, #26 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 5 of 5, #27 Exhibit 19 to the Kang Declaration, #28 Exhibit 20 to the Kang Declaration, #29 Exhibit 21 to the Kang Declaration, #30 Exhibit 22 to the Kang Declaration, #31 Exhibit 23 to the Kang Declaration, #32 Exhibit 24 to the Kang Declaration, #33 Exhibit 25 to the Kang Declaration, #34 Exhibit 26 to the Kang Declaration, #35 Exhibit 27 to the Kang Declaration, #36 Exhibit 28 to the Kang Declaration, #37 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Miscellaneous Administrative Request)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/28/2012)
<![CDATA[
KANG DECLARATION
EXHIBIT 5
Exhibit 4
(Submitted Under Seal)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE'S SIXTEENTH SET OF
INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
UNDER THE PROTECTIVE ORDER
Defendants.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1 already in the possession of Apple, publicly availab le, or as readily available to Apple as it is to
2 Samsung.
3
24.
Samsung objects to each interrogatory to the extent that it seeks information before
4 Samsung is required to disclose such inform ation in accordance with any applicable law, such as
5 the Northern District of California Patent Local Rules.
6
25.
Samsung objects to the interrogatories on the grounds and to the extent that they
7 seek legal conclusions or call for expert
testimony. Sam sung’s r esponses should not be
8 construed to provide legal conclusions.
9
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing General Statement and General Objections,
10 Samsung responds as follows:
11
INTERROGATORIES
12
13
14 INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
15
Explain in detail the operation of any monitoring circuitry, integrated circuit, chip,
16 controller, or module used to operate the touch screens (including the display and touch sensor
17 panels) and used to respond to touch events for each Product at Issue, with reference to and
18 identification of specific source code and microcode files and functions.
19
20 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
21
In addition to the General Objections stated above, Samsung objects to this interrogatory
22 as vague and ambiguous. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it seeks
23 to elicit information subject to and protected by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work24 product doctrine, the joint defense privilege, the common interest doctrine, and/or any other
25 applicable privilege or immunity. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory on the grounds
26 and to the extent that it seeks legal conclusions or calls for expert testimony. Samsung will
27 provide such contentions in accordance with the Court’s Minute Order and Case Management
28 order, dated August 25, 2011.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-5SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1
Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, and following a reasonable
2 investigation, Samsung responds as follows:
3
4
Product at Issue
5
Acclaim
6
Touchscreen Touchscreen IC
IC Vendor
P/N
Touchscreen
IC F/W
Version
TSP Module
Vendor
Captivate
7
8
9
Continuum
Droid Charge
Exhibit 4G
Epic 4G
10
Fascinate
11
Gem
12
13
14
Galaxy Ace
Galaxy Prevail
Galaxy S (i9000)
Galaxy S 4G
15
Galaxy S II
16
Gravity
17
18
Indulge
Infuse 4G
Intercept
19
Mesmerize
20
Nexus S
21
Nexus S 4G
22
23
Replenish
Showcase Galaxy S
Sidekick
24
Transform
25
Vibrant
26
Galaxy Tab 10.1
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-6SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1
Samsung further responds that some of the information requested in this interrogatory is
2 outside Samsung’s possession, custody or control. Pursuant to Rule 33(d), Samsung further
3 responds by citing the following documents from which such information may be determined:
4 ATMEL-SAMSUNG00000001-8302; SAMNDCA00298514-SAMNDCA00298644;
5 SAMNDCA00298645-SAMNDCA00298748; SAMNDCA00298749-SAMNDCA00298801;
6 SAMNDCA00298802-SAMNDCA00299039; SAMNDCA00299040-SAMNDCA00299312;
7 SAMNDCA00299313-SAMNDCA00299344; SAMNDCA00299345-SAMNDCA00299425;
8 SAMNDCA00324077-SAMNDCA00324077; SAMNDCA00324078-SAMNDCA00324082;
9 SAMNDCA00324083-SAMNDCA00324087; SAMNDCA00324088-SAMNDCA00324093;
10 SAMNDCA10280557-SAMNDCA10283952; SAMNDCA10765141-SAMNDCA10765619;
11 SAMNDCA10885838-SAMNDCA10924995. Samsung further refers to the transcripts for the
12 depositions of Heon-Seok Lee, Martin Simmons and Samuel Brunet from which the requested
13 information can be determined.
14
15 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
16
In addition to the General Objections stated above, Samsung objects to this interrogatory
17 as vague and ambiguous. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it seeks
18 to elicit information subject to and protected by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work19 product doctrine, the joint defense privilege, the common interest doctrine, and/or any other
20 applicable privilege or immunity. Samsung further objects to this interrogatory on the grounds
21 and to the extent that it seeks legal conclusions or calls for expert testimony. Samsung will
22 provide such contentions in accordance with the Court’s Minute Order and Case Management
23 order, dated August 25, 2011.
24
Subject to the foregoing general and specific objections, and following a reasonable
25 investigation, Samsung responds as follows:
26
27
28
Product at Issue
Acclaim
Touchscreen
IC Vendor
Touchscreen IC
P/N
Touchscreen
IC F/W
Version
TSP Module
Vendor
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-7SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1
Captivate
2
Continuum
3
4
Droid Charge
Exhibit 4G
Epic 4G
5
Fascinate
6
Gem
7
Galaxy Ace
8
9
10
Galaxy Prevail
Galaxy S (i9000)
Galaxy S 4G
Galaxy S II
11 Galaxy S 2 Epic 4G
Touch
12
Galaxy S 2
Skyrocket
13
Gravity
14
Indulge
15
Infuse 4G
16
17
Intercept
Mesmerize
Nexus S
18
Nexus S 4G
19
Replenish
20
Showcase Galaxy S
21
Showcase i500
Sidekick
22
Transform
23
Vibrant
24
Galaxy Tab
25
Galaxy Tab 10.1
26
27
28
Samsung further responds that some of the information requested in this interrogatory is
outside Samsung’s possession, custody or control. Pursuant to Rule 33(d), Samsung further
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-8SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY INFORMATION
1 responds by citing the following documents from which such information may be determined:
2 ATMEL-SAMSUNG00000001-8302; SAMNDCA00298514-SAMNDCA00298644;
3 SAMNDCA00298645-SAMNDCA00298748; SAMNDCA00298749-SAMNDCA00298801;
4 SAMNDCA00298802-SAMNDCA00299039; SAMNDCA00299040-SAMNDCA00299312;
5 SAMNDCA00299313-SAMNDCA00299344; SAMNDCA00299345-SAMNDCA00299425;
6 SAMNDCA00324077-SAMNDCA00324077; SAMNDCA00324078-SAMNDCA00324082;
7 SAMNDCA00324083-SAMNDCA00324087; SAMNDCA00324088-SAMNDCA00324093;
8 SAMNDCA10280557-SAMNDCA10283952; SAMNDCA10765141-SAMNDCA10765619;
9 SAMNDCA10885838-SAMNDCA10924995. Samsung further refers to the transcripts for the
10 depositions of Heon-Seok Lee, Martin Simmons and Samuel Brunet from which the requested
11 information can be determined.
12
13 DATED: March 22, 2012
14
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
By
Charles
Victoria F. Maroulis
K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-9SAMSUNG’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
APPLE’S 16TH SET OF INTERROGATORIES (NO. 81)
]]>
