Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1150

MOTION for Extension of Time and to Seal Documents re #1024 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #1022 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #1020 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #1023 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment, #925 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867 and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460, #1013 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Under Seal Re Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). Responses due by 7/2/2012. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Samsung's Motion, #2 Declaration of Anthony P. Alden in Support of Samsung's Motion, #3 Exhibit 1 to the Alden Declaration, #4 Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Samsung's Motion, #5 Exhibit 1 to the Kang Declaration, #6 Exhibit 2 to the Kang Declaration, #7 Exhibit 3 to the Kang Declaration, #8 Exhibit 4 to the Kang Declaration, #9 Exhibit 5 to the Kang Declaration, #10 Exhibit 6 to the Kang Declaration, #11 Exhibit 7 to the Kang Declaration, #12 Exhibit 8 to the Kang Declaration, #13 Exhibit 9 to the Kang Declaration, #14 Exhibit 10 to the Kang Declaration, #15 Exhibit 11 to the Kang Declaration, #16 Exhibit 12 to the Kang Declaration, #17 Exhibit 13 to the Kang Declaration, #18 Exhibit 14 to the Kang Declaration, #19 Exhibit 15 to the Kang Declaration, #20 Exhibit 16 to the Kang Declaration, #21 Exhibit 17 to the Kang Declaration, #22 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 1 of 5, #23 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 2 of 5, #24 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 3 of 5, #25 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 4 of 5, #26 Exhibit 18 to the Kang Declaration Pt. 5 of 5, #27 Exhibit 19 to the Kang Declaration, #28 Exhibit 20 to the Kang Declaration, #29 Exhibit 21 to the Kang Declaration, #30 Exhibit 22 to the Kang Declaration, #31 Exhibit 23 to the Kang Declaration, #32 Exhibit 24 to the Kang Declaration, #33 Exhibit 25 to the Kang Declaration, #34 Exhibit 26 to the Kang Declaration, #35 Exhibit 27 to the Kang Declaration, #36 Exhibit 28 to the Kang Declaration, #37 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Miscellaneous Administrative Request)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/28/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG'S MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST
PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11 FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CIVIL
L.R. 79-5(d) DECLARATION AND TO
SEAL DOCUMENTS

Defendants.

19
20

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung

21 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed a Miscellaneous
22 Administrative Request Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 for Extension of Time to File Civil L.R. 7923 5(d) Declaration and to Seal Documents.
24

Samsung requests that Apple’s Administrative Motions (Dkt. Nos. 925, 1013, 1020, 1022,

25 1023, and 1024) to file documents under seal be granted in part. Specifically, Samsung requests
26 that the following documents, or portions thereof, be filed under seal:
27
28
02198.51855/4827299.1



Exhibit Nos. 10, 17 and 22 to the Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Apple's
Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Number 7,362,867
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST

1

and Invalidity of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,456,893 and 7,577,460 ("Selwyn

2

Declaration") (Dkt. No. 922);

3



Exhibit Nos. 3, 4, and 10 to the Declaration of Karl Kramer in Support of Apple’s

4

Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Kramer Declaration”)

5

(Dkt. No. 1013);

6



Exhibits C, D, L, M, N, O, and S to the Declaration of Michel Maharbiz, Ph.D. in

7

Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment

8

(“Maharbiz Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 1013);

9



Exhibit Nos. 22, 30, 36, 39, 43, 44, 70, 73 and 74 to the Declaration of Jason R.

10

Bartlett in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary

11

Judgment (“Bartlett Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 1020);

12



Exhibit Nos. 31, 36, 37, 38, 67, 68, 70, 72 and 94 to the Declaration of Peter W.

13

Bressler in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary

14

Judgment (“Bressler Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 1022);

15



Exhibit No. 1 to the Declaration of Dr. Russell S. Winer in Support of Apple’s

16

Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Winer Declaration”) (Dkt.

17

No. 1023);

18



Exhibit Nos. 1 and 8 to the Declaration of Dr. Karan Singh, Ph.D. in Support of

19

Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Singh

20

Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 1024); and

21



The Declaration of Terry L. Musika in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung's

22

Motion for Summary Judgment (“Musika Declaration”) and Exhibits B, F, G, H, K,

23

and L thereto (Dkt. No. 1024).

24

Samsung has also filed the Declaration of Hankil Kang in Support of Apple’s

25 Administrative Motions to File Documents Under Seal (Dkt. Nos. 925, 1013, 1020, and 102226 1024) to establish compelling reasons for sealing these documents, or portions thereof.
27
28
02198.51855/4827299.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST

-2-

1

Having reviewed the relevant documents, and Mr. Kang’s declaration, the Court GRANTS

2 Samsung’s Miscellaneous Administrative Request and ORDERS sealed all portions of the
3 documents identified below and in the highlighted versions lodged with the Court.
4
Dkt. No.

Document

Pages with Redactions

5
Selwyn Decl., Ex. 10

p. 56

7

Selwyn Decl., Ex. 17

pp. 4-9

8

Selwyn Decl., Ex. 22

p. 92

Kramer Decl., Ex. 3

p. 6

Kramer Decl., Ex. 4

pp. 6-8

Kramer Decl., Ex. 10

pp. 9, 14-16

Maharbiz Decl., Ex. C

Bates Nos. -768-83

Maharbiz Decl., Ex. D

Bates Nos. -286-301

15

Maharbiz Decl., Ex. L

Bates No. -095-96, -098

16

Maharbiz Decl., Ex. M

Bates Nos. -827-70

17

Maharbiz Decl., Ex. N

Bates Nos. -465-66

18

Maharbiz Decl., Ex. O

Bates Nos. -873, -883

19

Maharbiz Decl., Ex. S

Bates Nos. -931, -932, -934

Bartlett Decl., Ex. 22

Bates Nos. -899-902, -904-09

Bartlett Decl., Ex. 30

pp. 38-53

Bartlett Decl., Ex. 36

pp. 76-81, 87-90

Bartlett Decl., Ex. 39

pp. 151-52, 169-70

Bartlett Decl., Ex. 43

pp. 89-90

26

Bartlett Decl., Ex. 44

p. 80

27

Bartlett Decl., Ex. 70

Bates Nos. -771-80

6

9

925

1013

10
11
12
13
14

20
21

1020

22
23
24
25

28
02198.51855/4827299.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST

-3-

1
Dkt. No.

Document

Pages with Redactions

2
3

Bartlett Decl., Ex. 73

Bates Nos. -706-07

4

Bartlett Decl., Ex. 74

Bates Nos. -604-06

Bressler Decl., Ex. 31

Bates Nos. -734, -737-79, -783, -78889, -790, -796, -799, -800, -803, -810-12, -814-21, -82328, -834-37, -839, -841, -843-45, -847, -851-58, -859-69

Bressler Decl., Ex. 36

Bates Nos. -460, -462, -470-73, -475, -476-97, -499525, -527-60

Bressler Decl., Ex. 37

Bates Nos. -409-13, -416-18, -420, -424-32, -434, -44041, -443, -489

Bressler Decl., Ex. 38

Bates Nos. -464-67

12

Bressler Decl., Ex. 67

Seal in entirety (document not Bates labeled)

13

Bressler Decl., Ex. 68

Seal in entirety (document not Bates labeled)

14

Bressler Decl., Ex. 70

Bates Nos. -460, -462, -470-73, -475, -476-97, -499525, -527-60

Bressler Decl., Ex. 72

Bates Nos. -689, -698, -700-04, -707-08, -710, -71214, -716-23, -725-27, -729-35, -737-40, -742-53, -755-58

Bressler Decl., Ex. 94

Seal in entirety (document not Bates labeled)

1023

Winer Decl., Ex. 1

pp. 48, 53-54, 58, 60-64, 66-67, 73

1024

Singh Decl., Ex. 1

pp. 85-86, 88-89, 91-99, 103-04, 108-10, 121-22

Singh Decl., Ex. 8

pp. 2-10, 12, 16, 25

22

Musika Decl., Ex. B

Seal in entirety (document not Bates labeled)

23

Musika Decl., Ex. F

Seal in entirety (document not Bates labeled)

24

Musika Decl., Ex. G

Seal in entirety (document not Bates labeled)

25

Musika Decl., Ex. H

Seal in entirety (document not Bates labeled)

26

Musika Decl., Ex. K

Bates No. -138

Musika Decl., Ex. L

Bates Nos. -347-48

5

1022

6
7
8
9
10
11

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

27
28
02198.51855/4827299.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST

-4-

1
Dkt. No.

Document

Pages with Redactions

2
Musika Decl.

3

pp. 6-7

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

DATED:

______________, 2012

9
10
11

Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4827299.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST

-5-