City of Winter Haven v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

Filing 295

US District Court Middle District of Florida PLAINTIFFS' EXHIBIT Exhibit Number: 1 6 . 2 2 6:06md01769ACCDAB In Re: Seroquel Products Liability Litigation Date Identified: Date Admitted:

Exhibit 16.22

Jaffe.Jonathan
From: Sent:
Tol Cc: Subject: G o o dnorning Michael: T h a n k you for providing this list. My goat today is to collect sufficient informatlon from P l a i n t l f f s to begin the database production process. I see the process occurring similar to along the following lines: o t h e r large pharmalitigatlon, L . Plaintiffs identify the databasesthat they want, based on the 3 0 ( b ) ( 6 ) depositions of AstraZeneca's IT people and inforrnation gathered from the -8 million p a g e s of documents that have been pnoduced thus far. 2 . Astrazenecawill collect field f i e l d namesactually mean. lists from those databases, including what any cryptic Dupre, Andrew[[e-mail]] T u e s d a yJune19,20078:43AM , Pederson, Mike Jaffe,Jonalhan; Rhonda Radlifi;Freebery, JamesJ.; Torregrossa, [e-mail]; BrennanWindfelder, ; Makenzie; \Mnchester, Tony R E :DataBaseproduction

3 . The parties will meet and confer to determine which fields the plaintiffs actually w a n t / s h o u l d get. Limiting the field scope to an agreed relevant subset will substantially s p e e d the data extnaction, and theneby get the database information to Plaintiffs fasten. 4 . Astrazenecawill do a test extnaction on someagreed subset of the agped fields, a p p r o v e dby Plaintiffs. 5. Astnazeneca will do a final data extraction and pnoduction. to be

T h e rernaining issues in your note (#2-7) do not really relate to databases. Instead, they for the custodial productions. to e x p r e s s none demands modify the centificate of completeness an equipmentlist for each F o n example, it appears Plaintiffs wish to discuss including I'd of course be happy to discuss these topics I'lith c u s t o d i a n (Iaptop, blackbenny, etc.). y o u . However,my opinion is that they ane not genmane databasesand do not fit with to I don't meanthat to be off-putting, but rathen to express that if we don't t o d a y ' s call. g e t moving on the databasesin a focused mannersoon, it will be very difficult to meet the v a r i o u s discovery deadlines ln the case. D o e s 3pmwork fon you today? I'F so, could you e m a i l me a dial-in? b e s tA n d r e w5 . D u p r e , E s q . & l v l c C a r t e n English, LLP 4 0 5 Nonth King Stneet 8th Floon W i l m i n g t o n , Delaware19801 P h o n e : 302-984-6328 Faxi 3AZ-984-A3LI My

------Original l'|essage--F r o m : Pederson,Mike [mailto:[e-mail]] 9:25 PM S e n t : l'londay,June 78, 2OO7 T o : Dupre, Andrew

Cc: Jaffe, Jonathan; [e-mail]; Rhonda Radliff 5 u b J e c t : Data Base pnoduction

Andrew, H e r e are someo'F the issues we need to discuss concerning and d e f e n d a n t s data base production. This llst is not compnehensive r e g u i r e s further discussion, but it should get us started. 1) Needto agree on a process fon getting electronic data from the databases: a. h,e need detalls on the data stored in each database. b. Onceinformation is neceived by Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs w i l l revlew infonmation and make specific requests f o n test data fron each system on rolling nequest/production basis. Defenseto provide test data fon each request. c. Plalntiffs to review the test data before Plaintiffs d. stored r e q u i n e s fulI copy/dovnload/extract of electronicalLy data e. Oncedata fields and format are agreed upon, and any to t e c h n i c a l issues resolved, De'Fense provide the e l e c t n o n i c data as requested, Plaintiffs could provide hand drives as data. r e q u i r e d fon the ease of transferrlng on 2) [r|eneed an agneement search terms, 3) !'fe need a report on the implernentation of non destruction policy, archive maintenance. t r a c k i n g of deletions, tnacking of backupsand 4) hle need you to supply server map (Active Directory Design) for all was searched. c u s t o d i a n s , and proof that each accessible server Defenseto supply documentationinventory of all corporate assets 5) assets ane i n use on control by custodian, and proo'F if such s e a r c h e dd u r i n g p r o d u c t i o n ( c u s t o d i a l o r o t h e r w i s e ) . Defenseto supply documentationthat production search lncludes 6) behalf of a l l files of custodian's delegates (those working on c u s t o d l a n s , example: assistants). 7) Defense to provide Data Topology f'lap and l4essagingplanning (e-mai1 server mapplng, downtimeplanning, archiving, etc.) documents W h e nwould be a good tine tonorow to have sone lnitial d i s c u s s i o n s on these issues? Please advise so I can set up a call in numben. from the law firm of McCanter& English, LLP is for the sole use of T h i s email message i n t e n d e d rectpient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any u n a u t h o r l z e d review, use, disclosure or distribution is pnohibited. If you are not the an i n t e n d e d necipient, please contact the sender by reply email(or [e-mail]) d d e s t n o y all copies of the oniginal message.