Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1346

Unredacted Exhibits to Bartlett Decl ISO Apple's Response to Samsung's Opening Memo Re Design Patent Claim Construction (Dkt. No. 1140) re 1256 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2, # 2 Exhibit 3, # 3 Exhibit 4, # 4 Exhibit 5, # 5 Exhibit 6, # 6 Exhibit 7, # 7 Exhibit 8, # 8 Exhibit 9, # 9 Exhibit 10, # 10 Exhibit 11, # 11 Exhibit 12, # 12 Exhibit 13, # 13 Exhibit 14, # 14 Exhibit 27)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/25/2012) Modified text on 7/26/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Exhibit 6 (Submitted Under Seal) Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 2 3 4 5 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK 8 9 10 11 12 13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. ____________________________/ 14 15 16 17 H I G H L Y C O N F I D E N T I A L O U T S I D E C O U N S E L O N L Y 18 19 20 21 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER STRINGER REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2011 22 23 24 25 BY: ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, CSR, RPR, CCRR, CLR CSR LICENSE NO. 9830 TSG JOB NO. 43706 TSG Reporting - Worldwide (877) 702-9580 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 3 FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2011 9:56 a.m. 1 2 3 4 5 6 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER STRINGER, taken at QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 7 8 SULLIVAN, LLP, 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 9 Suite 560, Redwood Shores, California, 10 Pursuant to Notice, before me, 11 ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, CLR, CCRR, RPR, 12 CSR License No. 9830. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 A P P E A R A N C E S: FOR APPLE INC.: MORRISON & FOERSTER By: MICHAEL A. JACOBS, Esq. 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105 FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD: QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN By: MICHAEL T. ZELLER, Esq. 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 ALSO PRESENT: Benjamin Gerald, Videographer Cyndi Wheeler, Apple, Inc. ---oOo--- 23 24 25 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2011 9:56 a.m. 1 2 3 4 5 6 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. This marks 7 the beginning of the disc labeled No. 1 of the 8 9 videotaped deposition of Chris Stinger -MR. JACOBS: Stringer. 10 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: -- Stringer. In the 11 matter Apple, Incorporated versus Samsung Electronics 12 Company Limited, et al. 13 14 Held in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose 15 Division. Case number is 11-cv-01846-LHK. 16 17 This deposition is being held at 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, in the city of Redwood Shores, 18 California. Taken on November 4th, 2011, at 19 approximately 9:56 a.m. 20 My name is Benjamin Gerald from TSG 21 Reporting, Incorporated, and I am the legal video 22 specialist. The court reporter is Andrea Ignacio, in 23 association with TSG Reporting. 24 At this time, will counsel please identify 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide Page 5 themselves for the record. MR. ZELLER: Mike Zeller for Samsung. MR. JACOBS: Michael Jacobs from Morrison & Foerster for Apple. With me is Cyndi Wheeler from Apple Legal. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Thank you. Will the reporter please swear the witness. CHRISTOPHER STRINGER, having been sworn as a witness, by the Certified Shorthand Reporter, testified as follows: THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Thank you. Please proceed. EXAMINATION BY MR. ZELLER MR. ZELLER: Let's please mark as Exhibit 1161 the Reply Declaration of Christopher Stringer in Support of Apple's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Document marked Exhibit 1161 for identification.) MR. ZELLER: Q. Please let me know when you've reviewed 1161. (877) 702-9580 2 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q Focusing your attention at the first page -or on the page of Exhibit 1, this is a CAD file showing the front face, then part of one of the sides of M68, which, as you said, was an iPhone concept; is that correct? A Yes. Q Do you have a name for what surrounds the display screen that's on the front surface of this design? A I would call that the housing. Q People within Apple also sometimes call it the case, C-A-S-E? A I would find that unlikely. Q Well, why was it Apple didn't use this design that's depicted in Exhibit 1 of your declaration? A We chose an alternate design. Q Why? A We found a more beautiful, more iconic form factor for this product. Q Any other reasons? A No. Q Who made that decision? A The design group at Apple made that decision. Q No one in particular made that decision? A Correct. Page 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. JACOBS: Objection; form. MR. ZELLER: Q. Isn't it true that Steve Jobs rejected this design? A That is not my recollection. Q Well, isn't it true, whether it was this exact design or not, that Steve Jobs rejected the initial iPhone designs that had the housing, the term you used, around the front of the screen on the front because it distracted from the display screen? A I do not recall that to be a fact. Q Well, weren't you at a meeting where Steve Jobs told everyone that the design that had this housing on the front surface was being scrapped? A I do not recall such a meeting. Q Well, directing your attention to the design that's shown in Exhibit 1 to your declaration, does having the housing that also extends on the front surface around the display, in your view, distract from the display screen? MR. JACOBS: Objection; form. THE WITNESS: I do not understand the question. MR. ZELLER: Q. What's unclear about it to you? A I do not know what you mean by "distract." Page 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q Well, why is it that the iPhone, as manufactured, doesn't have ornamentation on its front surface, other than the button? MR. JACOBS: Objection; form; assumes facts not in evidence. THE WITNESS: We found a more iconic design that we found more beautiful. MR. ZELLER: Q. Any other reason? MR. JACOBS: Same objection. THE WITNESS: That is the reason. MR. ZELLER: I didn't ask for "the reason." Q Is there any other reason? MR. JACOBS: Same objection. THE WITNESS: I -- we did not need another reason. MR. ZELLER: Q. So the answer is no. That was the sole reason; correct? A We found a more beautiful design. Q You've already said that. My question is: Is there any other reason at all? A *We based our decision on the facts that we found a more beautiful form factor, a more iconic form for this design. Q Let's mark that. Page 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide A Excuse me? Q I'm giving a direction to the reporter to mark it so when we raise this with the judge, we'll read this testimony back. Directing your attention to paragraph 7 of your declaration which we've marked as Exhibit 1161, in that same sentence I read earlier, you say here that you are familiar with: "The manufacturing and technical challenges for those products." Do you see that? A Excuse me. Could you repeat which line I'm looking for. Q This is paragraph 7 on page 2 of your declaration. The full sentence starts on line 10 and ends with line 12, and the part I'm focusing on now is where you say you're familiar with: "The manufacturing and technical challenges for these products." A Correct. Q Please tell me what your full basis is for saying that you're familiar with the manufacturing and technical challenges for these products. A I understand how we build these products. Q Have you been to the manufacturing facilities (877) 702-9580 6 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 78 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 That might mean that we redesign the product from scratch at one most extreme case -- and I cannot recall an example of that -- and it might mean we compromise the level of robustness that we introduce in the product. I am speculating at this point. I cannot recall the exact nature of how we responded to the drop test in this particular example. Q Can you tell me, with respect to the exterior design of any version of the iPod Touch, whether you recall any changes being made in response to any drop testing report? A Changes are always made if we choose to improve the results. Q And did that happen with the exterior design of any iPod Touch? A As to whether it implements the exterior design, it -- we would have designed a solution that we thought to be beautiful and iconic that served all of the requirements, one of those requirements being some level of robustness that may be a -- a tradeoff, based on an appearance judgment. Q Right. I understand. But I'm trying to find out: Do you recall if that actually happened with the exterior design of any Page 79 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 iPod Touch? A The drop test results do not design products. We design products to satisfy the level of robustness or product ruggedness that we think appropriate when -- when designing the device. So I'm afraid I'm not sure how to answer your question. But obviously, you don't seem satisfied with the answer. MR. JACOBS: Can we go off the record for a second. I may be able to help you. I recognize you trying to get a yes or no answer to something, and I may be able to facilitate that. MR. ZELLER: Okay. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This marks the end of disc No. 2 in the deposition of Chris Stinger -THE WITNESS: Stringer. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: -- Stringer. The time is 1:50 p.m., and we are off the record. (Recess taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This marks the beginning of Disc No. 3 in the deposition of Chris Stringer. The time is 1:59 p.m., and we are back on record. MR. ZELLER: Q. At any time were any changes made to the exterior of any iPod Touch design in Page 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 response to any drop test report? A I do not recall a specific instance when that occurred. Q Are you saying you don't recall one way or another? A I do not recall that occurring specifically. Q Is it your memory that it did not occur, or you're just not recalling one way or another? That's what I'm trying to figure out. A The latter. I do not recall. I don't recall. I don't remember a specific time when that would -- had occurred. Q Were any changes made to the exterior of any iPhone design in response to any drop test report? A I do not recall. Q Were any changes made to the exterior of any iPad design in response to any drop test report? A I do not recall. Q Do you recall one way or another whether any drop test report influenced any aspect of any iPod Touch design? A The question is broad. "Influence" is -- can be construed to varying degrees. And the design, to my mind, includes the interior of the product. So internal changes no doubt were made. I do Page 81 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide not recall specific instances of that. I'm trying to give you a lengthy answer to give you an understanding of our design process. Q Let me -- let me rephrase that. Do you recall one way or another whether any drop test report influenced any aspect of the exterior of any iPad -- iPod Touch design? A No. Q Do you recall one way or another whether any drop test report influenced the exterior design of any iPad product? A No. Q Do you recall one way or another whether any drop test report influenced the exterior design of any iPhone product? A No. Q Is there a group within Apple that's responsible for conducting drop testing and producing drop test reports? A Yes. Q What's the name of the group? A Reliability. We refer to them as the rel guys. In fact, they may have a slightly different name. I might be misquoting it as reliability. Q Who is the head of that group, as you (877) 702-9580 21 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 glass or a shadow beneath it, or a combination of both. Q Well, let me -- let me try it with another image, and maybe we'll come back to this in a minute. If you'd take a look at the next page, which is '18791. A Yes. Q And maybe this is a better image to try and work from, but you'll see that there is a -- a darker line that runs in between the lighter-colored housing and then the so-called glass, but is really plastic flat surface; do you see that darker line? A Yes. Q Does that darker line, in your view, correspond to the broader gap that you talked about earlier with respect to the 035 model? A It looks to me to be some combination of -and of the edge of what we call the glass -- cover glass and shadow beneath it. And my guess is it's -the lines show -- what we see is shadow. Q Is the broader gap depicted in this photo, the broader gap that you talked about earlier that is -A This is a dreadful quality reproduction of a photograph. Yes, the broader gap is depicted very Page 103 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 badly, but I can tell where it is on the picture. Q Okay. Well, terrific. If I could perhaps hand you a pen, and if you could label where you see that -- that broader gap that you had described and testified earlier with respect to the 035 model. A There. Q And maybe the most convenient way of doing this, if you could maybe hold it up for the -- the camera, and then just kind of show where it runs on the -- on the page. A Well, the narrower gap is depicted by this -THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Sir, can you show -THE WITNESS: Okay. The narrow gap is depicted by this gray fuzzy line here. The broader gap is in some part depicted by the dark shadow and the light area next to it. MR. ZELLER: And it runs along -THE WITNESS: It runs around the full, with less and less clarity, edge of the photograph. I have to say it's -- it's too poor an image to discern much of anything above the line. MR. JACOBS: Should we mark this as a new depo exhibit? MR. ZELLER: Yes, I think so. Page 104 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 So let's, for the record, please mark as the version of 841 that now has Mr. Stringer's marking on it on page '18791 as Exhibit 841A. (Document marked Exhibit 841A for identification.) MR. ZELLER: If we can go back to Exhibit 1170. And by the way, did you want to send those mockups back? MR. JACOBS: That would be great. MR. ZELLER: Okay. So let's go off the record. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 2:42 p.m., and we are off the record. (Recess taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 2:55 p.m., and we are back on the record. MR. ZELLER: Direct your attention to the '889 design patent, which was previously marked as Exhibit 8. MR. JACOBS: I'll just hand you my copy. THE WITNESS: All right. Thank you. MR. ZELLER: Q. Please take a look at Figure 1. A Yes. Q You'll see on Figure 1 that at least as part Page 105 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide of the -- at least along part of the -- generally what we'll call the perimeter area of the front, there's a darker, thicker line? A Which figure are you looking at? Q This is Figure 1. A Figure 1. Q Do you see where at least on part of the perimeter, there is a line that is darker and thicker? A Which would be the second line from the left on the left side of the figure. Q Right, on the left side. And then on the bottom portion of Figure 1, it appears to run -- to be the line that is -- that the -- is the edge, at least from that perspective? A It looks like the edge, yes. Q Do you know what that thicker line depicts? A It's -- on the lower edge, it's the -- it looks like the edge of the housing. Q Well, what about on the left side? A It's the edge of the housing. Q So on both the left side and the bottom side, you construe that darker, thicker line to be where the edge of the housing is? A I do construe that. And it's -- my assumption is confirmed by looking at Figure 3 that (877) 702-9580 27 Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only Page 122 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 No. 3 of 3 and concludes today's deposition of Chris Stringer. The time is 3:23 p.m., and we are off record. (WHEREUPON, the deposition ended at 3:23 p.m.) ---oOo--- Page 123 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JURAT I, CHRISTOPHER STRINGER, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing transcript of my deposition taken on November 4, 2011; that I have made such corrections as appear noted herein in ink, initialed by me; that my testimony as contained herein, as corrected, is true and correct. DATED this ____ day of _____________, 2011, at _____________________________, California. __________________________________ SIGNATURE OF WITNESS Page 124 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 1 2 3 I, ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, hereby certify 4 that the witness in the foregoing deposition was by me 5 duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth, and 6 nothing but the truth in the within-entitled cause; 7 8 That said deposition was taken in shorthand 9 by me, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of 10 California, and was thereafter transcribed into 11 typewriting, and that the foregoing transcript 12 constitutes a full, true and correct report of said 13 deposition and of the proceedings which took place; 14 15 That I am a disinterested person to the said 16 action. 17 18 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my 19 hand this 4th day of November 2011. 20 21 _______________________________________ 22 ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, RPR, CCRR, CLR, CSR No. 983023 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide Page 125 INDEX DEPOSITION OF CHRISTOPHER STRINGER EXAMINATION PAGE BY MR. ZELLER BY MR. JACOBS 5 119 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT PAGE Exhibit 1161 Reply Declaration of Christopher 5 Stringer in support of Apple's Motion for a Preliminary injunction; 50 pgs. Exhibit 1162 Colored Photograph Ad of iPad 26 Thinner and Lighter; 1 pg. Exhibit 1163 U.S. Patent No. D627,777 S; 41 7 pgs. Exhibit 1164 U.S. Patent No. D637,596 S; 41 7 pgs. Exhibit 1165 U.S. Patent No. D621,825 S; 41 14 pgs. Exhibit 1166 Sketchbooks, Bates Nos. 41 APLNDC0000037650 - '95; 46 pgs. (877) 702-9580 32

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?