Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1346

Unredacted Exhibits to Bartlett Decl ISO Apple's Response to Samsung's Opening Memo Re Design Patent Claim Construction (Dkt. No. 1140) re 1256 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2, # 2 Exhibit 3, # 3 Exhibit 4, # 4 Exhibit 5, # 5 Exhibit 6, # 6 Exhibit 7, # 7 Exhibit 8, # 8 Exhibit 9, # 9 Exhibit 10, # 10 Exhibit 11, # 11 Exhibit 12, # 12 Exhibit 13, # 13 Exhibit 14, # 14 Exhibit 27)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/25/2012) Modified text on 7/26/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Exhibit 7 (Submitted Under Seal) Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 2 3 4 5 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs. CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK 8 9 10 11 12 13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. ____________________________/ 14 15 16 17 H I G H L Y C O N F I D E N T I A L A T T O R N E Y S' E Y E S O N L Y 18 19 20 21 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF PHIL HOBSON REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2012 22 23 24 25 BY: ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, CSR, RPR, CCRR, CLR CSR LICENSE NO. 9830 JOB NO. 46054 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 3 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2012 9:10 a.m. 1 2 3 4 5 6 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF PHIL HOBSON, 7 taken at QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 8 SULLIVAN, LLP, 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 9 Redwood Shores, California, 10 Pursuant to Notice, before me, 11 ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, CLR, CCRR, RPR, 12 CSR License No. 9830. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 A P P E A R A N C E S: FOR APPLE INC.: MORRISON & FOERSTER By: HECTOR G. GALLEGOS, Esq. 555 West Fifth Street Los Angeles, California 90013 FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD: QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN By: SCOTT B. KIDMAN, Esq. 555 Twin Dolphin Drive Redwood Shores, California 94065 ALSO PRESENT: Steve Patapoff, Videographer ---oOo--08:42 08:42 08:42 25 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA 08:42 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2012 08:42 9:10 A.M. 08:42 08:42 08:42 08:43 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. This is the 08:43 start of tape labeled No. 1 of the videotaped 09:09 deposition of Phil Hobson. 09:09 In the matter of Apple, Inc., versus Samsung 09:09 Electronics Company. Being heard in U.S. District 09:09 Court, Northern District of California, San Jose 09:09 Division. No. 11-cv-01846-LHK. 09:09 This deposition is being held at Quinn 09:09 Emanuel, 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood Shores, 09:09 California on February 28, 2012, at approximately 09:10 9:10 a.m. 09:10 My name is Steve Patapoff. I'm the legal 09:10 video specialist from TSG Reporting, Inc., 09:10 headquartered at 747 Third Avenue, New York, New York. 09:10 The court reporter is Andrea Ignacio, in 09:10 association with TSG Reporting. 09:10 Will counsel please introduce yourselves. 09:10 MR. KIDMAN: Scott Kidman for Samsung. 09:10 MR. GALLEGOS: Hector Gallegos of Morrison & 09:10 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide Foerster, counsel for Apple. 09:10 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter please swear in the witness. PHIL HOBSON, having been sworn as a witness by the Certified Shorthand Reporter, testified as follows: EXAMINATION BY MR. KIDMAN MR. KIDMAN: Q. Good morning. 09:10 A Good morning. 09:10 Q Could you state your name for the record, 09:10 please. 09:10 A Phil Hobson. 09:10 Q And what's your home address? 09:10 A 315 Central Avenue, Menlo Park. 09:11 Q And by whom are you currently employed? 09:11 A Apple. 09:11 Q That didn't take long. 09:11 And how long have you been employed by Apple? 09:11 A About eight years. 09:11 Q Do you recall the date you started? 09:11 A I don't recall. 09:11 Q Do you recall the year you started? 09:11 877-702-9580 2 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 it was formed. 10:08 And so what were the issues that you 10:08 interfaced with the operations group about regarding 10:08 the aluminum housing and how it was formed? 10:08 MR. GALLEGOS: Objection; form. 10:08 THE WITNESS: I can give you an example of -- 10:08 of one issue. 10:08 MR. KIDMAN: Okay. 10:08 THE WITNESS: So the -- the tooling for 10:08 making the housing in this particular shape was fairly 10:08 complex. So working together with operations to 10:08 figure out exactly the configuration of the tooling to 10:08 make the housing. 10:08 MR. KIDMAN: Q. And when you refer to the 10:09 tooling for making the -- the housing in this 10:09 particular shape, are you referring to the -- the 10:09 shape of the housing in the product as it -- as it was 10:09 shipped? 10:09 A Yes. 10:10 Q And how would you describe the shape of the 10:10 housing of the original iPhone product that was 10:10 shipped? 10:10 A It was an aluminum shell that was open on 10:10 one -- one end. 10:10 Q Do you recall other shapes for the housing 10:10 Page 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 being considered that were not adopted? 10:10 A Yes. 10:10 Q What other shapes? What -- what shapes do 10:10 you recall being considered for the housing that were 10:10 not adopted? 10:11 MR. GALLEGOS: Objection; vague. 10:11 THE WITNESS: Shape in -- in what way? 10:11 MR. KIDMAN: Q. In -- in the same way that 10:11 you described for me the housing shape as being an 10:11 aluminum shell open on one end. 10:11 MR. GALLEGOS: Objection; form. 10:11 THE WITNESS: One shape that was considered 10:11 was an aluminum extrusion. 10:11 MR. KIDMAN: Q. Do you recall other shapes 10:11 that were considered but not adopted? 10:11 A Yes. 10:11 Q What other ones? 10:11 A A small plastic housing. I don't know how to 10:11 describe it. 10:12 Q Any others? 10:12 A Those were the main ones that -- that we 10:12 considered. 10:12 Q Do you recall any others that were 10:12 considered? 10:12 A ID looked at a variety of shapes, and I don't 10:12 Page 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 recall specifically what they looked like. 10:12 Q Did you interact with operations with respect 10:12 to the tooling for the aluminum -- aluminum extrusion? 10:12 A I don't recall. 10:13 Q Do you recall interacting with operations for 10:13 any purpose regarding the aluminum -- aluminum 10:13 extrusion-shaped housing? 10:13 A I don't recall. 10:13 Q Do you recall interacting with the industrial 10:13 design group regarding the aluminum -- aluminum 10:13 extrusion-shaped housing? 10:13 A I don't remember specific interactions, but 10:13 I'm sure that we did. 10:13 Q Do you recall generally interacting with the 10:13 industrial design group regarding the aluminum -10:13 aluminum extrusion-shaped housing? 10:13 A Yes. 10:13 Q What do you recall about those interactions? 10:13 A Again, I don't remember any specific meetings 10:13 or interactions. 10:14 Q I understand you might not recall a specific 10:14 meeting or a specific interaction, but what do you 10:14 recall generally about the nature of those 10:14 interactions? 10:14 MR. GALLEGOS: Objection; form. 10:14 Page 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide THE WITNESS: I can only comment generally 10:14 how we work on a project. Specifically for that form 10:14 factor, I don't remember. I don't remember any 10:14 interactions with them specifically. 10:14 MR. KIDMAN: Q. And I understand you might 10:14 not recall a specific conversation or a specific 10:14 meeting, but do you recall anything about the nature 10:14 of the interactions -10:14 MR. GALLEGOS: Objection. 10:14 MR. KIDMAN: Q. -- of the industrial design 10:14 group regarding the aluminum extrusion-shaped housing? 10:14 A No, I don't. 10:14 Q Do you recall any interactions with the 10:14 industrial design group regarding the -- what you 10:15 referred to as the small plastic housing that was 10:15 considered for the original iPhone? 10:15 A Again, no, I don't remember specific 10:15 interaction. 10:15 Q How about generally, do you recall any 10:15 interactions? 10:15 A I don't. 10:15 Q Do you have any -- any understanding as to 10:15 why the aluminum -- aluminum extrusion-shaped housing 10:15 was not adopted for the original iPhone? 10:15 A I don't. 10:15 877-702-9580 10 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Page 214 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 215 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 1 JURAT 2 3 I, PHIL HOBSON, do hereby certify under Penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing transcript of my deposition taken on February 28 2012; that I have made such corrections as appear noted herein in ink, initialed by me; that my testimony as contained herein, as corrected, is true and correct. 4 I, ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, hereby certify 5 that the witness in the foregoing deposition was by me 6 duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth, and 7 nothing but the truth in the within-entitled cause; 8 That said deposition was taken in shorthand by me, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of 11 California, and was thereafter transcribed into 12 typewriting, and that the foregoing transcript 13 DATED this ____ day of _____________, 2012, at _____________________________, California. 9 10 constitutes a full, true and correct report of said 14 deposition and of the proceedings which took place; 15 16 17 That I am a disinterested person to the said action. 18 __________________________________ SIGNATURE OF WITNESS 19 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of February 2012. 21 22 23 _______________________________________ ANDREA M. IGNACIO HOWARD, RPR, CCRR, CLR, CSR No. 9830 24 25 Page 216 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 INDEX 1 2 3 DEPOSITION OF PHIL HOBSON 4 5 EXAMINATION 6 PAGE 7 BY MR. KIDMAN 5 8 9 EXHIBITS 10 EXHIBIT PAGE Exhibit 1170 7-26-06 E-mail Subject: M68 106 11 12 Bezel Machining, Bates Nos. 13 APLNDC0001205831 - '35; 5 pgs. 14 Exhibit 1171 8-14-09 E-mail Subject: 129 15 Samsung Jet OLED Analysis, 16 Bates Nos. APLNDC0002113588 17 '608; 21 pgs. 18 Exhibit 1172 9-20-06 E-mail Subject: Re: 116 19 M68/P2 drop models: System 20 measurements, Bates Nos. 21 APL-ITC796-0000161405 - '09; 22 5 pgs. Exhibit 1173 11-18-08 E-mail Subject: HTC 131 23 24 HD Take Apart photos, Bates Nos. 25 APLNDC0002015009 - '21; 13 pgs. TSG Reporting - Worldwide Page 217 E X H I B I T S (Continued.) EXHIBIT PAGE Exhibit 1174 1-27-08 E-mail, Subject: Re N82 133 Housing: Tooling issues (1/26), Bates Nos. APLNDC0001370508 '11; 4 pgs. Exhibit 1175 10-4-06 E-mail, Subject: Re: 135 Thursday take-apart, Bates No. APLNDC0001531442; 1 pg. Exhibit 1176 6-2-06 E-mail, Subject: Re: 140 M68 GSM Type Approval Acoustic Adjustments Effort (Update: Wednesday 31 May 06), Bates Nos. APL7940001886403 - '21; 20 pgs. Exhibit 1177 2-23-06 E-mail String, Subject: 191 Re: Grape mech drop samples, Bates APLNDC0000187302 - '04; 3 pgs. Exhibit 1178 1-26-08 E-mail String, Subject: 163 Re: N82 master -01? Bates Nos. APLNDC0001205935 - '38; 4 pgs. Exhibit 1179 US Patent No. 7,688,574 B2; 168 13 pgs. /// 877-702-9580 55

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?