Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 2126

Declaration of Susan Estrich in Support of 2013 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law, New Trial and/or Remittitur Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50 and 59, 2054 Brief, 2053 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 to the Estrich Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 2 to the Estrich Declaration, # 3 Exhibit 3 to the Estrich Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 4 to the Estrich Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 5 to the Estrich Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 6 to the Estrich Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 7 to the Estrich Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 8 to the Estrich Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 9 to the Estrich Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 10 to the Estrich Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 11 to the Estrich Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 12 to the Estrich Declaration, # 13 Exhibit 13 to the Estrich Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 14 to the Estrich Declaration, # 15 Exhibit 15 to the Estrich Declaration, # 16 Exhibit 16 to the Estrich Declaration, # 17 Exhibit 17 to the Estrich Declaration, # 18 Exhibit 18 to the Estrich Declaration, # 19 Exhibit 19 to the Estrich Declaration, # 20 Exhibit 20 to the Estrich Declaration, # 21 Exhibit 21 to the Estrich Declaration, # 22 Exhibit 22 to the Estrich Declaration, # 23 Exhibit 23 to the Estrich Declaration, # 24 Exhibit 24 to the Estrich Declaration, # 25 Exhibit 25 to the Estrich Declaration, # 26 Exhibit 26 to the Estrich Declaration, # 27 Exhibit 27 to the Estrich Declaration, # 28 Exhibit 28 to the Estrich Declaration, # 29 Exhibit 29 to the Estrich Declaration, # 30 Exhibit 30 to the Estrich Declaration, # 31 Exhibit 31 to the Estrich Declaration)(Related document(s) 2013 , 2054 , 2053 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 11/9/2012)

Download PDF
Estrich Declaration Exhibit 5 1297 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 5 6 APPLE INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 PLAINTIFF, VS. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A KOREAN BUSINESS ENTITY; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 14 DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C-11-01846 LHK SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 7, 2012 VOLUME 5 PAGES 1297-1637 15 16 17 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 APPEARANCES ON NEXT PAGE 21 22 23 24 25 OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER: LEE-ANNE SHORTRIDGE, CSR, CRR CERTIFICATE NUMBER 9595 IRENE RODRIGUEZ, CSR, CRR CERTIFICATE NUMBER 8074 1298 1 A P P E A R A N C E S: 2 FOR PLAINTIFF APPLE: 3 4 MORRISON & FOERSTER BY: HAROLD J. MCELHINNY MICHAEL A. JACOBS RACHEL KREVANS 425 MARKET STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105 5 6 7 8 FOR COUNTERCLAIMANT WILMER, CUTLER, PICKERING, APPLE: HALE AND DORR BY: WILLIAM F. LEE 60 STATE STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109 9 BY: MARK D. SELWYN 950 PAGE MILL ROAD PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 FOR THE DEFENDANT: 94304 QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART, OLIVER & HEDGES BY: CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN ANNE ABRAMOWITZ 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 14 BY: 15 16 VICTORIA F. MAROULIS KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON 555 TWIN DOLPHIN DRIVE SUITE 560 REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA 94065 17 BY: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MICHAEL T. ZELLER WILLIAM C. PRICE 865 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 10TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 1299 1 INDEX OF WITNESSES 2 PLAINTIFF'S 3 4 5 PETER BRESSLER REDIRECT EXAM BY MS. KREVANS (RES.)P. 1336 RECROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN P. 1349 FURTHER REDIRECT BY MS. KREVANS P. 1354 6 7 8 9 10 SUSAN KARE DIRECT EXAM BY MS. KREVANS CROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN REDIRECT EXAM BY MS. KREVANS RECROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN FURTHER REDIRECT BY MS. KREVANS FURTHER RECROSS BY MR. VERHOEVEN P. P. P. P. P. P. 1356 1414 1478 1489 1492 1493 RUSSELL WINER DIRECT EXAM BY MR. JACOBS CROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN REDIRECT EXAM BY MR. JACOBS RECROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN FURTHER REDIRECT BY MR. JACOBS P. P. P. P. P. 1496 1529 1565 1572 1576 HAL PORET DIRECT EXAM BY MR. JACOBS CROSS-EXAM BY MR. PRICE P. 1577 P. 1591 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1421 1 Q OKAY. 2 WHERE WERE WE? WE WERE TALKING ABOUT YOU PROVIDED THE 3 TESTIMONY ABOUT HOW A CONSUMER MIGHT MAKE A MISTAKE 4 OR BE CONFUSED ABOUT THESE APPLICATION SCREENS 5 THINKING THAT, ONE, THAT IT'S A SAMSUNG APPLICATION 6 SCREEN AND MIGHT BE AN APPLE PHONE, RIGHT, OR AN 7 APPLE APPLICATION SCREEN. 8 A 9 LIKE THE DESIGN OF THE D'305 PATENT. DO YOU REMEMBER THAT? THAT A SAMSUNG APPLICATION SCREEN WOULD LOOK 10 Q DIDN'T YOU -- DIDN'T I HEAR YOU SAY THAT YOU 11 THOUGHT THAT A CONSUMER WOULD BE CONFUSED AS TO THE 12 SOURCE? 13 A WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT TRADE DRESS. 14 Q RIGHT? 15 A WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT -- EXCUSE ME. 16 YOU WERE ASKING ME ABOUT THE D'305. 17 Q 18 BEING -- WHETHER OR NOT CONSUMERS MIGHT BE CONFUSED 19 BY THE SAMSUNG APPLICATION SCREENS. OKAY. 20 I THOUGHT BUT YOU DID TALK ABOUT CONSUMERS DO YOU REMEMBER THAT? 21 A YES. 22 Q OKAY. 23 THEY MIGHT BE? 24 A YES. 25 Q OKAY. AND YOU THOUGHT THAT THERE'S -- THAT SO LET'S LOOK AT WHAT A CONSUMER WOULD 1422 1 SEE WHEN THEY TURN ON THE PHONE BETWEEN THE TIME 2 THEY HAVE A PHONE LIKE THIS IN THEIR HANDS THAT'S 3 TURNED OFF AND THE TIME THAT THEY ACTUALLY GET TO 4 THE APPLICATION SCREEN. 5 6 I'LL TRY TO DO THIS, YOUR HONOR, ON THE ELMO. 7 DO WE HAVE A MICROPHONE? 8 THE CLERK: 9 MR. VERHOEVEN: 10 A MICROPHONE? WAS A LITTLE HAND MIKE. YEAH. I THOUGHT THERE THERE WE GO. 11 DOES THIS WORK? 12 I'M GOING TO PUT THIS CLOSE TO THE PHONE 13 SO THAT -- OKAY. 14 Q 15 THE PHONE. 16 A THE START-UP SCREEN WITH THE -- 17 Q WHAT DOES IT SAY? 18 A IT SAYS, "SAMSUNG." 19 Q STILL SAYS SAMSUNG. 20 SO NOW I'M THE CONSUMER, AND I'M TURNING ON WHAT DOES THE CONSUMER SEE? WHAT'S DROID? IS THAT SHORT FOR ANDROID? 21 A I DON'T KNOW I KNOW IT'S THIS, THE DROID PHONE 22 HAS THE CHIN. 23 Q AND NOW WHAT IS THE CONSUMER LOOKING AT NOW? 24 A THE UNLOCK SCREEN. 25 Q SO THE CONSUMER HAS TO DO SOMETHING HERE; 1423 1 RIGHT? 2 A YES. 3 Q WHAT DO THEY HAVE TO DO? 4 A MOVE THE PUZZLE PIECE TO THE RIGHT TO UNLOCK 5 IT. 6 Q OKAY. 7 A THE HOME SCREEN OF THE SAMSUNG PHONE. 8 Q OKAY. 9 DO -- THIS IS -- THIS SCREEN HERE IS NOT ACCUSED; NOW, WHAT IS THE CONSUMER LOOKING AT? AND SO WHAT DOES A CONSUMER NEED TO 10 RIGHT? 11 A NO. 12 Q YOU WEREN'T EVEN ASKED TO LOOK AT THIS SCREEN; 13 RIGHT? 14 A 15 THIS SCREEN. 16 Q 17 RIGHT? 18 A YES. 19 Q OKAY. 20 TO DO -- WHAT DOES THE CONSUMER HAVE TO DO TO GET 21 TO THE APPLICATION SCREEN? 22 A 23 THE GRID OF SQUARES. 24 Q 25 THAT A CONSUMER GETS TO THE APPLICATION SCREEN. I WOULD SAY -- I WAS NOT ASKED TO CONSIDER OKAY. SO IT'S JUST THE APPLICATION SCREEN; AND REMIND US, WHAT DOES THE USER HAVE TOUCH THE BLUE BUTTON ON THE LOWER RIGHT WITH OKAY. SO IT'S ONLY AFTER ALL OF THOSE STEPS 1424 1 FAIR? 2 A YES. 3 Q NOW, DR. KARE, WOULDN'T YOU AGREE THAT BY THE 4 TIME A CONSUMER GOES THROUGH ALL THOSE STEPS TO GET 5 TO THE APPLICATION SCREEN, THAT CONSUMER KNOWS THAT 6 THIS IS A SAMSUNG PHONE? 7 A 8 SCREEN COMPARED TO THE APPLE HOME SCREEN. 9 Q I UNDERSTAND THAT. 10 A BECAUSE -- 11 Q BUT I HAVE A DIFFERENT QUESTION FOR YOU. 12 I WAS ONLY ASKED TO CONSIDER THIS APPLICATION WOULDN'T YOU AGREE THAT BY THE TIME THAT 13 A CONSUMER TURNS ON THE PHONE AND GOES THROUGH 14 THOSE STEPS WE LOOKED AT, WHERE THEY SEE THE 15 SAMSUNG NAME PROMINENTLY FOR SEVERAL SECONDS, WHERE 16 THEY SEE THE GRAPHIC FOR DROID, WHERE THEY HAVE TO 17 GO PAST THE HOME SCREEN TO THE APPLICATION SCREEN, 18 BY THE TIME THEY GET TO THAT APPLICATION SCREEN, 19 WOULDN'T YOU AGREE THAT A CONSUMER KNOWS THAT 20 THEY'RE USING A SAMSUNG PHONE? 21 A 22 THAT KIND OF USER EXPERIENCE. I'M NOT AN EXPERT IN CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND 23 I'M REALLY FOCUSSED ON GRAPHIC U/I. 24 DON'T KNOW THAT I'M QUALIFIED TO ANSWER THAT. 25 Q SO I WELL, QUALIFIED OR NOT, WOULD YOU AGREE WITH 1425 1 ME? A CONSUMER, BY THIS POINT, GOING THROUGH THE 2 START-UP AND ALL OF THAT, SEEING ALL THAT 3 ADVERTISING, THEY KNOW THEY HAVE A SAMSUNG PHONE, 4 DON'T THEY? 5 A 6 I DON'T KNOW. 7 Q YOU'RE NOT QUALIFIED? 8 A I HAVEN'T STUDIED START-UP EXPERIENCE FROM 9 PHONE TO PHONE. I JUST CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT BECAUSE I DON'T -- I -- I COMPLETELY -- I KNOW THAT 10 THIS IS THE APPLICATION SCREEN, NOT THE HOME 11 SCREEN. 12 Q 13 PHONE, SEES THE SAMSUNG NAME PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED, 14 SEES THE DROID ADVERTISEMENT AND ANIMATION, 15 WOULDN'T YOU AGREE THAT NO CONSUMER WOULD BE 16 CONFUSED AS TO WHICH PHONE THEY HAVE BY THAT TIME? 17 A 18 I DON'T KNOW ABOUT CONSUMER BEHAVIOR STARTING -- I 19 DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE QUESTION YOU'RE ASKING ME. 20 THAT'S OUTSIDE MY FOCUS. 21 Q IT'S OUTSIDE YOUR EXPERTISE? 22 A YES, AS A GRAPHIC U/I DESIGNER. 23 Q NOW, THERE WAS ONE SLIDE -- I'LL TURN THIS OFF 24 NOW, YOUR HONOR, IF THAT'S OKAY. 25 BY THE TIME THAT THE CONSUMER TURNS ON THE I CAN'T AGREE BECAUSE I HAVEN'T -- I DON'T -- THE COURT: GO AHEAD, PLEASE. 1426 1 BY MR. VERHOEVEN: 2 Q 3 RESPECT TO YOUR TESTIMONY MORE THAN OTHERS WHEN YOU 4 WERE TESTIFYING ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS WITH RESPECT TO 5 THE DESIGN '305 PATENT, AND THAT WAS PDX 14.7. THERE'S ONE SLIDE THAT YOU FOCUSSED ON WITH 6 CAN WE PUT THAT ON THE SCREEN. THIS IS A 7 SLIDE THAT COUNSEL FOR APPLE SHOWED YOU. 8 REMEMBER THAT? 9 A YES. 10 Q AND DO YOU REMEMBER YOU SPENT MOST OF YOUR 11 TIME EXPLAINING THIS SLIDE, AND FOR THE OTHER 12 SLIDES SHE SHOWED YOU, YOU SAID SAME REASONS? 13 A YES. 14 Q SO LET'S FOCUS ON THIS SLIDE. DO YOU 15 NOW, IF WE LOOK AT THE DESIGN '305 PATENT 16 COMPARED TO THE FASCINATE, DO YOU SEE IN THE DESIGN 17 '305 PATENT THE FIRST BOX IN THE UPPER LEFT SAYS 18 SMS? 19 A YES. 20 Q WHERE IS THAT ICON IN THE FASCINATE? 21 A I BELIEVE THAT THE ANALOGOUS ICON IS IN THE 22 BOTTOM ROW ON THE RIGHT, THREE FROM THE LEFT. 23 Q 24 25 I HAVE A LASER POINTER, YOUR HONOR. DO YOU MIND IF I HAND THIS TO THE WITNESS SO SHE CAN INDICATE ON THE BIG SCREEN? 1427 1 A GO AHEAD, PLEASE. 2 Q DO YOU KNOW HOW TO USE THESE? 3 A I'M NOT A LASER POINTER EXPERT, EITHER. 4 Q JUST PUT THIS BUTTON. 5 ANYBODY'S EYES. 6 A OKAY. 7 Q SO THE SMS IS ON THE TOP LEFT, RIGHT, IN THE 8 D'305? 9 A YES. 10 Q AND WHERE IS IT IN THE FASCINATE? 11 A (INDICATING). 12 Q RIGHT DOWN HERE? 13 A I BELIEVE THAT THOSE ARE ANALOGOUS. 14 Q OKAY. 15 A YES. 16 Q IN THE '305, THERE'S A DOCK OR -- WHAT WOULD 17 YOU CALL THIS BOTTOM ROW ON THE '305? 18 A 19 BECAUSE IT'S JUST A DESIGN, ORNAMENTAL DESIGN. 20 I JUST HAVE BEEN CALLING IT AN AREA AT THE BOTTOM, 21 A SEPARATED AREA AT THE BOTTOM, BECAUSE IT 22 DOESN'T -- THE '305 DOESN'T TALK ABOUT 23 FUNCTIONALITY. 24 Q 25 IN THE BOTTOM ROW THAT'S SET OFF SEPARATELY; RIGHT? DON'T POINT IT IN SO IT'S IN A DIFFERENT PLACE; RIGHT? YOU KNOW, IT DOESN'T REALLY SAY IN THE '305 OKAY. SO WELL, IN THE D'305, THE SMS ICON IS NOT 1428 1 A RIGHT. 2 Q BUT IN THE FASCINATE, IT IS IN THE BOTTOM ROW. 3 IS THAT BOTTOM ROW SET OFF SEPARATELY? 4 A YES. 5 Q SO YOU WOULD AGREE THAT'S A DIFFERENCE? 6 A YES. 7 Q NOW, YOU TALKED ABOUT ROUNDED RECTANGLES FOR 8 THE IPHONES. 9 A YES. 10 Q AND DO YOU REMEMBER YOU TESTIFIED WITH RESPECT 11 TO ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS THAT, GEE, SAMSUNG COULD 12 HAVE USED SOMETHING BESIDES ROUNDED RECTANGLES, 13 RIGHT? 14 A YES. 15 Q WELL, THIS ICON SHEER NOT JUST A ROUNDED 16 RECTANGLE. 17 SPEECH BOX THAT YOU SEE IN CARTOONS; RIGHT? 18 A RIGHT. 19 Q DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT? 20 A YES. 21 HAS, HAS ROUNDED RECTANGULAR ELEMENTS, BUT IT'S NOT 22 A SQUARE. 23 Q IT'S A DIFFERENT SHAPE? 24 A IT'S NOT A SQUARE. 25 EDGES ON TOP AND BOTTOM, BUT IT'S NOT -- AND DO YOU REMEMBER THAT? THEY COULD HAVE PICKED A DIFFERENT SHAPE? IT'S GOT A LITTLE -- IT'S ALMOST LIKE A I WOULD SAY IT IS A SPEECH BALLOON THAT RIGHT? IT HAS -- IT HAS STRAIGHT 1531 1 A THE LEAD PERSON AT CORNERSTONE. HIS NAME IS 2 SHANKAR, S-H-A-N-K-A-R, IYER, I-Y-E-R. 3 Q 4 SERVED AS AN EXPERT WITNESS ON AT LEAST 14 OTHER 5 LITIGATION MATTERS; RIGHT? 6 A THAT MIGHT BE CORRECT. 7 Q AND YOU'RE BEING PAID FOR YOUR TIME IN THIS 8 CASE; RIGHT? 9 A CORRECT. 10 Q TELL THE JURY HOW MUCH YOU'RE BEING PAID? 11 A SIX HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS AN HOUR. 12 Q AND HOW MUCH MONEY HAS APPLE PAID YOU SO FAR? 13 A APPROXIMATELY $50,000. 14 Q AND HOW MUCH TOTAL HAS IT PAID CORNERSTONE? 15 A I HAVE NO IDEA. 16 Q NOW, IN REACHING YOUR OPINIONS IN YOUR EXPERT 17 REPORT, YOU DID NOT DO ANY SYSTEMATIC CONSUMER 18 RESEARCH, DID YOU, SIR? 19 A 20 WAS ALREADY DONE FOR THE CASE. 21 Q 22 SYSTEMATIC CONSUMER RESEARCH; FAIR? 23 A THAT'S CORRECT. 24 Q YOU DIDN'T DO ANY FORMAL INTERVIEWS WITH 25 CONSUMERS ABOUT THEIR PURCHASING EXPERIENCES; SINCE 2000 -- SINCE THE YEAR 2000, YOU'VE I HAVEN'T COUNTED. I DID NOT CONDUCT ANY NEW STUDIES BEYOND WHAT YOU, YOURSELF, DID NOT PERSONALLY CONDUCT ANY 1532 1 RIGHT? 2 A THAT'S CORRECT. 3 Q AND YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE THAT CONSUMERS IN THE 4 REAL WORLD HAVE ACTUALLY BOUGHT APPLE DEVICES 5 THINKING THEY ARE SAMSUNG DEVICES; RIGHT? 6 MR. JACOBS: YOUR HONOR, OPENING THE 7 DOOR. 8 THIS MORNING, MR. VERHOEVEN HAS JUST ASKED THIS 9 WITNESS WHETHER HE HAS ANY ACTUAL EVIDENCE OF 10 MR. LEE'S TESTIMONY THAT YOUR HONOR EXCLUDED CONSUMER CONFUSION AND THIS WITNESS DOES. 11 MR. VERHOEVEN: LET ME, LET ME ASK YOU -- 12 Q 13 DEPOSITION WAS TAKEN ON APRIL 27TH? 14 A 15 THAT DATE, BUT I'LL ASSUME YOU'RE CORRECT. 16 Q 17 NO EVIDENCE THAT CONSUMERS OUT THERE IN THE REAL 18 WORLD HAVE ACTUALLY BOUGHT APPLE DEVICES THINKING 19 THEY WERE SAMSUNG DEVICES? 20 A 21 DID NOT DO ANY RESEARCH MYSELF THAT PROVED THAT. 22 Q 23 AT YOUR DEPOSITION -- DO YOU REMEMBER YOUR I REMEMBER BEING DEPOSED. I DON'T REMEMBER AND DO YOU REMEMBER TESTIFYING THAT YOU HAVE I THINK THAT MY REPLY WAS IN THE CONTEXT OF I WELL, LET'S LOOK AT WHAT YOU SAID. CAN WE PLAY DR. WINER'S DEPOSITION 24 TESTIMONY FROM APRIL 27TH, 2012, PAGE 35, LINES 7 25 THROUGH 15. 1533 1 2 (WHEREUPON, A VIDEOTAPE WAS PLAYED IN OPEN COURT OFF THE RECORD.) 3 MR. VERHOEVEN: ALL RIGHT. 4 IT AND GET THE VOLUME WORKING. 5 LET'S PAUSE HONOR. 6 I APOLOGIZE, YOUR (WHEREUPON, A VIDEOTAPE WAS PLAYED IN 7 OPEN COURT OFF THE RECORD.) 8 BY MR. VERHOEVEN: 9 Q 10 THAT WAS YOUR TESTIMONY YOU GAVE UNDER OATH IN APRIL, SIR? 11 MR. JACOBS: YOUR HONOR, UNDER THE RULE 12 OF COMPLETENESS, I BELIEVE WE SHOULD READ A COUPLE 13 MORE PASSAGES DOWN, AND MR. VERHOEVEN HAS OPENED 14 THE DOOR. 15 16 17 THE COURT: I THINK HE'S OPENED THE DOOR, BUT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO DO IT DURING HIS CROSS. THE WITNESS: I BELIEVE I RESPONDED TO 18 THAT IN THE CONTEXT OF WHETHER I HAD DONE ANY 19 RESEARCH MYSELF. 20 I CERTAINLY HAD READ DOCUMENTS, AND I 21 ALLUDED TO THEM IN MY DEPOSITION, AND MY REPORT, 22 THAT THERE WERE INTERNAL SAMSUNG DOCUMENTS 23 INDICATING REAL CASES OF CONFUSION IN THE 24 MARKETPLACE. 25 BY MR. VERHOEVEN: 1534 1 Q DO YOU STAND BY THE TESTIMONY WE JUST SAW, 2 SIR? 3 A SURE I DO. 4 Q OKAY. 5 THANK YOU. YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHETHER CONSUMERS HAVE 6 ACTUALLY BOUGHT APPLE DEVICES THINKING THEY WERE 7 SAMSUNG DEVICES, HAVE YOU? 8 9 MR. JACOBS: YOUR HONOR, I'M SORRY. THE WITNESS HAS BEEN INSTRUCTED NOT TO -- TO FOLLOW AN 10 EARLIER ORDER OF THE COURT AND MR. VERHOEVEN IS 11 OPENING THE DOOR. 12 THAT HE CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION TRUTHFULLY. 13 THE WITNESS SHOULD BE INFORMED MR. VERHOEVEN: I'LL MOVE ON, YOUR HONOR. 14 Q 15 SHOW THAT SAMSUNG'S ACTIONS HAVE DILUTED APPLE'S 16 BRAND; RIGHT? 17 A CORRECT. 18 Q AND YOU HAVE NO HARD DATA TO SHOW THAT 19 SAMSUNG'S ACTIONS HAVE DILUTED APPLE'S BRAND; 20 RIGHT? 21 A I WAS NOT ASKED TO DO THAT. 22 Q YOU HAVE NEVER QUANTIFIED THE AMOUNT OF ANY 23 ALLEGED HARM FROM DILUTION OR LOSS OF ANY KIND TO 24 APPLE AS A RESULT OF SAMSUNG'S ACTIONS; RIGHT? 25 A DR. WINER, YOU HAVE NO EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE TO CORRECT. 1535 1 Q YOU HAVE NO EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT SHOWS THAT 2 APPLE HAS ACTUALLY LOST ANY MARKET SHARE AS A 3 RESULT OF SAMSUNG'S SALES OF ITS DEVICES; RIGHT? 4 A NO. 5 Q THAT ANSWER IS YOU DON'T HAVE ANY EMPIRICAL 6 EVIDENCE; CORRECT? 7 A CORRECT. 8 Q AND YOU DON'T HAVE ANY EVIDENCE THAT 9 QUANTIFIES THE AMOUNT OF ANY LOST MARKET SHARE; 10 CORRECT? 11 A THAT'S CORRECT. 12 Q YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE QUANTIFYING THE NUMBER OF 13 PURCHASERS WHO BOUGHT A SAMSUNG DEVICE IN LIEU OF 14 BUYING AN APPLE DEVICE; RIGHT? 15 A I KNOW OF AT LEAST ONE. 16 Q YOU CAN'T QUANTIFY THE NUMBER OF PURCHASERS 17 WHO BOUGHT A SAMSUNG DEVICE IN LIEU OF BUYING AN 18 APPLE DEVICE; RIGHT? 19 A 20 COUNSELOR. 21 Q 22 THAT AT YOUR DEPOSITION, SIR. 23 CITE. 24 25 AS FAR AS I KNOW, ONE IS A QUANTIFICATION, OKAY. LET'S SEE WHAT YOU SAID IN RESPONSE TO PAGE NOTE NOTE LINE (WHEREUPON, A VIDEOTAPE WAS PLAYED IN OPEN COURT OFF THE RECORD.) 1536 1 BY MR. VERHOEVEN: 2 Q 3 ANSWER AT YOUR DEPOSITION; RIGHT, SIR? 4 A APPARENTLY SO. 5 Q DO YOU STAND BY THAT TESTIMONY? 6 A YES. 7 Q WILL HE ME SWITCH SUBJECTS NOW. YOU WERE ASKED THAT QUESTION AND YOU GAVE THAT 8 9 IN YOUR MARCH 22ND, 2012 EXPERT REPORT AT PAGE 160, YOU REFER TO WHAT YOU CALL A SLEEKCRAFT 10 FACTOR, NUMBER 6, DEGREE OF CARE WITH RESPECT TO 11 THE IPAD. CAN WE PUT UP PARAGRAPH 160 FROM 12 13 DR. WINER'S EXPERT REPORT FROM MARCH 22, PLEASE. CAN YOU PUSH THAT DOWN SO I CAN SEE WHERE 14 15 IT WAS PULLED OUT FROM, MR. FISHER? OKAY. 16 17 GO BACK. SO CAN WE -- THAT'S WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR, 160. DO YOU SEE IT SAYS SLEEK, SLEEK -- YOU 18 19 HAVE IT IN YOUR BINDER AS WELL, SIR? 20 A YES, I DO HAVE IT. 21 Q SLEEK -- SLEEKCRAFT FACTOR SAYS, "TYPES OF 22 GOODS AND," THIS IS WHAT I'M GOING TO FOCUS ON 23 HERE, THE REST OF THIS, "AND THE DEGREE OF CARE 24 LIKELY TO BE EXERCISED BY THE PURCHASER." 25 DO YOU SEE THAT? 1537 1 A I DO. 2 Q AND SO THE DEGREE OF CARE, YOU'D AGREE WITH 3 ME, THAT THE HIGHER THE DEGREE OF CARE EXERCISED BY 4 THE CONSUMER, THE LESS CHANCE THERE IS GOING TO BE 5 THAT THERE'S CONFUSION OR DILUTION; RIGHT? 6 A 7 TRUE. 8 Q 9 GROCERY STORE THAT PEOPLE MIGHT PICK UP, THE DEGREE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER, THAT WOULD BE SO IF IT'S LIKE A 50 CENTS DOODAD IN THE 10 OF CARE WOULD BE REALLY LOW, RIGHT? 11 A 12 IT WOULD BE, OVERALL, LOWER THAN FOR A $600 ITEM OR 13 $300 ITEM. 14 Q 15 BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE VERY EXPENSIVE FOR A LOT 16 OF PEOPLE, YOU'LL HAVE TO PAY FOR IT OVER A NUMBER 17 OF YEARS, SO THEY'LL BE REALLY CAREFUL WHEN THEY 18 BUY THAT, RIGHT? 19 A 20 WOULD SAY THAT THERE ARE ALWAYS SEGMENTS OF 21 CONSUMERS WHO TAKE MORE OR LESS CARE IN MAKING 22 PURCHASES OF PRODUCTS. 23 YOU WOULD BE SURPRISED, BUT I WOULD AGREE THAT OR TO GET REALLY CONTRASTING, A NEW CAR WOULD I JUST DON'T WANT TO USE GENERALITIES. I SOME MARKETING, WE DON'T WORK WITH THE 24 NOTION OF THERE BEING A MARKET. WE WORK WITH THE 25 IDEA THAT THERE ARE SEGMENTS AND DIFFERENT KINDS OF 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTERS 5 6 7 8 9 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 10 THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 280 SOUTH 11 FIRST STREET, SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY 12 CERTIFY: 13 THAT THE FOREGOING TRANSCRIPT, 14 CERTIFICATE INCLUSIVE, CONSTITUTES A TRUE, FULL AND 15 CORRECT TRANSCRIPT OF OUR SHORTHAND NOTES TAKEN AS 16 SUCH OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS OF THE PROCEEDINGS 17 HEREINBEFORE ENTITLED AND REDUCED BY COMPUTER-AIDED 18 TRANSCRIPTION TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY. 19 20 21 /S/ _____________________________ LEE-ANNE SHORTRIDGE, CSR, CRR CERTIFICATE NUMBER 9595 22 23 24 25 /S/ ______________________________ IRENE RODRIGUEZ, CSR, CRR CERTIFICATE NUMBER 8074 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DATED: AUGUST 7, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?