Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
2126
Declaration of Susan Estrich in Support of 2013 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law, New Trial and/or Remittitur Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50 and 59, 2054 Brief, 2053 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 to the Estrich Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 2 to the Estrich Declaration, # 3 Exhibit 3 to the Estrich Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 4 to the Estrich Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 5 to the Estrich Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 6 to the Estrich Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 7 to the Estrich Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 8 to the Estrich Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 9 to the Estrich Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 10 to the Estrich Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 11 to the Estrich Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 12 to the Estrich Declaration, # 13 Exhibit 13 to the Estrich Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 14 to the Estrich Declaration, # 15 Exhibit 15 to the Estrich Declaration, # 16 Exhibit 16 to the Estrich Declaration, # 17 Exhibit 17 to the Estrich Declaration, # 18 Exhibit 18 to the Estrich Declaration, # 19 Exhibit 19 to the Estrich Declaration, # 20 Exhibit 20 to the Estrich Declaration, # 21 Exhibit 21 to the Estrich Declaration, # 22 Exhibit 22 to the Estrich Declaration, # 23 Exhibit 23 to the Estrich Declaration, # 24 Exhibit 24 to the Estrich Declaration, # 25 Exhibit 25 to the Estrich Declaration, # 26 Exhibit 26 to the Estrich Declaration, # 27 Exhibit 27 to the Estrich Declaration, # 28 Exhibit 28 to the Estrich Declaration, # 29 Exhibit 29 to the Estrich Declaration, # 30 Exhibit 30 to the Estrich Declaration, # 31 Exhibit 31 to the Estrich Declaration)(Related document(s) 2013 , 2054 , 2053 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 11/9/2012)
Estrich Declaration
Exhibit 5
1297
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
5
6
APPLE INC., A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION,
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
PLAINTIFF,
VS.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., A KOREAN BUSINESS
ENTITY; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., A NEW YORK
CORPORATION; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, A DELAWARE
LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY,
14
DEFENDANTS.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C-11-01846 LHK
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 7, 2012
VOLUME 5
PAGES 1297-1637
15
16
17
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
APPEARANCES ON NEXT PAGE
21
22
23
24
25
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER: LEE-ANNE SHORTRIDGE, CSR, CRR
CERTIFICATE NUMBER 9595
IRENE RODRIGUEZ, CSR, CRR
CERTIFICATE NUMBER 8074
1298
1
A P P E A R A N C E S:
2
FOR PLAINTIFF
APPLE:
3
4
MORRISON & FOERSTER
BY: HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
RACHEL KREVANS
425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
94105
5
6
7
8
FOR COUNTERCLAIMANT WILMER, CUTLER, PICKERING,
APPLE:
HALE AND DORR
BY: WILLIAM F. LEE
60 STATE STREET
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109
9
BY: MARK D. SELWYN
950 PAGE MILL ROAD
PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
94304
QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART,
OLIVER & HEDGES
BY: CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
ANNE ABRAMOWITZ
50 CALIFORNIA STREET, 22ND FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111
14
BY:
15
16
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
555 TWIN DOLPHIN DRIVE
SUITE 560
REDWOOD SHORES, CALIFORNIA
94065
17
BY:
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MICHAEL T. ZELLER
WILLIAM C. PRICE
865 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
10TH FLOOR
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
1299
1
INDEX OF WITNESSES
2
PLAINTIFF'S
3
4
5
PETER BRESSLER
REDIRECT EXAM BY MS. KREVANS (RES.)P. 1336
RECROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN
P. 1349
FURTHER REDIRECT BY MS. KREVANS
P. 1354
6
7
8
9
10
SUSAN KARE
DIRECT EXAM BY MS. KREVANS
CROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN
REDIRECT EXAM BY MS. KREVANS
RECROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN
FURTHER REDIRECT BY MS. KREVANS
FURTHER RECROSS BY MR. VERHOEVEN
P.
P.
P.
P.
P.
P.
1356
1414
1478
1489
1492
1493
RUSSELL WINER
DIRECT EXAM BY MR. JACOBS
CROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN
REDIRECT EXAM BY MR. JACOBS
RECROSS-EXAM BY MR. VERHOEVEN
FURTHER REDIRECT BY MR. JACOBS
P.
P.
P.
P.
P.
1496
1529
1565
1572
1576
HAL PORET
DIRECT EXAM BY MR. JACOBS
CROSS-EXAM BY MR. PRICE
P. 1577
P. 1591
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1421
1
Q
OKAY.
2
WHERE WERE WE?
WE WERE TALKING ABOUT YOU PROVIDED THE
3
TESTIMONY ABOUT HOW A CONSUMER MIGHT MAKE A MISTAKE
4
OR BE CONFUSED ABOUT THESE APPLICATION SCREENS
5
THINKING THAT, ONE, THAT IT'S A SAMSUNG APPLICATION
6
SCREEN AND MIGHT BE AN APPLE PHONE, RIGHT, OR AN
7
APPLE APPLICATION SCREEN.
8
A
9
LIKE THE DESIGN OF THE D'305 PATENT.
DO YOU REMEMBER THAT?
THAT A SAMSUNG APPLICATION SCREEN WOULD LOOK
10
Q
DIDN'T YOU -- DIDN'T I HEAR YOU SAY THAT YOU
11
THOUGHT THAT A CONSUMER WOULD BE CONFUSED AS TO THE
12
SOURCE?
13
A
WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT TRADE DRESS.
14
Q
RIGHT?
15
A
WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT -- EXCUSE ME.
16
YOU WERE ASKING ME ABOUT THE D'305.
17
Q
18
BEING -- WHETHER OR NOT CONSUMERS MIGHT BE CONFUSED
19
BY THE SAMSUNG APPLICATION SCREENS.
OKAY.
20
I THOUGHT
BUT YOU DID TALK ABOUT CONSUMERS
DO YOU REMEMBER THAT?
21
A
YES.
22
Q
OKAY.
23
THEY MIGHT BE?
24
A
YES.
25
Q
OKAY.
AND YOU THOUGHT THAT THERE'S -- THAT
SO LET'S LOOK AT WHAT A CONSUMER WOULD
1422
1
SEE WHEN THEY TURN ON THE PHONE BETWEEN THE TIME
2
THEY HAVE A PHONE LIKE THIS IN THEIR HANDS THAT'S
3
TURNED OFF AND THE TIME THAT THEY ACTUALLY GET TO
4
THE APPLICATION SCREEN.
5
6
I'LL TRY TO DO THIS, YOUR HONOR, ON THE
ELMO.
7
DO WE HAVE A MICROPHONE?
8
THE CLERK:
9
MR. VERHOEVEN:
10
A MICROPHONE?
WAS A LITTLE HAND MIKE.
YEAH.
I THOUGHT THERE
THERE WE GO.
11
DOES THIS WORK?
12
I'M GOING TO PUT THIS CLOSE TO THE PHONE
13
SO THAT -- OKAY.
14
Q
15
THE PHONE.
16
A
THE START-UP SCREEN WITH THE --
17
Q
WHAT DOES IT SAY?
18
A
IT SAYS, "SAMSUNG."
19
Q
STILL SAYS SAMSUNG.
20
SO NOW I'M THE CONSUMER, AND I'M TURNING ON
WHAT DOES THE CONSUMER SEE?
WHAT'S DROID?
IS THAT SHORT FOR ANDROID?
21
A
I DON'T KNOW I KNOW IT'S THIS, THE DROID PHONE
22
HAS THE CHIN.
23
Q
AND NOW WHAT IS THE CONSUMER LOOKING AT NOW?
24
A
THE UNLOCK SCREEN.
25
Q
SO THE CONSUMER HAS TO DO SOMETHING HERE;
1423
1
RIGHT?
2
A
YES.
3
Q
WHAT DO THEY HAVE TO DO?
4
A
MOVE THE PUZZLE PIECE TO THE RIGHT TO UNLOCK
5
IT.
6
Q
OKAY.
7
A
THE HOME SCREEN OF THE SAMSUNG PHONE.
8
Q
OKAY.
9
DO -- THIS IS -- THIS SCREEN HERE IS NOT ACCUSED;
NOW, WHAT IS THE CONSUMER LOOKING AT?
AND SO WHAT DOES A CONSUMER NEED TO
10
RIGHT?
11
A
NO.
12
Q
YOU WEREN'T EVEN ASKED TO LOOK AT THIS SCREEN;
13
RIGHT?
14
A
15
THIS SCREEN.
16
Q
17
RIGHT?
18
A
YES.
19
Q
OKAY.
20
TO DO -- WHAT DOES THE CONSUMER HAVE TO DO TO GET
21
TO THE APPLICATION SCREEN?
22
A
23
THE GRID OF SQUARES.
24
Q
25
THAT A CONSUMER GETS TO THE APPLICATION SCREEN.
I WOULD SAY -- I WAS NOT ASKED TO CONSIDER
OKAY.
SO IT'S JUST THE APPLICATION SCREEN;
AND REMIND US, WHAT DOES THE USER HAVE
TOUCH THE BLUE BUTTON ON THE LOWER RIGHT WITH
OKAY.
SO IT'S ONLY AFTER ALL OF THOSE STEPS
1424
1
FAIR?
2
A
YES.
3
Q
NOW, DR. KARE, WOULDN'T YOU AGREE THAT BY THE
4
TIME A CONSUMER GOES THROUGH ALL THOSE STEPS TO GET
5
TO THE APPLICATION SCREEN, THAT CONSUMER KNOWS THAT
6
THIS IS A SAMSUNG PHONE?
7
A
8
SCREEN COMPARED TO THE APPLE HOME SCREEN.
9
Q
I UNDERSTAND THAT.
10
A
BECAUSE --
11
Q
BUT I HAVE A DIFFERENT QUESTION FOR YOU.
12
I WAS ONLY ASKED TO CONSIDER THIS APPLICATION
WOULDN'T YOU AGREE THAT BY THE TIME THAT
13
A CONSUMER TURNS ON THE PHONE AND GOES THROUGH
14
THOSE STEPS WE LOOKED AT, WHERE THEY SEE THE
15
SAMSUNG NAME PROMINENTLY FOR SEVERAL SECONDS, WHERE
16
THEY SEE THE GRAPHIC FOR DROID, WHERE THEY HAVE TO
17
GO PAST THE HOME SCREEN TO THE APPLICATION SCREEN,
18
BY THE TIME THEY GET TO THAT APPLICATION SCREEN,
19
WOULDN'T YOU AGREE THAT A CONSUMER KNOWS THAT
20
THEY'RE USING A SAMSUNG PHONE?
21
A
22
THAT KIND OF USER EXPERIENCE.
I'M NOT AN EXPERT IN CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND
23
I'M REALLY FOCUSSED ON GRAPHIC U/I.
24
DON'T KNOW THAT I'M QUALIFIED TO ANSWER THAT.
25
Q
SO I
WELL, QUALIFIED OR NOT, WOULD YOU AGREE WITH
1425
1
ME?
A CONSUMER, BY THIS POINT, GOING THROUGH THE
2
START-UP AND ALL OF THAT, SEEING ALL THAT
3
ADVERTISING, THEY KNOW THEY HAVE A SAMSUNG PHONE,
4
DON'T THEY?
5
A
6
I DON'T KNOW.
7
Q
YOU'RE NOT QUALIFIED?
8
A
I HAVEN'T STUDIED START-UP EXPERIENCE FROM
9
PHONE TO PHONE.
I JUST CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT BECAUSE I DON'T --
I -- I COMPLETELY -- I KNOW THAT
10
THIS IS THE APPLICATION SCREEN, NOT THE HOME
11
SCREEN.
12
Q
13
PHONE, SEES THE SAMSUNG NAME PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED,
14
SEES THE DROID ADVERTISEMENT AND ANIMATION,
15
WOULDN'T YOU AGREE THAT NO CONSUMER WOULD BE
16
CONFUSED AS TO WHICH PHONE THEY HAVE BY THAT TIME?
17
A
18
I DON'T KNOW ABOUT CONSUMER BEHAVIOR STARTING -- I
19
DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE QUESTION YOU'RE ASKING ME.
20
THAT'S OUTSIDE MY FOCUS.
21
Q
IT'S OUTSIDE YOUR EXPERTISE?
22
A
YES, AS A GRAPHIC U/I DESIGNER.
23
Q
NOW, THERE WAS ONE SLIDE -- I'LL TURN THIS OFF
24
NOW, YOUR HONOR, IF THAT'S OKAY.
25
BY THE TIME THAT THE CONSUMER TURNS ON THE
I CAN'T AGREE BECAUSE I HAVEN'T -- I DON'T --
THE COURT:
GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
1426
1
BY MR. VERHOEVEN:
2
Q
3
RESPECT TO YOUR TESTIMONY MORE THAN OTHERS WHEN YOU
4
WERE TESTIFYING ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS WITH RESPECT TO
5
THE DESIGN '305 PATENT, AND THAT WAS PDX 14.7.
THERE'S ONE SLIDE THAT YOU FOCUSSED ON WITH
6
CAN WE PUT THAT ON THE SCREEN.
THIS IS A
7
SLIDE THAT COUNSEL FOR APPLE SHOWED YOU.
8
REMEMBER THAT?
9
A
YES.
10
Q
AND DO YOU REMEMBER YOU SPENT MOST OF YOUR
11
TIME EXPLAINING THIS SLIDE, AND FOR THE OTHER
12
SLIDES SHE SHOWED YOU, YOU SAID SAME REASONS?
13
A
YES.
14
Q
SO LET'S FOCUS ON THIS SLIDE.
DO YOU
15
NOW, IF WE LOOK AT THE DESIGN '305 PATENT
16
COMPARED TO THE FASCINATE, DO YOU SEE IN THE DESIGN
17
'305 PATENT THE FIRST BOX IN THE UPPER LEFT SAYS
18
SMS?
19
A
YES.
20
Q
WHERE IS THAT ICON IN THE FASCINATE?
21
A
I BELIEVE THAT THE ANALOGOUS ICON IS IN THE
22
BOTTOM ROW ON THE RIGHT, THREE FROM THE LEFT.
23
Q
24
25
I HAVE A LASER POINTER, YOUR HONOR.
DO YOU MIND IF I HAND THIS TO THE WITNESS
SO SHE CAN INDICATE ON THE BIG SCREEN?
1427
1
A
GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
2
Q
DO YOU KNOW HOW TO USE THESE?
3
A
I'M NOT A LASER POINTER EXPERT, EITHER.
4
Q
JUST PUT THIS BUTTON.
5
ANYBODY'S EYES.
6
A
OKAY.
7
Q
SO THE SMS IS ON THE TOP LEFT, RIGHT, IN THE
8
D'305?
9
A
YES.
10
Q
AND WHERE IS IT IN THE FASCINATE?
11
A
(INDICATING).
12
Q
RIGHT DOWN HERE?
13
A
I BELIEVE THAT THOSE ARE ANALOGOUS.
14
Q
OKAY.
15
A
YES.
16
Q
IN THE '305, THERE'S A DOCK OR -- WHAT WOULD
17
YOU CALL THIS BOTTOM ROW ON THE '305?
18
A
19
BECAUSE IT'S JUST A DESIGN, ORNAMENTAL DESIGN.
20
I JUST HAVE BEEN CALLING IT AN AREA AT THE BOTTOM,
21
A SEPARATED AREA AT THE BOTTOM, BECAUSE IT
22
DOESN'T -- THE '305 DOESN'T TALK ABOUT
23
FUNCTIONALITY.
24
Q
25
IN THE BOTTOM ROW THAT'S SET OFF SEPARATELY; RIGHT?
DON'T POINT IT IN
SO IT'S IN A DIFFERENT PLACE; RIGHT?
YOU KNOW, IT DOESN'T REALLY SAY IN THE '305
OKAY.
SO
WELL, IN THE D'305, THE SMS ICON IS NOT
1428
1
A
RIGHT.
2
Q
BUT IN THE FASCINATE, IT IS IN THE BOTTOM ROW.
3
IS THAT BOTTOM ROW SET OFF SEPARATELY?
4
A
YES.
5
Q
SO YOU WOULD AGREE THAT'S A DIFFERENCE?
6
A
YES.
7
Q
NOW, YOU TALKED ABOUT ROUNDED RECTANGLES FOR
8
THE IPHONES.
9
A
YES.
10
Q
AND DO YOU REMEMBER YOU TESTIFIED WITH RESPECT
11
TO ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS THAT, GEE, SAMSUNG COULD
12
HAVE USED SOMETHING BESIDES ROUNDED RECTANGLES,
13
RIGHT?
14
A
YES.
15
Q
WELL, THIS ICON SHEER NOT JUST A ROUNDED
16
RECTANGLE.
17
SPEECH BOX THAT YOU SEE IN CARTOONS; RIGHT?
18
A
RIGHT.
19
Q
DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT?
20
A
YES.
21
HAS, HAS ROUNDED RECTANGULAR ELEMENTS, BUT IT'S NOT
22
A SQUARE.
23
Q
IT'S A DIFFERENT SHAPE?
24
A
IT'S NOT A SQUARE.
25
EDGES ON TOP AND BOTTOM, BUT IT'S NOT -- AND
DO YOU REMEMBER THAT?
THEY COULD HAVE PICKED A DIFFERENT SHAPE?
IT'S GOT A LITTLE -- IT'S ALMOST LIKE A
I WOULD SAY IT IS A SPEECH BALLOON THAT
RIGHT?
IT HAS -- IT HAS STRAIGHT
1531
1
A
THE LEAD PERSON AT CORNERSTONE.
HIS NAME IS
2
SHANKAR, S-H-A-N-K-A-R, IYER, I-Y-E-R.
3
Q
4
SERVED AS AN EXPERT WITNESS ON AT LEAST 14 OTHER
5
LITIGATION MATTERS; RIGHT?
6
A
THAT MIGHT BE CORRECT.
7
Q
AND YOU'RE BEING PAID FOR YOUR TIME IN THIS
8
CASE; RIGHT?
9
A
CORRECT.
10
Q
TELL THE JURY HOW MUCH YOU'RE BEING PAID?
11
A
SIX HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS AN HOUR.
12
Q
AND HOW MUCH MONEY HAS APPLE PAID YOU SO FAR?
13
A
APPROXIMATELY $50,000.
14
Q
AND HOW MUCH TOTAL HAS IT PAID CORNERSTONE?
15
A
I HAVE NO IDEA.
16
Q
NOW, IN REACHING YOUR OPINIONS IN YOUR EXPERT
17
REPORT, YOU DID NOT DO ANY SYSTEMATIC CONSUMER
18
RESEARCH, DID YOU, SIR?
19
A
20
WAS ALREADY DONE FOR THE CASE.
21
Q
22
SYSTEMATIC CONSUMER RESEARCH; FAIR?
23
A
THAT'S CORRECT.
24
Q
YOU DIDN'T DO ANY FORMAL INTERVIEWS WITH
25
CONSUMERS ABOUT THEIR PURCHASING EXPERIENCES;
SINCE 2000 -- SINCE THE YEAR 2000, YOU'VE
I HAVEN'T COUNTED.
I DID NOT CONDUCT ANY NEW STUDIES BEYOND WHAT
YOU, YOURSELF, DID NOT PERSONALLY CONDUCT ANY
1532
1
RIGHT?
2
A
THAT'S CORRECT.
3
Q
AND YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE THAT CONSUMERS IN THE
4
REAL WORLD HAVE ACTUALLY BOUGHT APPLE DEVICES
5
THINKING THEY ARE SAMSUNG DEVICES; RIGHT?
6
MR. JACOBS:
YOUR HONOR, OPENING THE
7
DOOR.
8
THIS MORNING, MR. VERHOEVEN HAS JUST ASKED THIS
9
WITNESS WHETHER HE HAS ANY ACTUAL EVIDENCE OF
10
MR. LEE'S TESTIMONY THAT YOUR HONOR EXCLUDED
CONSUMER CONFUSION AND THIS WITNESS DOES.
11
MR. VERHOEVEN:
LET ME, LET ME ASK YOU --
12
Q
13
DEPOSITION WAS TAKEN ON APRIL 27TH?
14
A
15
THAT DATE, BUT I'LL ASSUME YOU'RE CORRECT.
16
Q
17
NO EVIDENCE THAT CONSUMERS OUT THERE IN THE REAL
18
WORLD HAVE ACTUALLY BOUGHT APPLE DEVICES THINKING
19
THEY WERE SAMSUNG DEVICES?
20
A
21
DID NOT DO ANY RESEARCH MYSELF THAT PROVED THAT.
22
Q
23
AT YOUR DEPOSITION -- DO YOU REMEMBER YOUR
I REMEMBER BEING DEPOSED.
I DON'T REMEMBER
AND DO YOU REMEMBER TESTIFYING THAT YOU HAVE
I THINK THAT MY REPLY WAS IN THE CONTEXT OF I
WELL, LET'S LOOK AT WHAT YOU SAID.
CAN WE PLAY DR. WINER'S DEPOSITION
24
TESTIMONY FROM APRIL 27TH, 2012, PAGE 35, LINES 7
25
THROUGH 15.
1533
1
2
(WHEREUPON, A VIDEOTAPE WAS PLAYED IN
OPEN COURT OFF THE RECORD.)
3
MR. VERHOEVEN:
ALL RIGHT.
4
IT AND GET THE VOLUME WORKING.
5
LET'S PAUSE
HONOR.
6
I APOLOGIZE, YOUR
(WHEREUPON, A VIDEOTAPE WAS PLAYED IN
7
OPEN COURT OFF THE RECORD.)
8
BY MR. VERHOEVEN:
9
Q
10
THAT WAS YOUR TESTIMONY YOU GAVE UNDER OATH IN
APRIL, SIR?
11
MR. JACOBS:
YOUR HONOR, UNDER THE RULE
12
OF COMPLETENESS, I BELIEVE WE SHOULD READ A COUPLE
13
MORE PASSAGES DOWN, AND MR. VERHOEVEN HAS OPENED
14
THE DOOR.
15
16
17
THE COURT:
I THINK HE'S OPENED THE DOOR,
BUT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO DO IT DURING HIS CROSS.
THE WITNESS:
I BELIEVE I RESPONDED TO
18
THAT IN THE CONTEXT OF WHETHER I HAD DONE ANY
19
RESEARCH MYSELF.
20
I CERTAINLY HAD READ DOCUMENTS, AND I
21
ALLUDED TO THEM IN MY DEPOSITION, AND MY REPORT,
22
THAT THERE WERE INTERNAL SAMSUNG DOCUMENTS
23
INDICATING REAL CASES OF CONFUSION IN THE
24
MARKETPLACE.
25
BY MR. VERHOEVEN:
1534
1
Q
DO YOU STAND BY THE TESTIMONY WE JUST SAW,
2
SIR?
3
A
SURE I DO.
4
Q
OKAY.
5
THANK YOU.
YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHETHER CONSUMERS HAVE
6
ACTUALLY BOUGHT APPLE DEVICES THINKING THEY WERE
7
SAMSUNG DEVICES, HAVE YOU?
8
9
MR. JACOBS:
YOUR HONOR, I'M SORRY.
THE
WITNESS HAS BEEN INSTRUCTED NOT TO -- TO FOLLOW AN
10
EARLIER ORDER OF THE COURT AND MR. VERHOEVEN IS
11
OPENING THE DOOR.
12
THAT HE CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION TRUTHFULLY.
13
THE WITNESS SHOULD BE INFORMED
MR. VERHOEVEN:
I'LL MOVE ON, YOUR HONOR.
14
Q
15
SHOW THAT SAMSUNG'S ACTIONS HAVE DILUTED APPLE'S
16
BRAND; RIGHT?
17
A
CORRECT.
18
Q
AND YOU HAVE NO HARD DATA TO SHOW THAT
19
SAMSUNG'S ACTIONS HAVE DILUTED APPLE'S BRAND;
20
RIGHT?
21
A
I WAS NOT ASKED TO DO THAT.
22
Q
YOU HAVE NEVER QUANTIFIED THE AMOUNT OF ANY
23
ALLEGED HARM FROM DILUTION OR LOSS OF ANY KIND TO
24
APPLE AS A RESULT OF SAMSUNG'S ACTIONS; RIGHT?
25
A
DR. WINER, YOU HAVE NO EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE TO
CORRECT.
1535
1
Q
YOU HAVE NO EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT SHOWS THAT
2
APPLE HAS ACTUALLY LOST ANY MARKET SHARE AS A
3
RESULT OF SAMSUNG'S SALES OF ITS DEVICES; RIGHT?
4
A
NO.
5
Q
THAT ANSWER IS YOU DON'T HAVE ANY EMPIRICAL
6
EVIDENCE; CORRECT?
7
A
CORRECT.
8
Q
AND YOU DON'T HAVE ANY EVIDENCE THAT
9
QUANTIFIES THE AMOUNT OF ANY LOST MARKET SHARE;
10
CORRECT?
11
A
THAT'S CORRECT.
12
Q
YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE QUANTIFYING THE NUMBER OF
13
PURCHASERS WHO BOUGHT A SAMSUNG DEVICE IN LIEU OF
14
BUYING AN APPLE DEVICE; RIGHT?
15
A
I KNOW OF AT LEAST ONE.
16
Q
YOU CAN'T QUANTIFY THE NUMBER OF PURCHASERS
17
WHO BOUGHT A SAMSUNG DEVICE IN LIEU OF BUYING AN
18
APPLE DEVICE; RIGHT?
19
A
20
COUNSELOR.
21
Q
22
THAT AT YOUR DEPOSITION, SIR.
23
CITE.
24
25
AS FAR AS I KNOW, ONE IS A QUANTIFICATION,
OKAY.
LET'S SEE WHAT YOU SAID IN RESPONSE TO
PAGE NOTE NOTE LINE
(WHEREUPON, A VIDEOTAPE WAS PLAYED IN
OPEN COURT OFF THE RECORD.)
1536
1
BY MR. VERHOEVEN:
2
Q
3
ANSWER AT YOUR DEPOSITION; RIGHT, SIR?
4
A
APPARENTLY SO.
5
Q
DO YOU STAND BY THAT TESTIMONY?
6
A
YES.
7
Q
WILL HE ME SWITCH SUBJECTS NOW.
YOU WERE ASKED THAT QUESTION AND YOU GAVE THAT
8
9
IN YOUR MARCH 22ND, 2012 EXPERT REPORT AT
PAGE 160, YOU REFER TO WHAT YOU CALL A SLEEKCRAFT
10
FACTOR, NUMBER 6, DEGREE OF CARE WITH RESPECT TO
11
THE IPAD.
CAN WE PUT UP PARAGRAPH 160 FROM
12
13
DR. WINER'S EXPERT REPORT FROM MARCH 22, PLEASE.
CAN YOU PUSH THAT DOWN SO I CAN SEE WHERE
14
15
IT WAS PULLED OUT FROM, MR. FISHER?
OKAY.
16
17
GO BACK.
SO CAN WE -- THAT'S WHAT I'M
LOOKING FOR, 160.
DO YOU SEE IT SAYS SLEEK, SLEEK -- YOU
18
19
HAVE IT IN YOUR BINDER AS WELL, SIR?
20
A
YES, I DO HAVE IT.
21
Q
SLEEK -- SLEEKCRAFT FACTOR SAYS, "TYPES OF
22
GOODS AND," THIS IS WHAT I'M GOING TO FOCUS ON
23
HERE, THE REST OF THIS, "AND THE DEGREE OF CARE
24
LIKELY TO BE EXERCISED BY THE PURCHASER."
25
DO YOU SEE THAT?
1537
1
A
I DO.
2
Q
AND SO THE DEGREE OF CARE, YOU'D AGREE WITH
3
ME, THAT THE HIGHER THE DEGREE OF CARE EXERCISED BY
4
THE CONSUMER, THE LESS CHANCE THERE IS GOING TO BE
5
THAT THERE'S CONFUSION OR DILUTION; RIGHT?
6
A
7
TRUE.
8
Q
9
GROCERY STORE THAT PEOPLE MIGHT PICK UP, THE DEGREE
FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER, THAT WOULD BE
SO IF IT'S LIKE A 50 CENTS DOODAD IN THE
10
OF CARE WOULD BE REALLY LOW, RIGHT?
11
A
12
IT WOULD BE, OVERALL, LOWER THAN FOR A $600 ITEM OR
13
$300 ITEM.
14
Q
15
BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE VERY EXPENSIVE FOR A LOT
16
OF PEOPLE, YOU'LL HAVE TO PAY FOR IT OVER A NUMBER
17
OF YEARS, SO THEY'LL BE REALLY CAREFUL WHEN THEY
18
BUY THAT, RIGHT?
19
A
20
WOULD SAY THAT THERE ARE ALWAYS SEGMENTS OF
21
CONSUMERS WHO TAKE MORE OR LESS CARE IN MAKING
22
PURCHASES OF PRODUCTS.
23
YOU WOULD BE SURPRISED, BUT I WOULD AGREE THAT
OR TO GET REALLY CONTRASTING, A NEW CAR WOULD
I JUST DON'T WANT TO USE GENERALITIES.
I
SOME MARKETING, WE DON'T WORK WITH THE
24
NOTION OF THERE BEING A MARKET.
WE WORK WITH THE
25
IDEA THAT THERE ARE SEGMENTS AND DIFFERENT KINDS OF
1
2
3
4
CERTIFICATE OF REPORTERS
5
6
7
8
9
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OFFICIAL COURT
REPORTERS OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
10
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 280 SOUTH
11
FIRST STREET, SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY
12
CERTIFY:
13
THAT THE FOREGOING TRANSCRIPT,
14
CERTIFICATE INCLUSIVE, CONSTITUTES A TRUE, FULL AND
15
CORRECT TRANSCRIPT OF OUR SHORTHAND NOTES TAKEN AS
16
SUCH OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS OF THE PROCEEDINGS
17
HEREINBEFORE ENTITLED AND REDUCED BY COMPUTER-AIDED
18
TRANSCRIPTION TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY.
19
20
21
/S/
_____________________________
LEE-ANNE SHORTRIDGE, CSR, CRR
CERTIFICATE NUMBER 9595
22
23
24
25
/S/
______________________________
IRENE RODRIGUEZ, CSR, CRR
CERTIFICATE NUMBER 8074
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DATED:
AUGUST 7, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?