Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
88
Declaration of Jason Bartlett in Support of #86 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Errata 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40, #41 Exhibit 41, #42 Exhibit 42, #43 Exhibit 43, #44 Errata 44, #45 Exhibit 45, #46 Exhibit 46, #47 Exhibit 47)(Related document(s) #86 ) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 7/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
KENNETH H. BRIDGES (CA SBN 243541)
kbridges@bridgesmav.com
MICHAEL T. PIEJA (CA SBN 250351)
mpieja@bridgesmav.com
BRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS LLP
3000 El Camino Real
One Palo Alto Square, 2nd Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: (650) 804-7800
Facsimile: (650) 852-9224
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF JASON R.
BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE
INC.’S MOTION FOR A
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:
August 5, 2011
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 4, 5th Floor
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
1
2
I, JASON R. BARTLETT, do hereby declare as follows:
1.
I am a partner with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, which is counsel for
3
Plaintiff Apple Inc. I am admitted to practice law in the State of California and before this Court.
4
I submit this declaration in support of Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. I have
5
personal knowledge of the facts stated in this declaration, and I could and would competently
6
testify to them if called as a witness.
7
A.
Evidence Indicating Fame and Success of the Original iPhone
8
2.
Attached as Exhibit 1 is an excerpt from Apple’s 10-K securities filing for the
9
10
11
fiscal year ended September 25, 2010, which states that Apple sells personal computers and
displays, iPod, iPhone, iPad, and Apple TV devices, and software and media products.
3.
Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of an article from the front page of
12
the New York Times dated January 10, 2007, titled “Apple, Hoping for Another iPod, Introduces
13
Innovative Cellphone,” showing that the day after Apple’s announcement of the original iPhone,
14
the New York Times displayed a picture of the product on the front page. The article noted that it
15
was Apple’s “ability to fuse [essential smartphone functions] with a raft of innovations and
16
Apple’s distinctive design sense that had the crowd here buzzing.”
17
4.
Attached as Exhibit 3 are a true and correct copy of the front page of USA Today
18
dated January 10, 2007 and true and correct copies of articles from USA Today on the same day,
19
titled “Apple Unveils All-In-One iPhone” and “Apple Packs All Kinds of High-Tech Goodies
20
into iPhone,” which show that USA Today also displayed photographs of the original iPhone the
21
day after Apple first announced the product.
22
5.
Attached as Exhibit 4 are true and correct copies of two articles from the Wall
23
Street Journal dated January 10, 2007, titled “Apple Storms Cellphone Field” and “Apple’s
24
iPhone: Is It Worth It?,” which show that the Wall Street Journal also displayed photographs of
25
the original iPhone the day after Apple first announced the product.
26
6.
Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a LexisNexis printout of an
27
article from RCR Wireless News dated June 18, 2007, titled “Apple’s Show; AT&T’s Details,”
28
discussing a survey by M:Metrics, which indicates that “an estimated 19 million U.S. mobileDECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
1
phone users considered themselves strongly interested in buying an iPhone.” It quotes Mark
2
Donovan, senior VP and senior analyst at M:Metrics, as observing, “‘That kind of latent demand
3
is something I don’t think we’ve ever seen before.’”
4
7.
Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of a press release from Nielsen
5
BuzzMetrics dated June 25, 2007,1 titled “Unprecedented Pre-Launch Buzz Sets High
6
Expectations for iPhone Sales and Customers, Nielsen BuzzMetrics Reports,” which is dated a
7
few days before the launch of the original iPhone and states that “the iPhone section of [Apple’s]
8
site had 1.79+ million unique visitors in January 2007 and the keyword ‘iPhone’ was searched
9
870,000 times.”
10
8.
Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of an article by Alex Woodson of
11
the Associated Press dated July 2, 2007,2 titled “Bloggers Dialed in to New iPhone,” noting that
12
according to Nielsen BuzzMetrics research, “[t]he number of blog posts or ‘buzz’ surrounding the
13
iPhone . . . has been higher than conversations about Super Bowl commercials, ‘The Sopranos’
14
finale on HBO and other tech announcements about Microsoft’s Zune and Vista and Nintendo’s
15
Wii.” Attached as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of an article from the New York Times
16
dated June 27, 2007, titled “Matching the Ballyhoo, Mostly: The iPhone, Despite a Few Foibles,
17
Does Things No Phone Has Ever Done,” featuring a large picture of the iPhone and reporting that
18
“[i]n the last six months, Apple’s iPhone has been the subject of 11,000 print articles, and it turns
19
up about 69 million hits on Google.” Attached as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of an
20
article from USA Today dated March 9, 2007, titled “Apple Buffs Marketing Savvy to a High
21
Shine,” reporting that according to Harvard Business School professor David Yoffie, news
22
coverage of the iPhone had “generated $400 million in free publicity and ‘[n]o other company has
23
ever received that kind of attention for a product launch.’”
24
25
26
1
http://web.archive.org/web/20070710135319/http:/www.nielsenbuzzmetrics.com/
pr/releases/20070625, printed on June 30, 2011.
2
27
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/bloggers-dialed-new-iphone-141442, printed
on June 30, 2011.
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
2
1
2
3
9.
Attached as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of the iPhone section of the
Apple website on January 9, 2007, showing the iPhone.
10.
Attached as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of an Internet article from
4
Bloomberg News dated June 28, 2007,3 titled “Apple’s iPhone Generates Buzz That May Top
5
Mustang (Update2),” stating that Apple’s iPhone marketing effort “may be the most successful
6
marketing effort ever, surpassing the drive to promote Ford Motor Co.’s 1964 Mustang and
7
Microsoft Corp.’s Windows 95.”
8
11.
Attached as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of an article titled “The Jesus
9
Phone” by Paul Kedrosky from the Wall Street Journal dated June 29, 2007, noting that there has
10
been an “unavoidable drumbeat of hype” around the iPhone and showing a picture of the iPhone.
11
Attached as Exhibit 13 are true and correct copies of excerpts from USA Today dated June 29,
12
2007, showing the front page and articles titled “iPhone’s Launch Gives Jobs Butterflies” and
13
“Apple, AT&T CEOs See iPhone as Industry Game-Changer,” dated June 29, 2007, discussing
14
the iPhone.
15
12.
Attached as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct copy of an Internet article from
16
MarketWatch dated July 26, 2007,4 titled “Apple Profit Surges on Mac and iPod Sales,” reporting
17
that Apple sold 270,000 iPhones in less than two days after the product launch.
18
19
20
13.
Attached as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of an Apple press release dated
September 10, 2007,5 announcing that Apple had sold 1,000,000 iPhones in just 74 days.
14.
Attached as Exhibit 16 is a true and correct copy of an article from USA Today
21
dated August 22, 2007, titled “Japanese Tech Fans Are Eager to Get Hands on iPhones,”
22
reporting that according to Tsutomu Ishikawa, a Japanese journalist, people in Japan “regard [the
23
iPhone] as cool and advanced. And the interface is easy to use.”
24
25
3
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=21070001&sid=aZrIUC1BgzWU, printed
on June 30, 2011.
4
26
27
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-shares-rise-6-as-mac-ipod-and-iphone-driveearnings, printed on June 30, 2011.
5
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/09/10iphone.html, printed on June 23, 2011.
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
3
1
15.
Attached as Exhibit 17 are true and correct copies of full-page color
2
advertisements for the iPhone that appeared in the New York Times on Sunday, August 12, 2007
3
and in the Philadelphia Inquirer on Sunday, September 16, 2007, both showing large pictures of
4
the iPhone against a plain background.
5
16.
Attached as Exhibit 18 is a true and correct copy of the cover of Time magazine’s
6
Best Inventions of 2007 issue, dated November 12, 2007,6 showing a picture of the iPhone as part
7
of its “Best Inventions of 2007” issue.
8
B.
Evidence Indicating Fame and Success of Subsequent iPhones
9
17.
Attached as Exhibit 19 is a true and correct copy of a screenshot of the New York
10
Times website’s video section,7 showing a video about the iPhone 3G dated July 9, 2008, a few
11
days before the iPhone 3G was released.
12
18.
Attached as Exhibit 20 is a true and correct copy of an article by David Pogue
13
from the New York Times dated June 22, 2010,8 titled “New iPhone Arrives; Rivals, Beware,”
14
which reports that a few days before its release, the “iPhone 4 is already a hit” as “AT&T says
15
that it received 10 times as many preorders as it did for the iPhone 3GS last year.” According to
16
the same article, “On the first day of taking orders, Apple processed 600,000 requests — before
17
its ordering system, and AT&T’s, descended into chaos.” The article praised the iPhone 4’s
18
design, describing it as “two glass slabs, front and back, wrapped by a stainless-steel band. The
19
result is beautiful, and since there’s no more plastic, it feels solid and Lexus-like.”
20
19.
Attached as Exhibit 21 is a true and correct copy of an Apple press release issued
21
on July 14, 2008,9 announcing that Apple sold 1,000,000 iPhone 3G units in the first three days
22
after the iPhone 3G’s launch.
23
6
24
7
25
http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20071112,00.html, printed on June 30, 2011.
http://video.nytimes.com/video/2008/07/09/technology/personaltech/1194817110882/
the-iphone-3g.html, screenshot taken on June 30, 2011.
8
26
27
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/23/technology/personaltech/23pogue.html, printed on
June 30, 2011.
9
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/07/14iphone.html, printed on June 23, 2011.
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
4
1
20.
Attached as Exhibit 22 is a true and correct copy of an Apple press release issued
2
on June 22, 2009,10 announcing that Apple “sold over one million iPhone 3GS models through
3
Sunday, June 21, the third day after its launch.”
4
21.
Attached as Exhibit 23 is a true and correct copy of an Apple press release issued
5
on June 28, 2010,11 announcing these sales figures and quoting Apple CEO Steve Jobs as stating
6
that the iPhone 4G release was “the most successful product launch in Apple history,” and that
7
Apple sold over 1,700,000 units in the first three days after launch.
8
9
22.
Attached as Exhibit 24 are true and correct copies of announcements of awards
that Apple has received for its iPhone products. The original iPhone received the 2008
10
International Design Excellence Award (IDEA) Best in Show,12 a 2008 Design and Art Direction
11
(D&AD) “Black Pencil” award,13 and a 2008 International Forum (iF) Product Design Award.14 It
12
was included among Engadget’s “Ten Gadgets That Defined the Decade.”15 The iPhone 4 was
13
named Engadget’s 2010 Editors’ Choice Phone of the Year16 and received the Best Mobile
14
Device award at the Mobile World Congress in February 2011.17
15
16
10
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/06/22iphone.html, printed on June 23, 2011.
11
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/06/28iphone.html, printed on June 23, 2011.
12
http://www.idsa.org/category/tags/idea-2008-best, printed on June 30, 2011.
17
18
19
13
20
21
22
23
http://www.dandad.org/awards/professional/2008/categories/prod/productdesign/22709/iphone, printed on June 30, 2011.
14
http://www.ifdesign.de/exhibition_index_e?pagemode=awards&kategorie_id=1&pagemode=awards&sprache=1&award_id=142&ignore_cat=1&award_name=iF+product+des
ign+award&award_jahr=&radio_searchmode=on&search=apple&btn_search.x=15&btn_search.y
=19, printed on June 30, 2011.
15
24
25
26
http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/30/ten-gadgets-that-defined-the-decade/, printed on
June 30, 2011.
16
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/25/the-winners-of-the-2010-engadget-awardseditors-choice/, printed on June 30, 2011.
17
27
http://www.mobileworldcongress.com/awards/global_mobile_awards.htm, printed on
June 30, 2011.
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
5
1
23.
Attached as Exhibit 25 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from a report by
2
MillwardBrown Optimor titled “BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands—2011,”18
3
announcing that Apple topped the BrandZ Top 100 ranking of the most valuable global brands,
4
with an 84 percent year-over-year increase in brand value. The report attributes the brand value
5
to “successful iterations of existing products like the iPhone, creation of the tablet category with
6
iPad, and anticipation of a broadened strategy making the brand a trifecta of cloud computing,
7
software, and innovative, well-designed devices.”
8
C.
Evidence Indicating the iPad’s Commercial Success
9
24.
Attached as Exhibit 26 is a true and correct copy of the front page of the New York
10
Times dated January 28, 2010, showing a picture of the Apple iPad the day after it was announced
11
and reporting that “[a]fter months of feverish speculation, Steven P. Jobs introduced Wednesday
12
what Apple hopes will be the coolest device on the planet: a slender tablet computer called the
13
iPad.” Attached as Exhibit 27 is a true and correct copy of the front page of USA Today dated
14
January 28, 2010, which bears an image of the iPad on the front page. Attached as Exhibit 28 is a
15
true and correct copy of the front page of the Wall Street Journal dated January 28, 2010, which
16
also bears an image of the iPad.
17
25.
Attached as Exhibit 29 is a true and correct copy of an article from CNN’s website
18
dated February 25, 2010,19 titled “Dell’s Tablet Gunning for Apple’s iPad,” noting, “Say the
19
words ‘tablet computer’ and ten bucks says it’s Apple’s iPad that springs to mind”, and “With its
20
9.7-inch display, sleek design and Apple's relentless hype, the iPad could alter the way we
21
experience mobile computing.”
22
23
24
25
26.
Attached as Exhibit 30 is a true and correct of an article from Digital Journal
dated March 7, 2010,20 titled “Apple’s First iPad TV Commercial Airs During Academy
18
http://www.millwardbrown.com/Libraries/Optimor_BrandZ_Files/
2011_BrandZ_Top100_Report.sflb.ashx (printed on June 30, 2011).
19
26
27
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/02/25/dell.tablet/index.html, printed on June 30,
20
http://www.digitaljournal.com/print/article/288710, printed on June 30, 2011.
2011.
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
6
1
Awards,” reporting that “[a]t tonight’s Academy Awards, Apple aired its very first television
2
commercial for the upcoming release of their latest device, the iPad.”
3
27.
Attached as Exhibit 31 is a true and correct copy of an Apple press release dated
4
April 5, 2010,21 announcing that Apple sold over 300,000 iPads the first day that the product was
5
on sale.
6
28.
Attached as Exhibit 32 is a true and correct copy of an Apple press release dated
7
June 22, 2010,22 announcing that Apple sold 3,000,000 iPads in just 80 days. Attached as Exhibit
8
33 is a true and correct copy of a VentureBeat article dated October 18, 2010,23 reporting that
9
“Apple has shipped 7.5 million iPads since it launched in April, turning it into the largest player
10
11
in the tablet computer market.”
29.
Attached as Exhibit 34 is a true and correct copy of the Engadget review of the
12
iPad dated April 3, 2010,24 which contains multiple color photographs of the iPad showcasing its
13
design. The review notes that “[l]ike most Apple products, it’s a beauty to behold.” The review
14
goes on to compare the iPad to other Apple products, stating, “[I]f you’ve used an iPod touch or
15
iPhone, you'll find yourself right at home . . . and that’s exactly how Apple wants it.” Similarly,
16
the San Francisco Chronicle reported that “the iPad . . . invites more with its wider screen,
17
brighter colors and sleek design.” Attached as Exhibit 35 is a true and correct copy of an article
18
from the San Francisco Chronicle dated April 6, 2010,25 titled “With Release of iPad, Apple Has
19
Nailed It Again.”
20
30.
21
Attached as Exhibit 36 is a true and correct compendium of the covers of
Newsweek for the year 2010, with the cover featuring the iPad circled in red.
22
21
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/04/05ipad.html, printed on June 23, 2011.
23
22
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/06/22ipad.html, printed on June 23, 2011.
24
23
25
http://venturebeat.com/2010/10/18/how-apple-shipped-7-5-million-ipads-afterlaunching-it-six-months-ago/, printed on June 30, 2011.
24
26
http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/03/apple-ipad-review/, printed on June 30, 2011.
25
27
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/04/06/EDQR1CPVTT.DTL, printed on
June 30, 2011.
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
7
1
2
3
31.
Attached as Exhibit 37 is a true and correct copy of the cover of Time for the week
of April 12, 2010, as downloaded from the Time website.26
32.
Attached as Exhibit 38 is a true and correct copy of an article published on the
4
Gizmodo website on January 31, 2010,27 titled “Stephen Colbert Delivers Grammy for Song of
5
the Year from His New Apple iPad.”
6
33.
Attached as Exhibit 39 is a true and correct copy of a blog post on the personal
7
weblog Techlogr from February 28, 2010,28 discussing the design of Apple products and showing
8
side-by-side pictures of the iPad and iPhone’s similar designs.
9
34.
Attached as Exhibit 40 is a true and correct copy of an article from the Wall Street
10
Journal dated May 27, 2010,29 titled “Japan’s iPad Frenzy Signals a Sea Change.” The article
11
reports that “[t]he debut of Apple Inc.’s iPad tablet computer in Japan is generating a level of
12
hype and excitement rarely seen these days for a new electronics product in this gadget-loving
13
nation.” It states that the demand for the iPad in Japan was so high that “Softbank Corp., Apple’s
14
exclusive mobile carrier in Japan for the iPad, stopped accepting reservations for the device after
15
only three days.” It also states that “[m]ore than a half-dozen Japanese business and technology
16
magazines ran cover stories about the iPad’s debut, with one declaring in English: ‘Here comes
17
the game-changer.’”
18
35.
Attached as Exhibit 41 is a true and correct copy of an article from the Wall Street
19
Journal dated September 13, 2010,30 titled “Apple Takes its iPad to China,” which reports that in
20
China, consumers “bought iPads brought into the country by traders on the country’s flourishing
21
gray market, in which prices are high.”
22
26
23
27
24
http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20100412,00.html, printed on June 30, 2011.
http://gizmodo.com/5460921/stephen-colbert-delivers-grammy-for-song-of-the-yearfrom-his-new-apple-ipad, printed on Jun 30, 2011.
28
25
http://techlogr.tumblr.com/post/417511024/apple-design, printed on June 30, 2011.
29
26
27
28
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870363030457526992
1800507634.html, printed on June 30, 2011.
30
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870363030457526992
1800507634.html, printed on June 30, 2011.
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
8
1
36.
Attached as Exhibit 42 is an article from Reuters.com dated March 14, 2011,31
2
titled “Apple iPad Sales Seen Clearing 1 Million Units,” reporting estimates from analysts that
3
Apple “sold close to 1 million units of its next-generation [iPad 2] tablet computer during its
4
debut weekend,” and noting that the first-generation iPad “crossed the one-million mark 28 days
5
after its launch.”
6
37.
Attached as Exhibit 43 is a true and correct article published by CNET on March
7
11, 2011 and updated on June 9, 2011 (italics and emphasis in original),32 observing, “The
8
competition must really hate Apple. The Apple iPad wasn’t just a successful tablet computer in
9
2010—it was the tablet computer. In one fell swoop, Apple created the new tablet market and
10
sold tens of millions of iPads in spite of a global economic downturn and considerable
11
skepticism.” The article further notes that, “The bottom line: The iPad 2 refines an already
12
excellent product.”
13
38.
Attached as Exhibit 44 are true and correct copies of announcements of awards
14
that Apple has received for the iPad. These awards include Time magazine naming the iPad one
15
of the 50 Best Inventions of 2010,33 Popular Science heralding it as the Top Tablet in its Best of
16
What’s New 2010 feature,34 Engadget selecting the device as both the 2010 Editors’ Choice
17
Gadget of the Year and Tablet PC of the Year,35 and a 2010 red dot Award for Product Design.36
18
19
20
21
31
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/14/us-apple-researchidUSTRE72D30020110314, printed on June 30, 2011.
32
22
http://reviews.cnet.com/apple-ipad-2-review/#reviewPage1, printed on June 30, 2011.
33
23
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2029497_
2030652,00.html, printed on June 30, 2011.
24
34
25
35
26
http://www.popsci.com/bown/2010/product/apple-ipad, printed on June 30, 2011.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/25/the-winners-of-the-2010-engadget-awardseditors-choice/, printed on June 30, 2011.
36
27
http://en.red-dot.org/2783.html?cHash=cd608e03fc641df4440f80
e981e1d631&detail=7562&year=0, printed on June 30, 2011.
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
9
1
D.
Samsung’s Growing Market Share
2
39.
Attached as Exhibit 45 is a true and correct copy of Samsung Electronics’ 2010
3
Annual Report, which boasts:
4
We will bolster our leadership in mobile phones as we aim to
become the world’s No. 1 handset producer.
5
...
6
In 2010, Samsung Electronics reinforced our market leadership by
achieving sales of 280 million mobile phones worldwide, up 23%
over 2009 and a double-digit increase in operating profits. Our
flagship GALAXY S model posted sales of 10 million units, while
the GALAXY Tab also led the Android tablet PC market, earning
glowing customer reviews. Our leadership in fulltouch and
messaging mobile phones continued in both advanced and
emerging markets. In 2011, we plan to aggressively challenge a
market that grows ever more competitive. By launching GALAXY
S II, our flagship strategy smartphone, we will emphasize our
category leadership and provide readily available lineup options for
global customers. We are expanding and improving Samsung’s
unique mobile solutions as we strengthen our competitive lead in
both services and content.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
40.
Attached as Exhibit 46 is a true and correct copy of a press release from
16
International Data Corporation dated May 5, 2011,37 reporting that, based on data for the
17
worldwide smartphone market for the first quarter of 2011, Samsung’s market share increased
18
from 4.3% to 10.8% year-over-year and Samsung’s shipments increased 350% year-over-year
19
from 2.4 to 10.8 million units.
20
41.
Attached as Exhibit 47 is a true and correct copy of a press release from
21
International Data Corporation dated March 10, 2011,38 stating that Apple’s market share for
22
media tablets “came down from 93% in 3Q10 to 73% in 4Q10,” with “Samsung’s Galaxy Tab
23
[as] the primary competitor in the holiday season . . . capturing more than 17%” of the market.
24
25
37
26
http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS22815911, printed on June 30, 2011.
38
27
http://www.idc.com/about/viewpressrelease.jsp?containerId=prUS22737611, printed on
June 30, 2011.
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
10
1
2
3
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: July 1, 2011
/s/ Jason R. Bartlett
JASON R. BARTLETT
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF JASON R. BARTLETT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3012981
11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?