AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 60

MOTION for Summary Judgment Filed by AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Facts Points of Authority, #2 Statement of Facts Statement of Undisputed Facts, #3 Declaration Declaration of Jonathan Hudis, #4 Exhibit Ex. A, #5 Exhibit Ex. B, #6 Exhibit Ex. C, #7 Exhibit Ex. D, #8 Exhibit Ex. E, #9 Exhibit Ex. F, #10 Exhibit Ex. G, #11 Exhibit Ex. H, #12 Exhibit Ex. I, #13 Exhibit Ex. J, #14 Exhibit Ex. K, #15 Exhibit Ex. L, #16 Exhibit Ex. M, #17 Exhibit Ex. N, #18 Exhibit Ex. O, #19 Exhibit Ex. P, #20 Exhibit Ex. Q, #21 Exhibit Ex. R, #22 Exhibit Ex. S, #23 Exhibit Ex. T, #24 Exhibit Ex. U, #25 Exhibit Ex. V-1, #26 Exhibit Ex. V-2, #27 Exhibit Ex. W, #28 Exhibit Ex. X, #29 Exhibit Ex. Y, #30 Exhibit Ex. Z, #31 Exhibit Ex. AA, #32 Exhibit Ex. BB, #33 Exhibit Ex. CC, #34 Exhibit Ex. DD, #35 Exhibit Ex. EE, #36 Exhibit Ex. FF-1, #37 Exhibit Ex. FF-2, #38 Exhibit Ex. FF-3, #39 Exhibit Ex. FF-4, #40 Exhibit Ex. FF-5, #41 Exhibit Ex. FF-6, #42 Exhibit Ex. GG, #43 Exhibit Ex. HH, #44 Exhibit Ex. II, #45 Exhibit Ex. JJ, #46 Exhibit Ex. KK, #47 Exhibit Ex. LL, #48 Exhibit Ex. MM, #49 Declaration Declaration of Marianne Ernesto, #50 Exhibit Ex. NN, #51 Exhibit Ex. OO, #52 Exhibit Ex. PP, #53 Exhibit Ex. QQ, #54 Exhibit Ex. RR, #55 Exhibit Ex. SS, #56 Exhibit Ex. TT, #57 Exhibit Ex. UU, #58 Exhibit Ex. VV, #59 Exhibit Ex. WW, #60 Exhibit Ex. XX, #61 Exhibit Ex. YY, #62 Exhibit Ex. ZZ, #63 Exhibit Ex. AAA, #64 Exhibit Ex. BBB, #65 Exhibit Ex. CCC, #66 Exhibit Ex. DDD, #67 Exhibit Ex. EEE, #68 Exhibit Ex. FFF, #69 Exhibit Ex. GGG, #70 Exhibit Ex. HHH, #71 Exhibit Ex. III, #72 Exhibit Ex. JJJ, #73 Declaration Declaration of Lauress Wise, #74 Exhibit Ex. KKK, #75 Exhibit Ex. LLL, #76 Declaration Declaration of Wayne Camara, #77 Exhibit Ex. MMM, #78 Declaration Declaration of Felice Levine, #79 Exhibit Ex. NNN, #80 Exhibit Ex. OOO (Public Version), #81 Exhibit Ex. PPP, #82 Exhibit Ex. QQQ, #83 Exhibit Ex. RRR, #84 Exhibit Ex. SSS, #85 Exhibit Ex. TTT-1, #86 Exhibit Ex. TTT-2, #87 Exhibit Ex. UUU, #88 Declaration Declaration of Kurt Geisinger, #89 Declaration Declaration of Dianne Schneider, #90 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #91 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(Hudis, Jonathan). Added MOTION for Permanent Injunction on 12/22/2015 (td).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT QQ Case No. 1:14-cv-00857-TSC-DAR May 7, 2001 The Honorable United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator: I am writing on behalf of the American Psychological Association (APA) in support of three amendments that will be offered by Senator Paul Wel'stone during debate on S. 1, the Better Education for Students and Teachers Act. Senator Wellstone's amendments modify and clarify provisions relating to the use of tests and state assessments under the bill in an effort to ensure that the new testing provisions have the positive effects that the United States Senate intends. We encourage you to cosponsor these amendments and to support them when offered to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act during Senate floor consideration. With 155,000 members and affiliates, APA is the largest association of psychologists in the world, and strives to advance psychology as a science, a profession, and a means of promoting human welfare. Psychologists have unique expertise to lend to policy discussions involving educational and psychological testing. Psychological scientists developed the first intelligence tests, educational achievement and ability measures, and personnel selection instruments. They continue to be at the forefront of assessment technology, and remain committed to the fair and appropriate use of tests, particularly in high-stakes situations with significant consequences for individuals. APA's policy positions on testing questions are anchored by the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999), which is widely recognized as an authoritative document on test development and use. Codeveloped with the American Educational Research Association and the National Council on Measurement in Education, the Standards has been adopted by the U.S. Department of Education, cited in policy guidance issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and frequently relied upon in legal cases related to educational and employment testing. Senator Wellstone's amendments on state assessments would ensure that states adhere to quality assurances when developing and implementing the new assessments required under SA. One amendment would require that assessments meet the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999) and would offer grant support to States to develop assessments that are high quality and include multiple measures of student achievement. A second amendment would ensure that bonus funds authorized in the legislation are awarded to States that develop high quality tests, instead of those who simply create new tests the fastest. A third Wellstone amendment would clarify provisions relating to the use of certain tests by requiring that the new assessments authorized under S.1 be used for diagnostic purposes only and that adequate yearly progress be determined based on the tests already authorized under current law. APA believes that together these amendments will assure that the new assessments authorized in S.1 are of high quality and are used appropriately for the benefit of school districts, schools, and students. If APA can be of assistance to you and your office in your deliberations on high-stakes educational decisions, please contact our Public Policy Office at (202) 336-6062. Sincerely, Raymond D. Fowler, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President ..... - AERA_APA_NCME_0031523

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?