Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1201

Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier in Support of 1182 Statement Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier iso Joint Statement Regarding Exhibit Objections filed bySAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34, # 35 Exhibit 35, # 36 Exhibit 36, # 37 Exhibit 37, # 38 Exhibit 38, # 39 Exhibit 39, # 40 Exhibit 40, # 41 Exhibit 41, # 42 Exhibit 42, # 43 Exhibit 43, # 44 Exhibit 44, # 45 Exhibit 45, # 46 Exhibit 46, # 47 Exhibit 47, # 48 Exhibit 48, # 49 Exhibit 49, # 50 Exhibit 50, # 51 Exhibit 51, # 52 Exhibit 52, # 53 Exhibit 53, # 54 Exhibit 54, # 55 Exhibit 55, # 56 Exhibit 56, # 57 Exhibit 57, # 58 Exhibit 58, # 59 Exhibit 59)(Related document(s) 1182 ) (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 8/2/2012)

EXHIBIT 14

Foundation for
A-5193

Defendants

Plaintiffs

Resp

identifying

Trial Exhibit A-5193

Objs

to

James MeLeod

Interrogatory
as

support

No

sales

Foundational Support

98

in

Defs

manager

for

5th Set of Interrogatories

Acusimet and Honeywell

Cummins Sept 16 2008 Depo Tr at 8222-838 Rule 30b6
James McLeod as an Oracle regional support sales manager
Cummins Sept 16 2008 Depo Tr 345-25 Rule
support

renewal/sales

30b6

testimony

testimony

representatives report to regional managers

identifying

indicating

that

and associated job

responsibilities

Duggan Aug
responsibilities

Duggan Aug
support

SVI-108747v1

sales

2009

Depo Tr 2123-2225 Rule

of supports

2009

Depo Tr

30b6

representatives and

sales

2316-24

representatives with

regard

Rule
to

testimony

describing the job

managers

30b6

testimony

identifying duties of

communications with Oracle

customers

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN

LLP

DONN

PICKETT SBN 72257
GEOFFREY
HOWARD SBN 157468

HOLLY
HOUSE SBN 136045
ZACHARY
ALINDER SBN 209009
BREE

HANN SBN

Three

Embarcadero

CA

San Francisco

215695
Center
94111-4067

415 393-2000
415 393-2286

Telephone
Facsimile

[e-mail]
[e-mail]
holly.housebingham.com
[e-mail]

bree.hannbingham.com

DORIAN DALEY SBN
JENNIFER GLOSS
10

500

Oracle Parkway

Redwood
11

154227

M/S

5op7

CA 94070
650 506-4846
650 506-7114

City

Telephone
Facsimile

12

129049

SBN

[e-mail]
jennifer.glossorac1e.com

13

14

Attorneys

for Plaintiffs

Oracle

USA

Oracle

EMEA

Inc

Oracle International

Limited

and

Siebel

Corporation
Inc

Systems

15

16

UNITED

17

NORTHERN

18

STATES DISTRICT
DISTRICT

OAKLAND

COTJRT

OF CALIFORMA
DIVISION

19

20

ORACLE USA INC eta

21
Plaintiffs

22

23

AG eta
Defendants

24

25

26

27

______________________________

CASE

NO

07-CV-0 1658

PLAiNTIFFS
RESPONSES

PJH

EDL

SUPPLEMENTAL

AND

TO

OBJECTIONS

INTERROGATORY
NO.98 IN
DEFENDANTS
FIFTH SET OF
INTERROGATORIES SIEBEL

CONTAINS HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO
PROTECTIVE ORDER

28
07-CV-01658

PLAINTIFFS

SUPPLEMENTAL
RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
DEFENDANTS
FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES SIEBEL

PJH

NO.98

EDL
IN

PARTY

PROPOUNDING

Defendants

RESPONDING PARTY
SET

NO

Five

Pursuant

Oracle International

Oracle
Set

Plaintiffs

and

their response

supplement

between

Oracle

Corporation

of Interrogatories

11 2009

Rule of Civil Procedure

to Federal

with respect

EMEA

The
below

as

12

these

13

Siebel

software

Systems Inc

No

Interrogatory

USA

Oracle

Plaintiffs

product

98

Inc

collectively

of Defendants

Fifth

pursuant to the June

line

the parties

10

Response

to

Siebel

GENERAL

11

Limited and

objections

Oracles

to

33

if

General Objections

following

in

fully repeated

OBJECTIONS

each

Response

are incorporated

Any

to repeat

failure

each

into

all

or

specific

of

any part

of such objections

General Objections

14

15

16

17

shall

preserve any objections

trial

in

this

Oracle

20

Federal

to

Interrogatories

in

any manner

of Civil Procedure

to the extent

22

24

25

26

that

is

not

limitation information

the Interrogatories

required

and

within

that

exceeds

that

or

and

Responses

in the

be without

relevance

their

prejudice

matenality

subject

is

Oracles

each

matter

at

to and

or

any hearing

Rules

required

they

Oracle

shall

the extent

to

or control

that

respond

to

Defendants

obligate

the

seek

without

including

of any partys customers
its

to

by the Rules

possession custody

in

purport

with the requirements of the

laws

Interrogatory

in the possession

the extent

to

inconsistent

applicable

manner

to

is

or

any other

based only on information

by the Federal

27

the

competence

to the Interrogatories

Oracle objects
information

to the

shall

waiver or relinquishment

action

respond

Rules

any Interrogatory

may have

Oracle objects

19

23

it

to

of any of the Interrogatories

admissibility

or

answers

that

shall not constitute

Response

specific

Oracles

18

21

in

Oracle will respond

own possession custody

or control

to

as

of Civil Procedure

Oracle objects

to these

Interrogatories

to

the extent

they are compound

28

07-CV-01658PJ11EDL

PLAINTIFFS

SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS

RESPONSES
FIFTH

AND

TO INTERROGATORY
SET OF INTERROGATORJES
SIEBEL
OBJECTIONS

NO.98

IN

Oracle

information

witness

and

from discovery

protected

statement and/or

afforded

discovery

other

all

intend

privileges

such protected

reserves

10

are

an appropriate

to

Oracle

Oracle

13

to

14

that

15

of 1dentif

16

information

17

such individuals

require

to

cannot be identified

for current

they

or

it

obligate

21

the Federal

22

Oracle shall respond

Oracle to respond
Rules

in

that

that

grounds

Oracle

January
extent

that

parties

have

2002

it

objects

objects

reached

burden

regarding

amend

is

to

search

the rules

as required

Responses

at

26e

to the extent

Oracle further objects

the extent

that

it

purports

address

or business

Defendants

that

or

to the Definition

intend

affiliation

to contact

counsel

Nos

of

and

or

this

is

Court

rules

and

inconsistent

or

that

it

and

in the

to

purports

with the requirements

any other applicable

of construction

manner

laws
by law

required

in Instruction

No

No

stated

of

is

on

overbroad

time period

of response

to the extent

as

set

by

Instruction

overbroad and

different

unduly burdensome

from or additional

production of information

before

which

2004

to the

and

to the

the

agreement

after the

filing

07-C V-01658

PLAINTIFFS

Oracle

possession custody or control

its

only to the extent

to the

or obligation

these

Oracle to provide

Instruction

to the

search

reasonable

of Identif

not within

To

These

DEFINITIONS

any manner that exceeds

through the date

imposes

trial

TO INSTRUCTIONS

they are unduly burdensome

25

will

do so through Oracles

to the Interrogatories

Oracle

the

objects

of Civil Procedure

23

28

to

attempt

Oracle

20

27

TO

former employees

may

for

Oracle does not

ongoing

is

following

of Civil Procedure

to require

purports

to date

the Definition

OBJECTIONS

19

26

Rule

reasonable

following

to the extent

to

information

provide

exemptions from

or in preparation

litigation

of the case

facts

and

Responses

objects

18

24

these

OBJECTIONS

12

of

immunities under the law

or

into the

investigation

to Federal

11

and

of

disclosure

work product

interest

the privileges

privileges

protections

seeks

it

information

supplement

time pursuant

common

by the attorney-client

made based on Oracles knowledge

the right

the extent

to

Interrogatory

prepared in anticipation

Oracles

Responses

each

communications

party

materials

to

applicable

to disclose

to

objects

SUPPLEMENTAL
RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
DEFENDANTS
FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATOIUES SIEBEL

of the
PJJ-1

NO.98

EDL
IN

Oracles

Accordingly

litigation

March 22 2007

unless

the discovery

be for the time period

will

responses

covered

is

by the Expanded

2004

January

to

Discovery Timeline

Agreement
Oracle objects

that the relevant

frame for Siebel

time

from

starts

January

2006

RESPONSES AND OIJECTIONS

TO IISITERROGATORY

DEFENDANTS

NO.98 IN

FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES

NO 98

INTERROGATORY
the

Identify

Regional Managers

10

Defendant

11

Production

12

RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY

13

TomorrowNow
and

14

objects

15

that they

16

this

17

control

to

of Oracle

require

19

by the Federal

21

22

extent

to

it

immunity including
Oracle also objects

24

and

25

of admissible

seeks

26

Oracle

27

already

to

to

Subject

that

is

neither

this

and/or

that

and

abstract

protected

search

Oracle

on the grounds

to

that

nor reasonably

it

to the extent

that

it

to

this

overbroad

information

protection

or

protection

unduly burdensome

records

purports

that

to require

Oracle has

produce

without

waiver of the foregoing

General and

Specific

objections Oracle
07-C

PLAINTIFFS

to the

Interrogatory

to lead to the discovery

the Interrogatory

business

to

purports

information required

work product

calculated

to

objects

possession custody or

by any privilege

and

is

further

historical

also objects

privilege

summary from

the

for responsive

from discovery

on the grounds

responsible

the extent

to

with respect

attorney-client

or

for

by reference Oracle

here

Oracle

in

not

is

Interrogatory

Siebel

relevant

in

31 2008

and October

Oracle incorporates

in particular

Oracle further objects

or will

and

which

the reasonable

beyond

Interrogatory

compilation

to

to

listed

98

for information

of information

this

evidence

produced

calls

but not limited to

information

create

it

customer

of Requests

Sets

2002

January

each

for

First

its

overbroad and unduly burdensome

J.D Edwards

disclosure

to

terms Regional Managers

of Civil Procedure

PeopleSofi

23

28

anything

Rules

seeks

NO

Oracle further objects

Oracle to do

between

Plaintiffs

General Objections

to the extent

Interrogatory

related

its

vague ambiguous

18

20

to

use of the undefmed

the

are

to

Support Sales

Inc.s Supplemental Exhibit

Interrogatories

In addition

for

responsible

SUPPLEMENTAL
RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
DEFENDANTS
FIFTH SET OF LNTERROGATORIES
SIEBEL

V.01 658

PJH

NO.98

EDL
IN

responds

as

follows

were connected

managers

the relevant

time period

Oracle could

not locate

the extent

that

it

could

with

either or that

has

11

or sales representative

12

managers

13

are identified

14

risk reports

15

cancellation

16

ORCL00267953

17

e.g.ORCLOO

to

attempted

3d

and

to

undue

name below

information

identify

documents

information

numerous

in

Oracle

refers

not

be located

Oracles

related

to the

customers on

bookings

ORCL0001

see

6776

to those

identify

In addition

reports

see

lists

e.g ORCLOO 184144
Therefore

documents

in

pursuant

Oracles

or

where

had

been

search Oracle

sales

support

the

identified

names

manager

of the sales

customer

list

including for example

at-

e.g ORCLOO 131330

revenue

support

been

TomorrowNows

Oracles production

throughout

have

reasonable

that

customer

ORCLOO 131416

Defendants

production

during

Oracle has to

no sales representative

following

sales

sales representatives

representatives

to the

territory spreadsheets

and

sales

customer

with the customer

name of any

the

related

documents

see

149099

Such

by Defendants

to the

assigned

associated

Further to the extent

see e.g ORCL00274684
reports

been

burden included

could

understanding of which

its

customers identified

manager

customer

that

sales representatives

in

sales

below

lists

no sales manager had

name of

the

to their

10

18

Where

related

identify

next

assigned

with the TomorrowNow

could do so without

it

search Oracle

reasonable

Following

to

see
and

renewal

Fed

letters

Civ Proc

see

Rule

production

19

20

Name
Customer
21

22

Star

Name

If

Discrepancy

Any

Alternate

Customer

Name

Quality

Sales

Five Star Quality

Care

Inc

23

24

______________________

AO

Smith

Smith

Corporation

Chris

Name

Manager

Madsen

Nancy

Deena
Schebe
Marchese

Robert

Lachs

Jordan

Rowe-McCune

__________________

______________________

________________

_____________________

___________________

Abbott

Abbott

James

Laboratories

Limited

25

26

27

Laboratories

Canada

Blackford

John

Humphrys

Limited

28
07-CV-01658

PLAINTIFFS

SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS

RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES SIEBEL

Pill

NO.98

EDL

IN

Inc

Consolidated

James

Inc

Abitibi-Consolidated

AhIbI

____________________
_________________________

John

Blackiord

Humphrys
_______________________

ANSI
ConsolIdat
Canada

AC

of

See e.g.
oRcL00000099

Alameda

Transit

Contra

Costa

Chris

Madsen

Transit

Masmy

Sooth

_________________________

James

Ltd

Academy

Ott.

Blackford

___________

UP
Me

___________________________

_______________________

_____________________

Kersten

Ace Pathing

Parking

Knickerbocker

Man anement
10

Inc

ACM Food
12

13

ACH

Camoanles

Inc

AGN

By

Europe

Food

ACN

Robert

Companies

BV

Europe

Lachs

Gordon

Stephen

Anderson

Hans

Trencart

14
___________________

____________________

Kuijpers

_________________________
American

15

Robert

LachsAian

CamrnunicaUons
16

_________________

17

ACO

Network

Romano

Inc

PRODLJITS

Alisa

POLYMERES

S.A

_____________

Horsnail

AGO

Prodolts

Potvmsres
18

__________________

______________

Rachel

Amalia

lonescu

Daniele

Sterescu

_________________

Trencart

James McLeod

Company

Acushnet

19

Mary

Daniele

Robert

Lachs

20
_________________

A4v.ce

ffl
22

__________________

Auto
__________________

AFLAC

____________________

______________________
Advance
Stores

Company

Robert

Incorporated

____________________

Mac

____________________

Vuka

American

Family

23

Ishikawa

Hidehiko

Life
of

Takamatsu

Columbus
24

Jennifer

Romano
Muihem

Robert

Assurance

Company

Lachs

Laths

Rachel

Rachel

Romano
25
AaFlrst

26
Credit

Farm

AgFirst

Farm Credit Bank

Bank

_________________

Robert

______________________

___________________

Rachel

Lachs

Romano

Deene

Marchese

28
07-CV-01658PJHEDL1

PLAINTIFFS

SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS

RESPONSES
FIFTH

AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY

SET OF INTERROGATORIES

SIEBEL

NO

QS

IN

See

Hum.

e.g.

ORCL000117YO

Services

CommIssion

Marie

Dimnond Shoot

Henry

Lee

Blackford

Inc

Production

Herbert

Waldmann

Herbert

WsISnann

GrnbH

Gordon

Stephen

Co

Mary

Robert

Anderson

tjchttschnik

Ciobotea Amelia

GmH

Sterescu

Valley

VALLEY

System

Health

James McLeod

SYSTEM

Heritaoe
10

Ann

Miloradovitch

James

Production

Henry

Laths

Robert

Diamonds

Helzberg

ja4zbero

HEALTH

Lachs

Robert

Rachel

Romano
ii

13

14

H4hi

Robert

Lachs

Storage

James

Blackford

Inc

Collier Jordan

HIGH INDUSTRIES

industries

High

Global

Hitachi

Storage

Global

Technologies

INC

McCune

Technojocy
15

16

_____________

____________
Casino

Holland

________________
Holland

______________

Home

Dave

__________________

______________________

Home

Deoot

Depot

_______________
Daniele

Casino

USA

Trencart

Hans

Kuijpers

Robert

Lachs

Incorporated
l8

19

INTERNATIONAL

Inc

_n._flflflat
_________________

INC

___________
________________

_______

20
Host
21

_____________________
James
Mcl.eod
Debra

HONEYWELL

_ll

Communications

Communications

Hubbard

Con.fructlon

24

Robert

Laths

Company

22

--

Kersten

Knickerbocker

Inc

Hubbard

Hutchins

Ctany
_________________
Huntsville

25

of

26

__________________

City

Construction

______________________
City

Of

Huntsville

HunSvIIle

__________________

Ho.St

______________________

James McLeod

_____________________

James McLeod
Malone

Gauthier

Lars Mcculloch

System

27

28
18

PLAINTIFFS

SUPPLEMENTAL
DFFENDANfS

RESPONSES
FIFTH

SET

ucV-oIosg

AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
OF INTERROGATORIES

SIEBEL

PJH

NO.98

EDLI
IN

Dan chup

Chandler
Diane

Howell-

WatkinsJordan

Rowe-MeCune

____
Smart

Betty

Centers

SC
--

Simpson

_______

Kent

Stephen

Standard

John

_______

-Iurnphrys

Edwards

Jeinie
Register

Company

________

-_____
Laboratofles

_______--

iApostos
Edwards

Jennie

DATED

September18

Bemazzanr

Chrissy

Inc

2009

12

IIINGIIAM

13

NkC

lUMEN

LU

By__2c4
Alinder

Zachary

16

lbr Plaintiffs

Attorneys
Oracle

17

Corporation

LSA

Inc.

Oracle

vsteiiis

18

International

Oracle

EMEA

Limited

and

Siehel

Inc

20

21

23

24

25

26

27

28
37

PLAINTIFFS

SUPPLEMENTAl
DFEENDANTS

RESPtNSFS
FIFTHSFt

AND OBEC11CNS
TO I%ERRUGA
OF lNTFRRCkiA
1Uk1iS.SwBht

IflV-EUiM

FURY

MI
IN

am over
San

County

Francisco

94111-4067

am

thai

with

familiar

the

in

Embarcadero

2009

served

San

employed

in

California

Francisco

and

for collection

FedEx

day

and

action

office

this

business

of

this

Center

of

delivery/next

course

in

party

the practice

ordinary

On September

not

age

Three

at

for maillthxlhand

same day

of

years

California

readily

of correspondence

deposited

thghteen

processing

and

delivery

they

are

business

the

attached

RESPONSES AND
SUPPLEMENTAL
NO 98 IN
OMECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
DEFENDANTS
FiFTH SET OF INTERROGATOWES
PLAINTIFFS

SLEBEL

BY FAX
10

numbers

II

BY MALL
United

12

below

forth

Mail

at

San

as

Se

addressed

practice

for collection

United
14

States

Postal

EXPRESS

16

of
17

with

18

documents

persons

to

be

al

the

persons

the

listed
at

of

the

in

sealed

below

is

am
of

to

fax

the

with

and

with

the

with

the

United

in

processing

postage

firms

law

this

for mailing

deposited

in the

with

envelopes

correspondence
is

be placed

to

familiar

readily

for collection

left

above

copy

California

correct

above

listed

500 p.m

Correspondence
it

hand

above

DELIVERY

States

the ordinary

addresses

set

by transmitting
at

the email

forth
via

correct

envelopes

sealed

in

and

in

sealed

correct

copy

envelopes

below

true

by causing

delivered

forth

set

and

true

by causing
by FedEx

be delivered

to

addresses

the

SERVICE

VLA EMAIL
to

documents

the

before

processing

Service

fees prepaid

19

20

and

MATL/OVERNIGITIT

PERSONAL

all

forth

same day

documents

the

date

business

of

course

the

facsimile
this

Francisco

and

Postal

Service

on

true

by causing

States

prepaid
13

via

by transmitting
set

copy
with

of

all

the

fees

above
hilly

paid

to

the

below

email

documents

the

addresses

set

forth

listed

above

on

this

date

below

21

22

Robert

23

Elaine

Jones
24

555
26th

Tharan

Gregory

Jane

Esq

Froyd Esq

Wallace Esq

Jones

Day

Caltforma

Street

1755

San

Francisco

415

CA

Alto

650

CA

Road

94303

739-3939

626.3939

tglanierJonesDay.com

26
[e-mail]

27

Esq

Day

Tel

94104

Lather

Embarcadero

Palo

Floor

Tel

25

Esq

Mittelstaedt

McfloneH

Jason

jfroydJonesDay.com

jmcdonellJoriesDay.com
ewallaceonesDay.coni

28
38

PLAINTIFFS

SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTs

07-CV-OI6fl

RESrONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
SIEBEL

Pill

NO.98

EOLj
IN

Ideclare

whose
2009

direction

at

San

that

the service

Francisco

am employed
was made and

in

that

the office

this

declaration

member of

the

was executed

barofthis

couti

on September

ai

18

California

39
PLAINTIFFS

of

SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS

RESPONSES
FifTH

SET

07-CV-016SS

AND OBJECTIONS TO IWrEnOGATORY
OF TNTROGATORLES
SIEBEL

NO

PTh

E4

98 TN

RICHARD CUMMINS
September 16 2008
ATTORNEYS EYES
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

ONLY
Page

STATES

UNITED

DISTRICT

DISTRICT

NORTHERN
SAN

OF

FRANCISCO

COURT

CALIFORNIA

DIVISION

000-ORACLE

Delaware
CORPORATION
ORACLE
USA INC
Corporation
Colorado
and
Corporation
ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION
California
Corporation

Plaintiffs

No

Vs
SAP
SAP

EDL

07-CV-0l658-PJH

AG

German
Corporation
Delaware
ANERICA
INC
CORPORATION
TOMORROWNOW
INC
Texas
and
DOES
Corporation
150 Inclusive

Ii

Defendants

________________/

VIDEOTAPED

RULE
ORACLE

CONFIDENTIAL

Reported
Job 412495

By

16

September

ARLEN

Merrill Legal

800

2008
255

Pages

ATTORNEYS

INFORMATION

WENDY

OF

CUMMINS

RICHARD

Volume
HIGHLY

DEPOSITION

CORPORATION

Designee

Tuesday

30b

CSR

4355

CRR

EYES

ONLY

RMR

Solutions

8699132

e6a0856a-Oee4-4b35-albf-ca2Oaf8a26bc

HIGHLY

September 16 2008
RICHARD CtJMbiINS
ATTORNEYS EYES
INFORMATION
CONFIDENTIAL

ONLY

Page

82

continuously
Yes
And
time

other

have

direct

your

that

Burr

Chris

than

in

changed

reports

Yes
Rave

there

lot

been

of

few

or

changes

Afew
Can
1U09

you

When

came

you

13

when

15

And

over

he

the

beginning

Mt

was

was

right

Andy

before

moved

the

recall

Mr

But

Arid

his

of

sales

in

name

Allbritten

had

responsibility

Yes

22

head

sales

renewal

support

to

report
to

Okay
for

did

dont

21

23

1110

it

reported

Peoplesoft

19

20

boss

well

moved

who

Andy

IIiQ

at

over

16

18

2005

your

Oracle
Kevin

was

It

Allbritten

1109

to

had

this

all

start

just

been

theyve

in

reports

Lets

Okay

11

12

direct

FeopleSoft

what

us

remember

to

have
110

tell

time

At

25

the
At

24

Rob

Lacha

who

time

the

and

were
of

time

Jamie

the
of

reports

at

that

acquisition

the

acquisition

James

Mcbeod

Blackford

Merrill Legal

800

direct

your

Solutions

8699132
oeaOBSea.ee.44b35-albf-c.ZOfaa2ebc

HIGHLY

september 16 2008
RICHARD CUNNINS
ATTORNEYS EYES
INFORMATION
CONFIDENTIAL

ONLY

Page
those

Were

83

managers

regional

Yes
then

And
1110

did

how

the

change

organization

that

after

Janie

and

left

replaced

RoweMcCUfle

Jordan

Jamie
When

that

was

other

What

1110

2006

in

Soxnetixne

Miloradovitch

10

LeeAnn

11

Did

she

replace

No

she

was

12

the

long

regional

in

involved

operations

on

report

to

you

year
fourth

was

that

direct

report

you

had

Yes
time

for

20

person

to

whom

you

At

reported

what

in

point

change

Was

cime
that

did

the

June

of

35

23

111

other

the

then

19

22

she

roughly

So

21

of

me

to

reporting

began

one

more

did

How
For

L111

recall

side

Peoplesoft

15

19

you

managers

13

14

do

changes

Yes

24

And

25

Yes

then

Merrill

it

Legal

800

became

Mr Madsen

Solutions

8699132
eOaOSSGa-O.e4-4b35-al

bf-ca2OafBa2Sbc

RICHARD

16

September

CUbdMINS

2008

CONFIDENTIAL

MR
break

for

McDOHELL

the

See

day

Im

Counsel
you

then

Thank

week

next

to

you

going

sir
This

VIDEOGRPHER
1701

videotape

number

Cuminins

four

Going

off

in

the

marks

end

deposiLion

the

the

of

record

the

time

of

Richard

is

502

oQothe

Whereupon

502

15

at

--o0o--

declare

12

14

adjourned

p.m

10

13

was

deposition

the

foregoing

under

is

and correct

LTue

_____

.C1ifornia

penalty

of

perjury

Subscribed

this

day

that
at

of

2008

19

Signature

of

Witness

20

21

22

23

24

25

253
Merrill

Legal

800

Solutions

8699132

Errata Sheet

Deposition

Page

41

Rick

of

Line

Cummins September 16

2008

Reason

Change

1-22

Change Juans responsibility is
manager to Juan is responsible

service

Clarification

delivery

for service

delivery

managers
Change

14

No

havent

havent

124

talked

to

talked

hundreds

to

customers

to

No

Clarification

of customers about

TomorrowNow
151

174

Change

less to

more

Change welcome

23

to

176

Change

Hutton

to

207

Change

McGee

Change

were new

22

245

Subject

14

to the

Change

above

changes

Signre/

A172687826

IP

to

Ierty

Correction

Correction

Murquia

Correction

renew

Correction

to

Change or doesnt

232

Oracle

Hunt

to

219

Correction

to

does

or

doesnt

Correction

IT

that

Correction

the transcript

is

true

and

correct

_____
ate

certify that

Reporter

hereby

foregoing

deposition

the

whole

said

by

and

therein

witness

said

11

computer

review

of

14

requested

15

deponent

16

period

before

tell

but

that

the

reduced

the

and

completion

of

reporter

are

either

19

deposition nor

in

20

this

that

21

parties

any

any
way

was

that

certify
or

of

the
by

deposition
was

not

made

the

by

during

the

hereto

appended

further

time

typewriting

the

the

allowed

the

at

supervision

changes

to

in

testimony

to

any

attorney for

of

the

am

not

of

counsel

parties

to

the

said
of

interested

am not

related

in

the

event

to

any

of

thereto
DATED

Cckok

WENDY

ARN

2008

23

24

25

the
in

truth

down

person

requested

If

and

the

taken

iXi

18

22

and

direction

and provided

cause

to

transcript

the

17

sworn

deposition was

stated

my

That

13

the

nothing

thereafter

was

under

12

and

in

duly

disinterested

me

shorthand

10

me

by

witness

the

cause

That

place

was

truth

withinentitled

Certified Shorthand

ARLEN

WENDY

truth

REPORTER

OF

CERTIFICATE

CSR

No

4355

the

or

RICHARD CUNMINS
September 16 2008
ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

Page1
UNITED

STATES

DISTRICT

DISTRICT

NORTHERN
SAN

OF

FRANCISCO

COURT

CALIFORNIA

DIVISION

-O0o-ORACLE

Delaware
CORPORATION
Corporation
ORACLE
USA INC
Colorado
and
Corporation
ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION
California
Corporation

Plaintiffs

No

Vs
SAP
SAP

07CV0l658PJH

EDL

AG

German
Corporation
Delaware
AMERICA
INC
CORPORATION
TOMORROWNOW
INC
Texas
and
DOES
Corporation
150 Inclusive

Defendants

________________/

VIDEOTAPED

RULE
ORACLE

RICHARD

CONFIDENTIAL

Reported
By
Job 412495

ARLEN

16

2008
255

Pages

ATTORNEYS

INFORMATION

WENDY

OF

CUMMINS

September

Volume
HIGHLY

DEPOSITION

CORPORATION

Designee

Tuesday

30b

CSR

4355

CRR

EYES

ONLY

RNR

Merrill Legal Solutions

800

8699132

e6a0856a-Oee4-4b35-albf-ca2Oaf8a26bc

RICHARD
HIGHLY

CUMMINS

September 16 2008
INFORMATION
ATTORNEYS EYES

CONFIDENTIAL

ONLY

34

Page
likely

TomorrowNow
either

customers

for

ways

is

through

license

0944

in

get

regional
0944

support

does

license

from
with

relationship

correct

rep

relate

that

reps

and

manager

you

Now

nie

through

the

to

license

do

you

report
did

so

to

up

say

rep
did

You

10

meant support

11

12

support

13

And

14

support

15

onto

support

back

or

so

17

thats

18

they

reps

report

if the

can

19

then

be

responsible

22

to

returning

is

group that
for

to
of

with

will
any

up

make

new

back
them

something
of

what

involved

other

through

me

bringing

parameters
get

the

back

customer

bring

their

to

come

structure

there

trying

group
you

other

that

would

license

sales

stuff

already

customers

MS

HOUSE

24

THE

WITNESS

II

issues

to

manager

to

are

reports

23

mentioned

trying

then

there

21

regional

to

trying

So

apologize

how

outside

do

than

25

is

there

If

of

Is
the

to

up

customer

theyre

if

out

reps

understands

rep

20

0945

of

Oracle

loop

the

The

0945

to

Correct
Then how

0945

kind

some

or

rep

return

to

dont

Merrill

Objection

believe

Legal

800

Other

vague

than

the

so

Solutions

8699132

eGaOB5Sa-Oee4-4b35--o

bf.ca2oafan

Bbc

RICRARD

CUMMINS

16

September

2008

CONFIDENTIAL

MR
break

McDONELL

the day

for

Im

Counsel

See

then

Thank

week

next

you

to

you

going

sir
This

VIDEOGRI\PHER

170

videotape
Cuminins

Going

four

number

off

the

of

deposition

record

time

the

was

deposition

of

Richard

is

502

adjourned

at

--o0o--

declare

12

the

foregoing

under

isyue

and

____________

of

penalty

perjury

Subscribed

correct
this

14

15

end

p.m

10

t3

the

the

Whereupon

502

in

the

marks

/.S14

day

that
at

of

2008

19

Signature

of

Witness

20

21

22

23

24

25

253
Merrill

Legal

800

Solutions

8699132

Errata Sheet

Deposition

Rick

of

41

2008

Change

Line

Page

Cummins September 16

1-22

Change

Reason

Juans

manager

to

is

responsibility

Juan

is

responsible

service

Clarification

delivery

for service

delivery

managers
Change

14

No

havent

havent

124

talked

to

talked

hundreds

to

customers

to

No

Clarification

of customers about

TomorrowNow
151

Change

174

less to

more

Change welcome

23

Change Hutton

176

to

to

Change

232

245

14

Subject

//

A72687826A

to

the

above

to

or doesnt

to

Change

22

were new

Change

219

McGee

IP

changes

Sign4reJ

to

fo

Oracle

Correction

Hunt

Change

207

Correction

Correction

Murquia

Correction

renew

Correction

does

or

doesnt

Correction

IT

Iperttfy

that

Correction

the transcript

is

true

and

correct

_____
te

CERTIFICATE
WENDY

foregoing

deposition
whole

said

by

and

therein

said

witness

11

computer

Ip
U2

review

14

requested

15

deponent

16

period

of

the

deposition was

stated

before

allowed are

tell

truth

further
either

attorney for

19

deposition nor

in

20

this

that

21

parties

the

to

and

and

any

any
way

the
by

deposition
not

was
made

changes

the

reporter

the

by

during

the

hereto

of

the

am

not

of

counsel

parties

to

the

said
of

interesfed

am not

in

related

thereto

the

event

to

any

of

nc
DATED

2008

24

WENDY

of

typewriting

the

of

certify that
or

time

supervision

any

to

in

the

at

23

25

the
in

testimony

was

appended

18

22

reduced

completion

requested

and provided

cause

to

down

person
the

transcript

If

17

the

the

taken

that

arid

direction

my

That

13

but

nothing

thereafter

was

under

12

arid

in

sworn

duly

disinterested

me

shorthand

10

me

by

witness

the

cause

That

place

was

truth

withinentitled

Certified Shorthand

certify that

hereby

the

REPORTER

ARLEW

Reporter

truth

OF

AREN

CSR

No

4355

the

or

PAUL DUGGAN
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

2009

August

ATTORNEYS

EYES

ONLY
Page

IN

THE

UNITED

STATES

DISTRICT

DISTRICT

NORTHERN
SAN

OF

FRANCISCO

COURT

CALIFORNIA

DIVISION

--000-ORACLE
CORPORATION
Delaware
corporation
Colorado
USA

ORACLE

INC

and

corporation
INTERNATIONAL
California

ORACLE

CORPORATION
corporation
Plaintiffs

vs
SAP

AG

SAP

AMERICA

07-CV-1658

German

PJH

corporation

INC

Delaware

TOMORROWNOW
Texas
corporation
1-50
inclusive

corporation

INC
DOES

and

Defendants

VIDEOTAPED

DEPOSITION

REPORTED

BY

ATTORNEYS

CONFIDENTIAL

SARAH

LUCIA

BRANN

Merrill Legal

800

PAUL

DUGGAN

2009

August

HIGHLY

OF

CSR

EYES

ONLY

3887

421893

Solutions

8699132

f2f3l2ff-3d87-4268-a7b3-2b05efa96663

HIGHLY

2009
ATTORNEYS EYES

PAUL DUGGAN
CONFIDENTIAL

August

ONLY
Page

094632

customers

Siebel

MR ALINDER

094633
194634

and

Vague

Objection

ambiguous

094635
0946

21

THE

WITNESS

M1

DELMIJNTY

Can

restate

you

the

question

36

094637
094641

type

04643

Siebel

094644

Is

there

other

any

with

interaction

representatives

094645

11

094649

13

has

more

customers

than

the

support

MR

12

094653

that

10

Dq4648

employee

of

094656
15

094706

to

regard

you

are

most

would

this

typically
the

in

speaking

be

with

contact

customers

those

MR
turn

managed

09412

18

094714

t9

091715

20

091716

21

094724

22

094725

23

094729

24

indicate

25

hay

Do

If

have

would

that

for

ambiguous

renewals

support

person

16

094709

WITNESS

THE

Calls

Objection

and

Vague

spcu1ation

the

094704

LINDER

sales

they

And

DELAHUNTY
what

by

have

refer

you

formal

more

to

title

MR

ALINDER

WITNESS

To

as

are

they

in

managers

just

than

Objection

THE

then

manager
Vague

as

to

of

knowledge

time

they

were

31st

that

2007

DELABUNTY
in

the

there

Merrill Legal

800

best

my

managers

regional

MR

the

And

time

period

were

two

your
June

regional

notes

1st

2006

to

nanagers1

Solutions

8699132

12131

2f14d87-4268-a7b3-2b05efa96663

HIGHLY

PAUL DUGGAN
CONFIDENTIAL

2009

August

ATTORNEYS

ONLY

EYES

Page

094736

Mlicja

and

Rago

094737

Is

094746

Yes

094749

Can

correct

that

Is

Yes

094739

Edwards

Jennie

22

that

accurate

describe

you

094751

responsibilities

094152

how

that

across

their

period

time

job
sales

representatives

094757

The

094800

the

differ

sales

support

094806

10

basis

094810

11

representatives

094814

12

sort

094816

13

094820

14

094823

15

094827

16

position

094831

17

when

094833

18

094831

19

094841

20

094843

21

managers

094850

22

will

094851
094855

support

manage

daytoday

from

sessions

forecasts

would

managers

representatives

coaching

doing

of

sales

support

the

from

the

reviewing

and

those

performance

things
What

are

you

when

to

referring

you

Say

forecasts
you Imow

This
you

So

have

in

sales

is

who

is

The

representatives

responsible

deals

same

the
for

sales

any

what

forecast

to

support

as

will

close

way
those

creating

forecasts

to

then

build

that

communicate

in

24

review

that

25

eventually

forecast
those

case

And

forecast

with

this

myself

it

would

Merrill Legal

800

will

make

at

Those

forecasts
that

Rick
it

work

to

with

managers
roll

time

Cununins
Chris

their

up

to

would
and

Madsen

Solutions

8699132

12131

Zff-3d87-4268.a7b3-2b05e1a96663

PAUL DUGGAN
HIGHLY

113457

2TTORBYS

CONPIDENTI1L

the

Whereupon

113457

2009

August

concluded

at

EYES

ONLY

was

deposition

a.m

1124

oOo

113457
113457

declare

113457

foregoing

113457

5/-tJ

of

is

true

under

and

penalty

correct

pcpC.tO

of perjury

Subscribed

California

kUuS1

the

at

this

day

2009
_____

Paul

Duggan

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

80
Merrill

Legal

800

Solutions

8699132

Merrill

Legal Solutions

YOUR

INSTRUCTIONS FOR READING/CORRECTiNG

To

assist

you

follow

please

them

in

and attach

Please

read

make

insert

and the

making

the

line

changes

number

below

and/or

and then

reference

do not make any changes

Please

do NOT change

designated
Main

Street

4th

you

your deposition

testimony

any errors or changes
sheet by

you wish

change

furnish

sheet

on the errata

corrections

line

please

and

sign

return

the

the

last

Errata

CA 94105

FlOor San Frndsco

ERRATA

Page

errata

find

the

br

and

to

pages are necessary please

to

on the face

you wish

listing

the

to

page

make

of the transcript

any of the questions

your review

Signature

of the

corrections

Please

After completing

If

careftilly

corrections

additional

If

pages to the back

your transcript
the

br

changes and

the directions

DEPOSITION

or fax

sheet above

of the errata

page
sheets

to

Merrill

them

to

Legal

415

Solutions

the
at

135

357.4301

SHEET

Line

Change

imc

Reason

--

F1

Change

1EL

Reason

5u iJ%

Reason

if FO

fETS

-r-tPc

Change

IN

3ZIKJC

S4

Gia

Page

Une

Change

12LtS

Reason

rLt

Reason

Sk

T1

Change

R4

.-rt Pc

A-1

Ft

.S

Change_____________________________________

Reason_______________________________________
Change_______________________________________
Reason_______________________________________

Change_______________________________________
Reason_________________________________________

Change
Reason_________________________________________

Change_______________________________________
Reason_________________________________________

to the

________

Subject

_______

No changes

i1

signature

above

have

changes

certify

that

the transcript

is

true

and correct

made

certify

that

the transcript

is

true

and

been

_

date

correct

CERTIFICATE

LUCIA BRANN

SARAH

Reporter
foregoing

deposition

that

hereby certify

the

truth

whole

withinentitled

place

therein

10

witness

11

computer

was

said

the

in

sworn
but

nothing

and

before

review

14

If

15

provided

to

16

appended

that

the

to

tell

the

taken

the

in

the

time

and

truth

down

to

and

the

testimony

of

typewriting

the

said

by

supervision
of

completion

in

at

person
the

reduced

direction

my

13

was

disinterested

thereafter

That
of

and

witness

duly

deposition

stated

under

12

the

by me

truth

me

by

was

Certified Shorthand

cause

That
shorthand

REPORTER

OF

the

deposition

hereto.

requested

transcript
any

the

changes

reporter

further

17

attorney

19

deposition

nor

in

20

this

and

that

21

parties

for

cause

made

either

or

any

by

during

certify

18

was

EXJ

that

the
the

am

any

of

way-

interested

am

not

the

was

reques.ted

and

deponent

allowed

period

not

parties

related

not

of

counsel

to

the

are

or

said

in

the

event

to

any

of

of

the

thereto

ZOOci

DATED

24

25

SARAH

LUCIA

BRANN

CSR

No

3887

PAUL

DUGGAN
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

2009

August

ATTORNEYS

EYES

ONLY
Page

THE

IN

UNITED

STATES

DISTRICT

DISTRICT

NORTHERN
SAN

OF

FRANCISCO

COURT

CALIFORNIA

DIVISION

--000ORACLE
CORPORATION
Delaware
corporation

INC

USA

ORACLE

Colorado

and
ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION
California
corporation

corporation

Plaintiffs

vs
SAP

AG

German

SAP

AMERICA
corporation

INC
DOES

07-CV-1658

PJH

corporation

INC

Delaware

TOMORROWNOW
Texas
corporation
1-50
inclusive

and

Defendants

VIDEOTAPED

DEPOSITION

REPORTED

BY

ATTORNEYS

CONFIDENTIAL

SARAH

LUCIA

BRANN

Merrill Legal

800

PAUL

DUGGAN

2009

August

HIGHLY

OF

CSR

EYES

3887

ONLY

421893

Solutions

8699132

f2f312ff-3d87-4268.a7b3-2b05efa96663

PAUL
HIGHLY

DUGGAN

2009

August

ATTORNEYS

CONFIDENTIAL

ONLY

EYES

23

Page

r94905

Can

09490

one

creating

describe

you

MR

kLINDER

Objection

094915

THE

WITNESS

Can

094916

MR

DELMIUNTY

024907
094913

in

methodology

forecasts

those

of

the

and

Vague

ambiguous

094920

and

094925

these

service

support

forecasts

094929

The

094934

Jo

forecasting

09493e

IL

percentage

094945

12

use

091947

13

typically

to

0150

the

095003

those

in

date
OKS

the
our

and

which

conversations

numbers

in

our

standard

How

do

those

095006

17

responsible

0950O9

18

forecasts

095012

19

20

095019

21

some

cases

05021

22

with

that

from

quotation

terms

the

based

we

system

there
the

on

of

are

reps

roflup

and
of

reporting

sale

095014

is

between

directors

16

of

one

the

in

And

renewals

the

095004

managers

track

Likelihood

and

managers

the

create

will

system

support

verbal

do

to

refer

you

representatives

close

track

How

representatives

that

that

clarify

you

095025
095031

24

25

for

determine

The

to

those

the

manager

customer
to

and

getting

Is

record

800

or

sales

of

be

in
the

tracking

purchase
of

the

closing

representative

would

created

are

creating

likelihood

communications

eventually

Merrill Legal

forecasts

the

support

who

individuals

constant
sales

with

and

in

contact

cycle

the

customer

order
those

Solutions

8699132

12f31

2ff-3d1142681b3.2bO5ofagGO2

HIGHLY

113457

PAUL DUGGAN
CONFIDENTIAL

2009
August
ATTORNEYS
EYES

Whereupon

113457

concluded

113457

the
at

was

deposition

1124

ONLY

a.xn

o0o--

113457

declare

113457

foregoing

SAP

113457
11

of

is

true

under

and

Fi24VJCt.CO

Auusi

penalty

correct

of perjury

Subscribed

California

the

at

this

day

2009
____

Paul

Duggan

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

80

Merrill Legal Solutions
800 8699132

Merrill

Legal Solutions

FOR READING/CORRECTiNG

INSTRUCTIONS

To

assist

please

them

read

make

insert

the

making

changes

the directions

and attach

Please

and

in

you

follow

the

br

and

below

pages to the back

line

the

changes

number

and/or

reference

Please

do not make any changes

Please

do NOT

After completing

change

you

corrections

and

then

the

br

and

to

your deposition

Main Street

4th

ftmish

find

any errors or changes you wish to
on the errata sheet by listing the page

change

you wish

corrections

to

on the face

make
of the transcript

any of the questions

your review please sign the last page of the errata
line and
return the Errata sheets
to Merrill

FlOor

testimony

sheet

Signature

designated

DEPOSITION

pages are necessary please

of the errata

If

your transcript carefully

corrections

additional

If

YOUR

sheel

Legal

San

CA 94105

Frandsco

or fax

them

to

415

above

Solutions

the
at

135

357.4301

ERRATA SHEET
Page

Line

25 --

7t-.riz

Change
Reason J.J12

__

-c-

Change
Reason

111a

Sr t.cci

Change
Reason

lThc

i1

fE-

-r
-E

Page

Line

Change

z2ts tt

Reason

.fSf

Change
Reason

A-r-

pa

Ci
1Th

R4

A-i-

Po

Change_____________________________________

Reason_______________________________________
Change_____________________________________
Reason_____________________________________

Change_____________________________________
Reason_______________________________________
Change
Reason_____________________________________

Change_________________________________
Reason_____________________________________

to the

above

changes

certify

that

the transcript

is

true

and

correct

made

certify

that

the transcript

is

true

and

correct

_______

Subject

_______

No changes have been

11111
signature

11
date

CERTIFICATE OF
LUCIA BRANN

SARAH

certify that

Reporter

hereby

foregoing

deposition

the

truth

whole

REPORTER

was

truth

Certified
the witness

in

the

sworn

to

tell

by me
and

Shorthand

duly

but

nothing

the

the

truth

in

the

time

and

within-entitled cause
That
shorthand

me

by

therein

place
10

witness

11

computer

was

said

12

and

thereafter

13

review

the

14

If

15

provided

to

16

appended

that

taken

down

to

and

the

testimony

of

typewriting

the

said

by

supervision
the

of

completion

in

at

person
the

reduced

direction

my

before

That
of

disinterested

stated

under

was

deposition

deposition

hereto

requested

17

transcript
any

the

changes

reporter

further

18

attorney

19

deposition

20

this

21

parties

or

nor

in

any

and

that

cause

made

by

during

certify

for either

was

tX.J

any

that
of

was
the
the

am

not

requested

and

deponent

period allowed

not

the parties

of

counsel

to

the

in

the

event

am

to

any

of

related

or

said

way interested
not

are

of

the

thereto
DATED

_______

24

25

SARAH

LUCIA

BRANN

CSR

No

3887