Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Filing
1201
Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier in Support of 1182 Statement Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier iso Joint Statement Regarding Exhibit Objections filed bySAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34, # 35 Exhibit 35, # 36 Exhibit 36, # 37 Exhibit 37, # 38 Exhibit 38, # 39 Exhibit 39, # 40 Exhibit 40, # 41 Exhibit 41, # 42 Exhibit 42, # 43 Exhibit 43, # 44 Exhibit 44, # 45 Exhibit 45, # 46 Exhibit 46, # 47 Exhibit 47, # 48 Exhibit 48, # 49 Exhibit 49, # 50 Exhibit 50, # 51 Exhibit 51, # 52 Exhibit 52, # 53 Exhibit 53, # 54 Exhibit 54, # 55 Exhibit 55, # 56 Exhibit 56, # 57 Exhibit 57, # 58 Exhibit 58, # 59 Exhibit 59)(Related document(s) 1182 ) (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
<![CDATA[
EXHIBIT 22
Foundation for
A-0059
Merck
Defendants
0RCL000343
Oracle
ORCLOO3
18663
sales
regional
Plaintiffs
Manager
Oracle
Objs
Barbara
to
Sharpe-Moore
support
renewal/sales
as
No
Sharpe-Moore
Barbara
identifying
Sales
98
support
Tr 345-22
representatives
Barbara
as
Sales
Support
Interrogatory
Foundational Support
identifying
document
Strategic
Cummins Sept 16 2008 Depo
that
Support
production
Oracle
manager
Resp
identifying
organizational chart
17 Oracle
Senior Regional
Merck
A-0059
Trial Exhibit
in
sales
24-25
report
to
located
at
Sharpe-Moore
ORCLOO3
Defs 5th Set of
manager
Rule
for
as
18663
Interrogatories
Merck
30b6
testimony
regional managers
and
indicating
associated job
responsibilities
Duggan
Aug
responsibilities
Duggan
support
SVI-108747v1
Aug
sales
2009
Depo Tr 2123-2225 Rule
of supports
2009
sales
Depo Tr
representatives
representatives
2316-24 Rule
with
30b6
testimony
describing the job
and managers
30b6
testimony
regard to communications
identifying
with Oracle
duties
customers
of
Organition
Chart
http//people.us.oracle.comfpIs/oncIC/fip8000362244O366
OI%CLE Ma
People
18912.
Search
Jason
Sr
Director
TaAor
Support
Dects
Barbara
Snr Regional
Sales
Total
Strategic
43
Sharo-Moore
Manager
Support
Sales
Directs
Total
.Chils
Services
Todd
Inside
Usa
Highly
Confidential
Rp
Andrea
Services
Representative
RObert
Graritti
Sivicos Renewal
Orlando
Sales
Serves
sIun
Dusek
Renewal
Rep
Ma.lln
Renewal
Donella
Patttrsori
Renewal
Sercas
Rep
Servioes
Rep
Poie
Renewal
Rep
Supancic
Renewa
Rep
lnforniaflon
Attcrneys
Eyes Only
0RCL00034317
Prom
Barbara
Sent
October12
Wednesday
OSSINEO_US_APPR
To
Sharp-Moore
Subject
Fed
Ex
Attachments
Fed
Ex Pricing
frd
details
Ex
2005
524 PM
pricing
details
for
2005
4213695.xIs
Pidng
fbr
200..
for
barbara
disauss.ion
SharpMoore
Sales Manaqer
RegLcnai
Oracle
Strategic
Support
7033640108
Phone
Sales
Fax 1033647057
Confidential
lnformatbn
ORCLOO31
8663
BINGHAM McCUTCHEN
LLP
PICKETT SBN 72257
GEOFFREY
HOWARD SBN 157468
DONN
HOLLY
HOUSE SBN 136045
ZACHARY
ALINDER SBN 209009
BREE
Three
HANN SBN
Embarcadero
215695
Center
CA 94111-4067
415 393-2000
415 393-2286
San Francisco
Telephone
Facsimile
donn.pickett@bingham.com
geoff.howard@bingham.com
holly.house@bingham.com
zachary.alinder@bingham.com
bree.hannbingham.com
DORIAN DALEY
JENNIFER
GLOSS
10
500
Oracle Parkway
Redwood
11
12
SBN 129049
SBN 154227
M/S
5op7
CA 94070
650 506-4846
650 506-7114
City
Telephone
Facsimile
dorian.daley@oracIe.com
jennifer.g1oss@orac1e.com
13
14
Attorneys
for
Oracle
USA
Oracle
EMEA
Plaintiffs
Inc Oracle
Limited
International
and
Siebel
15
16
Corporation
Inc
Systems
UNITED
17
STATES DISTRICT
NORTHERN
18
DISTRICT
OAKLAND
COURT
OF CALIFORNIA
DIVISION
19
20
ORACLE USA INC eta
21
CASE
SAP
07-CV-0
1658
Pifi
EDL
SUPPLEMENTAL
RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS
INTERROGATORY
NO.98 IN
DEFENDANTS FIFTH SET OF
INTERROGATORIES SIEBEL
PLAINTIFFS
Plaintiffs
22
23
NO
AG eta
Defendants
TO
24
25
26
27
_____________________________
CONTAINS HIG11LY
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO
PROTECTIVE ORDER
28
07-C V-01658
PLAINTIFFS
SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS
RESPONSES
FIFTH
AND
OBJECTIONS
TO INTERROGATORY
SET OF INTERROGATORIES
SIEBEL
Pill
NO.98
EDL
IN
PARTY
PROPOUNDING
Defendants
RESPONDING PARTY
SET
Plaintiffs
NO
Five
Pursuant to Federal
Oracle
International
Oracle
their
of Interrogatories
Set
11 2009
between
of Civil Procedure
Oracle
Corporation
supplement
Rule
Oracles
to
The
12
these
13
and
Siebel
USA
Inc
Systems
No
Interrogatory
software
Oracle
Plaintiffs
Inc
collectively
98 of Defendants
Fifth
product line pursuant
each
June
to the
specific
the parties
10
Response
to
Siebel
GENERAL
11
Limited
and objections
response
with respect
EMEA
33
OBJECTIONS
General Objections
following
are incorporated
into
of such objections
below
as
if
General Objections
14
15
admissibility
17
or
trial
in
20
Federal
this
it
to
in
respond
to the extent
that
is
and
to
or
to the
the
be without
shall
and
Responses
all
or
of
any part
waiver or relinquishment
constitute
competence
25
the Interrogatories
26
required
the Interrogatories
in
that
based
by the Federal
is
the
manner
to
each
to and
prejudice
relevance materiality
their subject
to the
inconsistent
required
laws
matter
at
or
any hearing
only on information
extent
they purport
Interrogatory
with the requirements
Oracle
shall
to
the extent
or control
that
its
own
respond
obligate
of the
to the
possession
Defendants
including
of any partys customers
in
to
by the Rules
possession custody
in the possession
Rules
is
or
any other applicable
Oracles
not within
limitation information
27
not
any Interrogatory
may have
Oracle objects
information
to
any manner that exceeds
Rules of Civil Procedure
Interrogatories
shall
failure to repeat
action
22
24
that
Oracle objects
Oracle
23
answers
Any
Response
Response
of any of the Interrogatories
18
19
each
specific
preserve any objections
16
21
in
Oracles
shall
in
fully repeated
Oracle
seek
without
will
respond
custody or control as
of Civil Procedure
Oracle objects
to these
Interrogatories
to the
extent
they
are
compound
28
07-CV-OI65SPJHEDL
PLAINTIFFS
SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS
RESPONSES
FIFTH
AND
TO INTERROGATORY
SET OF INTERROGATORJES
SIEBEL
OBJECTIONS
NO.98
IN
to
Oracle objects
information
witness
afforded
discovery
and
communications
party
to materials
other applicable
all
intend
andlor
privileges
such protected
to disclose
Oracles
Responses
the
reserves
10
are
to
an appropriate
time
12
to
require
Oracle
to
15
of Identify
cannot
to
16
information
17
product
exemptions from
or in preparation
litigation
law
the
Rule
of the case
facts
to date
and
Responses
Federal
is
for trial
Oracle does not
will
amend
These
ongoing
search
reasonable
following
these
Oracle
as required
Responses
at
26e
of Civil Procedure
for current
they
it
or
to
that
search
former employees
may
not within
is
to
attempt
Oracle
to require
purports
of Identify to the extent
the Definition
reasonable
following
the extent
such individuals
do
so
To
Oracle further objects
provide address
to
the extent
that
it
purports
custody or control
possession
its
that
to
the Definition
or business
Defendants
or
intend
affiliation
to
contact
through Oracles counsel
OBJECTIONS TO iNSTRUCTIONS
18
19
Oracle objects
20
obligate
21
the Federal
Oracle
Oracle
to
respond
in
shall
respond
grounds
that
they are
25
January
27
extent
parties
that
have
2002
it
through the date
imposes
reached
the rules
burden
regarding
of
only
to the
unduly burdensome
Oracle objects
26
Instruction
to the Interrogatories
Oracle objects
the
to
Nos
any manner that exceeds
Rules of Civil Procedure
23
28
knowledge
information
provide
be identified
that
24
these
Oracle objects
14
22
work
and
of
disclosure
OBJECTIONS TO DEFINITIONS
11
13
of
seeks
interest
the privileges
immunities under
into the
investigation
to
it
information
supplement
pursuant
or
protections
made based on Oracles
right
common
privileges
prepared in anticipation
the extent
to
from discovery by the attorney-client
protected
statement
each Interrogatory
to
to the
to
or
and
is
Court
this
the extent
to the extent
inconsistent
and
any other
production
and
in the
manner
in Instruction
No
No
stated
SUPPLEMENTAL
of
by law
required
is
on
overbroad
time period
set
by
Instruction
different
from or additional
of information
before
2004
which
burdensome
to the
and
after
to the
agreement
the
filing
07-C V-01658
PLAINTIFFS
to
purports
laws
applicable
of response as overbroad and unduly
or obligation
it
with the requirements
or
rules of construction
that
RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
DEFENDANTS FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATORJES
SIEBEL
NO
the
of the
PJH
FDL
98 IN
Accordmgly Oracles
litigation
March 22 2007
unless the
discovery
is
be for the time period January
will
responses
covered
2004
to
Timeline
by the Expanded Discovery
Agreement
Oracle objects
that
the relevant
time frame for Siebel
from January
starts
12006
RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
NO.98 IN DEFENDANTS
FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES
NO
INTERROGATORY
the
Identify
98
Regional Managers
10
Defendant
11
Production and Interrogatories
12
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY
13
In
addition
14
objects
15
that
they
16
this
Interrogatory
17
control
18
19
20
to
are
Supplemental Exhibit
to
NO
General Objections
undefined
to the extent
of Oracle
Oracle
to
to
Oracle
it
further
do anything
22
immunity
23
Oracle also objects
24
and
25
of admissible
seeks
seeks
which
its
to
objects
beyond
but not limited
to
information
this
that
evidence
26
Oracle to create
27
already
and
Oracle incorporates
and
Managers
is
or will
to
neither
that
search
particular
Siebel
abstract
or
for
31 2008
October
from
on the grounds
that
for responsive
it
that
it
information
to historical
to
and work
is
the extent
summary from
this
to
required
information
to the
Interrogatory
product
overbroad
protection
or
protection
unduly burdensome
to lead to the discovery
the Interrogatory
business
to
or
purports
discovery by any privilege
privilege
Oracle
by reference
possession custody
to the extent
nor reasonably calculated
to
here
records
to require
purports
that
Oracle has
produce
and without
waiver of the foregoing
General and
Specific
objections
07-CV-01658
PLAINTIFFS
in
listed
Oracle further objects
Oracle also objects
on the grounds
Oracle further objects
of Requests
responsible
not in the
with respect
to attorney-client
relevant
is
Interrogatory
the reasonable
Interrogatory
compilation
produced
this
in
each customer
First Sets
2002
January
for information
calls
of information protected
disclosure
including
Subject
to
for
98
terms Regional
PeopleSoft J.D Edwards and/or
extent
it
between
Plaintiffs
by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
related
Support Sales
vague ambiguous overbroad and unduly burdensome
21
28
its
to the use of the
require
Inc.s
TomorrowNow
for
responsible
SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS
RESPONSES
FIFTH
AND
TO INTERROGATORY
SET OF JNTERROGATORJES
SIEBEL
OBJECTIONS
Oracle
PJH
NO.98
EDL
IN
responds
as
follows
reasonable search Oracle
Following
managers
were connected
the relevant
time
with the TomorrowNow
Where no
period
sales
Oracle could not locate the name of
the extent
that
it
it
could
with
next to
assigned
related
identify
either or
their
has attempted
ii
or sales representative
12
managers
13
are identified
14
risk reports
15
cancellation
16
0RCL00267953
17
e.g ORCLOO 149099
18
3d
to identify
and
sales representatives
in
numerous
see
in
see
and
to
with the customer
name of any
the
Oracles production
that
have
been
customer
related
to
the
customers on TomorrowNow
bookings
reports
see
ORCL000 16776
to those
support
see
in
lists
84144
Oracles
manager
of the sales
customer
list
including for example
see
at-
e.g
and renewal
Therefore pursuant to Fed
documents
been
e.g ORCLOO 131330
revenue
ORCLOO1
e.g
had
addition the names
Oracles production
throughout
where
identified
sales
support
the
spreadsheets
In
or
search Oracle
reasonable
identify
during
Oracle has to
no sales representative
following
sales
sales representatives
sales representatives
the extent
e.g ORCLOO 131416
Oracle refers Defendants
associated
to
documents
territory
by Defendants
related
e.g 0RCL00274684
reports
understanding of which
assigned to the customer
could not be located
documents
information
Such
Further
its
been
included
customer
name below
information
that
10
to that
had
manager
undue burden
do so without
could
below
customers identified
manager
sales
lists
letters
see
Civ Proc Rule
production
19
20
Name
Customer
Name
21
22
If
Discrepancy
Any
Star Quality
Star
Care
Chris
Madsen
Smith
25
Marchese
AO
__________________
Nancy
Deena
Schebe
______________________
________________
Smith
Corporation
_____________________
______________________
Abbott
Abbott
Laboratories
27
Quality
Name
Manager
Sales
Inc
23
26
Customer
Name
Five
Care
24
Alternate
Limited
Laboratories
Canada
Robert
Lachs Jordan
Rowe-McCune
____________________
James
Blackford
John
Humphrys
Limited
28
07-C V-01658
PLAINTIFFS
SUPPLEMENTAL
RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
DEFENDANTS
FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATORJES
SIEBEL
PJH
NO.98
EDL
IN
_________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________
_________________________________________
Manugistics
Robed
Group
Rciwe-MoCune
Inc
Jordan
Lachs
Markel
Robert
Corporation
Knickerbocker
____________________
_________________________
McLennan
________________
____________________
State of Texas
Stefnescu
camelia
Madsen
Chris
County
___________________
James
McLeod Lars
Department
of
MeCulioch
Information
Resources
Gauthier
Texas
of Health
Lars
and
Dept
Human
Kersten
Lachs
Marjorie
Szafran
Eric
Moculloch
Services
Commision
10
Medicine
James
Hat
Blackford
City of
Ii
Merck
12
Madsen
Chris
Company
McLeod
Inc
James
Robert
Lachs
Barbara
Kersten
13
Sharp-Moore
Knickerbocker
James
Jim Steder
14
15
Backford
United
Metex
Capital
Corp
Corporation
Machine
Metro
Robert
Machine
17
19
20
________________
Mieco Inc
_______________
Mortice
__________________
MIECO
______________________
____________________
Rachel
_____________________
James
Blackfcrd
Madsen
Chris
James
Kern
Systems
Lachs
Ramano
Corporation
18
Biackiord
_______________________
I6
Metro
James
Inc
John
Blackford
Humphrys
21
22
of
Oracle
Anchorage
has
able
Municipality
locate the
to
Support
23
not been
Sales
or Sales
Manager
for this
Representative
24
25
name
Murphy-Brown
Chris
LLC
Robed
Smithfield
__________________
27
28
Mson
Kugler
Mutual
of
Omaha
Mutual
Of Omaha
Foods
Madsen
Laths Jim
Steder
Robed
Laths
22
PLAINTIFFS
SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS
RESPONSES
FIFTH
SET
O7-CV-O
AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
OF
Jordan
SIEBEL
653
PJH
NO.98
EDL
IN
Diane
Chup
Dan
Chandler
HoweLl-
WatktnstJordan
Rowe-Mccune
________________________
Smart
_______________________
________________
Centers
Simpacn
Betty
John
LLC
Keanet
Edwards
Stephen
Standard
Jennie
Register
Company
_______
_______
___________
________
ta
Laboratories
Inc
Apostolos
ChrEssy
Jennie
Bernazzanit
Edwards
10
II
DATED
September
18 2009
12
BINGIIAM
13
McCUTCHEN
Z4
iS
By
LLP
aZA//4ir
LAUnder
Zachary
16
br Plaintiffs
Attorneys
Oracle
17
Corporation
USA
Inc
Oracle
Oracle
EMEA
International
Limited
and
Siebel
Systems Inc
18
20
21
77
23
24
25
26
27
28
37
PLAINTIFFS
SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS
RESPONSES
FIITFI
SE
07-Cv-0165
AND OBJEClIONS TO INTERROGAlORY
OF INTERROGATORIES
SIEBFL
NO.98
PilL
IN
lam
San
County
Francisco
1am
94111-4067
that
familiar with
On
in the
Embarcadero
18 20091
San
in
California
Francisco
and
for collection
FedEx
day
employed
processing
and
delivery
are
they
business
the
served
and
action
office
this
business
of
this
Center
of
delivery/next
course
in
party
the practice
ordinary
September
not
age
Three
at
for mail/fax/hand
same day
of
years
California
readily
of correspondence
deposited
oyer eighteen
attached
PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES AND
NO.98 IN
OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
DEFENDANTS FIFTH SET OF TNTERROGATORIIES
SIEBEL
BY FAJ by
transmitting
numbers
forth
10
set
BY MAIL
United
12
Mail
practice
13
addressed
for collection
United
14
States
Postal
the
date
and
set
forth
and
correct
below
it
is
of
the
documents
with
18
PERSONAL
all
documents
at
be hand
the
VIA EMAIL
to
the
at
persons
above
in
above
left
to
the
familiar with
this
fax
and
in the
with postage
mms
law
with the
for mailing
with the United
deposited
is
for collection
be placed
to
envelopes
sealed
of correspondence
in the
processing
to
set forth
States
ordinary
correct
set
true
via
by transmittiu
the email
envelopes
in sealed
forth
in
sealed
correct
copy
envelopes
below
and
and
true
by causing
by FedEx
be delivered
by causing
delivered
addresses
at
DELIVERY
addresses
the
SERVICE
to
persons
20
listed
fees prepaid
17
19
of the
readily
Correspondence
same day
EXPRESS MAIL/OVERNIGHT
16
copy
aP
above
listed
500 pin
California
processing
Service
documents
the
before
of business
course
15
as
Postal
Service
facsimile
this
San Francisco
at
prepaid
on
true
by causing
States
via
below
of the above
copy
with
all
fees fully paid
to
the
below
the
documents
set forth
addresses
listed
on
this
date
07-CVM1655
email
PJH
EDL
above
below
21
22
Robert
Mittelstaedt
JasonMcDonell
23
Elaine
Jones
24
sss
26th
25
Tharan
Sheet
1755
Lather
CA
Alto
CA
Tel
94104
Esq
Day
Embarcadero
Palo
Floor
650
Roaji
739-3939
94303
626.3939
tglatherJonesDay.com
26
jfroydJonesDay.com
ramittelstaedtJonesDay.com
27
Froyd Esq
Jones
Day
California
415
Gregory
Jane
Wallace Esq
San Francisco
Tel
Esq
Esq
jmcdone1lJonesDay.com
ewallaceJonesDay.com
28
38
PLAINTIFFS
SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS
RESPONSES
FIFTH
SET
AND
OflJECTIONS
TO INTERROGATORY
OF INTERROGATORIES
SIEBEL
NO
9S IN
declare
whose
2009
direction
at
San
the
that
service
Francisco
am employed
was made and
in the office
of
that this declaration
member of
was
the
executed
bar
on
of this court
September
at
18.
California
23
24
25
26
27
28
39
PLAINTWFS
SUPPLEMENTAL
DEFENDANTS
07-CV-rn6SSPJHEDL
RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORY
FWTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES StEBEL
NO.98
TN
RICHARD CUMMINS
September 16 2008
ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Page
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
NORTHERN
SAN
OF
FRANCISCO
COURT
CALIFORNIA
DIVISION
--DUo-ORACLE
Delaware
CORPORATION
ORACLE
USA
INC
Corporation
Colorado
and
Corporation
ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION
California
Corporation
Plaintiffs
Vs
SAP
SAP
No
EDL
07CV-01658-PJH
AG
German
Corporation
Delaware
INERICA
INC
CORPORATION
TOMORROWNOW
INC
Texas
and
DOES
Corporation
150 Inclusive
Defendants
____________________________________________________/
VIDEOTAPED
RULE
ORACLE
RICHARD
CONFIDENTIAL
Reported
Job 412495
By
16
ARLEN
Merrill Legal
800
2008
255
Pages
ATTORNEYS
INFORMATION
WENDY
OF
CUMMINS
September
Volume
HIGHLY
DEPOSITION
CORPORATION
Designee
Tuesday
30b
CSR
1t4355
CRR
EYES
ONLY
RNR
Solutions
8699132
e6a0856a-Oee4.4b35.al
bf.ca2Oat8a26bc
HIGHLY
2008
RICHARD CUMMINS
September
ATTORNEYS EYES
INFORMATION
CONFIDENTThL
ONLY
34
Page
likely
for
ways
is
TomorrowNow
license
either
hot
Then
in the
get
does
license
that
teps
and
manager
regional
with
correct
rep
relate
you
to
do
How
you
report
did
so
me through
to
up
license
the
say
rep
0944
meant
11
12
did
You
10
support
the
if
And
14
support
15
onto
back
or
t7
thats
18
they
out
can
theyre
the
then
20
than
21
be
responsible
22
to
returning
group
is
that
for
there
trying
any
up
to
something
of
other
new
what
involved
throigh
make
back
bringing them
parameters
get
me
group
you
other
that
wculd
license
sales
stuff
already
customers
MS
HOUSE
24
THE
WITNESS
mentioned
will
reports
with
the
back
customer
-bring
their
of
come
structure
to
then
23
25
issues
trying
there
Is
19
are
outside
of
do
to
to
manager
to
trying
how
there
If
So
apologize
regional
is
understands
rep
if
to
up
customer
support
so
reps
support
report
reps
L3
Q943
relationship
of
support
from
loop
The
0945
Oracle
to
Cotteot
.0944
0945
or
rep
kind
some
thrqugh
return
to
customers
dont
Objection
believe
Merrill Legal
800
Other
vague
than
the
so
Solutions
B99l32
eOaOa56a.flee4.4b3S-al
bf-ca2flafsa26bc
CtThINS
RICHARD
16
September
2008
CONFIDENTIPL
MR
break
for
McDONELL
the
See
day
Im
Counsel
you
then
Thank
week
next
to
you
going
sir
VIDEOGRPHER
i70
videotape
number
Cummins
Going
This
four
in
the
off
the
marks
the
end
deposiLion
of
record
the
time
of
Richard
is
502
--o0o-the
Whereupon
502
deposition
was
at
adjourned
p.m
-o0o--
10
12
declare
the
foregoing
I14
15
____________
under
is
and
true
____
California
penalty
correct
this
of
perjury
Subscribed
iS
day
that
at
of
2008
19
Signature
of
Witness
20
21
22
23
24
25
253
Merrill
Legal
800
Solutions
8699132
Errata
Deposition
Rick
of
Page
Line
41
21-22
Cummins September 16
Reason
Change Juans
Change
No
havent
14
2008
Change
responsibility
manager to Juan
managers
124
Sheet
talked
is
havent
to
is
responsible
talked
hundreds
to
service
Clarification
delivery
for service
customers
delivery
to
No
Clarification
of customers about
TomorrowNow
Change less
151
174
to
more
Change welcome
23
Change Hutton
to
207
Change
McGee
Change were
22
232
14
to
the
Change
above
changes
IP
to
Correction
Murquia
Correction
renew
Correction
to
Change or doesnt
245
Subject
new
Correction
Hunt
to
219
Oracle
to
176
Correction
to
does
or
doesnt
Cot-rection
IT
I9ertify
that
Correction
the
transcript
is
true
and
correct
CERTIFICATE
WENDY
hereby
foregoing
deposition
the
certify
whole
said
shorthand
by
and
therein
me
witness
10
said
11
computer
review
14
requested
15
deponent
16
period
the
of
and
but
are
the
truth
to
and
in
the
19
deposition
nor
in
20
this
and
that
21
parties
or
any
way
am
of
typewriting
the
by
deposition
not
made
reporter
the
by
during
the
hereto
that
of
the
am
not
parties
interested
not
related
thereto
of
counsel
to
the
said
of
in
the
event
to
any
of
nc
DATED
2008
23
24
WENDY
time
testimony
was
the
any
the
at
the
of
changes
certify
either
in
supervision
any
to
down
person
was
appended
further
taken
reduced
completion
requested
attorney for
25
tell
to
the
the
transcript
allowed
was
that
direction
18
22
the
sworn
nothing
thereafter
and provided
cause
arid
witness
duly
deposition
before
If
17
the
me
by
stated
my
That
13
that
disinterested
was
under
12
Certified Shorthand
cause
That
place
was
truth
within-entitled
REPORTER
ARLEN
Reporter
truth
OF
AREN
CSR
No
4355
the
or
DUGGAN
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
PAUL
2009
August
ATTORNEYS
EYES ONLY
Page
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
NORTHERN
SAN
OF
FRANCISCO
COURT
CALIFORNIA
DIVISION
--oooORACLE
Delaware
CORPORATION
corporation
INC
USA
ORACLE
Colorado
and
corporation
INTERNATIONAL
California
ORACLE
CORPORATION
corporation
Plaintiffs
vs
SAP
SAP
AG
German
AMERICA
corporation
INC
DOES
07CV1658
PJH
corporation
INC
Delaware
TOMORROWNOW
Texas
corporation
150 inclusive
and
Defendants
VIDEOTAPED
DEPOSITION
REPORTED
BY
ATTORNEYS
CONFIDENTIAL
SARAH
LUCIA
BRANN
Merrill Legal
800
PAUL
DUGGAN
2009
August
HIGHLY
OF
CSR
EYES
3887
ONLY
421893
Solutions
8699132
f2f312ff-3d87.4268-a7b3-2b05efa96663
PAUL
HIGHLY
DUGGAN
2009
August
ATTORNEYS
CONFIDENTIAL
EYES
ONLY
Page
Q94532
customers
Siebel
MR ALINDER
094633
09434
21
and
Vague
Objection
ambiguous
09435
WITNESS
ThE
og4636
the
restate
Can you
question
DELAHUNTY
.9946.37
464I
type
094643
Siebel
094644
Is
thre
cthe
any
representatives
employee
that
has
customers
than
the
of
NR
09fl45
994648
11
0946t9
12
Q9465
13
regard
094656
i4
the person
C947.04
15
thOs
094106
16
094709
17
turn
@94712
18
Do
094714
19
094715
20
034716
21
094724
22
TH
to
wIRS.s
supp.rt
sales
support
Calls
for
ambiguous
If
you
renewals
would
hhat
with
interaction
Cbj.ection
and
Vague
speculation
in
speaking
this
would
bontact
with
typically
the
have
re
most
he
customers
MR
managed
they
And
DEI1ANUNTfl
by
have
what
refer
you
to
title
fo rmal
more
MR ALINDER
then
as
are
they
just
in
managers
thp manager
Vague
Objection
as
to
of
knowiege
time
THE
they
were
24
indicate
25
ay
31st
WITNESS
that
2007
DELA
in
the
there
Merrill Legal
800
the
To
best
my
managers
regional
MR
094725
Q9472
ALINDER
lucre
And
time
period
were
two
your
June
regional
notes
1st
2006
to
managers
Solutions
8699132
tZfal
2ff-3da74268-a7b3.2b05e1a96663
HIGHLY
PAUL DUGGAN
CONFIDENTIAL
2009
August
ATTORNEYS
ONLY
EYES
Page
094736
pJicia
094737
Is
a947.46
Yes
04749
Can
correct
that
Is
Yes
094739
Edwards
Jennie
and
Rago
22
that
accurate
desribe
you
bow
from
differ
og4751
responsibilities
094752
time
that
across
period
their job
the
sales
support
representatives
0477
The
094800
the
094806
basis
sales
support
sales
support
sessions
094610
1-
094814
12
sort of
09481-6
11
094920
14
094823
15
O94927
16
position
94an
17
when
094833
18
09H937
19
094841
20
094843
21
managers
09li50
22
will
0948fl
23
myself
in
004855
24
review
that
forecasts
reprsentativesT
manage
daytoday
from
representatives
coaching
doing
would
managers
the
reviewing
those
petformance
and
things
What
are
you
when
to
referring
you
say
forecasts
This
So
to
have
you
know
you
in
is
Who
is
The
the
deals
will
close
way
same
for
representatives
responsible
sales
any
what
forecast
sales
support
as
those
creating
torecastst
-A
to
then
eventually
build
that
cormnunicate
forecast
And
forecast
with
it
would
Merrill Legal
800
njake
work
Those
forecasts
those
case
this
will
at
that
Rick
it
to
with
managers
roll
Chris
up
to
would
time
Cunimins
their
and
Madsen
Solutions
8699132
f2f21
2ff-3d87.4263.albS-2b05e1a96663
DUGGAN
PAUL
HIGHLY
113457
2009
August
ATTORNEYS
EYES
COlPIDENTIJL
the
Whereupon
113457
concluded
at
was
deposition
1124
ONLY
a.iu
000
113457
113457
declare
113457
foregoing
113457
5/-N
113457
of
is
true
under
and
correct
2C.CO
kUUS
penalty
of perjury
Subscribed
California
the
at
this
day
2009
_____
Paul
Duggan
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
80
Merrill
Legal
800
Solutions
8699132
Merrill Legal Solutions
JNSTRUCTIONS FOR READING/CORRECTING
To
assist
please
them
and
read
make
insert
and
the
changes and
below
If
additional
to the
back
of the
in
attach
Please
br
making
the directions
you
follow
the
pages
If
your transcript carefully
the
line
changes and/or
number
Please
do not make any changes and
Please
do
NOT
After completing
designated
Main
Street
your review
FlOor
errata
furnish
sheet
any errors or changes you wish
you wish
change
corrections
line
please
and
sign
return
the
the
last
Errata
CA 94105
San Frndsco
ERRATA
Page
testimony
to
to
by hsting the page
make
on the face
of the transcript
any of the questions
change
Signature
4th
your deposition
on the errata sheet
the
br
to
DEPOSITION
pages are necessary please
find
you
corrections
and then
reference
corrections
YOUR
of the errata
page
sheets
or fax
to
Merrill
them
to
sheet above
Legal
415
Solutions
357.4301
SHEET
Line
___
Change
Fj
Reason
Ims
ia
cI-iange
Reason
change
Reason
ItFG
2GC
5u
F
the
at
135
Page
Line
---
--_
Change
I-
Reason
Ti
1r
R_L
RiSk
Change
Reason
1f Po
Change
Reason
Change
Reason_________________________________________
Change
Reason
Change
Reason
Change
Reason_______________________________________
Subject
_______
signature
No
to
the
above
changes have
changes
certify
that
the
made
certify
that
the transcript
been
is
transcript
is
true
and
correct
true
and
correct
date
CERTIFICATE
that
Reporter
hereby
foregoing
deposition was
the
certify
whole
withinentitled
place
said
witness
11
computer
was
and
thereafter
That
of
the
me
Shorthand
witness
in
the
sworn
to
tell
duly
but
nothing
the
before
13
review
14
If
15
provided
to
16
appended
that
the
truth
down
in
the
time
and
to
and
the
of
testimony
typewriting
said
by
supervision
of
completion
in
the
at
person
the
reduced
direction
taken
was
disinterested
under my
12
the
deposition
therein stated
10
and
truth
me
by
by
Certified
cause
That
shorthand
FEPORTER
LUCIA BRANN
SARAH
truth
OF
the
deposition
hereto
requested
17
any
the
changes
reporter
further
18
attorney
19
deposition
20
this
21
parties
for
cause
was
transcript
made
during
certify
either
by
that
the
the
am
or
any
of
any
way
interested
nor
in
and
that
am
not
the
was
requested
and
deponent
allowed
period
not
parties
related
not
in
of
counsel
to
the
are
the
to any
said
of
event
of
or
the
thereto
______
DATED
24
25
SARAH
LUCIA
BRANN
CSR
No
3887
PAUL DUGGAN
2009
August
ATTORNEYS
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
EYES
ONLY
Page
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
NORTHERN
SAN
OF
FRANCISCO
COURT
CALIFORNIA
DIVISION
--000ORACLE
CORPORATION
Delaware
corporation
INC
USA
ORACLE
Colorado
and ORACLE
INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION
California
corporation
corporation
Plaintiffs
vs
SAP
AG
German
SAP
I4ERICA
corporation
INC
DOES
PJH
07-CV-1658
corporation
INC
Delaware
TOMORROWNOW
Texas
corporation
150 inclusive
and
Defendants
VIDEOTAPED
DEPOSITION
REPORTED
BY
ATTORNEYS
CONFIDENTIAL
SARAH
LUCIA
BRANN
Merrill Legal
800
PAUL
DUGGAN
2009
August
HIGHLY
OF
CSR
EYES
ONLY
3887
421893
Solutions
8699132
f2f312ff-3d87-4268-a7b3-2b05efa96663
DUGGAN
PAUL
HIGHLY
2009
August
ONLY
EYES
ATTORNEYS
CONFIDENTIAL
23
Page
Can
094905
094906
forecasts
those
of
one
creating
MR
ALINDER
15
THE
WITNESS
04916
1R
LELAHUNTY
0949107
094920
O9
and
4Y2
these
The
10
forecasting
094938
11
percentage
094945
13
use
094947
13
typically
Q91950
14
the
095003
15
those
095004
16
095005
1-7
responsible
10
forecasts
095012
to
you
track
our
and
managers
numbers
How
do
those
those
And
terms
there
on
of
system we
the
based
are
reps
rollup
and
of
reportiricj
wiw
individuals
forecasts
the
determine
the
the
between
standard
of
one
in
is
which
directors
the
in our
for
likelihood
conversations
verbal
track
renewals
support
managers
create
will
system
OKS
the
in
the
d.c
to
refer
and
date
are
the
creating
or
of
likelThood
closing
sale
The
2-C
the
sales
support
509
21
some
cases
095021
22
with
that
095025
23
from
quotation
095031
24
to -eventually
ebting
25
Is
record
09
HoW
representatives
close
094934
095014
and
that
clarify
representatives
that
f.orecasts
2U
Ti
service
support
091929
095009
VagS
Obj.ectibn
aiguous
094913
19
in
methodology
the
describe
you
manager
custotner
to
Merrill Legal
800
arid
representative
would
be-
the
tracking
communications
purchase
created
in
of
constant
sales
with
the
and
iii
contact
cycle
custornr
order
those
Solutions
8699132
f2131
Zft.3d87-4268.a7b3.2b050fa96563
HIGHLY
2009
August
EYES ONLY
ATTORN1YS
DUGG2N
PAUL
COREIDENTIAL
113457
Whereupon
concluded
113457
the
at
was
deposition
a.m
1124
--oOo
113457
declare
113457
113457
foregoing
5tI
113457
113457
of
is
true
under
and
44CiO
AUuS
penalty
correct
of
perjury
Subscribed
California
the
at
this
day
2009
________
Paul
Duggan
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
80
Merrill Legal Solutions
800 8699132
Merrill Legal Solutions
To
assist
please
them
in
you
follow
and
read
your
make
insert
the
the
directions
line
transcript
below
changes and/or
not
Please
do
NOT change
After completing
designated
Street
your
Signature
Floor
of the
If
you
and
errata
furnish
sheet
any errors or changes you wish to
on the errata sheet by listing the page
you wish
corrections
to
make
on the face
of the transcript
any of the questions
review please
line
and
sign
return
the
last
the Errata
CA 94105
San Francisco
ERRATA
Page
testimony
your deposition
pages are necessary please
then the change
br
to
DEPOSITION
find
corrections
make any changes and
do
corrections
additional
If
carefully
number reference
Please
Main
br
changes and
attach the pages to the back
Please
and
making
the
YOUR
FOR READING/CORRECTENG
INSTRUCTIONS
of the errata
page
sheets
or fax
to
them
Merrill
to
sheet above
Legal
415
Solutions
357.4301
SHEET
Line
Change
Reason
Change
Reason
Change
Reason
--
Ff
1Th
--
IN
f-
t4_
1215
rIF
3J.J
the
at
135
Page
Line
Change
Reason
1M
X$
-rf
Change
Rjc
l4-
Reason
13
A-r
iS
r5Po
iZ
Change
Reason_______________________________________
Change
Reason_______________________________________
Change
Reason_______________________________________
Change
Reason_______________________________________
Change
Reason
Subject
to the
above
changes
certify
that
made
certify
that the transcript
No changes have been
the transcript
is
true
and
correct
is
true
and
correct
______
signature
date
CERTIFICATE OF
LUCIA
SARAH
hereby
Reporter
truth
the
was
That
said
me
by
10
witness
11
computer
was
witness
in
the
sworn
to
tell
duly
but
nothing
the
and
before
13
review
14
If
15
provided
to
16
appended
that
reduced
the
to
and
direction
my
That
taken
was
the
in
the
time
and
the
said
truth
down
disinterested person
thereafter
under
12
and
deposition
therein stated
place
me
by
Shorthand
cause
within-erititled
shorthand
the
that
truth
whole
Certified
BRANN
certify
foregoing deposition
REPORTER
the
of
testimony
typewriting
by
supervision
the
of
completion
at
in
deposition
hereto
of
the
requested
transcript
any
the
changes
reporter
further
17
for
made
either
or
attorney
19
deposition
riot
in
20
this
and
that
21
by
during
certify
18
was
XJ
that
of
was
the
the
am
not
requented
and
deponent
allowed
period
not
the parties
of
counsel
to
the
are
or
said
parties thereto
cause
any
any
way interested
in
the
event
am
to
any
of
CSR
No
not
related
of
the
DATED
24
25
SARAH
LUCIA
BRANN
3887
]]>
