State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 64

REPLY in Support of 5 Opposed MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Phil Bryant, Paul R. LePage, Patrick L. McCrory, C.L. "Butch" Otter, Bill Schuette, State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Idaho, State of Indiana, State of Kansas, State of Montana, State of Nebraska, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio, State of Oklahoma, State of South Carolina, State of South Dakota, State of Texas, State of Utah, State of West Virginia, State of Wisconsin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex 1, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 2, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 3, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 4, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 5, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 6, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 7, # 8 Exhibit Ex. 8, # 9 Exhibit Ex. 9.a, # 10 Exhibit Ex. 9.b, # 11 Exhibit Ex. 10.a, # 12 Exhibit Ex. 10.b, # 13 Exhibit Ex. 10.c, # 14 Exhibit Ex. 10.d, # 15 Exhibit Ex. 10.e, # 16 Exhibit Ex. 10.f, # 17 Exhibit Ex. 10.g, # 18 Exhibit Ex. 10.h, # 19 Exhibit Ex. 10.i, # 20 Exhibit Ex. 10.j, # 21 Exhibit Ex. 10.k, # 22 Exhibit Ex. 10.l, # 23 Exhibit Ex. 10.m, # 24 Exhibit Ex. 10.n, # 25 Exhibit Ex. 10.0, # 26 Exhibit Ex. 10.p, # 27 Exhibit Ex. 10.q, # 28 Exhibit Ex. 10.r, # 29 Exhibit Ex. 10.s, # 30 Exhibit Ex. 11, # 31 Exhibit Ex. 12, # 32 Exhibit Ex. 13, # 33 Exhibit Ex. 14, # 34 Exhibit Ex. 15, # 35 Exhibit Ex. 16, # 36 Exhibit Ex. 17, # 37 Exhibit Ex. 18, # 38 Exhibit Ex. 19, # 39 Exhibit Ex. 20, # 40 Exhibit Ex. 21, # 41 Exhibit Ex. 22, # 42 Exhibit Ex. 23, # 43 Exhibit Ex. 24, # 44 Exhibit Ex. 25, # 45 Exhibit Ex. 26, # 46 Exhibit Ex. 27, # 47 Exhibit Ex. 28, # 48 Exhibit Ex. 29, # 49 Exhibit Ex. 30, # 50 Exhibit Ex. 31, # 51 Exhibit Ex. 32, # 52 Exhibit Ex. 33, # 53 Exhibit Ex. 34, # 54 Exhibit Ex. 35)(Oldham, Andrew)

EXHIBIT 10

App. 0274

U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528

Homeland
Security
March 4, 2013
Shoba Sivaprased Wadhia, Esq.
Clinical Professor and Director
Penn State/Center for Immigrants Rights
329 Innovation Blvd
Suite 118
State College, Pennsylvania 16803
Re:

COW2012000939
2013-HQFO-00305

Dear Ms. Wadhia:
This is the final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), dated and received by the United Stated States Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) on September 13, 2012 and received by this office on November 16,
2012. Specifically, you requested the disclosure of any and all records that were prepared, received,
transmitted, collected, and/or maintained by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
and/or U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) that describe, refer, or relate to
applications for deferred action since June 17, 2011, and Consideration of Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals (DACA) since August 15, 2012.

A search for documents responsive to your request produced a total of 459 pages. Of those
pages, I have determined that 406 pages of the records are releasable in their entirety and 53
pages are partially releasable pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(7)E), FOIA Exemptions
b7(E).
You have a right to appeal the above withholding determination. Should you wish to do so, you
must send your appeal and a copy of this letter, within 60 days of the date of this letter, to:
Associate General Counsel (General Law), Mailstop 0655, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, D.C. 20528, following the procedures outlined in the DHS regulations at 6
C.F.R. § 5.9. Your envelope and letter should be marked “FOIA Appeal.” Copies of the FOIA
and DHS regulations are available at www.dhs.gov/foia.
The Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) also mediates disputes between FOIA
requesters and Federal agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If you are requesting
access to your own records (which is considered a Privacy Act request), you should know that
OGIS does not have the authority to handle requests made under the Privacy Act of 1974. If you
wish to contact OGIS, you may email them at [e-mail] or call 1-877-684-6448.

App. 0275

Provisions of the FOIA allow us to recover part of the cost of complying with your request. In this
instance, because the cost is below the $14 minimum, there is no charge. 6 CFR § 5.11(d)(4).
If you need to contact our office again about this matter, please refer to COW201200093, HQFO00305. This office can be reached at 866-431-0486.
Sincerely,

James Holzer
Director
Disclosure and FOIA Operations
Enclosure(s): Responsive Documents

App. 0276

I
j
)

1

"

National Standartj Operating Procedures (SOP)
'';

Deferred Actio:n for Childhood Arrivals
J(DACA)
(Form l-~210 and Form 1-765)
.;

Prepared by: Serv·r e Center Operations Directorate
i

:i
September 13, 2012
Version 1.0

i
I

"

·!
I

'
•\

..

:i
:•
·,

~
i

'.

'
>

.

App. 0277

Tab.e of Contents
l
'

2: Introduction
3: Sucnm of the Overall Process Flow for DACA Filin s
4: Lockbox Intake
5: Service Cemcr Intake
6: Back ound and Securi Checks
7: DACA Overview
8: Ad"udication of the DACA Re uest
A. Procedural Overview
8 . S stem Searches
C. Dcterrninin if Guidelines are Met
D. Economic Neccssi
E. Removal Procccdin s
F. Fin
riots and RAP Sheets
G. Evaluating Issues ofCrimiiiaJity, Public Safety, and
National Securi
:
• Court Dis ositions
·1
• Arrests and Convictions'
• Public Safet Concerns''.
• National Securit Concerns
• Handlin Procedures ;:
H. Adjudicating Form 1 D,tpart 3, Criminal, National
-821
Sccurit • and Public Safe Information
I. Fraud Review and Fraud Referrals
9: Decisions
A. Re uest for Evidence
8. Notice oflntent to Den
C. A rovals
D. Denials
• Su crviso Review
10: Post Denial Process
11: Returned Mail

21-22
23-29
30-38
39-41
42
43
44-63
64
65-70
71-73
74-76
77-79
80
8I
81
82-84
85-87
88-91
92
93
94-95
96-99
96
100
101

Co ntimttd o~ nat page

.

.

'

FotOJT'CW. Ull Oli&.."r (rOUOf• U.l't(~OfTNllllW'tT't[ CU:S ) 1

TtM~i.r~O'='rlC\olil !J3'C:.-.Y •~ r.tcrn!OM M ,.._,.1_..~~
"°"p.dct*-:,l"IOIS"N k~d~Aa (~U.IC. l ~ r.-.t.~-Dtl9~~ '~da'~

-

2

-:d~d-~..,. Dt«S pcky~ID .......... 8;;i U ~.J (Ml.J) ._,~m"l:ll-l'llll'OM 1--''>h P-Lk~
.... ~ . . . OlrDl,.. ...... ~..-. ....... ptof'~~N

App. 0278

Table of Contents

B. Ad"udication
C. Re laccmcnt Cards
13: Customer Service - Use of Service Request Management
. Tool (SRMT) to Respond to Requests to Review Certain
Denials
14: OACA Termination

15: Processing Fonn 1-131, Application for Travel
Document, for Individuals With Approved Forin 1821D, Consideration of Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals (DACA)

uec

'°"°'

sa:wsrrm

104-109
110
111-1 21
122-1 24
125-127

FOROfllCW..
()Jf.,'(
· l.lWOllOltCOfOff
(liS)
nuoea.~~ R:A.CU~ uet: °"''f' •uira.~t'.- ..,t.e~
tftp,dc...._.,..,,._r~fl~Ad l~U S.C. f~'n'A~ltb•~ ,...n;hit~ ~
ft~d"-~•l'l l>aX*f~!> S....."" U.~(S8U)~inl• l'Olbt.. l'-....clbfWP..-:ir

-

~~--,..,.,....,,..,~~toe\:a,l:

.............

3

~r:J-.

App. 0279

Appendices
Appendix A: June 15, 2012, Secretary of Homeland Security memorandum entitled, Exercising
Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United
States as Children.

.

Appendix B: November 7, 2011 , memorandum entitled, Revised Guidance for the Referral of
Cases and Issuance of Notices to Appear CNTAs) in Cases Involving Inadmissible
and Removable Aliens.
·
Appendix C: Overview of the Bacliground Check Process
Appendix D: DACA RFE' Call Ups
Appendix E: Notice oflntcnt to Deny-- Not a Brief, Casual, or Innocent Depanure Under Voluntary
Departure, or Final Exclusion, Deportation, or Removal Orner
Appeodi."t F: DACA Denial Template
Appendix G: SRMT Responses
Appendix H: SRMT Denial Template'
Appendix I: Notice of Intent to Terminate Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals and
Termination Notice

f OR OF"f'lClAI. uac OJl'ly f'OUO). LAW ENFORCU.tHT Sl:NttTM l\.UJ

:

n..dl:Dlmr.11tr~or:ACW.uSEOM.Y.1tUllWA'l!l ~ ....1"""t:e•;...,i

-

tO'np.tk ,.._.~ r- r~r:I L*-'cn AtJ.(~ U...S.C. I~ nttaa:YTWC 1110 N~t.ard«l t.._c.;t, ~

_,d.IP*ddin~""'h 0tCSrdt:JncclrOI0,.,..,..._9LA~ed'IS8U)•~l'nlllcr\#'4hrY:flDbtt""-':JID .... ~u
-..-.crnir1 .... ., .............. .,.,..._~~.....,--......., ..........

4

App. 0280

Chapter 1: Definitions and Applicability to DACA
Absconder

An alien who failed to surrender to OHS for removal after receiving a final
order of deportation,, exclusion, or removal.

Aggravated
Felon

Any alien who has been convicted of a criminal offense within the definition
of lOl(aX43) of the immigration and Nationality Act (Act).

Alias

An additional name (e.g., nickname, maiden name, or married name) or an
assumed name.

Ancillary

Applications for travel, employment authorization, or applications that do not
convey an immigrant or nonimmigrant status, and are filed in connection with
a primary or an underlying application or petition.

AppUcation

ASC

Application Support•Center. The ASCs, which are located throughout the
United States and i~. outlying territories, facilitate the capture.of fingerprints
and biometric data. :
: ·

BCU

Background Check Unit: A work unit located at each of the Service Centers
and the Nt•·~etiefits Center. The BCU is responsible for reviewing and
resolving
its·and other criminal, national security, and public safety ·
concerns m accordance with Agency policy.

BCUDACA
Team

A specialized team within the BCU that specifically reviews and adjudicates
issues of criminality arising from DACA requests. The team may consist of .
Immigration Servi~ Officers, as well as officers assigned to CARRP, NTA
issuance, and Triage duties, and the analysts who support them.
Continued on next page

-

Fc:.Of~W..USf:CMIL.Yf"ouot ·LAWC. .OAC0.0llKW*nvtl.(I) :,

nm. ....,.llF<>R CR'ICW. USE 0...Y. ll~Wcr!NllOrl hll _.,be .........

fl"M,__ r. . . Ul'der h

R..... d~ ACl(~IJ.8.C. f ~ TtMcticvNlfri. Oii.C(Jl!I•~........... .-.......,; ~

1

5

.C._.,t:l lll ~ lllh 0!1S pioky ~IOS... . . ll.t~(S8U}~ niilnct "bt ~ " N . . . ~

. . ,......."""' . . . . . . .. . . . ~ . . . . . . . ~ ....... ft-.. .

.

App. 0281
5

Definitions and Applicapility to OACA, Continued
Brief, Casual,
and lnnocenl
Absence

A brief, casual, and innocent absence from the United States before August
IS, 2012 will not interrupt continuous residence for purposes of DACA. · An
absence will be considered brief, casual, and innocent, if:
(I) The absence was short and reasonably calculated to accomplish the
purpose of the absence;
(2) The absence was not the result of an order of exclusion, deportation,
or removal;
(3) The absence was not because of an order of voluntary departure, or an
administrative grant of voluntary departure before the requestor was
placed in ex~lusion, deportation, or removal proceedings; and
(4) The purpose of the absence from the United States or actions while
outside of the United States were not contrary to law.
This definition of a brief, casual, and innocent absence has its basis in case
law and was codified into the regulations for tbe Temporary Protected Status
(TPS) program. Elements of this definition of brief, casual, and innocent will
be used for individuals requesting DACA. See 8 C.F.R. §244.1. See a'lso
"Continuous Residence" below for additional circumstances that will not
break continuous residence.

CFDO

The Center Fraud Detection Operations (CFDO) is the Fraud Detection and
National Security (FONS) organization within Service Centers. The CFDO is
comprised of FONS officers under the direction of an FONS supervisor who
reports directly to the CFDO Assistant Center Director (ACD). While most
CFDO work occurs in an office environment, some Service Centers conduct
administrative investigations in support ofFDNS's field operations.

CLAIMS (CJ)

Computer - LinkL-d Application Information Management System Version 3.
A case managemeiit'application system to track and process the adjudication
of applications, petitions, and other requests fo'r immigration benefits and
services.
Continued on next page

rOA OlllCW.. UK Of..Y ,OUOJ -UW £ 1CSMCDID'1' 80l¥Tl'f'[ (LCI)

-

n..*--'1111 FCIR C>'s;;te:W. UstONL'f. • ~ ~ ~ ..... ..,. b9 ~

e.. :..d&-~ .. "~"~Hl ( ~ua,c. t !Q) ne~...... 111w~ .~.-......c.i.~

MJ~dh~•"OHSCX*'f~b,,_,_ .... ~ CIOU) ~_.., .. tU
-~

............ ,._ • .,..,~bma ......

,,,.....,,.,..._ r.
:

flD ti.,...._,111 .... p.dca

App. 0282

Definitions and Applica~ility to DACA, Continued
Continuous
Residence

The DACA requescor is to reside in the United States for the entire period
specified in the guidelines for DACA to be considered. Ao alien shall.not be
co.nsidercd to have fai led to maintain continuous residence in the United
States by reason of a brief, casual, and innocent absence as defined within this
section.

CARRP

Controlled Application Review and Resolution Program. This program
outlines the process to identify, record, and adjudicate
applications/petitions/requests where a National Security concern is
identified.

OACA

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals

Deferred
Action

Deferred action is a discretionary determination to defer removal action of an
individual as an act of prosecutorial discretion. Deferred action does not
confer any lawful status.

ONR

Does Not Relate. A determination by \_ISCIS personnel of whether a security
check result relates t. a DACA requestor.
o
'

Egregious
Public Safety

Any case where routine systems and background checks indicate that 1.1n
individual is under investigation for, has been arrested for (without
disposition), or has been convicted of, a specified crime, including but not
limited to, murder, rape, sexual abuse of a minor, trafficking in firearms or
explosives, or other crimes listed in the November 7, 2011 , memorandum
entitled Revised Guidance for the Referral of Cases and Issuance of Notices
to Appear (NTAs) in Cases Involving Inadmissible and Rcmova~lc Aliens.

(EPS)

Concern

Continued on next page

fOMOf"ncu., U!C ON\.Y C"OUO)-l.AW[lffale[KEHT •tH3fTI'lr Ual

-

n..~-. ~~ Us.E:OC.Y r. ~Wl:rtMO::nM--r t.•~4

-. ..... .....___. _ ,_d~ ,111:1( $ U.a C. t '°'1). 0-.0JCl.rwf)l lot. ~ twdld. • A'WlGl!l~

7

tn:ll~d~~•lhDHSpolcyJMlll'IOto~OJ~ tl&U) fttlrn.kr\-911rdmti. 1 ~1Dhp.d; or
..,_~..,....""',_.•'rald"~MM~.,,.,U;ll"Ol'fill t-~

App. 0283

Definitions and Applicability to DACA, Continued
Evhkocc

Affidavits
.
Affidavits generally will not be sufficient on their own to demonstrate that a
requestor meets the DACA guidelines. However, affidavits may be used to
support the following guidelines when primary and secondary evidence are
unavailable:
• A gap in the documentation demonstrating that the requestor meets the
five year continuous residence requirement; and
• A shortcoming in documentation with respect to the brief, casual and
innocent departures during the five years of required continuous
presence.
Two or more affidavits, sworn to or affinned by people other than the
requestor, who have direct personal knowledge of the events and
circumstances, can be submitted. If the affidavits are not sufficient to
establish that the guideline is met, issue an RFE using RFE DACA 302 call
up in Appendix D.
USCIS will not accept affidavits as proof of satisfying the following
guidelines:
The requestor is currently in school, has graduated or obtained a
certificate of completion fro m high school, has obtained a general
education development certificate, or is an honorably discharged
veteran from :the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States;
The requesto'r was physically present in the United States on June 15,
2012;
l
The requestor came to the United States before reaching his/her 16th
birthday;
The rcquestor was under the age of31 on June 15, 2012; and
The requestor's criminal history, if applicable.
Weigh the assertions in the affidavit in light of the totality of all the evidence
presented. When evaluating what weight to give an affidavit, take the
following into consideration:
An affidavit needs to be signed and dated;
• The identity of the affiani needs to be readily ascertainable from the
information in the affidavit;
·
• The affidavit should state the relationship between the affiant and the
DACA reques"tor and contain facts that are relevant to the guideline the
requestor seeks to meet;
The affidavit ~hould state the basis ofthc affiant' s knowledge and
exhibit first-hand knowledge of the fact asserted.
Continued on ne.u page

rotOlf'lCW.UliOHlT~) · UWD~OIDn~nvtUa )

.
•

n•m:.-.r k FOtOTr-C~ UIE. OJ'i.Y t~hi(J"9ar\h111!'9'ti.~

~nUc _

_.,_~~dlrlll:rww:xnJd. 1 ,U.IC..f!U) llft~"llObtWfllitA•·.1,,~t-TIOtid.~

8

_..,~dh~ .... OHSfdeJ"'*'°to..,..,...W~CS8UJ l"ll:li~ntleMIDt..-._,11,..~t11

....,....,_.....
..,..,., .......................

~

........... .-w~.. .._eo..

App. 0284

Definitions and Applicability to DACA, Continued
Evidence

(Continued)

Preponderance of ~e Evidence
A DACA requcstor is to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that
he/she meets the guidelines for the exercise ofprosecutorial discretion in the
form of deferred action. Under this standard, the requestor must demonstrate
that it is more likely 'than not that he or she meets those guidelines. The
preponderance of the evidence standard is a lower standard of proof than both
the "clear and convincing evidence" standard and the "beyond a reasonable
doubt" st_ndard applicable to criminal cases.
a
Primary Evidence
Primary evidence is evidence which, on its face, proves a fact. In the DACA
context, an example of primary evidence that could be submitted to satisfy the
age guideline would:be a birth certificate. An example of primary evidence
that cou ld be submitted to satisfy all or part of the continuous residence
guideline would be rl.'Tltal agreements or school records in the DACA
requestor's name. :
Secondary Evidenc~
Secondary evidence must lead the officer to conclude that it is more likely
than not (in other words, probable) that the fact sought to be proven is true.
For example, if an individual is unable to obtain a copy of his birth certificate
to establish his date of birth, baptismal records issued by a church showing
that an individual was born at a certain time would be acceptable secondary
evidence of the birth. for purposes of satisfying the DACA age guideline.
Similarly, to satisfy the continuous residence guideline under DACA, rental
agreements in the name of the DACA requestor's parent could be acceptable
secondary evidence demonstrating periods of the requestor's residence in the
United Scates, if corroborating evidence in the file (for example, school or
medical records) points to the DACA requestor's residence at that address.
Sufficiency of the Evidence
The sufficiency of all evidence is judged according to its relevance,
consistency, and credibility.
Continued on next page

I

r0t: Of"OCW. Ul(OM.'fcrouot- U.WfNFOfllCCNOO llMllTM CU:SI •

Tl'M.._. • JOf~~VSEOJC.Y. l ~WU~ hl ,_,°"'~
ti:r.tp.dc,.._..,...,. r, -""d~At:I C~UtC t :l.J') ltn~t.-bt~hlni«S, • .--.a.i.~
_,~dr\-on....itt0ttlPl)ik'y~ IO ~O!.l~ (SUU) •-.•~ Wll'-fU110bl"*'-dllOhr"6:0
. . . . ,.__....~dlNINlf"WI ............. °""'°"~

9

..............,,,,,......_ ....

-

.I

App. 0285

Definitions and Applicability to DACA, Continued
Totality of the Evidence
For DACA, the totality of the documentary evidence should be reviewed to
determine whether the facts needed to establish a specific guideline have been
demonstrated. In many instances, an adjudicator may be satisfied based upon
the review of all the documentary evidence, that it is more likely than riot that
a specific guideline has been meet even if the record docs not contain one
specific document that, in fact, satisfies the guideline. For example, if a
DACA request0r is unable to submit a specific document evidencing his/her
presence in the United States on June 15. 2012, helshe may be able to satisfy
this guideline by submitting various forms of credible documentation
evidencing that helsbe was present in the United States shortly before and
shortly after June 15: 2012 from which the officer could infer, based on the
totality of the evidence, that the individual was present in the United States on
June 15, 2012. (Note: evidence upon which one may infer that a fact has
been demonstrated is also known as "circumstantial evidence," a term that
appears in many DACA public information documents).

Evidence
(Continued)

Officers must see do:cumentary evidence (either primary or secondary) in
order to iJetermine if the follow ing guidelines have been met:
Requestor W under the age of3 I on ~uae 15, 2012; and
!15
• Reques1or is ~urreatly in school, ba5 graduated or obtained a
certificate of completion from high school, has obtained a general
education development certificate, or is an honorably discharged
veteran of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States ·
Officers may not infer from other sources that either of these two guidelines
have been rncL
'
·
Officers should look' to the totality of the evidence (meaning that facts can be
inferred from one or' more sources) to detennine ifthe fo llowing guidelines
have been met:
·,
• The requesto~ was physically present in the United States on June 15,
2012;
• The requesto~ came to the United States before reaching his/her 16th
birthday;
• The requestor satisfies the continuous residence requirement, (as long
as he or she presented clear documentation of continuous residence in
the United States for a portion of the required fi ve-year pc.Tiod and any
other evidence submitted supports a finding that the requcstor was
actually residing in the U.S. during the period for which he has not
provided clei\r documentary evidence of such residence); and
Any travel outside the United States during the five years of required
continuous presence was brief, casual. and innocent.

.

Conrin11ed on next page

TOllJ OITICW. IJtE Oftl'LY F<JUO). LAWUUORec.rNt toltnM Cl..(tJ

-

nM~""fi)qa:f"ICW..USEOlo&.Y l~Wtll.,.._ toes,_,t. -...
r.r,,~,,.,_
,_kwellnd~ld (~USC t!61) '"'--~ •IDbeWN ~~ ,.
...,...,d..'.b..taa.
_,~dh..cGC11ree•t1 Dlt:S~~~ . . . . . . &.l~($ GLl l .....-..:n,.tnJ t.rQIOtl9~1Dt"!l~U

........

.... ,..._... ....

00,_"-"11,......,..,.....~

.

...

.

....,ll"W~ .....,.,

10

...

'\

.l.

App. 0286

Definitions and Applicability to DACA, Continued
Evidence

(Continued)

For the remaining guidelines, i.e., the requestor was in unlawful status on
June 15, 2012, bas no disquali fying criminal convictions, and.does not
olhcrwise pose a threat to public safety or national security, the infonnation
presented by the DACA requestor on his/her Fonn 1-821 D in combination
with background and security checks, routine systems checks, supporting
evidence submitted oy the requestor, and any other information on file, may
establish that these guidelines have been met

Front End
Check

Security and systems checks performed upon the receipt of an application or
petition or other requests to screen for national security, EPS, fraud, or other
criminal concerns. ·

HQFDNS

Headquarters Office of the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate
ofUSClS.

Hit

A record returned by a security or background check system in respon se to a
query that may relate to the subject being queried.

Interpol

International Criminal Police Organization, the world's largest international
police organization. This organization facilitates cross-border police
cooperation and supPorts and assists all organizations, authorities, and
services whose mission is to prevent or combat international crime.
1

JITF

Joint Terrorism TasR Force. The JITF is run by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI).· The JITF is comprised of small groups of highly
trained, locally based members from U.S. law enforcement ;md intelligence
agencies. JTIF is ~ponsible fo r all domestic and international terrorism
matters.
Continued on next page

fOM DFTIC\.t.lU3EOM..Tf'°"°9·1..AWC'tfCllC DtOrT~CU.IJ ;

,,.~•rooorncwuu.OM..v. • ~hb~rw,.,t.S1WYP

-

.

klionµ.dc..._ll"dW .... ~~d~Ad l 5U.SC..15ta1'1 Tlu <IOCu'!Wflil'1l9~,._,.,, , ~ct•~

11

.-40$1Mdd.-t~_,., DK5or.k'¥ ,.*'O b~W~(DJ)nb""*-\ 9"1' 11 10bN,..,....,•r-.~t1

...,...,__. ..,._.,_.,....,.,... .......~ ..... ~~9'llCl"C"l'1l~N

App. 0287

Definitions and Applicability to DACA, Continued
KST

National
Security
(NS)

Concern

NCTC

An NS Concern exis.ts when an iadividual or organization has been
determined to have an articulable link to prior, current, or planned
. involvement.in, or association with, an activity, individual, or organization
described in §§ 212(a)(3){A). (B), or (F). or 237{a)(4)(A) or (B) of the Act.
This determination requires that the case be handled according lo the CARRP
policy outlined in the memornndum issued on Apcil 11, 2008.

National Countcncrrorism Center. In August 2004, the President established
NCTC, a multi-agcn~y organization, to serve as the primary organization for
the U.S. Government for integrating and analyzing all ialelligeoce pcnaining
to terrorism and countertcrrorism {CT) and lo conduct strategic operational
planning by integrating all instruments of national power.
Conrfnued on ne:cr page

KROFRQM. U3' CIG..Y,Ol.Of. l..t.WUlfOltC:Q.IU'J tol!ll'lM:(LE I) · '

O.~•r-dtCFFa.irt l.:11.!0it,'f · ~~tvd~t»~

-

·~Podt·,....W"dlrhlfr~d~Ad(!ltJl.C.i Ol.l). n..~ a.b1»~,.....t..~~

..

:.·=:.-=~-:i=·~.=-~~~e~~nlilldto•..--.11;1 ~.~

App. 0288

,.
'

.I

Definitions and Applicability to DACA, Continued
No Match

Non-KST

A Noo-KST NS concern includes all other NS concerns, regardless of.the
source, including but not limited to: associates ofKSTs. unindicted
coconspirators, terrorist organization members, persons involved with
providing material suppon to terrorists or terrorist organizations, and agen ts
of foreign govcmments.

Primary Name

The name and date of hinh provided by an applicant, petitiont.'r, or requestor

and DOB

as his/her given name and date of birth. This is generally listed in the first pan
of the application/peiition/requcst

Relates

This annmation is uSed on the ROIQ if nllflluery results in a hit that
closely corresponds 10 the subject qucri~
\

Resolution

A determination of the effect or relevance of tbe available information on the
eligibility of the applicant, requestor, petitioner, bcneficiary,.or derivative for
the benefit or rcqu~i soughL

'
ROIQ

Record of IBIS Query. This form is used lo record the search criwria queried
and the results of those queries.

SNAP

Scheduling and Notitication of Applicunt:; For·Processing. An automated
system that schcdu l~ uppoiniments for individuals to submit biometric
information to ASCs.

Sm'ttary's

The June 15, 201 2, memorandum entitled, Exercising Prosecutorial
Discretion with Respccl 10 Individuals Who Came to the United States as
Children, issued by the Secretary ofHorneland Security.

Memorandum

Conti•ued on nut pog~

f"ClltCl''IQllC..UAO...¥ IOl.Q..U W l.-olCOtNT~ J.(a]

-

"-~ • f<R~~CM.T ·-~r-~-,i:,.~
._.,a&*..._...,.. t>eA....,.• ..._...,.,.l)Ull C •!&'to

hGIN'W'l1 • 1;t. c.o •d'M.,.,....,.. 1 .....,...,~

13

...t ~ fllflt ~'""" CrepA<;o 1 ..-0lla...... e..~(..f!IJ I H;.~ .-o11• 1011tt:- ~ ti t • OIA:llt•
~~ Nl'IO • - "- • ••.._..~ ._.
uou...,uo.tt a.-..

........

.

App. 0289

~

Definitions and Applicability to DACA, Continued
Stturity Check

A specific check or a combination of checks required for each application,
'
pctirion, or requesl conducted in accordance wirh Agency policy.
I

System Match

A record retorncc.I byllflln response to a query, the subject of which may
or may not relate to the subject heing queried. This is the same a~ lllll~Hit.

TECS

TECS is fonnerly known as the Trcai;ury Enforcement Communications
Systcm/lnreragency Border Inspection System. TECS is an automated
enforcement and inspection lookout system that combines infonnation frc1m
multiple agencies, darabases, and system interfaces 10 compile data relating to
national security risks, public safety issues, current or past targets of
investigations, and other law enforcement concerns. The sysrcm is maintained
by U.S. Customs and Border Protecrion.

VGTOF

Violent Gang and Terrorist OrgWlizntioa File. 111e VGTOF file h:is been
designed to provide identifying infonnation about violent criminal gangs nnd
terrorist organizations nnd members oflhose gangs and organizations to law
enforcement pcrsonAel. This information serves to warn law enforcement
officers of !he poten~inl danger posed by viok-nt individµals and to promote
the excbwige of info)'mation about these organizations and members to
facilitate criminal investigations. USCIS has access lo VGTOF lhrough
NCIC.

_ ............

lot~U.llo.l.•,-ou.lt· LA• CW~~Ua)
h~ • fo:.CJnc\lii.l:!IE.~· ......... ~,_.., ,• •~
M\ ~. . . . \l'Or ... ~-~..ltlt""'t<:. t ~ n.~-•i.•t. ~r.tllM.fwdflol i.,.,.._,, ~

-

....,.._................ ,_, ,,....

.........

--...

14

""diJIO'«l clk~..... lh ~ rw*'t,..,• .,l•~ 0" \1..~t~J ~,,.... s.. ,.,,. ~t. ~~,... ,uar;a
_.~

~

App. 0290

Chapter 2: Introduction
Purpose

This SOP describes the procedures Service Centers are IO follow when
adjudicnting DACA rcqucstS. This SOP includes tho proced1m:s for
processing Fonn 1-82 1D, Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals, and Fonn 1-765. Application for Employment Authorization. It also
dcscnocs the procedure.~ for adjudicating advru1ce parole requests for
individuals whose removal has been deferred under DACA and who need to
travel outside of the United Su11es for educa1ional, c.'lTlploymcnt, or
humanitarian purposes.

References

For DACA: Memorandum issued Jw1e 15, 2012, Exercising Proseculorial
Discretion with Resnec1 to Individuals Who Carne to 1he Uniled States as
Children. by Secrelltry of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services;
and lmmi~tion and Customs Enforcement. See Appendix A for a copy of
ffi~ ' ' 3a:• ~Weiii'orinal:Diil
For Employment Authorization: 8 C.F.R. § 274a l 2(c)(14) is the legal
authority for employ.rncnt authorization based on a grnnt of deferred action.
The (cX33) code will be used to distinguish EAD grants under DACA from
EAD grants under other forms of deferred action. See also the Secretary's
memorandum, which provides !hat USCIS shall accep t applications to
determine whe1her individuals whose removal has been deterred under
DACA qualify for ~ork authorization during the period of deferred action.

'
Fraud Cases

All officers arc required to review cases for the possibility of fraud. All
officers should review " cusc based on the ~tandard fraud referral protocols
the
and the addition.al guidance provided in Chapter 8, Section K of this SOP.

Applicability

This SOP is applicable to all Service Center pcn;onncl pe:rfonning
adjudicative and clerical functions or review of those functions. Personnel
outside of Service Centers performing duties rcla1ed 10.DACA pmccssing will
he similarly bound b_ the provisions.ofthis SOP.
y
Co11tlnued on nl!tt page

i()lt(IHIOM.utlfOM.Vf'O\.Ot • U.Wr~OIOO l.OtaM'tt~,I~

;

rH. ~• ro1NT01i1,IJ'S((MV, teo-.~,..._,i.......,.

tQn.,._.._..,._ ...,_

-

_,..,_..,.lti;Jt)Ua..c..tSQ h~rr..'1:>----~ t'.-C.C:..00~

::.:::::::..--:=--~=~~~:!".!

......e~~ "'"U•)m~·'•"'*•

15

App. 0291

Introduction, Continued
Conflict
Resolution

Any provision of the Act or 8 C.F.R. found by Headquaners Service Center
Operations Directorate (SCOPS) to be in conflict with this SOP will take
precedence over the SOP; any individual who identifies such an apparen t
conflict will report the matter immediately to the DACA SISO POC, who will
in tum repon the con flict to SCOPS.
Ifaoy apparent conflict is noted between this SOP and policy or guidance
documents, the matter should be reported to SCOPS through the supervisory
chain of command.

Revisions

SCOPS will issue numbered revisions to this SOP. No other document will
be considered a valid modification.

Version Control
All personnel who maintain a hard copy of the SOP will ensure that it is the
latest version. An electronic copy of the latest version will be posted per
local procedures. The training unit will archive all prior electronic versions
of this SOP.
Additional
Resources

For additional resources on DACA, please see a supervisor or training
coordinator for DACA training presentations and modules.
Conti1111ed oir next page

~="
u,:.ci::-~~~~'::!:~,=-.~~:!~·.,,,

-

t:iep.dc-r.nwl'»~r:J~ld (SUSC

l&e.11.

ft"•~• atntiit urtdild. ~•~~

rC~d"~~ °"' ~~~'-'-""'8'11~ ($1U}t"tr)'rMto:f\.-d"- rabM '-1• h ~o

f/Cf{//"""""',.,.. •

...,, ~. "*l~t.. ~ Jl'b'......-~~

:

App. 0292

Introduction, Continued
DACA

Overview

Childhood

Arrival

On June 15, 2012, the Secretary of Homeland Security issued a memorandum
entitled, Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who
Carne to the United States as Children. In this memorandum, the Secretary
provides guidelines for exercising prosecutorial discretion on a case -by-case
basis to defer removal action of individuals who were brought to the United
States as children. By issuing this memorandum, the Secretary recognized
that, as a general matter, these individuals lacked the requisite intent to violate
the law when they entered the United States as children. Therefore, the
. Secretary determined that additional measures are necessary to ensure that
enforcement resources nrc not expended on these low priority cases, but
rather, on those who meet DHS's enforcement priorities.
For purposes of considering an individual for DACA under the Secretary's
memorandum, an individual may be favorably considered for DACA if
he/she:
l. Entered without inspection before June 15, 2012, and had no lawful
status as of that date, or if admitted or paroled, his/her lawful
immigration status expired as of June 15, 2012;
2. Wasundertheageof31 as of June 15,2012;
3. Came to the United States prior to reaching.his/her 16th birthday;
4. Has continuously resided in the United States since June 15, 2007, up
to the date of filing;
5. Was present in the United States on June 15, 2012, and at the rime of
making his/her request fo r consideration of deferred action with
USCIS;
'
.
6. Is currently in school, has graduated or o'btained a certificate of
completion from high school, has obtained a GED certificate, or is an
honorably discharged veteran of the U.S ..Coast Guard or U.S. Armed
Forces; and ·.
7. Has not bc~:n' convicted ofa felony, a significant misdemeanor, or
three or more misdemeanors, and does not otherwise pose a threat to
national security or public safety.

-

ra:t OIRCUL. Ulf: Ofi4..Y fOUO)· lA'fff Hf()RCC.Ol'f aotSTM Clfll
1hit~ -1 00Cf'1CW.USEONY •~~,..,..,,_,t.~
.

.

~~.....,.'-"°"':...~d~>rd f~U,$.0.. S W> n.t.cax"'"""11ol)ti.W'Wdlel.IW«la\'°~~
... p.dca

Continued on next page

17

--~-.,~-~Dt JS pci1i:y1....,~ba......B::M~1SOU1 N:.~.-.oi.r-:A11:1tir. 1~10
~
~:ir'w ....... . .._..
.
.

...,,._...,,,."""'.Nll .........
~

...

~

:

App. 0293