State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 64

REPLY in Support of 5 Opposed MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Phil Bryant, Paul R. LePage, Patrick L. McCrory, C.L. "Butch" Otter, Bill Schuette, State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Idaho, State of Indiana, State of Kansas, State of Montana, State of Nebraska, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio, State of Oklahoma, State of South Carolina, State of South Dakota, State of Texas, State of Utah, State of West Virginia, State of Wisconsin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex 1, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 2, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 3, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 4, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 5, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 6, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 7, # 8 Exhibit Ex. 8, # 9 Exhibit Ex. 9.a, # 10 Exhibit Ex. 9.b, # 11 Exhibit Ex. 10.a, # 12 Exhibit Ex. 10.b, # 13 Exhibit Ex. 10.c, # 14 Exhibit Ex. 10.d, # 15 Exhibit Ex. 10.e, # 16 Exhibit Ex. 10.f, # 17 Exhibit Ex. 10.g, # 18 Exhibit Ex. 10.h, # 19 Exhibit Ex. 10.i, # 20 Exhibit Ex. 10.j, # 21 Exhibit Ex. 10.k, # 22 Exhibit Ex. 10.l, # 23 Exhibit Ex. 10.m, # 24 Exhibit Ex. 10.n, # 25 Exhibit Ex. 10.0, # 26 Exhibit Ex. 10.p, # 27 Exhibit Ex. 10.q, # 28 Exhibit Ex. 10.r, # 29 Exhibit Ex. 10.s, # 30 Exhibit Ex. 11, # 31 Exhibit Ex. 12, # 32 Exhibit Ex. 13, # 33 Exhibit Ex. 14, # 34 Exhibit Ex. 15, # 35 Exhibit Ex. 16, # 36 Exhibit Ex. 17, # 37 Exhibit Ex. 18, # 38 Exhibit Ex. 19, # 39 Exhibit Ex. 20, # 40 Exhibit Ex. 21, # 41 Exhibit Ex. 22, # 42 Exhibit Ex. 23, # 43 Exhibit Ex. 24, # 44 Exhibit Ex. 25, # 45 Exhibit Ex. 26, # 46 Exhibit Ex. 27, # 47 Exhibit Ex. 28, # 48 Exhibit Ex. 29, # 49 Exhibit Ex. 30, # 50 Exhibit Ex. 31, # 51 Exhibit Ex. 32, # 52 Exhibit Ex. 33, # 53 Exhibit Ex. 34, # 54 Exhibit Ex. 35)(Oldham, Andrew)

Download PDF
Processing Decisions - Approvals After a decision to approve an initial 1-821 D, the Service Center must follow.the steps below to process an approval for a DACA request. 1 I Perform TECS checks . ·- ··J~~"'"~-"'"·· ·-· 1:..: .:... · 2- -' ~·- 1 ·P1ac·~ryot:ir·app-rova1· :sta·m·p'"'a'rrd ·sr~rn·aturetn ·trre~ "A'ction-Bto·ck"-dffhe 1:.:s21D. .·cfrtd'..n·ote''~J~•·,.._ the validitv dates directlv under the aooroval stam..,. 3 I Access "Adjudicate A Case" and wand in the receipt number of the Form 1-821 D. 4 I From the 1-821 D {l-821, with "3" in Part 2) screen: ·-• Press [F1 O] and select "Approve the Case". • Then select "Approve - Order Notice" to access the approval screen. I Select the aoorooriate aooroval ohrase. 5 6 I Complete the following fields: • The-valid from date is the date of approval: • The valid to date is 2 years from date of approvai. • Send to Clerical - always change the "Y" to .an "N". 7 8 9 I Press [F4] to· save. You will be asked if you want to change case status. Select "Yes". I Press [ESC] until you are asked to exit. I Put in ROP order. and place a pink ·coversheet on the left-hand side of the file. ----- - U.S. Citi?.cnshlp and In1 n1ipr~ttion Services ,) ~ ,· ·'-"=>-"-~---·· v ..... 196 . FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0593 Processing Decisions - Denials ~· -:- .- ·- :.·. • A denial template has been created for DACA and is .included .. .in,th.e . D.A.CA_ .Q.P,.~ .Ihi.s..DACA .d.en.i.aJ..te.m.plat.e .w..ill._.b_e., 1 a_,e.d.JP~···- .-..-·..,.......·....... . .S . d Q all centers' common drive/correspondence generator. Use of this denial template is mandatory. Individualized, locally created denials shall not be used. When an officer encounters an issue for which there is no check box on the denial template, the officer must work through his/her supervisor to ·identify the issue for SCOPS so that the template can be amended. -.·. ... . ~ U.S. (Jrilcnship ~ • ·1 97 ~J ~ nd ~JT1n1igrat.ion ~,erv Kes FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0594 ; f I ': " " ''· · f~ ~ . ~II ~.. _II>, • ,. ,, :t ' . .·.-.·~·I.,, ;.f·-f:~ ~f:~. °'"...~~ir~-_·;~~n-.~:.:·-~tr·: : .·.' " ·,:<~·:'. ~'",, . T,·-~ "'°"•· ,. . • '; .. '>•· . ' " . ".....,. .. ··: ...--.; . -, .;.'¢ > ;.. . ., ., ..;:":::;u.;'.:·· · • ·;f>.r-·-- 0.-0" _·b .....µ ·. ·, ..• . i. t • • r j 0 • ;-.o .<. • ' r I o· , ' " . .. ·.' ., . " • . "' . .. -·,·-· ·. ..... .. e-· i .. .... ""'"" """· ,;, . ,,. • ···. o · •" ., ·• . •. " .• . ' ,. • ;! '· . , ''l . , .,;: ·'·" 'I ·i ' j 1 I }:"- ·U . - " .. • ...,"" "" ' c 0 I r Q) ~ m :::s O' ., 0 CD :..-• "'"i- · 1 , . . '... I ... j .·,,· ·l:lt l·• ·f! .1;{ • .. , ' ' , :• •. . .... . " ' \·11)•,.• M . . ! .. .,.. , -Z. . o ' • • •• 1 ._':: . , "· . 9', . . · •.. ...; . 11:., •.:-. •,,., • I t .. ' " • . ";_-., ' 15.'·::. ,·, ·'. " • ~- ~·t:3r · • " ·: § . •· . <'> 1 l'l . . . ' ' " - •'H-. Q , -1- . ,,·::, ,., .. " ' '!b· i=" "" ,. . ' • ' .. . « . . .. ·I ' . .: R: • . :·· ·· O .. - I:'· · ·• )C Q :· i : ..; , ' ·" , .. •-4· . · ;0 il h . • ~~ '';1.-·;,.. .. ,. .. ; . ' · . · ' " ' ... .. " ·• " ' .-. ~ ·:-~9~4.···~'·i»:!':· !ib ~. O \1 '. V"1 ·.· ' ·--~:;._ ~~:. ~ ;_.;~· ; t;_-.\,. • ; ~ •:. •, •>, J'·•~•·v B ,_,. ;',"t ril .. ' " " , . .. .,fi 1 .. ii .. 1r-. ,. J: ':ii j '. . . " . .• " ' ·''\ . ·o > • g.• . i,; C.. - ,,( Ill ·• • :; i ' ,, ' ' -.&;-_..,,.•••, ..,,_- • ' ' ". r IH9 . If'. ; ia,..'-: ,Jlt r ::.i .. . :1'. Q ·a " " ~'~ 1i l~~-1r ,~1 :(\~~·-'-:.~~1!1-t.~;,-1 i!~ :l·~ ·;~ :;;~ I 0 ,.- ,, ·. :,... .'·:... .:. n. /' . . '". O',T(,'.•· ...· • . .• . ' '" ' . J. r:s. >'. "T1 : .. · ' . · ~ ·~ , J. i:~~~-Ali_1.', ~··~- ro ·:• ~·,>;A "·'0'~,.1. - ·- ~·',:.;o_•. -: ~-4~ ~f-: ;l-."o.~· :fa;'.1= 8 :;, o, ...,-. ·i;l.....:;,1\Jf:a.1 . !;.fi!',.,i j~i·'J·,~."·: ,,..1,.r.~ ~-''~ . ~11 ~f.· .- .f:~;,..-~fi1i.· .il..,"..,.:J 11 1~.•-..~.·1. ·'}.' ?J;'"'~-~., " ~:. ... i " .,.oi ,- , . . lD~ :· :.r · ~ ·. :;: 1 ;u,1 ·11:t~ - ' l. :h ~!, if., .~1r·'<·- '·lil~·~ R~ L'j.i,' f!f '. ~.,'~I!: ·-It i : :.i!j = 1 I • .. ;.a -•(l " , '" ' '•!'• ' ' [ . l . ··a· .. , ', .>:. 11: .I ~ ~j~~1 }~1~::;1.111.:ii~ ~- . ;a. it·I'' ll',..~· ·1·. a·i;l! l i ..! ·• ..- r.!~l,. .·t,8-, :1i..·.r .b ,,.. . .la l>i, .~ ~..,,s li Hp~.. ~~ ~e... ~ ,"'··sIi ~ ·fi' ''fl·1·. '"' : . 111 ~· .s>a....... la. ,.,1.··- - J~." ., ...... •. ... ' ,.-r: 't·..'1 " ... ;, ' 1 . ' gl ·I ...: ~ ~i"' .~~·~~·f'n l11-1i.~~~1li·~:ir~.l!:t11'.?~i~'!:··~'1'.:1l~iFU,P.r!:\~.~l'~: l:1:!·j:·?-. '.Jt'a;1..~;..1i'4.l~~fl~..~;:~(i·1(.. ~;.:.a!I~~~--~ r;,_:.:!:.~1..~1~s-i; ~)1 -i1.rt~r~11...~; .:-i;~· :~;I · ..,~1-· " .i~d' j~ -.;~~-,- '. tat· :J 15,:1'" ~ . -~ ! : 1 , gr ~'1.r ~ &· 6 •!il . ~ l•t.!llih..,~-. ·~l· ·•,_.,~;.~- ~J:s:: •~ "·. . .~-.,"':· .11~ ~·,1··"-~· '~"1.., ,. ."1.. -.·r, • ·•~.- I;.....,1!0.:·'~· . ., ~,.;"',o ·:. .,.:· .. . 1:~ ,, 6 1 D,'.,~. -o.., ". .. " -~ h .;.~, .~ ' ·~1" r&""/,~ Qi..l~.r,·... ..., B: .,' ._J..' '"\ ' >;! .... ~,·. .·' ..~., " "l'"" I'"'i•~' . '" ""-'. .' " " :~1 .. " " ~, "" "" '" ~·: ~' . ; ; : . .'~ ·,; ~ . · , :, ~ ~I' I!··~-. ·1 ' ~ I·!.:~> ·_.§· -.- ~G. ~"· ;~ '·1•il~·:.· ~1l'~If '.~".~-.~., ·, •·• '.«·'·•.1 ·~ ~ l·i;f~...;!•i-: r;;,;itt:JC:§'· :::lt.·. ·J.....f': ·.u~,,. ,,!.:·.:,' r· ""~ '..·:tl f,l i .::;: ::a·a1, .,"B,;;;;;·;i;:1 i.?;.;~;/: ... · ff B . '. ! "· •"!' · ; ;' ~I ,~ ," , s,,..l... ........·;, f.i~p· .."'..}.''''<',.I~-,.,;fl?.,....'·u.i )' .,.. . ,• ~.. ..:,!.t. . •' ' ;::~'<°',,_, ( i'''1 .' ...... . •. - , .J• f'l '•..,,. ~'.·'.. . 1'.![.. ""' : .. ·~ '. '~.;.....,. . _. ..... ·"--' ,, i'·ei~;.-"",p·:i~'.-.,,il":·'"~"lf-' ":..-.. ·'' "';;••~..;;::. ;: : •" ..-.''.&; . . " . . . - ." ". ._:,o..:: "'--' ..~· •.• ""·· . " ""'''t . ,; ' ;> \'" l ' ~--1· .-~. . ~- t . .-. . ;_ , ·. \ .... - ! .... ""'''f ;-: ·"'' ..•,"", \•,;,_.:· .. _., ,• • ... It ;; < ·" 3 CD :::s ,.. 0 "' :::s (I) )> "' <' ;:;: 0 (I) )> 0 CD ::J -· tu -; CD 3 - "O ..a. CD Q) o:> r+ CD .. I App. 0595 Processing Decisions - Denials (Continued) Supervisory Review on Denials Officer m·u st obtain supervisory review before entering the final determination if the denial is based upon: L,~,..-.,... . .·-· ·" - .4 ·;•'-'·····Convicti0n as,··an,·adult ,for,. crime comm·itted· as ·a minor:~·· ' ,. ... ·. . ....:....~,_ .,_, ).~·-'· ...·· ~-" .......... ..... -., ..... 2·. Convicted of a "significant misdemeanor"; 3. No criminal convictions, but there are credible reasons to believe the requestor poses a threat to national security or ·public safety. ·1n these instances the officer should refer the proposed denial for supervisory review after. CARRP vetting has been completed; 4. Departures during the CR period do not s-eem to be "brief, casual , and . 1nnocent" ; . . ... ' . . .. . ... . . . . ... . . ........-.. ..... . . 5. Respondent is not "currently in school," but claims that he/she meets the guidelines based on enrollment in .a non-academic or vocational class, or 6. The CFDO has issued a statement of findings with confirmed ·fraud. · TJ S r· · · ..... ~Hl7.CT1() I11p , . . ano rn1rn1Rranon _ Services ~. 199 FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive I • App. 0596 Processing Decisions - · enials (Continued) D When the denial falls under one of the categories that requires supervisory review, ensure that concurrence has been obtained ·before processing the DACA re·q uest for denial. ..· 1 2 3 4 Perform TECS checks. Access "Ad"udicate a Case" and wand in the barcode on th - 21 D Press F10 . Select: • "Deny the Case". • "Order Denial Notice". • e Case Status?" Remove the Supervisor Hold: • Press [ALT]+ [F8] at the same time. • Enter User ID and Password. • Press [F4]. • Select "Confirm Action". Press ESC until ou are asked to exit. Place your denial stamp and signature in the "Action Block" of the 1 -821. NOTE: The date on the denial stam should be the date of ad'udication. Pre are and send the denial. Put in ROP order and place a pink coversheet on.the left-hand side of the file over er. 765 for.denial. See Chapter 12. ,.._.~,~-~,~--•"'•''°''" O:-•~··-" ••'-<>~.• ·M·to---.-----------------------------e=-. 5 6 7 8 9 •-•• • •' , 202 FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0597 Processing. Decisions - Abandonment Denials Abandonment denials are initiated on Form 1-821 D in the following instances: • Failure to respond to an RFE or NOID; • Failure to.appear at an ASC for biometrics collection within the specified time frame. Process the 1-821 D abandonment denial only after ·fil! A-files are retrieved. - .,.. ~-- - - - - •·· - -- -... - - - - ' • 1 2 3 4 5 · ·; .. .. . , .,. .. .. . .. .. _ -·-- ·- - . ........... _ , ,. • •,~.-·._.• - · .. \ • , • - • • · .. . •• - ·· ~.. '-'"-·· - .. ,......- . -... • .·. ·1 .... ~ .. . ....·n-~...- .a. ....,.-.:..,._--,.., -~. - - - -- ., -..-~- -- --· .. - · •• -···.·-·--•·-""'...i.....-.·.... .,_,,,.. ..-.'11: . :-41.>1.""T•',r--•.:.. ;.._- :.-._~..-:.:...:- -~._..._ _, •..,....: .:t Ensure that no other addresses exist: 1. Review the file for any correspondence received, 2. Review the returned envelope for any changes from the post office, 3. · Check C3, National Claims, and AR11 for an alternate address or an address change, and 4. Check the systems to see if a more recent DACA request was submitted with updated address. 5. · Check Forms l-821D and 1-765 to ensure that there is no different address provided between the o forms. Perform TECS checks. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _-t .................... Access "Ad'udicate a Case". Press F10 . · Select: • Deny the Case. • Order "Abandonment Deni.al Notice", if denial paragraph inform.ation pops up, press "ESC" once. -' ·-··•'. ---· ·~~ -"· ~ ~- 1---t------ -·- . ~ ·~· \ lT.S. Citi7.Cl1shq) . • .. , .. ,f I. "' ... .,. ....,,I . .. \ ~ • 1 .,., • ·1 ---- . --·-·-c.- ~-··----·.. , ;)erv tCT~ I t t "Chan e Case Status?" FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive .. 203 continued . .. App. 0598 Processing De. isions - Abandonment Denials c · (Continued) 6 7 8 9 ·10 -- • ' ·• I '' • • ;I \ Remove the Supervisory Hold at the main screen: · • Press [ALT] + [F8] .~t _t.~e same t!me. .. ..· ... .._... • Enter User ID and password. • Press [F4]. • Select "Confirm Action". I Press [ESC] until you are asked to exit. I Place your denial stamp and signature iil the "Action Block'~ of the 1 -821 D. NOTE: The.date on the denial stamo should be the date of adiudication. Prepare and send the denial. Put -n ROP order and place a pink coversheet on the left-hand side of the file· i t...-· ...... - ·-· -·· ··-· :.. ..... .... ._ ... ,,.f.. ..... .• ••• over the denial letter. Process the Form 1-765 for denial. See Chaoter 12. • ' ' ' 11 T "j (' i. . . ,._'I. • , . . .. ..... .._ ••• _ • • •• • ... J . - • • - .:. • -- - - ... - ... . . •• •• ., . •• • ..... . . ·- ~ •• .:,.... · t- ·•.• .. ~. ,.....,. • 1. Lll J:t.CilS.ill) and . I1n1n.igr:u:i'on , S~rv1ces ~ 1 ... . - -- -· - · , _ • • • • - . .. _ .., · ~·-----·-;-. ,,; ,. , ... . • - ~>-- 204 <. FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0599 - .. . ··- ... . ·• -..:. ,._ _ _ ..._,~· ..I Processing Decisions - Abandonment Denials (Continued) • NOTE: If the RFE/NOID was not stamped as a "No Response," the officer should write it on the document. A "No Response" will ALWAYS remain on top of the request for proper ROP and the officer will place the denial/withdrawal letter on top of the "No Response." ·When· n6tfces are returned as undeliverable, the officer shou·icr · • Review the file and systems for any change of address • Check.both Form 1-821 D and the 1-765 to ensure that there is no difference between the provided addresses. ·When an ·RFE, NOID, or NOIT is returned to the Service Center as urideli\1e·rable, the-·officer should up.d_ C3~ follow all .procedt..fres ···a bove ate· to locate a new address. If a new address if found, re-mail the RFE, NOID, or NOIT . . ; ~ • ··-·- , .i lJS r·. .. . '- lt1?.ensn1p and I111n1igr.:li ii.111 ~. 0ervKes i r \ . 205 • FOLIO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0600 Post Denial Process - NTA After a DACA denial, take the following post-denial processing steps to determine if ~n NTA or other further action is required. 1. Review the grounds for denial. -· . .. ·- . . . . . . - . -· . . ... - - ·...... .. . -. - . . . -- - - -- ·: - ...:·- .. . ___, .,,. .2 . .If the denial grounds do not involve criminal, national security, or public safety issues, hold the A-file for 45 days and then forward to the NRC if a request to review is not received through SRMT. 3. If the denial involves criminal, national security, or public safety issues, refer to the November 7, 2011 NTA memo. Confirmed fraud denials also warrant NTA issuance. 4. The NTA unit will determine whether NTA issuance is appropriate under the NTA memo referenced above . . • ( ' -. U.S. Citi7enshjp 207 l a11d I nnni gratlon ~ .~ . i:> C!"\' LU..'S FOLIO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0601 . .. . --.. Q) en ·u . Q) · Q) ·~ O w Q) "- "- >< .c -0 Q) Q) "- > ~ ·u; :::J c Q) en <tJ c . 0Q) "- Q) E Q) ~ 0 L.. Q) ..q c w Q) ~ ·> ~ "- I 0 ::> 0 ~ 0 1.1.. -~ C'-· -ro c: ·- Q) .. c 0 ·en ~ Q) :::J a c . C. . Q) :::J ""O en en ro ·- Cl c c Q) ·:::J ..c CJ) en s ·- App. 0602 Best Reproducible Copy Avai lable Returned Mail If a DACA denial. is returned to the Service Center as undeliverable, follow all procedures above to locate a new address and re-mail the denial. r( :'\ >{·' • • ., .. '~)I• • (." • .. :-'' •· •' •• '.'~:J .I .. c .. ~~(\'}t.':~:. ~ :·~·~: :.~r>~~:. :. :~[€.; -~~. ~(J~'~. ·. ~~ ~. ~;~~~;~~~:. ~· ~';;:~.~J a !. '······· U.,\. Cirizr·n~.hin ~ and Ilnn1h!~·.1tion Services .... 209 FOLIO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0603 Returned Mail (Continued) If mail ·is returned as undeliverable and no·other address is found : • If the response time indicated has not yet passed , ·the file should be · placed on hold in accordance with local procedures for the remainder of the response time . . "' ...... . - "\'· •< ' ' ·, t··r;~; \,. ' ,\, •• " , ' . : ·,,.,,, .. ,.... \ ,j' ! • '• .4 .. , ' ••• ) \ \ •• , , , , · "' ,\ \'~· ••• • ~',/ , :: . • t.~· t,; \\. \!\1 . .......... (1 -" - .•. r- --:-.. ' '\·, I I I• o , \ ',...!,) .:.: :: #:\':. ' I" Ito..•'- •f ~ ,, ... ........ . ~<.! · · :~'. ~.~~;: ~~·:, :. ~; ' .. '.::.~. f:::":.:·: ~-..r:. . ~::,; ~' ·' ~ ·-· · ,1\", 1 ~ !'\ o ' " • .. , '\\ J :T;~~~- ':~. \y · '>"···· . ,. r;!:~ 1 j••\• r \ ' •._ ... o~1 ••• • , ,. .. \. .. ' 1.' ~~ ~. \)t - i;:· 'I .. e:;:~ \ \!<'•"+ • (.•. / 1\ (<"\ ·,.._, ... ,./... ,..,., .(:"'·"· • ••• t.~ . •• · ' '"•',,,••• '~\•JI • •• ,..·t,.,.... ,;... \\, , • ,. .. ~i ,/( :~~, ?~,. ~ . ~~~~;!) •I"'"\· j.:• v .7+ :• · ;.· ti'•'•" I . . ·.. .. ... .. . .. .(t_ v U.S. Cir1zcnship and lrn ini:<ration St::rv i<..cs ~·-·~~ '• · ,, 1~ \ :-.., ,/";\ _r;•\ J\.\ .~.'.-i \. \::_•. , ~ i \ , 210 FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0604 . 0 ' (/) . ...., .rn " . ~ ·c en .© 0 :J 0- c Q) ' · l'V ro . u.. t Q) 0 . Q) . o. ~ 0) :::::.. c > . · -- .· J) ( -0 ·- c > 0 (]) a. 0::: en Q) Q) > :;i '(ij c:: Q) CJ) +' c:: Q) E Q) 0 ~ .E c: w ~ m _. I 0 :::> 0 u. 0::: - II >< App. 0605 Module Objectives The objective of this section is to provide a basic understanding of: • The denial grounds which may be reviewed through the SRMT process; and, • Responding to a request for review. .. ~J ro L -~: ,.,. • • • ·,_ll17Cn'.~11?!> and lnl111·i~:r:1tion Services · 212 FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0606 Requests for Review • DACA requestors cannot file a Motion to Reopen or Reconsider and cannot appeal denial of their Form 1-821 D. However, DACA requestors may request review of certain denials using the Service Request Management Tool (SRMT) process if there is a claim that the denial was incorrect or the denial ~::-~.·.,.,,:.:. ~- ·.·- -is · based·· on-adm·n· strative error. · The ·denial :grounds that may be reviewed i i through the SRMT process include: • The requestor did not come to the United States prior to reaching his/her 16th birthday; 11 .The requestor was under the age of 15 at the time of filing, but not in removal proceedings; • The requestor was not under the age of 31 on June 15, 2012; • The requestor was not in an unlawful immigration status as of June 15, 2012; 11 The .requestor was not physically present in the United States on June 15, 2012; • The requestor did not appear to have biometrics collected at a USCIS ASC; • The requestor did not request to have his/her biometrics appointment at a USCIS ASC rescheduled pri9r to the scheduled date; 11 The requestor failed to p·a y the filing and biometric fees for the Form 1-765; and 11 The requestor failed to respond to an .R FE (including claims the USCIS possibly mailed the RFE to the incorrect address). J ' ,,. · • l • ;,.rnd lnnrrigration Services T 213 t. "'·'.· \..~ ll 1Zl'l1Sl1Jp FOUO - Law. Enforcement Sensitive App. 0607 Responding to Requests to Review • Standard responses, to include some interim responses, have been developed to inform the requestor that his/her denial has been reopened .on a service motion and that the denial is.correct or incorrect. • : . • •• o . - • • • " •. - -• - • • • •' ' "' .:,._ • - • ' . • v. , • .~ .•- ' •••, " • '''" • o\-- _. •• , ._ • ' • ...:"• - ...... • ,• '"'T I ., • . • • .. •• , ::. ,,. , . _, -J ,".~ ',.; •,'..,.' ; ,,., . .. •.C"•,-.o:t' ; ~:~:- ••,:1~-'."!- • ,.. • In addition, Special History Action Codes (HAG), which have been developed in order to track.the requests for reyiew, are to be used when responding to a request to review. See Cha.pter.13 of the DACA SOP. for a list of these codes and their appropriate use. 1· .... Hl7.C"llS.11µ USC"·' J1- .1 (!•' a "(Jl .. I ·11~ t. t'ht <1t·1' l")"' ) Services JI 214 l FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0608 ,t • ' c 0 ·........ ro c ·.. E. L.. ~ <(. 0 Q) > :;; a; <(. 0 c: Q) .. en c: Q) E (1) >< • ~ .g c: w ;: ro _J I 0 :::::> 0 u. App. 0609 Module Objectives The objective of this section is to provide a basic understanding of: • What termination is; • When it is appropriate to terminate; and, • The process for termination. .... U.S. Citi1enship a11d hn1n1".~ration .. St=- :·v .·t' c·p ·'· '·'- . ..... 216 FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0610 DACA Termination - General Ineligibility If removal under DACA was improperly deferred Reopen the case on Service Motion and issue a Notice of Intent to Terminate (NOIT). 11 • The DACA requestor has 33 days to respond to the NOIT and provide a brief or statement contesting the grounds cited in the intent to terminate. • If the adverse grounds are not overcome, or no response is received to the NOIT, the officer should prepare a termination letter and seek supervisory review of the draft termination letter prior to issuance. • Adjudicating officers must ensure C3 is updated using the newly created HACs. .9 ~ ..... _.;.- ~ U.S. Citi?.cnship ll ~~nd ~n1n1igr"l ion W :Servtees 217 FOLIO-Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0611 DACA Termination - Fraud or Misrepresentation • If an officer subsequently learns that a DACA requester committed fraud related td seeking the DACA request, the officer should reopen the case on Service Motion and issue a NOIT indicating the fraud/ misrepresentation. • The decision to issue a NOIT based on fraud should be supported by a fully documented Statement of Findings (SOF) and any other relevant documents/information. • The requester is· allowed 33 days to respond .to the NOIT. • If the adverse grounds are not overcome, or f)O response is received to. .the NOIT, the officer should prepare a termination letter and seek · · ·· ····· supervisory review of the draft·termination letter prior to issuance. • The terminated DACA case must be recorded in FDNS-DS. • Adjudicating officers must ensure C3 is updated using the newly created HACs. -. ti \~ ~ TIS Cirizr~n~hip \ arid rnun igr.Hirn i I servJCes • 218 FOLIO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0612 DACA Termi nation Criminal, NS, or Public Safety Issues If disqualifying criminal offenses or public safety concerns, which are deemed to be EPS, arise after removal has been deferred under ._. .. ~ · ·-···..·--- ·----- - DAG·A~- the officer·should·forward the case to the BCU DACA Team who in tu_ will refer the case to ICE and follow the handling rn, procedures outlined in the Novem_ er 7, 2011 NTA memorandum for b EPS cases. im • If ICE does not accept the case or if the disqualifying criminal offe. se n is non-EPS per the November 7, 2011 NTA memorandum, the BCU · DACA . eam will .process the case for termination and forward the T ,_ .·. · .-·----- - individual's name to ERO. __ .. ·· --.· .... ·- ,.. , .,... - · ... · · --- ·- • If national security concerns arise after removal has been deferred under DACA, the case should go through the CARRP process, per established CARRP protocols . , --- \ • lJ""r" ' " 1· • ...). ~ lt17.Ci1S Yt p 219 i and l111n1igration =-"' Sen· ices FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0613 : :? ~ ,; ., ' I ' Q) ,I Q) I c : ~~ ' .. ,.' (/) ' E c~ Q) c E 0 w ·co N > ·-· s.... ><· £0 I ' • .. .. . . :J 0 ~ 0.. ,. ' · . I ' :J <( . ' Q) > :e C/) c: Q) en ..... c: Q) E Q) 0 I.. .E c: w ~ «S ..J I 0 ::::> 0 LL. App. 0614 Module Objectives The objective of this section is to provide a basic understanding· of: • The legal authority for employment authorization based on deferral of removal under DACA; • The forms required for an employment authorization request under DACA; • How an individual might show economic necessity; and • Requests for replacement EADs. / . T •., ,.., • • 1 • L1 •.'.l . '-·: 1fl7.ClF.rnp 221 and In1n1 ip rat ion · 1 ~)crvi(.·es ... , FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0615 Employment Authorization under DACA • The Secretary's memorandum provides that individuals whose removal has been deferred ·under DACA may receive employment authorization. · e • The . ligibility category for employment authorization based on a grant of deferred action is 8 CFR 27 4.12( c )( 14) and requires a showing·of economic necessity. . . • To identify DACA-related EADs, t~e . (c)(33) code·will be used. • DACA requesters have been instructed to note the (c)(33) code on their Form 1-765. • The .EAD is predicated on deferred action under DACA. Therefore, the 90-day EAD clock on the Form 1-765 begins after Form 1-821 D is · ·approved. 222 _, FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0616 Employment Authorization Under DACA (Continued) Forms 1-821 D and 1-765, with Form l-765WS must be concurrently fi led. The new Form l-765WS is a worksheet designed to captures the information about the requestor'.s income, expenses, and assets needed for the economic necessity determination. . • To streamline the adjudication of the employment authorizatior:i application, the l-765WS should have been reviewed while adjudicating the Form 1-8210. • To assist officers, a. intake, the Lockbox will place the l-765WS in ROP order t behind the Form 1-821 D. Form 1-765 .cannot be approved unless Form 1-821 D has been approved. ·~<~ U.S . CHi?:c:nsh1p · .':I -- - ~~ • •. • :>?. 223 ~;.. ;: I ,1 nd "• • •·• ' ; . · -"' I ln1 li"ri '.!rd t H) r·i Sr.rv ices ; .. _t FOLIO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0617 Processing While it is contemplated that the same officer will routinely adjudicate both Forms 1-821 D and 1-765, when that is not the case and yo~ are adjudicating only Form 1-765, review C3 to ensure that there is no outstanding RFE and that Form 1-821 D has been approved. • The RFtt would have been issued on Form 1 -765 during· the a. j.udication of Form 1-821 D. d • The··RF·E .on -Form · .J.~ 765 does not preclude adjudication of, and should not routinely delay Form 1-821 D. ,.. . . ··- - .. . ,,_ ... e l)'. c·. n s ,r1.p .J n1.c . , '-·. ~- \ 224 · dnd Tn1;nit. 1 r,1fion ,., \~ ~ Ser\' ices FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0618 Showing Economic Necessity • An EAD based on deferred removal under DACA requires a showing of economic necessity. · • If Form ·1:..765WS has been completed; ~review the information pro\.iidea -- ·-· .. ... · regarding current income, assets, and expenses to determine whether economic necessity has been established. The requestor may, but need hot, include supporting documents with Form l-765WS. 11 There is a general presumption that DACA. requestors will need to wor~ given their undocumented circumstances and the fact that they are not generally anticipated to have independent means. Absent evidence of sufficient independent financial resources, the Form l-765WS is sufficient to establish economic " eec(withou" any fu'rther·economfc n t · -···'~ ari. iysfs: .. .. a T ·; .-· r· ' l · 225 ,_1.,"\ . .._] f.li' (· Jl ':-1111) a ncl hnr rig i·,:tt:-.i'on Ser v .;ces .-.. ,·. . . ........ . FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0619 ... .. . . ...-. . Showing Economic Necessity (Continued) If l-765WS is Incomplete or Not Presented • If the Form l-765WS is blank or the form is missing, an officer must issue an RFE on the 1-765 (not the Form 1-821 D). . . . :. . .. ··1 ··. • • EXCEPTION: There is a very limited fee exemption available. If the DACA.requester has b~en granted a fee exemption, which will display as a fee waiver in C3, DO NOT RFE for the completed· l-765WS. • If an officer issues an RFE on the 1-765, he/she should proceed with adjudication of the 1-821 D. • When the response to the 1-765 RFE is received and the 1-765 is approve ~, -the·-expiration date of the EAD should be fo·r 2 years or the end date of the deferred removal under DACA, whichever is earlier. 11 . 8 If the requester does not respond to the I-765 RFE, the 1-765 should be denied for abandonment. TJSf""ltl7.C! 1 \i11p . . L . , . ,~ " 226 t ) and In1111igra1 ion Serv i ce~ FOUO.- Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0620 The ·(c)(33) EAD If removal is deferred under DACA, action can be taken on the Fdrrrl"".-1-. 65. If the·Form 1-7.65 . is-·approved, a (c)(33) EA_ will be 7 D issued with a 2 year validity from the date of the approval, or to the end of the deferred removal under DACA, whichever is earlier. ,,...,, " 1.I..!;;' '-·1 t 1ztnsmp :>. anci In11nigration Services I • 227 FOUO - Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0621 Replacement EAD· s Evidence Required: • Biometrics from the applicant's most recent ASC visit. • Original signature . .. ...... ..... :-... .. - Current ca-rd ·issued-with validity -dates that have NOT ·expired (unless the-··· - ·- - . ·individual is requesting to replace a lost/stolen EAD). Validity Dates: When issuing a replacement card, the validity period should mirror the dates authorized under the previous card . . Biometrics: Upon receipt, the contractor will clone from biometrics from the applicant's most recent ASC visit. Note _.;. Remind~r, NBC will process all ·stand-alone initial DACA EADs when the (c)(33) is based upon· an ICE determination. 228 FOUO- Law Enforcement Sensitive App. 0622

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?