State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 64

REPLY in Support of 5 Opposed MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Phil Bryant, Paul R. LePage, Patrick L. McCrory, C.L. "Butch" Otter, Bill Schuette, State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Idaho, State of Indiana, State of Kansas, State of Montana, State of Nebraska, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio, State of Oklahoma, State of South Carolina, State of South Dakota, State of Texas, State of Utah, State of West Virginia, State of Wisconsin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex 1, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 2, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 3, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 4, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 5, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 6, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 7, # 8 Exhibit Ex. 8, # 9 Exhibit Ex. 9.a, # 10 Exhibit Ex. 9.b, # 11 Exhibit Ex. 10.a, # 12 Exhibit Ex. 10.b, # 13 Exhibit Ex. 10.c, # 14 Exhibit Ex. 10.d, # 15 Exhibit Ex. 10.e, # 16 Exhibit Ex. 10.f, # 17 Exhibit Ex. 10.g, # 18 Exhibit Ex. 10.h, # 19 Exhibit Ex. 10.i, # 20 Exhibit Ex. 10.j, # 21 Exhibit Ex. 10.k, # 22 Exhibit Ex. 10.l, # 23 Exhibit Ex. 10.m, # 24 Exhibit Ex. 10.n, # 25 Exhibit Ex. 10.0, # 26 Exhibit Ex. 10.p, # 27 Exhibit Ex. 10.q, # 28 Exhibit Ex. 10.r, # 29 Exhibit Ex. 10.s, # 30 Exhibit Ex. 11, # 31 Exhibit Ex. 12, # 32 Exhibit Ex. 13, # 33 Exhibit Ex. 14, # 34 Exhibit Ex. 15, # 35 Exhibit Ex. 16, # 36 Exhibit Ex. 17, # 37 Exhibit Ex. 18, # 38 Exhibit Ex. 19, # 39 Exhibit Ex. 20, # 40 Exhibit Ex. 21, # 41 Exhibit Ex. 22, # 42 Exhibit Ex. 23, # 43 Exhibit Ex. 24, # 44 Exhibit Ex. 25, # 45 Exhibit Ex. 26, # 46 Exhibit Ex. 27, # 47 Exhibit Ex. 28, # 48 Exhibit Ex. 29, # 49 Exhibit Ex. 30, # 50 Exhibit Ex. 31, # 51 Exhibit Ex. 32, # 52 Exhibit Ex. 33, # 53 Exhibit Ex. 34, # 54 Exhibit Ex. 35)(Oldham, Andrew)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 2 App. 0047 U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service HQADN 70/6.2 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Office of the Executive Associate Commissioner 4257 Street NW Washington, DC 20536 MAY ... 8 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR JOHNNY N. WILLIAMS EXECUTIVE ASSOCIATE COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF FIELD OPERATIONS FROM: Stuart Anderson /S/ Executive Associate Commissioner Office of Policy and Planning SUBJECT: ~ Deferred Action for Aliens with bona fide Applications for T Nonimmigrant Status This memorandum outlines changes in Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) procedures for deferred action determinations on behalf of victims of severe forms of trafficking whose applications for T nonimmigrant status have been determined to be bona fide but are still awaiting final adjudication by the Vermont Service Center (VSC). It should be read as a supplement to guidance by the Office of Programs on December 19, 2000, and September 7, 2001, and to a memorandum dated August 30,2001, that instructed INS offices to utilize deferred action as one means to provide possible victims the opportunity to avail themselves of the provisions of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, including applying for T or U nonimmigrant status.1 Effective the date of this memorandum, the VSC is responsible for assessing deferred action for all applicants whose applications have been determined to be bona fide. The duration of the initial deferred action assessment shall be at the discretion of the Service Center Director but shall not exceed 12 months. The initial assessment may be for less than 12 months if the director determines an application would be adjudicated within that time. Deferred action will not be considered or assessed for a T nonimmigrant status applicant if he or she is currently in _________________________________ 1 This memorandum does not, however, after the guidance outlined in those memoranda regarding the interim procedures to be followed while the regulations implementing the U nonimmigrant status are being promulgated. Aliens who are identified as possibly eligible for U nonimmigrant status should not be removed from the United States until they have had the opportunity to apply for such status. Existing authority and mechanisms such as parole, deferred action, and stays of removal should be used to achieve this objective. App. 0048 Memorandum for Johnny N. Williams Subject: Deferred Action for Aliens with Bona Fide Applications for T Nonimmigrant Status removal proceedings unless the case has been administratively closed by the Immigration Judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals. For purposes of this memorandum, removal proceedings are defined as the period between the filing of the Notice to Appear with the Immigration Judge and the issuance of the final decision. If a deferred action determination is made, the VSC will notify the alien to submit Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization. Applications for employment authorization based on an assessment of deferred action at the VSC must be filed with the VSC. After the initial deferred action decision and issuance of a one-year Employment Authorization Document, the VSC will hold those files and review each subsequent request for employment authorization and deferred action upon receipt of each application. Requests for extensions of employment authorization and deferred action will be reviewed and granted in increments of twelve months. Field Offices (and other Service Centers) may continue to receive inquiries from T applicants regarding determination of deferred action. These may be initial requests or requests for an extension of deferred action. These requests should be mailed to: USINS- Vermont Service Center, ATTN: Keith Canney, Box 1000, 75 Lower Weldon St., St. Albans, VT 05479-0001. If you have any questions regarding this memorandum or other T nonimmigrant status issues, please contact Laura Dawkins, Office of Adjudications at (202) 514-4754. App. 0049

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?